|
There has been a surge in prices.
I'm not selling this hits 30th position in coinmarketcap. That's it's value.
|
|
|
|
|
As of the current time the website doesn't open. Hope they'll let me withdraw my BTCs.
Negative WOT rating from my side.
|
|
|
|
Share with me valid nodes for synchronization, please? I can not finish synchronization: server=1
daemon=1
listen=1
maxconnections=80
rpcport=9999
port=11973
addnode=37.139.15.128
addnode=198.199.88.26
addnode=192.241.249.49
addnode=212.71.251.113
addnode=192.241.171.45
addnode=202.149.97.149
addnode=121.149.221.224 $ ./quarkcoind getinfo
{
"version" : 80320,
"protocolversion" : 70001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 19203,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 10,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 255.62164798,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1383221932,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}
It's probably not cause you got less no. of nodes. There're other bottlenecks like disk i/o. |
|
|
|
|
Ok, so let's see what this exchange offers --
1) Regular downtimes
2) Erratic coin pairs going offline.
3) No guarantee that your money will not be stolen by the site owner (as per the warning that you see on the exchange recently).
|
|
|
|
|
2) I don't understand this reply of yours. Once you receive orders, you sell the TFS without delay. What does this have to do with big investors and holders?
3) Yes, that's what I'm talking about; suppose some things costs €10; going through the exchange process -- TFS -> BTC -> €, TFS -> BTC -> $ -> €, TFS -> € or whatever, you'll set the product's price. So if this's what you want to do, why do you want to reserve 10%? Since there're no losses in this method. The loss is borne by the buyer and fluctuating prices really doesn't matter, since the product prices will change every 5 minutes or something.
In order to ensure that you're not a scam, can someone from the eurozone buy something with DOGE from that website?
Why don't you advertise your website to DOGE holders and developers?
|
|
|
|
i think it´s time to sell now (thanks)
like doge, the "high" will never been seen again
What the heck are you talking about? Have you seen the order book? if people wanna sell, let them. they sure know what they are doing. for anybody else look at the order depth here https://cryptrader.com/charts/mintpal/myr/btc and make up your on mind. Yeah, they're nerds after all. They rather sell at 1/10th the price instead of waiting for a few hours. |
|
|
|
i think it´s time to sell now (thanks)
like doge, the "high" will never been seen again
What the heck are you talking about? Have you seen the order book? |
|
|
|
Is Cham coin really dead?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! F  ----------------K Yeah to mine this instead. |
|
|
|
"Can't fuck fuckcoin."   F5shaT6mmrEksUTNJ8AXMt5sKptNdVtX17 |
|
|
|
So the premine is to reduce the loss that you incur cause of price instability, or a crash. But this's not going to help you cover the losses for long. Just initially. So what are the long time plans for such losses? Why not link the prices of the good to they exchange, so they vary by time depending on the prices in the exchange? And when someone buys something, sell the TFS at the same time. Why not sell the coins at a high price to ensure that you'll not go through the loss and instead profit? Can't these solutions not be seen as an alternative to premine? Also it's not always about money, it's about good design also. For e.g. most of the coins that I've predicted to be a success are a success unless the dev's gone missing. You can see UnionCoin as the most prominent e.g. although the design is kind of unstable, but compared to other alts, it's irons out a lot of flaws in them, as a result it's support is fantastic. And it never even had a dev. But it failed to come to an exchange probably cause of it's unsuitability. The striking feature of this coins does not lie in the wallet and it's design -- it lies on that e-commerce website that has been launched. If this doesn't turn out to be a scam, this's a major leap in the altcoin market and even the e-commerce industry. This gives pointer in the future to things like 'ebay coin', Amazon coin, newegg coin -- and we already have cryptsy points. Most of these will be based on ideas of this crypto. |
|
|
|
|
I don't get the reasoning for your 21% premine. If there was like 1% premine -- it would've been a hit no doubt, but with 21% there's always a doubt.
So what's 'company operations'? And why the 'reserve'?
