You know the drill, boss. Just sign a message from the mentioned old bitcoin addresses that were posted through the account and my negative will be gone. It's that simple.

Imagine how the other person whose account was stolen or hacked so that it gets sold to you is feeling.

He looks like a complete probit shill and some weird token. Just check out his post history - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3205637;sa=showPosts
I would definitely never trust any of them (probit and the token OP is trying to shill) even with a cent.

I would also like to inform users that on your website, users are likely going to lose their money because everything about your platform is just fake and false. From fake reviews to fake partnerships. Everything about your service is not honest.

Perhaps the person in charge of screening new applicants into the stake campaign isn't keen enough, but there's nothing much we can do since it's their money. If it's gambling board shitposters they prefer to pay, then that's up to them. It's their loss.

But on the side change of account ownership, I am also going to mark then since the accused hasn't bothered to come around and prove to as that they are still the same owner.

I think only admins can do that since they have access to IP logs that Mods don't have, but from the look of things, admins seem to be rarely involved in banning users.

More like the case of the humanrightsfoundation, the user would get banned immediately as soon as any of his sockpuppet accounts were discovered.

I believe it's Ok to share some PMs, especially if it involves the new owner of the account in question for transparency purposes since he doesn't want to respond in the thread.

This is what CPNpr sent in my inbox

Do you believe this guy?

FYI, never trust what random review sites say, especially if it has anything to do with Bitcoin mixers. There are quite a number of fake review sites that list scam mixers. If you are not sure of a service, always first ask here in the forum rather than risk getting scammed, I am sure members will give you good suggestions.

Crystal Palace is weak?

Isn't it the same team that drew with Liverpool in the second game week and also managed to steal 4 points from Arsenal last season?
The truth is Arsenal has improved drastically, especially with those two signings from Manchester city.

You can't compare him to Modric though. Modric is one of the few exceptions. Even Toni Kroos who used to be so brilliant has slowed down, and it's quite clear it's because of age.
What we should actually first look at is if he can cope up in the Premier League before we even think if he will be good for the next four years.

Lol, how does he have Manchester United at heart, yet he has never played for them? 

It was always about money. Manchester United were offering much more money for him on top of a longer deal. Real Madrid were willing to make at least 60M out of him, so it was obviously business as usual.

You should have done background checks on the fraudulent wallet service before sending them any funds and most importantly, you should have opted for only noncustodial wallets like metamask. That way, even with such a mistake, you would still be able to recover your funds by yourself.

Wake up mate. Crypto is all about having control of your funds.

Looks like Rayo Vallecano is going to be one of those teams that are hard to beat this season if they continue with the way they played in the first two matches. It was definitely no mistake, they managed to draw and keep a clean sheet against that reformed attack of Barcelona. It's a team to watch.

In other news, it's debut day for Isco in Sevilla colors. He has just come in, in the 68th minute.

This is an interesting case worth following

The website redirects to gaysfinder.life (NSFW) I am not sure if that was the owner's intention 

To prove that he is the original owner of the account, he should be summoned to sign a message from this address or else I think it will be safe to assume the account changed hands

I have seen the spreadsheet and can confirm that he was accepted in the signature campaign.

Sorry to disappoint you. Not that I want to brag, but I have more than 0.5 BTC just in one of my trading accounts. I am pretty sure there are very rich members in here. They just don't talk about it and definitely they don't want to lend it out to a bunch of newbie scammers.

Subscription campaigns are more like an added bonus for making contributions in the forum for some members. How could anyone survive on $20 a week?

it could be speculation, but why do I have a feeling that OP and you could be one person?  
Why are you always looking for loans, yet you know you don't have a chance?

OP you would rather use every resource available and try borrowing the money from the bank since you are sure repayment will be made in time rather than try here. Truth is, nobody is going to get you a 0.5 BTC non-collateral loan. I am just being honest.

Look, I have been here for close to 5 years, but I doubt if I would get a no collateral loan of a half a BTC too. I am just giving you perspective.

Thanks to icopress, I am confident I will join the UCL prediction campaign, I will make payment and confirm before 5th September. I hope I won't lose it along the way like I did with La Liga last season 
It's sad that I missed out on the FPL pool deadline, since fantasy Premier League has been my favourite for years.

They would, but at the moment, they probably can't risk the whole wallets of the casino to try to recover your funds. Attempting to recover the funds means they are exposing all private keys of their hot wallets. The major reason is just about security.

Even exchanges rarely recover wrongly sent money. I have seen a ton of cases where users lost lots of funds with no help.

Too late for him, and he's also too dumb to think any sensible manager or signature campaign will accept him with all the negs his profile has.

Tagged and flagged since the account used to carry out trades too - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3021

Nice. It would be more fun if you could please share more information, especially screenshots of your entries, exits, and profits. Some people don't do twitter here. For example, your challenge is already on day 11 out of 20 with a profit of $4.4K. We don't know how you started and how you got there. We don't know your wins and losses etc.

Give them a benefit of doubt and put a neutral maybe for future reference purposes. Negative is too harsh in this situation, and it's completely different from the other aacount situation you are trying to compare.

If the account changed hands and the first thing the new owner would do is to go ask for a loan in the lending board, post a trade deal or apply for a signature campaign, then a red would be worth it.

I also don't think the counter-feedback is necessarily. It worked with the old trust system, but not this one.