|
The reason why this coin is dying/dead is cause there're no nodes to sync from (all of them are dead).
And the dev is kind of passive.
|
|
|
|
@thekidcoin Can you please answer this -- Does the wallet enforce the transaction fee on the miner's end? Cause there'll always be clients which don't enforce it.
|
|
|
|
This has to be the most bogus coin ever.
So what I got to do to earn coins is send coins to myself again and again fastest possible (once balance has been matured).
So I suggest, instead of mining, people just send coins to themselves to earn it.
dE! I take offence in that you haven't added Trollcoin as one of your Overrated coins! We thrive on bad press!  1) Trollcoin is not an overrated coin 2) Trollcoin's days have not come yet. It's not even in coinmarketcap. |
|
|
|
This has to be the most bogus coin ever.
So what I got to do to earn coins is send coins to myself again and again fastest possible (once balance has been matured).
So I suggest, instead of mining, people just send coins to themselves to earn it.
You really think you're the first to think of it, furthermore you think the dev didn't think of that?  You will eat up your bankroll in transaction fees more reliably than get rewards. Does the wallet enforce the transaction fee on the miner's end? Cause there'll always be clients which don't enforce it. |
|
|
|
The coin distribution does not sound fake.
However, I fail to understand that if 50% of the coins will be distributed to Icelanders, then why are Americans happy about it?
Well, I'm Dutch but maybe Americans are happy about Auroracoin for the same reasons as I am. Most obvious of course would be the personal profitability aspects. But on a far more larger part I'm happy with the prophecy of it's initiative. Iceland is the perfect candidate to actually get an entire economy using cryptocurrency nationwide. If Auroracoin succeeds this will have massive impact on the acceptance of crypto currencies worldwide. To get back to Americans, if you take some time to study the position of the USD in the near future, you will find out any Americain that is not happy about the prospect of successful integration of cryptocurrency like BTC is just not aware enough... I still fail to understand why inflation is bad. So what you want here is that if the cost of basic things increases, inflation should not be there to compensate for it's prices, instead the load should be put on the people to manage with whatever salary they get. |
|
|
|
|
Since the dev is skilled, I would like to see a game which gives fucks as reward.
An interesting game to prepares a man's fucking tool.
|
|
|
|
|
Now I'm really starting to get suspicious of this coin.
The dev promotes this coin in 'installments'.
Either he does not have time or has some other plans, or doesn't know that you start a new thread and update top post on practically any event like new pool or any new stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
The coin distribution does not sound fake.
However, I fail to understand that if 50% of the coins will be distributed to Icelanders, then why are Americans happy about it?
|
|
|
|
|
This has to be the most bogus coin ever.
So what I got to do to earn coins is send coins to myself again and again fastest possible (once balance has been matured).
So I suggest, instead of mining, people just send coins to themselves to earn it.
|
|
|
|
|
Someone got some other plans to help the falling prices?
|
|
|
|
|
The exchanges should try futures.
|
|
|
|
That would've been something of a though if it whould've been posted BEFORE the drop in prices. |
|
|
|
|
The top post should also have "planned multiplayer game."
|
|
|
|
|
And maybe start a new topic --
[ANN]ENTROPYCOIN GAME -- Human mining
And ask people to report bugs.
The game works well till now, I tested it.
This's a great coin! Great spec and the dev support is great! He's skilled too.
|
|
|
|
|
Block 400k to 800k -- premine.
|
|
|
|
There should be a new thread -- [ANN]LEADCOIN -- Community takeover. It's premature for now. Meanwhile, I've got working block explorer for Leadcoin on my local machine, maybe will publish on server this weekend and upload to github for anyone interested. Probably will add some google ads so it hopefully could pay for itself  http://imgur.com/SXBcaeIGreat job! A lot of people will be waiting! |
|
|
|
|
It won't die unless the dev gives up.
@etcdev
You need to update the top post to link to the Windows wallet. Otherwise people are going to think it doesn't have a Windows wallet.
|
|
|
|
There should be a new thread -- [ANN]LEADCOIN -- Community takeover. |
|
|
|
|
To people who're trying to think why Quark is going down --
It's not going down relatively. All cryptos are going down and Quark is down in proportion cause of Auroracoin.
|
|
|
|
Quark is going to be huge: It is incredibly fast and it is the most secure coin there is, at a time when the security of cryptocoins is becoming a major issue, and transaction speed will become an issue for any coin that wants to move beyond enthusiasts and into the mainstream.
Fast doesn't really mean anything, you have to wait for more confirmations anyway to ensure a secure transaction. More confirmations = more time. It's a zero-sum game. Darkcoin has 11 rounds of different hashing so you could argue that that is the most secure, not quark. You're trying really hard to get people interested, but the fact remains that it's mined out. No one wants to mine a mined out coin, and no one wants to buy off bagholders. "Darkcoin in terms of hashing functions it is a combination of Quark's 6 hashing functions and Qubit-coin's 5 hashing functions, so in total Darkcoin has 11. Five of Quark's hashing functions (Blake, Grøstl, JH, Keccak and Skein) were the finalists of the NIST competition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NIST_hash_function_competitionBut Quark is using 9 rounds of hashing: while using 6 rounds from Blake, Blue Midnight Wish, Grøstl, JH, Keccak and Skein it adds 3 more rounds of hashing randomly: so the computer doesn't know whether it will be Keccak or Grøstl or Blake. And that's one of the uniqiue beauties of Quark. Unfortunately, Darkcoin or Qubitcoin don't do that: the computer remains certain about which hashing function will be used. In addition, Darkcoin's block generation time is 2.5minutes (150seconds), while Quark is 30 seconds. Which means that Quarks algorithm with an element of randomness (unpredictability) will have to be cracked in 30 seconds to create a double-spend fork, while for Darkcoin this window of opportunity for the attacker is 5 timeslonger: 150 seconds with no element of randomness. If you take all these factors into account, Quark is still the most secure - it's not only about the number of hashing functions." Yeah, that's why Quark's GPU miner is slow and takes less power. I think 15 to 20 rounds of random hashing and complex decision making process will kill GPU mining as a whole. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
