Bitcoin Forum
September 19, 2024, 07:22:11 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 ... 170 »
901  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: October 18, 2014, 08:37:27 PM
Hashfast is a fraud for losing 100% of their customers preorder money when production costs should have been no more than 10%. Simple as that.

I propose to quote this post every time that idiot replies.

HF didn't "lose 100% of their customers preorder money."  That is a lie.

Where did the money go?

Quote
The notion that "production costs should have been no more than 10%" is false.

How much do you think they spent on production costs?

Last I checked hashfast was trying to "liquidate" their hardware at inflated prices and that was around $1/gh.

Why is it that every other company spent less than $1/gh on production costs but hashfast supposedly spent all $10/gh?

Please don't include NRE costs because we all know that was covered before tapeout/taking preorders.

Quote
Your idiotic willingness to embrace such obvious falsehoods demonstrates the adamant confirmation bias to which I previously referred.   Wink

How are we supposed to take you seriously when all you literally do is spread falsehoods/misconceptions?

Sidenote: I'd love to know how you can have absolutely no shame.

How can you advertise a scam, get scammed, then defend the scam once everyone's been scammed?

Is it stockholm syndrome or do you make money off of this?
902  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: October 18, 2014, 06:41:22 PM
you seem to be one of these (most of the time very young, delusional or in a state called 'denial of reality') persons, which believe, if they repeat something very often, it will magically become reality/truth.

Many showed you this many times, will you be able to comprehend one day?

Quote
received: by 10.194.138.199 with SMTP id qs7csp90853wjb;
        Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.236.45.102 with SMTP id o66mr196684yhb.13.1376696316262;
        Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <bitpaysupport@hashfast.com>

Hi Jim,
Thank you so much for your patience while I got the answer for you, I greatly appreciate it.

The answer is if you buy Baby Jet for 51 BitCoins today and it does not ship, you will be refunded the 51 BitCoins you paid.

I hope that helps and hope you have a good weekend!

Thanks,
Cara

You guys are just giving icebreaker permission to once again spew verbal diarrhea with these cyclical arguments.

Fact is that HF offerred full btc refunds ONLY to aquire more customers.

They did not intend on actually giving the full btc refunds unless they made a profit doing so. (If the price of btc drops). They were gambling on the exchange rate and they lost.

According to icebreaker it's your fault for not being a psychic who would have known from the start that they are greedy scammers who don't give a rats ass about a contract but everyone else will agree it's not the victims fault.

This whole argument about btc vs usd refunds is pointless because hashfast could would not do either.

Hashfast is a fraud for losing 100% of their customers preorder money when production costs should have been no more than 10%. Simple as that.
903  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Antminer U3: Decentralization continued. Order now, Ship on Nov. 5th on: October 18, 2014, 05:25:42 PM
This might have been a decent deal if it was released 3+ months ago but now it's just an overpriced novelty.

Rockminer has been selling cheaper noob miners for months.
904  Economy / Services / Re: PB Mining -- 5 year mining contracts! on: October 18, 2014, 04:31:48 AM
LOL i dont work for pbmining.

Not only do you work for pbmining, but you're probably the sole employee of this ponzi scheme. I have no doubt you are just trying to weasel your way out of this slip up.

PBmining literally said "What I was saying is that they've paid out more than 100% of the btc" or something along those lines which actually was what johnnybtc was saying.

Either he was practicing his acting skills, or he posted on the wrong account while shilling.

But in the rare chance that I'm wrong I'd love to hear PBminings explanation as to why he made a post pretending to be you.

I'm sure some idiots (or shills) will buy your BS just like how some people actually believe the coin mixer was implemented for privacy purposes.
905  Economy / Services / Re: PB Mining -- 5 year mining contracts! on: October 18, 2014, 03:59:15 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill

Quote
"Shill" typically refers to someone who purposely gives onlookers the impression that they are an enthusiastic independent customer of a seller (or marketer of ideas) for whom they are secretly working. The person or group who hires the shill is using crowd psychology to encourage other onlookers or audience members to purchase the goods or services (or accept the ideas being marketed).

