Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 07:14:23 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 93 »
261  Economy / Services / Re: I will answer chemistry questions for BTC tips on: December 18, 2013, 06:11:05 PM
Thats cool chemistry is fun, can you help even university students? or just high school
also how about the rest of the sciences like biochemistry, biology, physics?

gl anyways

Yes, I can help university students as well. I spent a couple years as a teaching aide and lab instructor while I was in grad school, and I also tutored several college students.  

I can try to answer questions on other subjects, hit me with your best shot  Wink
262  Economy / Services / Re: I will answer chemistry questions for BTC tips on: December 18, 2013, 05:08:50 PM
Any tips for memorizing periodic table?  I always had a tough time with that in school and I think I'd like to have a better understanding of it.  Thanks.

I never really memorized the periodic table, it is easy enough to access it when you need it. Have a copy of it readily available to look at, like hang one on the wall by your desk. The best way to learn the periodic table is to use it, so find a high school/introductory college textbook and answer the questions in the chapter about the periodic table. But it you just want to impress people by being able to say all the elements, then look up them set to music; having something set to music is a great way to memorize it.
263  Economy / Services / Re: I will answer chemistry questions for BTC tips on: December 18, 2013, 05:03:39 PM
How can I synthesize MDA (3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine)?  None of this "molly" shit, I want some White Doves shit from the 90's.



Well, I imagine that there are several ways to make this. My initial thought is to get some safrole (http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/sigma/s9652?lang=en&region=US), treat it with aqueous acid (sulfuric acid and water) to hydrate the double bond and make an alcohol, and then treat with ammonia to do a nucleophilic substitution to replace the alcohol with the desired amine. I am not sure how well the methylenedioxy moiety at the other end of the molecule would hold up under these harsh conditions, I will have to look into that some more.

Found a nice reference: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073804004463


Start with safrole, react with HBr, then react with ammonia.
264  Economy / Services / I will answer chemistry questions for BTC tips on: December 18, 2013, 04:12:27 PM
Hi everybody! I am a chemist, and I thought it would be fun to answer chemistry questions for tips in bitcoin.

My background: I studied chemistry at Michigan State University. I now work as a RnD chemist at one of the worlds largest chemical companies, working mainly on organic chemistry synthesis.

You can ask general questions you have, or if you need help with understanding chemistry homework I can help with that too.

Tips can be sent to:  1Q9ncDwGc5xSTK2xmEBVGmLbL1dFHSfg1y
265  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: CEO of BTC China speaking to CNBC on: December 18, 2013, 03:02:43 PM
It really annoys me when people start all their sentences with "So...". In English you BARELY EVER start a sentence with "So..." and it's even rarer to use it to answer a direct question. I mean WTF? I thought this was a quick fad but it's been going on long enough and we have to put a stop to it. I'm starting a committee or something. It drives me fucking nuts. Learn to English.

So, I start sentences with 'so' all the time. So what?
266  Economy / Economics / Re: Worst bitcoin decision you've ever made? on: December 17, 2013, 05:01:35 PM
The first time I did a trade on the OTC ... I wanted to sell some bitcoin, this guy with lots of nice feedback offered to buy the for dwolla cash. I didn't have any rep (I think I still don't), so he wanted me to go first. He was giving me a nice deal on them, a bit over MtGox at the time, so I sent the bitcoins. About a minute later, the channel mod called him out for being identified (simple password) but not confirmed (gpg signature required). After complaining for a minute he disappeared. I should have seen the signs of the scammer using a stolen account, but I was having too much fun doing an OTC trade for the first time so I missed it.
267  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: will the bitcoin reach $1000 one day...? on: December 16, 2013, 09:16:45 PM
Rather than speculating on how high bitcoins will skyrocket, how long will it take for them to become as stable as, say, USD?

Once it's become used by everyone everywhere

The USD is not used by everyone everywhere.
268  Economy / Economics / Re: Why Bitcoin will collapse in price. on: December 16, 2013, 09:12:30 PM

I really fail to see abundance here. Maybe you could expand on that?

21 million plus numerous altcoins people can switch to is absolute abundance, especially if nobody wants the damn tokens.

I have explained already, why I feel bitcoin is not scarce: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=366523.0



There are only 21 million coins on the longest cryptographic blockchain. The blockchain upon which they rest is a key characteristic which constrains their abundance. This is like claiming gold is not scare because it is just an element, and look how much of these other elements we have sitting around!

Try to read the links.

Aha, I looked at the link and I see your problem. You tried to make up your own definition of scarcity and then argue using your own definitions of other words why bitcoins cannot fit into that box. This is something like a strawman argument. If you want to have decent debates, you must agree to use the same definitions for words as everybody else uses.

No. The term is from wikipedia and a generally accepted definition by most economists. Again if nobody wants the damn things, they are not scarce. Also the numerous alt coins people might switch to is a problem ignored by bitcoiners.

