Is there an option to specify algos for selected pools?
I.e. I want to mine x16r at zergpool but I don't want to mine x16r at ahashpool. And vice versa, I want to enable x17 for ahaspool only. Tried to edit Config\PoolsAlgos.json but no luck - still have x16r for ahashpool at "benchmarks" section.
Go to Nemos Miner's directory, then \Config\PoolsAlgos.json There you can delete what algos you don't want to use under the name of the pool.
|
|
|
Changed some Eth to BTC using auto exchange a few days ago, BTC hasn't arrived, Eth is gone. Can this be looked into?
Weird, it's normal to disappear for a few hours until it's exchanged but never for days. Are you sure you're not exaggerating when saying "a few days ago"?
|
|
|
Oh noeees we fell to the 60th place! We're falling farther away from the top50!! So wanna guess what that means? It means higher profit multiplier when we go back up! ... Oh, Tron website and info is look like fucking little kid joking around of taking over the world. ...
I don't know if you guessed it or you already know, but the founder of the TRON platform is indeed a kid! lol This is the guy: https://www.forbes.com/profile/justin-sun/
|
|
|
I know from personal experience that having a coin supported by Ledger Nano S is a huge advertisement. With so few coins supported by the device (relatively few when there are hundred coins), it gives you the impression that whatever is listed there, is a noteworthy and trusted coin.
I bought the Nano S to hold my XRPs and through this I learnt about the ARK. Now ARK is on my top 3 holdings along with ETN and XRP. If I can have all 3 of them in Nano S, that'd be great!
I don't think that the dev team would care about hardware wallets though since ETN is a mobile-focused coin, meant to be spent on micro-transactions. Having them on a hardware that's almost a cold wallet (unless you go everywhere with your Nano S!) is going a bit against their philosophy, that's what I think.
|
|
|
Why so little info about PUBG? Other than some "out-of-platform" tournaments you've held, are there any plans to integrate the game into 1ST soon?
|
|
|
Little question.. When updating miners, it is enough if I extract the ps1 files for miners that got an update? What happens if the bin folder contains already same name files for that outdated miner? It will download? I dont know how the "Auto update" works, I have to check manually on github whats new.
1.delete "bin" folder 2.replace miner.ps1 files with updated files from : https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner/archive/master.zipBest Regards Nemo Or just delete the folder of the miner that has been updated, inside the "Bin" folder, instead of the whole folder. Depending on your internet speed, it could take a considerate amount of time to redownload every miner. Also, check the date of the update for the .ps1 files in GitHub. That way you can see which have been updated. Personally I'm also checking WHAT has been updated, there were times I wasn't agreeing with a change and I didn't update.
|
|
|
I think they're waiting for V2 to be finished. Ark Core v2 is now at 93% finished, this is a really great step I think price will go up when v2 hit the devnet and people can see it at real time. Where did you get the information about 93%? On the official site, in the Roadmap section - still ARK CORE v2 = 71%. If you click on the blue title "ARK CORE v2", the "Developing & writing ARK CORE v2" is on 93%. I guess that's the percentage he mentioned, but the overall 71% would be a better indicator. Nevertheless, let us remember those percentages are changed manually by the team whenever they feel like they've done good progress. They might suddenly progress faster or they might hit a wall that'll delay them.
|
|
|
Warning! nexybit is a scammer and trying to steal your Bitcointalk account!
What you're saying makes so much sense! lol They replied to you before you do something stupid with your account and thus they're hackers?
|
|
|
Oh I apologize for that! As you understood, I though you were saying "ARK have shown no respect". All's good !
|
|
|
This is one of your previous comments, why does ark not reach the same tx/s as other Dpos projects like eos, bitshares and steem?
shoudn't we reduce our block time and time to finality in order to become usefull for application builders?
Because others lie and hype so they could pump. I'm sure FX Thoorens could just say Ark can do 10k TPS and still no one would have any clue, just like other scam liars. Anything with Ark is possible just like Bitcoin but the storage would balloon up too much and too fast. The more TPS the faster bigger storage, those scammers just put out TPS out of their ass. You know, those scammers claim it that way but their whole blockchain don't even have 10k transactions per day. They just claim it so they could hype. Think about it, what is the point of claiming they have 100k or 100million TPS per second but their blockchain for the entire day don't even have 10k transactions? It don't make sense but seem everyone buy into this TPS hype scam. Eth claimed something like this then they choke like a chicken. Don't forget the bottleneck of the node who forging the block. It's not possible to have 10k, 100k or 1m tx/s with decentralized because the chance a person node/computer who forging the block can't handle it, it's possible with a centralized blockchain with one or two supercomputers to handle this. All and all you can't have cake and eat it. Example Ark could lower block time from 8 seconds with 2Ark to 4 seconds with 1Ark, then 150/tps now become 300/tps. Low to 1second then 1200/tps etc.. but the trade off with storage is not worth it in my view and their is no point to it when most scam blockchains have less than 10k transactions day. I've done Ark.v2 TPS calculation, 150 transactions per block = 1,620,000 daily transactions, which is plenty. Currently Bitcoin have about 200k and Ether about 700k daily transactions. Eth all time high about 1,200,000 transactions daily and it choke the fukk out of it. If Ark lower it block time from 8seconds to 1second as I mentioned above it can do 12,960,000 transactions daily. TPS = pure hype scam This is your new comment, Yes, Ark have no respect which it should. Even the coin/s waiting to copy Ark have more respect. I think it's all about insider/s pump to jump start.