You really think your customers are retarded don't you?
906  Economy / Services / Re: PB Mining -- 5 year mining contracts! on: October 18, 2014, 03:48:14 AM
Anyone else just notice PBmining slip up his shilling?

He just posted a response "What I was saying ....." as if he was JohnnyBTC. Then he edited the post to fix his mistake "As customers are saying..."

Unfortunately refreshed the page after he deleted the post so I have no proof so maybe someone else can confirm this.

I have to admit, good job shilling (besides that minor slip up). I would have never guessed JohnnyBTC was a shill account based on his post history.

what is 'shilling' anyway?

Nice try but anyone with internet access can easily look up the definition of a shill.

At least you posted on the right account this time.
907  Economy / Services / Re: PB Mining -- 5 year mining contracts! on: October 18, 2014, 02:04:44 AM
Anyone else just notice PBmining slip up his shilling?

He just posted a response "What I was saying ....." as if he was JohnnyBTC. Then he edited the post to fix his mistake "As customers are saying..."

Unfortunately refreshed the page after he deleted the post so I have no proof so maybe someone else can confirm this.

I have to admit, good job shilling (besides that minor slip up). I would have never guessed JohnnyBTC was a shill account based on his post history.
908  Economy / Services / Re: PB Mining -- 5 year mining contracts! on: October 18, 2014, 01:03:24 AM
ROI seems so steady above 100% though. how does a ponzi last so long? i think they are making profit somehow. it looks like more money has been paid back than paid in sooo maybe they sell bacon  Cool

They just need to keep getting new customers to pay out the old ones.

Look at the "sent" chart: https://www.blocktrail.com/address/1Payday1sm5wGqtatKscfXnxARZ2B2MF3z

They've had a steady increase in customers/payouts until around a month ago.

So far ROI has been only ~10% for the early birds and that can easily be covered by new customers payments.

Some contracts were priced to the point they will never ROI and new contracts will not break even in less than ~6 months so this ponzi could easily last a while.
909  Economy / Services / Re: PB Mining -- 5 year mining contracts! on: October 17, 2014, 11:27:49 PM
Thank you for the detailed numbers, very interesting to see the differences.

I think the people that buy these contracts are well aware of the risks, and as with all investments, risk is not something you can put aside.

People are satisfied as PBmining delivers week on week payments, and I'm sure they will do so in the future as well.

It's up to PBmining to decide whether they will demonstrate their hardware or not, for me personally it won't change anything.
They don't even need to demonstrate the hardware, they just need to demonstrate the 2.7PH/s of hashpower they have. That much power is pretty apparent on the network, it's about the same amount as  Bitminter or P2Pool. Where are the blocks?
https://blockchain.info/blocks/CloudHashing
https://blockchain.info/blocks/KnCMiner
https://blockchain.info/blocks/Unknown%20with%201BX5YoL%20Address (Cointerra)

Currently "unknown" pool is hashing with 21% of the total power. It's probably a collection of several mining services combined?

Yes and at any point PBmining could just say "to prove we are not a ponzi, here is our mining address which anyone can clearly see is mining with ~2.7PH/s".

The only side effect from doing this would be transforming the skeptics(probably 90% of the people who see their ads) into customers and making tons of money.

But apparently Mr Pbmining doesn't like making tons of money because he refuses to prove his company is not a ponzi and thus limiting his customer base to nothing but gamblers and financially ignorant investors.

Seriously why would Pbmining NOT want to double the amount of customers they have? The answer is really quite simple. (it's a ponzi)

Here's more proof if you're not convinced:


Hmm.  That could have easily been insurance kicking in if our hardware didn't have 100% uptime for that week.  Not sure though, since it's such a small amount I would have to dig through the logs.  It could have also bounced back unintentionally -- which could possibly explain why we have had excess Bitcoins in the payday wallet for quite awhile now (around 8 BTC - 15 BTC after each payout).  Smiley

Either way, things appear to be running very smoothly. 

