This is exactly why we need to keep our boarders more secure. If a drug smugger can cross our boarder multiple times then anyone can cross our boarder as they please (assuming they have the resources). If we are to protect ourselves from terrorists (who are generally well funded and have lots of resources) then we need to make sure that people who are not authorized to enter our country do not enter our country. 

The hysterical reaction here really shows that a lot of people have no idea about how things work in data security.  Hackers make inroads to servers every day - literally. The e is absolutely no such thing as a 100% secure computer. And within networks, there are multiple levels of security. Forward facing servers - the ones you actually connect to when you go to a web site - are placed in what's called a DMZ.  Servers in there are known to be vulnerable to attack - they are less protected by security than other servers that actually contain sensitive data.  The main servers that house sensitive data are deeper in the network, with no direct access from the internet.  And you really can't access their data "through" a DMZ web server. That's not how it works. a Hacker would have to actually take control of the web server to use it's connection to the inside to communicate with the more secure servers. And even then, they'd have to hack the security in THOSE links as well, and somehow bypass the Intruder Detection Systems to access sensitive data. This did not happen. What happened here is that the system worked - a hacker found a vulnerability (and there will ALWAYS be vulnerabilities) in a forward facing web server. The hack was discovered two weeks ago - and it went no further than the web server itself.  The hack was discovered, and it was dealt with. That's how data security works. We hack our own systems - both in test labs and in the wild, always searching for new vulnerabilities. And they always exist on some level. Data security is not about being totally unbreachable, it's about a balance between that and reaction time to breaches. In this case, a hacker got some malicious code onto a web server. The hack was discovered, no data was at risk and the breach was mitigated. The system worked.

I am having some doubts about the whole incident. How the ISIS was able to separate the Shiites from the Sunnis? Both are the same people, speaking the same language. More likely, they rounded up all the captured Iraqi soldiers and then shot them dead. Most of them might have been Shiites, but some might have been Sunni Arab or Kurd.  

That usually would mean they were one of the early adopters with millions of $ worth of Bitcoin and wouldn't see any reason to ever scam.

100% skill involved.You have to destroy the other players tanks to grab their bitcoins.

Game is being completed tomorrow at 3.

Independents are not winning because voters turn out rate is low. Most independent voters sit at home and complain rather than going out and do something about it.

DIWANIYA, Iraq — Ali Hussein Kadhim, an Iraqi soldier and a Shiite, was captured with hundreds of other soldiers by Sunni militants in June and taken to the grounds of a palace complex in Tikrit where Saddam Hussein once lived.

The militants, with the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, separated the men by sect. The Sunnis were allowed to repent for their service to the government. The Shiites were marked for death, and lined up in groups.

Mr. Kadhim was No. 4 in his line.

Unfair for the child. He will suffer for the rest of his/her life

I just started playing WoW. I like the game so far although I feel lost most of the time. Do you like the game and why?

Also, I seen the new world of warcraft warlord of draenor is on preorder at g2a.com. I just might buy it. I don't know yet. I am still trying to learn the game.