Clearly people want the damn things, since there are people paying to get them. So they have a demand, so they are scarce. And I addressed the point about altcoins already a couple posts ago, since that is where I thought you were going with the scarcity argument when you first brought it up. These arguments have been debunked many times before.
269  Other / Off-topic / Re: Lose vs Loose on: December 16, 2013, 09:02:49 PM
Alsmost the same as ( of course and ofcourse) Cheesy my grammar is broken.

I don't see any similarity???

(of course spelled ofcourse) is making a compound word out of two words in a way which is not done in English (at least, I can't think of any words where of is used as a prefix), and the resulting word is not a valid English word and so this mistake will be caught by any spellcheck.

Often?

Though it is not a compound word, since it is just an extended form of oft, as far as I know. But looks very similar to what you can't think of...

Often is not derived from 'of ten', it is, as you rightly point out, related to oft. Thanks for emphasizing my point for me.
270  Economy / Economics / Re: Why Bitcoin will collapse in price. on: December 16, 2013, 08:39:14 PM

I really fail to see abundance here. Maybe you could expand on that?

21 million plus numerous altcoins people can switch to is absolute abundance, especially if nobody wants the damn tokens.

I have explained already, why I feel bitcoin is not scarce: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=366523.0



There are only 21 million coins on the longest cryptographic blockchain. The blockchain upon which they rest is a key characteristic which constrains their abundance. This is like claiming gold is not scare because it is just an element, and look how much of these other elements we have sitting around!

Try to read the links.

Aha, I looked at the link and I see your problem. You tried to make up your own definition of scarcity and then argue using your own definitions of other words why bitcoins cannot fit into that box. This is something like a strawman argument. If you want to have decent debates, you must agree to use the same definitions for words as everybody else uses.
271  Economy / Economics / Re: Why Bitcoin will collapse in price. on: December 16, 2013, 08:35:24 PM

This explains a lot... What would you do if your government decided one day to confiscate to buy from you all those shiny pieces of metal at some fixed price?

Well I have stored my metals at a secure place nobody knows about.


Having the metals stored in a secure place does not help you any if it is illegal to trade things for that gold, or transport the gold (how are you going to sneak it through checkpoints on the highway, security at the airport?). It would actually be easier for the government to stop people using gold than for them to stop bitcoins.
272  Economy / Economics / Re: Why Bitcoin will collapse in price. on: December 16, 2013, 08:31:09 PM

I really fail to see abundance here. Maybe you could expand on that?

21 million plus numerous altcoins people can switch to is absolute abundance, especially if nobody wants the damn tokens.

I have explained already, why I feel bitcoin is not scarce: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=366523.0



There are only 21 million coins on the longest cryptographic blockchain. The blockchain upon which they rest is a key characteristic which constrains their abundance. This is like claiming gold is not scare because it is just an element, and look how much of these other elements we have sitting around!
273  Other / Off-topic / Re: Lose vs Loose on: December 16, 2013, 08:22:24 PM
Alsmost the same as ( of course and ofcourse) Cheesy my grammar is broken.

I don't see any similarity???

(of course spelled ofcourse) is making a compound word out of two words in a way which is not done in English (at least, I can't think of any words where of is used as a prefix), and the resulting word is not a valid English word and so this mistake will be caught by any spellcheck.

(lose spelled loose) is spelling a word more phonetically than the correct spelling, and the resulting word is a valid English word, so spellcheck will not catch it.
274  Economy / Economics / Re: Why Bitcoin will collapse in price. on: December 16, 2013, 08:08:57 PM

Yes. At the moment I dont see any facts that disprove my opinion. I only see a speculative mania (that might continue for a while, who knows).

If bitcoin does become what you hope it will, I will have to correct my theory. However I am as strongly convinced that  bitcoins are (worthless)tokens not money as you are that bitcoins are money not tokens.  

To summarize:  Where you see adoption I see a speculative mania.
                         Where you see money I see worthless tokens.
                         Where you see value I see high prices (and no value).
                         Where you see scarcity I see abundance.
                    

You see what you are looking for. What would adoption look like to you? I see an increasing number of people around the world using bitcoins for an increasing number of things.

What would money look like to you? I traded something for bitcoins, after some time I traded those bitcoins for something I wanted. That looks like it is functioning as money.

What would value look like to you? Right now I check my balance and I see I have X bitcoins. I can choose to hold those X bitcoins or trade them for Y. The person selling Y seems to agree with me that those X bitcoins have a value of Y.

I really fail to see abundance here. Maybe you could expand on that?
275  Economy / Economics / Re: Why Bitcoin will collapse in price. on: December 16, 2013, 07:58:18 PM
You could earn real money, porc. Will gold ever give you such an opportunity to get rich? If you knew in advance that bitcoin price would skyrocket (bubble or no bubble), would you then take this chance or rather continue to sling mud at bitcoin here?

