Thanks LoyceV (to pull the entire record) and thanks Paste.ee (All in one file)

Here we have the row data from LoyceV: https://paste.ee/p/3bO0H (All in one file)

The Data is:

• Unchecked
  
  • correct link for the user
  • correct link for the staked address
  • Any missing entry
• Single user have multiple entry

Goal: Check and sort the data Alphabetically (username).

Checklist
✔ One user one line. Place the older entries next to the the latest record (latest staked address by the user)
Format:
LINK1 2nd latest - LINK4 oldest
✔ Check the link of the username
✔ Check the link of the staked address
✔ Check the editing date (if any). If the gap between original posting date and editing date is too long then have a side note. Like

Data files: Total 23

------------ : ----------------------------------------: Assigned member : Checked file          : Status
DataFile#1: Special characters and no username
DataFile#2: Character A --------------------------: mdayonliner          : Checked File Cha A: Done: Link
DataFile#3: Character B --------------------------: mdayonliner          : Checked File Cha B: Done: Link
DataFile#4: Character C --------------------------: mdayonliner          : Checked File Cha C: Work in progress
DataFile#5: Character D
DataFile#6: Character E
DataFile#7: Character F
DataFile#8: Character G
DataFile#9: Character H
DataFile#10: Character I
DataFile#11: Character J
DataFile#12: Character K
DataFile#13: Character L
DataFile#14: Character M
DataFile#15: Character N
DataFile#16: Character O
DataFile#17: Character P
DataFile#18: Character Q
DataFile#19: Character R
DataFile#20: Character S
DataFile#21: Character T
DataFile#22: Character U - Z
DataFile#23: UsernameLess


DataFile #1 and #23 will be the most challenging job(DateFile #2 to #22 are comparatively easier). Whoever takes #1 and #23, they will check and sort those data alphabetically then load them in a paste file. The final output will marge with the checked files #2 to #22

Finally we will have all data in one paste.ee file.

In one post I figured we can have 302 lines. I will create a fresh new topic with 20 to 25 reserved spots once we will have final checked paste.ee file. I guess I can handle the rest anyway.



How to find any missing entry?
Requesting users to check their records are in the list (Please wait for us to finish the project). If your record is missing then comment using following format

This is helpful format. Better take off the numbering. If the data is correct then we only need sorting.


It's late here. I will start tomorrow. In the mean time if anyone wants to check the data then please feel free. Also feel free to update the code and have a https://paste.ee of this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5090133.msg48913467#msg48913467 I will update the code once I am online tomorrow.

If the Data from LoyceV is correct then the rest will be easier for us. All we need is the dumped data using above format.


I am thinking of letter-wise work sharing. Thoughts please.

---

I am thinking - how about writing a script (using any language) which will take each line (from LoyceV's dumped data) as string and sort the lines by username? In that case, we don't even need to sort the list manually.

Updated, thank you.



We were testing first few pages. The latest address will replace the old one. Hoping to update Kevin77's once we hit the latest one.

May be they lost the private key of the old one.

Because quotes were ignored 

Waiting for the next move.

LOL I am thinking to ask all the entries then we can manually sort them. Not sure if your AI can sort it itself  



Test 2 was nearly perfect except this:
Have a look on 24


Give me few minutes to check test 3

---

By profession or may be you graduated as a programmer?

---

Bold one shows wrong result. Green means already added. I guess when someone is quoting others address its basically getting that address as them?

PS: I am thinking to get rid of the list structure...

Give me few mins.

---

update:
Done. Please check the new formatting on my OP

---

Thank you.

It's 485 pages meaning a lot of workload. I really need volunteers to make it a success.

These are the difficulties:
- Giving a letter means whoever gets whatever letter s/he has to scan all the pages.
- Giving some pages means sorting problem. Say: Person a gets page 1 - 100 and person b gets page 101 - 200 meaning once they both done someone else need to do another sorting which will marge a and b's work. It more complicating then giving one letter to each.

I need feedback to pick the better option.

You might need to move the topic in the Scam Accusations section.

Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Trading Discussion > Scam Accusations

Make sure you follow the format.


By the way, It's sad to see people get scammed

1

 1Referee --- 12oWtmuwHipw9rC9BYUuMGWMWB3RxMsxUN

A
 
 asuryan180 --- 1FyV4Mq1yMg33hVrRAhCZG4QPrWNKMfixZ
 

B
 
 Blazed --- 1BLazedp2eGDrDM3NMbxkn7n4PCCk6WYVX
 btc-facebook ---  1D2SEqdu5c52fq59VHp6u61sdjL2j2mmjf
 bugmenot --- 1KQtiRVB7x8h7R7aLbHTqAzN4YNv5d8GQf
 BurtW --- 1BurtWEejbnKeBRsvcydJvsNztB1bXV5iQ
 

C
 
 chronicsky --- 1LCjVo8go5rD2AGd6tQS1bALpcVrry4n3G
 coinpr0n --- 1ocQJhevwiFE2LdRcDqmuGSRyf3wVLZX9
 CrackedLogic --- 1LogiCdhcCHYqi1qqfqsnkhxDZ33BaLFLj  
 