I'm not sure if you were sarcastic or if you're using a malfunctioning bot software. What's up, buddy? On your post a few days you put a good effort and explained why high TPS is a scam and ARK team does well to not claim unreasonable high TPS. Therefore you're saying ARK is "respecting" the investors by not promising useless stuff. Today you're posting something that has a lower syntax quality which comes out of the blue (you're starting with a "yes"... who are you answering to?) and you're saying the ARK team is not respecting us and they're pumping the price? Or am I understanding your post wrong?
|
|
|
This is one of your previous comments, why does ark not reach the same tx/s as other Dpos projects like eos, bitshares and steem?
shoudn't we reduce our block time and time to finality in order to become usefull for application builders?
Because others lie and hype so they could pump. I'm sure FX Thoorens could just say Ark can do 10k TPS and still no one would have any clue, just like other scam liars. Anything with Ark is possible just like Bitcoin but the storage would balloon up too much and too fast. The more TPS the faster bigger storage, those scammers just put out TPS out of their ass. You know, those scammers claim it that way but their whole blockchain don't even have 10k transactions per day. They just claim it so they could hype. Think about it, what is the point of claiming they have 100k or 100million TPS per second but their blockchain for the entire day don't even have 10k transactions? It don't make sense but seem everyone buy into this TPS hype scam. Eth claimed something like this then they choke like a chicken. Don't forget the bottleneck of the node who forging the block. It's not possible to have 10k, 100k or 1m tx/s with decentralized because the chance a person node/computer who forging the block can't handle it, it's possible with a centralized blockchain with one or two supercomputers to handle this. All and all you can't have cake and eat it. Example Ark could lower block time from 8 seconds with 2Ark to 4 seconds with 1Ark, then 150/tps now become 300/tps. Low to 1second then 1200/tps etc.. but the trade off with storage is not worth it in my view and their is no point to it when most scam blockchains have less than 10k transactions day. I've done Ark.v2 TPS calculation, 150 transactions per block = 1,620,000 daily transactions, which is plenty. Currently Bitcoin have about 200k and Ether about 700k daily transactions. Eth all time high about 1,200,000 transactions daily and it choke the fukk out of it. If Ark lower it block time from 8seconds to 1second as I mentioned above it can do 12,960,000 transactions daily. TPS = pure hype scam This is your new comment, Yes, Ark have no respect which it should. Even the coin/s waiting to copy Ark have more respect. I think it's all about insider/s pump to jump start.
I'm not sure if you were sarcastic or if you're using a malfunctioning bot software.
|
|
|
The system tells me I have reported 2 users so far with 100% accuracy, but I don't know what that means! Do they just delete their posts or do the users have some kind of a punishment? This guy though seems to be a bot with 4 accounts (Fengxia, frankkkkkkk, zrunfeng, xx63245613). Nice find DdmrDdmr, you get a +Merit from me!
|
|
|
Like i said, the amount of new coins created will still be 9 million ETN daily. no matter how much ASICs or GPUs you throw at the network
GPU mining farms also big business. you can remove the hobby miner, and you wont even notice anything different
The only thing that drive the price down is weakhands that got scared of FUDs
either you don't understand or you pretend you don't. GPU mining farms and one of the GPU/CPU - it's a fair competition, but when there are many asics high hashpower - then there is no competition. you cant mining etn with GPU/CPU. the meaning of blockchain and cryptocurrency is decentralization - this is when there is no monopoly on the means of production for a limited number of persons (with a lot of asics in our case). and in this case, I and many others will not buy and hold such a cryptocurrency... Personally I still buy and hold it! Why? because I'm looking at the bigger picture, combining macroeconomics and microeconomics analysis and also thinking about the value 1 year or more in the future. My ETN Macroeconomics Analysis: The mainstream users are in need of something simple to understand and use. By my experience as a Google stocks holder, I know that the world is moving toward mobile platforms. Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Intel... they all know that and focus their products toward mobile users. Electroneum's team is doing the same. My ETN Microeconomics Analysis: A solid plan that will create demand for the coin. A technology that looks to diversify itself and create patents. This is also a project which broke some records with its' ICO, people got to hear the name and even all this FUD is nothing more than an advertisement in the long run. Twitter was getting a lot of FUD a few months ago too and where is it's stock pride today? Double of what it was (you don't get 1000% return in stocks, a 100% return is a lot). Every day I was reading new FUD and I was just buying cheaper and cheaper. I see the same with ETN. Is the developer's plan to accept ASICs? No. So why would I bet my money on what might happen/keep happening for a few months forward when it's safer to bet on the future? PS: You're welcome for the free investing lesson!