Here are just a few more instances you've paid from the "insurance fund(s)"

https://bitiodine.net/a2a/1HammmJ8zaGVHicRxTPRDMdfGCujrfZc8y/1Payday1sm5wGqtatKscfXnxARZ2B2MF3z

https://bitiodine.net/a2a/1PBackwRV1rHvDpqkYRTR9WCEEEMEwuSrJ/1Payday1sm5wGqtatKscfXnxARZ2B2MF3z

https://bitiodine.net/a2a/1Bacon6DCo11jrXMvm39sgTxhRG9bRjQWy/1Payday1sm5wGqtatKscfXnxARZ2B2MF3z

https://bitiodine.net/a2a/1FeedQtUArhfWVGuVH13dX8dbf5XqqqJSq/1Payday1sm5wGqtatKscfXnxARZ2B2MF3z

https://bitiodine.net/a2a/1Porky8h4XMoM1RbtTHe7ZpPAe7DpE79Hb/1Payday1sm5wGqtatKscfXnxARZ2B2MF3z

https://bitiodine.net/a2a/1BaconH9L8CQ9eGJkjDqN28Pw8v8Rzbp6f/1Payday1sm5wGqtatKscfXnxARZ2B2MF3z

https://bitiodine.net/a2a/1Bacont6QxTg3SxfqEG5gfiqefGMCeSNqs/1Payday1sm5wGqtatKscfXnxARZ2B2MF3z

https://bitiodine.net/a2a/1PiGgYR36C3VdCP9k2zQLrp1ZvDQNdQsre/1Payday1sm5wGqtatKscfXnxARZ2B2MF3z

https://bitiodine.net/a2a/1BaconV3vARfyvKDMCbfZ5rE6acstH6GFV/1Payday1sm5wGqtatKscfXnxARZ2B2MF3z

https://bitiodine.net/a2a/1PorkyB6s8Tb7JU8QiBpreD159iW6aaSWt/1Payday1sm5wGqtatKscfXnxARZ2B2MF3z

Just curious do you ever pay from the mining fund? I'm having a hard time finding any payments that originate from mining.
910  Economy / Securities / Re: MPEx securities discussion thread on: October 17, 2014, 04:00:06 PM
This is a great idea by MP. (Disclaimer: have done zero research and am assuming MP is still making up companies because nobody else wants to participate in his schemes)

Now he doesn't have to pay people to advertise his schemes. (He might even make money instead of spending it advertising.)

My only question is why MP chose to stick with Bitcoins.

It's clear that the Bitcoin economy and the Mircea economy basically never overlap.

Why doesn't he just create Mircea Popecoin? Or Cultcoin?

Features could include:

- no blockchain (100% trust in the hidden MPchain)
- rate of mining decided by the great MP
- for every coin that is mined/bought/sold/traded a new coin appears in Mirceas wallet.
- earn 10 MPcoins for tricking persuading a friend to buy 10 MPcoins
- each pageview on MPcointalk.org costs 1 MPcoin.

He could even creat an MPcoin exchange for maximum manipulation capabilities. Sounds like Mircea's wet dream.
911  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Proof of Work to be powered by Clean and Abundant Energy? on: October 14, 2014, 05:34:38 AM
Please just explain why he is seeking investments before proving his claims through the scientific method?

There is really no excuse other than once again his invention is a sham.
912  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER Speculation Thread on: October 14, 2014, 02:04:27 AM
Pretty much. The stock is trading purely on fading memories of past dividends at this point.

That's absolutely not true.

The stock is trading on the fact that the company is operating smoothly, dominating the hardware market, and owning millions of dollars worth of assets.

You can argue that the company is worth less than what it's trading for, but it's clearly not worth nothing.
913  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 14, 2014, 02:01:14 AM
As much as I want to support AM, I needed to upgrade and needed an all-in-one self contained solution. I got a used Dragon 1 TH unit delivered in 3 days for $550. I did not need a power supply, ethernet controller, customs delivery issues, nor did I need to screw with the firmware to get it to mine on my pool of preference. It was up and hashing at 1028 GH in less than 4 minutes, with just a hair over 1000 watts at the wall.