D

E
 
 erikalui --- 15kADsBTud7qMKqD6cBcvGpnJX37Lznuhh
 ETFbitcoin --- 1PnGfmiC6VwVbjeb5vAm6YB3rgBiu3HpmZ
 

F

G
 Grumpster --- 1BgqnqkaRz2LXpTDeUgyKBzJHDM1f8C96c
 Gisado --- 1GiSadoJDr6CphnmSfiAL7KXL1B3R5nnkL
 goose20 --- 15SSSmXELHg4szZNzW71oKmBrpqvq9kTHZ
 

H

I

J
 
 Josepht --- 14nFvoNLUVNKqMuSH9Hrz5kBmiuwLXqwHf
 

K
 
 Kevin77 ---   1AGGxwgVT57gRcAcmRdRpmeWocAh1obtgh  
 

L

M
 
 Madness ---   12AYZG9Qk7XssfLLWcf6KV3u9XVLgBNkuL  
 master-P --- 16Ag7a28TfKwUQiUKcQuvTxATJM5khmX5p
 micky123 ---   133KGgCJQSToSByvwU5cDjhMuqmziLJ1Rm  
 Muhammed Zakir ---   1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh  
 

N
 
 ndnh --- 1At8KjNtUyAhWdUuNrZyUsCVQCFqcuY68m
 Neonecrox13 --- 1FiJJy2C22A4KhfQaU68yVa3DdsoCWQ9SV
 NeuroticFish --- 1KBKTnYoyQ3hc4mBmF4iytwn7AotiMEDRJ
 

O

P

Q

R
 
 redsn0w ---   1redsY74u97ECVVKx7Gz9QWJWECUuzsrj  
 

S
 
 safetybitcoin ---   1NDUXQuVVjcmmqDrdt4ZUyTkoXg8fjSZLV  
 Sarthak ---   13FwZeMsiigSpDLc9TLFUVQ8BhcKeGdvVM  
 seoincorporation --- 1BtcBoSSnqe8mFJCUEyCNmo3EcF8Yzhpnc
 

T
 
 The Bitman --- 1GfV5pQWwAJDsTmJJF4x2JYWPVbi9UpjJw
 tidus1097 --- 123DL3REb5Z1YteCdZmoRQgQaQjPbS6W4G
 Tomatocage ---   1FLnpvdXL6ooBpFj2LHqZxQsrxn2voj5uv  
 TookDk --- 1TookDkVTaqsCn56Xo7aMfUMAUN3NhRjN
 twister ---   123Get818NzrAiYRs28dJkga9FdHxmWBnE  
 

U

V

W

X

Y

Z

Other day I was working on grtthegreat's The BCT PGP/GPG Public Key Database: Stake Your PGP Key Here. Please have a look on the Previous version and the Current version

The arrangement for the older version was ranked based other than that there were no order (my observation). Problem was:

- When someone ranks up then it was hard to update the list because you don't know who is ranking up and when.
- Since there were no other order, it was hard to find a member from the list unless someone using Ctrl+F (windows)

So, I proposed grtthegreat an alphabetic order list which is the current version of course. I am glad that grtthegreat liked it and we are working on the project together that does not mean that you are not welcome to give us a hand by the way  

---

How about a similar list for Tomatocage's Stake your Bitcoin address here? An alphabetic order of all the staked address with their links?

Problem is : Tomatocage is not anymore regular in the forum (post history). We can turn this topic to list of staked bitcoin addresses which will be sorted alphabetically.

I understand it's a lot of work but I can give it a start. I would appreciate volunteers for the campaign. We can work together and create a sorted list and keep up with the updates when there will be a new entry.

Thoughts?

Format

Demonstration in my second post.

---

UPDATE1
I guess we have a plan now (Please read): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5090133.msg48928160#msg48928160
Please share your thoughts.

Update2
Please feel free to join the campaign. I really can use to help: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5090133.msg48928160#msg48928160

It does actually to some extent . People join the forum to participates in the bounties, most of them are spammers no doubt but from them you will find some of them become loyal members. I have seen a lot of the examples.


If you feel to report then do it but I think it's better to leave them there because those posts serving a purpose for the bounty participants.

Awesome and archived for reference. I appreciate the steps. Thank you very much.

---

completed the Starter campaign
BTC2 address image link: http://prntscr.com/m05475
BTC2 address: 1VEDB4KxTCBckZCNoSRaXKGUXoqU7uC1W
Twitter username: FollowMasudul
Reddit username: mdayonliner
Email: c*****t@ma********ir.com

Filled up the google form for signature campaign. Working on changing the sig and other stuffs.

Please check you PM. Thanks

You are welcome. I am glad that you have chosen the alphabetic order one over the regular one.

It's hardly visible. I guess I would not notice if I missed this topic 

PS: The reality is if anyone wants to buy this domain then they already should know the history of the domain and if they know the history then they will come here and contact the admin. So, whoever was planning to trick people wouldn't succeed anyway. 