|
|
|
While I support merit system I don't think it's fair that at the launch of the system old ranks remained unchanged. This is controversial, because you now see Members and above that make spam posts, yet they have access to all the benefits of current rank, while newbies have to work very hard to get to the same rank...
Don't you think those who joined bitcoin (bitcointalk) in 2010 or 2011 should be more respectable than new comers? Well to me those are the real ones behind the success of bitcoin because the believed in bitcoin more than we do and they deserve the benefits if there are any. I agree they should be respected, but not all of the old members are angelic creatures who never shitpost. As AlekSandRAx said, they all get an advantage and some of them just don't deserve it. A spammer who registerded one year ago is rewarded much more than a hard-working quality poster who registered one month ago. What I see as a solution to this,1) Separate the rank and merit points, let old members keep their rank and allow them to have the signature advantages but they should start with 0 merit. 2) Campaign organizers should use merit points for reward scaling. With the above system, even if a lot more people will end up using big signatures, they won't be able to get rewarded if they're spammers with 0 merit. What kind of campaign would reward a hero member with 0 merit points? Such an old member should be experienced enough to make quality posts, so if he/she has 0 merit it means he/she is a spammer and no one would reward them with my proposed change. I'd love to hear what you think about it. PS: I've read a lot of pages of this thread and I think no one has proposed the above, but if I've missed something I apologize.
|
|
|
https://ark.io/roadmapCore V2 under "Developing & writing ARK CORE v2" is at 93% ! Once it will reach 100% it's gonna be tested and then the final step is deploying on main net, not too far away it seems Thanks for bringing this to my attention, didn't know it was already that high in % of development. I'm excited in the features it will give to ARK. I'm also excited for the imminent pumps and dumbs of the price! Not to be misunderstood, I don't mean a price manipulation but people will rush to buy in early before the big release, wait for the news to spread and late people to buy high and then the early people will sell even if they're gonna buy again after the dumb. I hope you mean "dump" because "dumb" is something else lol you're right! But maybe I meant that people who dump ARK are dumb!
|
|
|
https://ark.io/roadmapCore V2 under "Developing & writing ARK CORE v2" is at 93% ! Once it will reach 100% it's gonna be tested and then the final step is deploying on main net, not too far away it seems Thanks for bringing this to my attention, didn't know it was already that high in % of development. I'm excited in the features it will give to ARK. I'm also excited for the imminent pumps and dumbs of the price! Not to be misunderstood, I don't mean a price manipulation but people will rush to buy in early before the big release, wait for the news to spread and late people to buy high and then the early people will sell even if they're gonna buy again after the dumb.
|
|
|
Can we get on some more exchanges?
It's on Bittrex and Poloniex! If you're a European or US citizen, I don't see why would you need anything else and/or how would that benefit the project!
|
|
|
This project looks interesting. I will be looking out for more information, let's see another opinion giving to this project & how this project will turn out.
Sure, just take a look at the 282 other pages if you want to read opinions!
|
|
|
Είχαμε και την επίθεση από το trio stooges των γέρων κατά του Bitcoin μιλάω για τους Buffet, Gates και τον άλλο που πρώτη φορά διάβασα το όνομα του.
....
Μήπως ο άλλος ήταν ο Andrew Left (κάποιας εταιρίας Citron Research); Ο συγκεκριμένος που λέω συνηθίζει να λέει βλακείες ενάντια σε τεχνολογικές εταιρίες που απλά μου δημιουργούν ευκαρίες αγοράς. Για παράδειγμα πριν ένα χρόνο και κάτι όταν η Nvidia ήταν 120$, είπε πως πρέπει να πέσει στα 60$ για να αξίζει να την αγοράσει κάποιος. Έπεσε σε 1 εβδομάδα στα 95$ μετά το FUD του, είχα ήδη μετοχές αλλά αγόρασα περισσότερες στα 97$ και έχω κρατήσει κάποιες μέχρι σήμερα (είναι στα 250$ πλέον). Νομίζω πως όλα αυτά τα δημόσια πρόσωπα που είναι και λεφτάδες, όταν λένε κάτι κακό είναι επειδή έχουν χάσει την ευκαρία να αγοράσουν φτηνά και προσπαθούν να ρίξουν την τιμή για να αγοράσουν.
|
|
|
|