When did you start mining?

$550/TH is about $100 more expensive than the AM Prisma.

At $0.1/kwh the AM Prisma would save ~$100 worth of electricity in 6 months.

So unless you can mine $200 in profit before the Prisma's begins shipping, then the Prisma is a better deal.

Quote
Now granted, I could not get 100 of them at this price if I was running a large operation, and the Prisma is somewhat more efficient, but you really only realize those efficiencies if you run them in bulk.

Where did you get the idea that efficiency only matters in large scale operations? If anything it's the exact opposite.

The cheaper the electricity, the less of an effect efficiency has. If you have free electricity then efficiency means nothing (as long as cooling is not a problem).

Quote
I guess AM has it's sights on datacenters only.

How so? A 1100W machine seems perfectly fine for home use as well as datacenter use.

Quote
Hopefully AM has lots of room to reduce the prices as more larger units come out of datacenters and into the secondary market.

Not sure what you mean.

Do you think there are some massive farms that will be dumping miners on the market for some reason? The only reason for this I can think of would be to replace their current gen hardware with AM Prismas.

I don't think AM has anything to worry about with current gen hardware as it's clear that no other company can come close to the $/gh that AM is offering. And as soon as there is a competing chip, AM's gen4 will probably be ready or due soon.
914  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Proof of Work to be powered by Clean and Abundant Energy? on: October 14, 2014, 01:24:56 AM

So more accurately 6/6 amateur scientists who have been collaborating with Rossi have confirmed his claims.. again.

That makes the grand total 6/1,000,000 scientists who believe Rossi's invention is legit.

Please read these articles (from a source that seems passionate about LENR's potential) and tell me if you still believe this "inventor" is not really just a con artist:

http://news.newenergytimes.net/2014/10/12/rossi-handles-samples-in-alleged-independent-test-of-his-device/

http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2012/Report5-Rossis-Profitable-Career-in-Science.shtml

http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/Andrea-Rossi-Energy-Catalyzer-Investigation-Index.shtml#rossi

Quote

I already know that millions have been spent researching cold fusion and resulted in failure time and time again.

I want to see a source where NASA or any other respectable entity is pursuing tech based on Rossi's findings or even just suggest that Rossi might not be full of shit.

You have to ask yourself why this man, who claims to have invented the greatest invention since the invention of fire, is trying so hard to raise investment money yet also putting as much effort as possible into avoiding disclosing how his machine actually works. He even tried to file for a patent without disclosing his secret sauce that makes it work (I wonder why).

If his cold fusion device truly worked Rossi would have told everyone exactly how it works ASAP and thousands of scientists would confirm his findings leading to a contract with every energy company/government/electricity user in the world yet he chose to keep everything a secret, rely on his outstanding reputation as a white collar criminal, and avoid the scientific method which would give his claims validity and billions of dollars.
915  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Proof of Work to be powered by Clean and Abundant Energy? on: October 13, 2014, 07:18:58 PM
6/6 scientists who did a 6 month evaluation of the device and wrote the 54 page paper provide remarkable evidence.  

Source?

Quote
In addition, it is public knowledge that NASA, DARPA, University of Missouri SKINR, SRI, United States Navy Research Lab, Purdue University, Italian ENEA, Mitsubishi Heavy, Toyota Corp., DIA, University Illinois, have programs pursing similar tech. 

Source?

Quote
Bitcoin miners should at least be paying attention and following any advances in this arena.

No we really shouldn't care at all. If this device works then energy companies everywhere will start using it. Bitcoin miners or anyone else using electricity do not have to worry about a thing.
916  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S4 Discussion and Support Thread on: October 13, 2014, 04:30:25 PM
S4 PSU issues ?

Can Bitmain please advise the community as to what is up with the Power Supplies ? I just lost my first S4 and it was just installed less then 7 days ago .