And lets not talk about your previous experience since you don't have a proof of that.
|
|
|
|
Ok, this DOES sound like an April fool's joke. The patch does not apply. patching file src/main.cpp
Hunk #1 FAILED at 886.
patch: **** malformed patch at line 31: + |
|
|
|
In the mean time cryptoaltex seems like a scam.
I don't have that much experience with them but the few times i did use them, I've deposited,traded and withdrawn there without any issues. Also do people want QB to be added to the mintpal voting list? Yeah, why not? the support seems good. |
|
|
|
|
Besides your coin uses an algo which has an ASIC.
These cons have no future. They need a $10,000 miner.
|
|
|
|
|
So the 'bank' is actually a 1Billion premine.
|
|
|
|
Any more nodes?
You can also use this node(it's block explorer): addnode 107.170.118.16 addBoth nodes always stay online and they share other peers with your client. Example for adding nodes to leadcoin.conf addnode=107.170.118.16
addnode=107.170.71.190:27000
Oh, it did sync a few minutes later. |
|
|
|
|
And I've not explored Xeons yet. Those are much more efficient and I suspect have more value.
|
|
|
|
Well then, if X11 is not fast on GPU, we wont see it too. But in my experience, the GPU one is VERY fast; X11 is just too slow on CPU when compared to Quark.
With Quark buying a GPU is kind of pointless. You can buy 2 i7s, overclock them (it has unlocked multiplyer) and get 2MH/s; then we have the cloud.
As of ASIC, my logic is that making 11 hashing functions will be very difficulty when implemented in hardware; Quarks's algo maybe harder but X11 is hard enough to not see an ASIC for a long long time.
Maybe scrypt-n, but I'm pretty sure making an ASIC is easier cause we just need to modify the scrypt ASIC.
Both Quark and X11 are 'hard enough' that you will not see asics for either for some time unless there is a massive incentive to do so (ie quark/dark goes up 1000x in value). But when they do it will be easier to make one for X11 than Quark algo. Have you tried mining Quark type algos with a GPU miner?? I think you haven't. It is VERY fast AND older hardware kicks butt. I get up to 2.7Mhash/s with a single Radeon 6970 and it is so energy efficient that that card only pulls 100watts when mining quark algo (compared to ~300 for scrypt) and runs cool as a cucumber (quark 55-60oC...scrypt 85oC). A Radeon 6970 is a hell of a lot cheaper than 2x i7 (+2x motherboard etc etc). Also for other hardware info I get ~2.3Mhash/s from an 5850 and 2.1 from a 5830. The kicker is I only get 1.7Mhash/s from a 7970... [these values are from Smelter] X11 algo is overhyped. Quark algo is underhyped. Quark algo kicks ass. The card is expensive ( 2x i7 4770), however it takes only 100W? <-------- Now that's valuable. But then 2 MH/s vs 2.7 is not that much. You talking about used cards? You can buy server boards with 4 LGA1150 sockets. There're a lot of secrets when it comes to mining quarks with the GPU. You wont believe the kind of value I get on my lower end card.  I was lucky. |
|
|
|
Well then, if X11 is not fast on GPU, we wont see it too. But in my experience, the GPU one is VERY fast; X11 is just too slow on CPU when compared to Quark.
With Quark buying a GPU is kind of pointless. You can buy 2 i7s, overclock them (it has unlocked multiplyer) and get 2MH/s; then we have the cloud.
As of ASIC, my logic is that making 11 hashing functions will be very difficulty when implemented in hardware; Quarks's algo maybe harder but X11 is hard enough to not see an ASIC for a long long time.
Maybe scrypt-n, but I'm pretty sure making an ASIC is easier cause we just need to modify the scrypt ASIC.
Yet it is more expensive cause of the vram chips used. SHA3 or SHA2 asics are a piece of cake, what drives the cost up is vram. Scrypt n or chacha would only need an asic capable of adjusting lookup gap values and equipped with more than enough ram for at least two n factor changes. Those ASICs can always have modular ram. |
|
|
|
|
Too bad I cant withdraw.
In the mean time cryptoaltex seems like a scam.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