Thank you for the permission however 50% meaning I will get half the reward than a non nag account. I will pass I guess unless I be treated the same.

Thanks again for the opportunity.

How do you define valid? Please have a look on my trust rating and let me know if I can join the signature campaign.

Thanks

I was referring to that too. Here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4864633.msg43837185#msg43837185

Good to hear another new possible date by the way

That should be okay knowing that very few people are dealing with it. This is something needed to be done long ago. I was having a feeling that something is going on when I saw this post (Recovering hacked/lost accounts) earlier today.

A bit off topic (not sure): How about the script you were writing we heard from the PM of one of the member (qwk i guess)?

If I create a brand new account and if my first post is to offer a $100k escrow service or even the 10th or 20th post is to offer a $100k deals then there is something wrong. Since Vod was used for example then I have noticed most of Vod's tags are for a brand new account asking for no collateral loan. I am always saying when the crime is obvious then tag the user.

Like I said before when the crime is not obvious and you can not prove it then leave a warning. Can hilariousandco prove it that I was going to walk away with the 20BTC? S/he can't because the event never happened. A user may make a mistake, give them a chance. Warn for the first time. S/he may not realize the dept of the wrongdoing/wrong-practice. Warn them! If needed then warn them for the 2nd and third too. Leave a neutral feedback as the prove of the warning. Do it for the 2nd and third time too. If they don't listen THAN go for action. If a single tag from DT can destroy someones accounts then DTs should be very careful before tagging an account. A harsh tag is injustice for the member.


- Read some of the reply from AdolfinWolf on the topic. It was like I wanted to trade paypal £ because I know paypal is reversible and I am determined that I will do that once I will get the BTC. It's like he is reading my mind and throwing out even made up shit like paypal still do charge back even after 180 days.

- Another trusted member wanted to sell btc and wanted to have paypal. When I left PM he said nothing personal and he will do deal with only trusted members. Later I found he dealt with few 'member' accounts.

- I used escrow service from one of the very highly trusted member (several times). He wanted to sell BTC for paypal. When I contacted with him he said he will wait for few more offers.

Non of these would not happen if I did not have the highlighted warning....
"Warning: Trade with extreme caution!"

The warning means I stole or scammed more than a penny! Did I scam a penny from anyone here? I did not and I don't think I will ever.

I said some members think red tagged members should not ranked up. By the way, I do feel the impact. I used to receive merits from the boards which shows trust rating but after getting the red tag I am not receiving much from those boards.

I never did because I never realized the after effect until I had one. I was not wearing their shoes.

---

I did not promote any ponzi in and outside the forum while I am a member of the forum. I left promoting those business long before joining this forum because I was sick and tired of their terms.

---

I am saying the same thing like the other member that custom trust list is not solving the problem. Feedback from DTs are visible to everyone and forum member's count the DT feedback only.

Again since the DTs trusts are countable it's not only affecting to signature stuffs it's effecting when you are going to do any single trade. I never scammed anyone but I had hard time to trade my PP for btc because of the warning I have in my profile.

May be this is a good idea (not red though, red looks scary, may be some other color) when the tag is not for a proven crime like troll, offering shady service, account selling, asking for no collateral loan from a brand new account etc etc.

For a confirmed crime like loan default, not posting products you paid for, reversing paypal once got the BTC etc etc keep the current warning text "Warning: Trade with extreme caution!"

I don't think anyone is denying the fact that DTs are not necessary. DTs ARE the asset of the forum who are responsible to keep the forum clean from the scammers. It's a voluntary job they are doing and the community should be grateful to them. Mods are responsible to keep the forum clean from the spammer but the difference is - they are paid (I guess).

My question was, if I have never scammed a single penny from anyone then:

- How is the display of my trust rating is relevant?

"Warning: Trade with extreme caution!"

- Why people get scared and bullied me when I wanted to trade only £111 paypal? I have lost 100 times larger amount in this forum when I had my lending topic.

- Why some member think red tagged members like me should not rank up hence they usually skip meriting my posts.

- Yes I made a mistake offering an escrow of over $100k (I did not even know what is a 2/3 multi-sig, I was noob) and for that reason DT tagged me saying a ponzi promoter can not be trusted who offers $100k escrow? DT could have left me a neutral feedback without destroying my account. This should serve as a warning. DT could give me a chance for a mistake which did not harm anyone. Did I harm anyone by my noob offer?

- I got tagged for promoting ponzi (Even though I never promoted a ponzi in the forum).

---

DTs basically sometimes forget that one red could ruin everything for a member. DTs need to be careful when they make a decision to tag someone, no matter it's a negative, positive or neutral because your rating reflates the weight of an account.

Don't just leave a negative feedback based on your¹ personal believe, if you brought up in a slam and other guy bought up in an elite family then life experience between you and other guy will be very different. Leave a neg once the crime is proven else leave a neutral which should serves as first time warning, may be 2nd and third too. Then go for a red.

¹ _{means in general.}