Its late now in CN so I'll see what they say tomorrow. They're not made in house though, its a large OEM who have made mistakes - Bitmain are as upset as you are.

So are you finally going to admit that there are hardware issues?

I don't know how people can think Bitmain mined using these machines when they have so many problems.
917  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Proof of Work to be powered by Clean and Abundant Energy? on: October 13, 2014, 04:17:24 PM
Not a good idea. Your best solution is to use the cheapest kind of energy that you can use. If you pay more for "clean" energy then you are essentially giving away money to crazy liberals with does not make economic sense

If this tech works, and is adopted widely, it will be far cheaper than any available source of energy.  Just because it is clean, doesn't require it to be more expensive.  Your comment makes sense if applied to solar and wind.

Key word is IF.

I did a little research after hearing about this and I've come to the same conclusion reached by 10/10 scientists which is that Andrea Rossi is nothing more than a con artist.

Just look at his wiki page, it screams snake oil salesman: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Rossi_%28entrepreneur%29

He has not inventioned just one, but THREE separate green energy "breakthroughs" and you guessed it, none of them have been proven to work by any means of the scientific process.

From Wikipedia:
Quote
In 1974, Rossi registered a patent for an incineration system. In 1978, he wrote The Incineration of Waste and River Purification, published in Milan by Tecniche Nuove. He then founded Petroldragon, a company for developing oil from waste, which collapsed in the 1990s amidst allegations of dumping toxic waste,[11] and accusations of tax fraud

How can anyone possibly look past that enormous red flag? How dare anyone call this man a scientist?

If that didn't tip you off here's another giant red flag:

Quote
Electricity from waste heat

In the US Rossi started the consulting firm Leonardo Technologies, Inc. (LTI). He secured a defense contract to evaluate the potential of generating electricity from waste heat by using thermoelectric generators. Such devices are normally only used for refrigeration (Peltier effect), because the efficiency for generating electrical power is only a few percent. Rossi suggested that his devices could attain 20% efficiency. Larger modules would be manufactured in Italy.

Rossi sent 27 thermoelectric devices for evaluation to the Engineer Research and Development Center; 19 of these did not produce any electricity at all. The remaining units produced less than 1 watt each, instead of the expected 800–1000 watt.[16]

So out of 27 devices, ZERO worked even close to advertised specs. Sure you can claim gross incompetence but I think we all know it's just part of the scam.

It's clear as day that Rossi is just taking advantage of the clean energy craze and peoples lack of understanding the scientific process.

And please don't pretend a few "scientists" sitting in a room with the machine for a few hours is independent verification or that a post on a Chinese forum means anything of substance.

Soon this new cold fusion invention will fade into obscurity as more and more evidence comes out against it and Rossi will invent his next revolutionary green technology and surely raise millions of dollars before any sort of scientific evaluation.

My guess is he will go with an antimatter generator or maybe a water powered car.
918  Economy / Services / Re: PB Mining -- 5 year mining contracts! on: October 12, 2014, 05:06:54 PM
I don't know whether it is a legit cloud mining but it pays on time and it is here since 2013.

Be honest, they were not here since 2013. They sold maybe a dozen contracts on ebay a month before 2013 ended but that's it.
919  Economy / Services / Re: PB Mining -- 5 year mining contracts! on: October 12, 2014, 05:05:49 PM
It is NOT an investment. You are purchasing a service.

It's more of a gamble because you have absolutely no idea what's going on behind the scenes.
920  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S4 Discussion and Support Thread on: October 12, 2014, 04:55:50 PM
It is incredibly misleading that shipping to the hosting facility is selected by default.

Looks like they at least added this to the top of the shipping page:

Quote
Note:
We offer you two delivery options 'Direct Shipping' and 'Umisoo Hosting' when you place an order. Please make sure you choose correct delivery option           before confirming your order. Umisoo Hosting means you are agreeing to host miner in China.


Not sure why they wouldn't just change regular shipping to default.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 ... 170 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!