Yes Bitcoin was a great  (pyramid like) scheme, that one could have profited from as a speculator. However I only buy when I see REAL VALUE and I only SAVE in real money. Now I dont see any of this in bitcoin (as I said I think the price will collapse as I dont think bitcoin will become money).

But now we see that gold lost a third of its last winter highs (silver even more than that). How on earth can you consider those shiny metals as having real value really? A few years ago silver got nearly as high as $50 per ounce. It was a perfect bubble right then that you preach against now. And this year it fell even below $18 per ounce...

How come, porc?

Don't forget that those prices are quoted in the inflating currency of USD, so the loss of purchasing power is even greater than what is reflected in the price of these metals.
276  Economy / Economics / Re: Why Bitcoin will collapse in price. on: December 16, 2013, 07:39:57 PM
These "low transaction costs" were a joke from the beginning, as nobody wants to hold onto bitcoins (tokens masquerading as money).

The spread (buying and selling bitcoins for dollars) and high volatility result in high! transaction costs guys.

I explained this in the OP already. And dont assume that the volatility will stop: Artificial agreements to trade useless tokens that nobody wants, for goods are always volatile (I have adressed this already). Its in the nature of this artificial agreement. Also, most of the people buying bitcoins are speculators, buying because they think they will get rich.

volatility depends on market participation. With 400 billions market cap we'll have a foreign currency like volatility. For sure.

You wont reach this market cap (at least not for a sustained period of time, I could only imagine a blow off bubble top). Worthless tokens will never become money, as they dont fullfill the requirments of money. I have adressed this already:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=361037.msg3926046#msg3926046

How many people before this year were saying we would never reach $100 for a sustained period? Yet we did, now if you offered to buy a bitcoin for $100 people would laugh at you.

You keep saying that "Worthless tokens will never become money, as they dont[sic] fullfill[sic] the requirments[sic] of money.", maybe your requirements for money are wrong? In the hard sciences (chemistry, physics, etc), if we observe facts which do not match our theory then we change our theory, we do not throw out empirical observations.
277  Economy / Securities / Re: [HAVELOCK] (HIF) Havelock Investments Fund on: December 16, 2013, 05:16:14 PM
It is hard to keep track of everything going on around here, but with VTX delisting, and "mining companies" turning out to be scams, even though a couple new listings have gone up, the total number of listed funds has remained pretty much constant. How is this company supposed to grow and make the money projected in the prospectus if they lose business as fast as they get it new?

I still think the IPO was vastly overpriced.
278  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Oops - 20BTC fee paid on .05 transaction? on: December 16, 2013, 04:37:30 PM
Some people are just not up to the challenge of handling their money responsibly.  Undecided

Funny how we are split between sympathy and .... whatever the opposite of sympathy is.

People need to learn how to treat their bitcoins with respect. Clicking is a lot easier than handling real cash. Its not like anyone ever went into a restaurant, paid for a $10 meal, and left a $3000 tip.


Actually, ... I remember hearing once of a waitress who was left a huge tip by a generous couple so she could afford to go to school (I don't remember the exact detail).
279  Other / Off-topic / Re: Lose vs Loose on: December 16, 2013, 01:27:08 PM

now that I know how many people are bothered by something as simple as your vs. you're I'm going to do it all the time.

This one bugs me. Not only do they have different meanings, they have different pronunciations. Your is one sylable, like yore, and you're is two syllables, rhymes with sewer. But the most annoying part of your-you're is that many times the sentence will have a valid but completely different meaning when the wrong word is used.

I can't argue with that. Your right. rofl

Your retarded  Grin.

What about his retarded smile? I think you forgot to complete your sentence!

It is my right to be offended at idiots.

Eh?

He said he can't argue with me because it is my right to be bugged by that sort of typo.

Then you started to say something about his retarded smileyface but didn't finish the thought.


Feel free to laugh at yourself  Cheesy Cool.

Clearly you didn't get my joke, since I had to explain it to you. Who should be laughing?
280  Other / Off-topic / Re: Lose vs Loose on: December 15, 2013, 02:16:00 PM

now that I know how many people are bothered by something as simple as your vs. you're I'm going to do it all the time.

This one bugs me. Not only do they have different meanings, they have different pronunciations. Your is one sylable, like yore, and you're is two syllables, rhymes with sewer. But the most annoying part of your-you're is that many times the sentence will have a valid but completely different meaning when the wrong word is used.

I can't argue with that. Your right. rofl

Your retarded  Grin.

What about his retarded smile? I think you forgot to complete your sentence!

It is my right to be offended at idiots.

Eh?

He said he can't argue with me because it is my right to be bugged by that sort of typo.

Then you started to say something about his retarded smileyface but didn't finish the thought.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 93 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!