How about you learn to read first before you criticize me eh fuckstick?

"Yet, as Visual Capitalist's Marcus Lu details below,..."

That author is from Visual Capitalist, not Zero Hedge, as I have explained about a billion times they are mostly an aggregator, and Visual Capitalist is well respected. So is Zero Hedge, except to choads like you who shit their pants and cry every time some one links them and you want to distract from the contents of said link.

No. Determining fault in a criminal trial by definition includes the examination of what the plaintiff in the case potentially may have done to contribute to the damages. The standards for civil fault are pretty restrictive. The standards for criminal fault are very strict as far as the level of evidence needed. I have sourced these statues, and legal precedents above. You just keep denying this is the case and substantiate nothing.

Something a lot of you here could benefit from reading.

update

Weird, I thought when people objected to federal government overreach via the local school systems, that made them Republicans unwilling to fund education. At least I remember some one saying that... I forget who. How could you be against funding education!?

Yeah, its always "in error", just like the last 800 times thing like this happened "by mistake".

"Twitter Bans Goya Bean Memes to Hide Silent Majority's Support for Trump"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwqEzHiYSgY

That might be the case if there were civil action. Criminally the standards are too high and there is court precedent showing this. The DA or whoever charged him knows this, this is just to appease the frothing mobs now, and furthermore use the fact that these charges won't stick as a way to rile up these mobs again later. This poor guy is just a scapegoat.

They are using peoples lives like toys to acheive their hive mind cultural revolutionary goals. Nothing they say means anything, everything is relative, postmodern, group think and they walk around injecting themselves into everyone else's lives for no other reason than the fact that they are allowed to. This isn't about race, they don't care about race, this is about ideology. It doesn't matter what color your skin is, if you don't agree with them then you are the untouchable class. They are happy to include people of all colors, just as long as they all think exactly the same.

Yes, that is literally the existing criminal and to a lesser extent civil law on negligence.

I am going to quote this again, maybe you will read it this time.






I haven't denied any of those things. Everything I am saying is fact. I sourced the criminal statutes as well as the relevant civil law on the matter. You strawman and distract with your old faithful, "NO U!"

TwattySqueal have you seen that squirrel over there? It is right next to that shiny object. I say confessed and convicted for supplying bombs for the purposes of violent terrorism and murder. You say "bombing charges dropped", as if oh well she isn't directly responsible for terrorist activity, so its not reprehensible so HEY LOOK OVER THERE! Did I mention Michael Fynn? You are defending terrorism. I don't give a shit if you ignore me. Have fun.

You are REALLY desperate to find any way to slide the topic now aren't you? What does it feel like finding yourself publicly defending domestic terrorist organizations?

Convicted is just a word for confessing to supplying bombs to terrorists for murdering people. Its ok though, "murder" is just a word for taking some one's life, so no need to be concerned.

(4) "Ms. Rosenberg was arrested in November 1984, when she and a companion, Timothy A. Blunk, were caught unloading 740 pounds of dynamite and weapons, including a submachine gun, from their car off Interstate 295 in Cherry Hill, N.J. She admitted that she was planning to supply the explosives to others for bombings and has apologized for the crime.
...
In the explosives case, Ms. Rosenberg was convicted in 1985 of eight counts of possessing explosives, weapons and fake identification cards. She was sentenced to 58 years in prison...."

https://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/21/nyregion/former-terrorist-among-those-pardoned-freed-clinton-s-final-acts-office.html








The "protestors" negligent actions literally make him "less wrong" by the definition of the law.

No, the highway was blocked off by police in an emergency. That is not the same as the highway being closed. When a highway is closed, its closed, ie physically inaccessible not just legally off limits. One is an emergency action done on short notice, the other is a semi-permanent state. Highways are for driving. The idea we are even discussing the merits of running around on highways at night, blocking off highways risking driver's lives, or any of the other violent conflict that inevitably results from such reckless actions is asinine. All you are doing is advocating for death and more people getting shot, run over, or otherwise beat, maimed and killed. Your hive mind ideology is so important to you that you are willing to support behavior that results in this rather than just admit your woke cult is not so woke.



Ad hominem. Base refutation without substantiation or support.

Yes lets break it down.

(1) "convicted terrorist"
(2) "she sits on the Board of Directors"
(3) "fundraising arm of Black Lives Matter"
(4) "She was convicted for..."

Are any of these numbered references not factual?


(1) (2) (3) (4) "Rosenberg was also identified as a member of the Thousand Currents board of directors in the charity’s Form 990s submitted to the IRS for its 2016, 2017 and 2018 fiscal years, indicating that the former terrorist has been involved with the group for the entirety of its fiscal sponsorship arrangement with the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation, which began in 2016."

https://www.westernjournal.com/convicted-terrorist-released-bill-clinton-now-sits-board-blms-fundraising-organization/



(2) "As of June 2020, the vice chair of Thousand Currents board of directors was Susan Rosenberg, a former member of the Weather Underground and May 19th Communist Organization who spent 16 years in federal prison before having the remainder of her sentence commuted by President Bill Clinton in 2001.[56]"

https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/thousand-currents/#people


"Thousand Currents

Oakland, California, United States

Enhance local and place-specific interventions to address issues impacting the lives of Black community members, families and children by building the infrastructure and capacity of the national #BlackLivesMatter to support and strengthen their local chapters’ organizing capacity

June 1, 2016 - May 31, 2019"

https://www.wkkf.org/grants/grant/2016/06/black-lives-matter-p3034683



(2) "Susan Rosenberg
Human and Prisoner Rights Advocate and Writer
Thousand Currents Vice Chair of the Board of Directors"

https://web.archive.org/web/20200616222408/https:/thousandcurrents.org/board-of-directors/



(2)(4) "Exposing Black Lives Matter's ties to convicted domestic terrorist
... Susan Rosenberg sits on the board of a non-profit that is tied to Black Lives Matter's fundraising operations; reaction from former NYPD Commissioner Bernie Kerik."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/motorsports/exposing-black-lives-matters-ties-to-convicted-domestic-terrorist/vp-BB16vq1O


(3) "In 2016, BLM Global Network approached Thousand Currents to create a fiscal sponsorship agreement. Thousand Currents, a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt nonprofit organization, provides the legal and administrative framework to enable BLM to fulfill its mission. Fiscal sponsorship is a common structure utilized by nonprofit organizations. Oftentimes, nonprofit initiatives seek fiscal sponsorship to be able to have the fiscal sponsor handle administrative operations while the organization focuses on its programs and builds up its own organizational infrastructure. In this capacity, we provide administrative and back office support, including finance, accounting, grants management, insurance, human resources, legal and compliance. Donations to BLM are received as restricted donations to support the activities of BLM."

https://thousandcurrents.org/black-lives-matter/



(4) "Ms. Rosenberg was arrested in November 1984, when she and a companion, Timothy A. Blunk, were caught unloading 740 pounds of dynamite and weapons, including a submachine gun, from their car off Interstate 295 in Cherry Hill, N.J. She admitted that she was planning to supply the explosives to others for bombings and has apologized for the crime.
But at the time, Ms. Rosenberg was also wanted for fleeing while under indictment for charges that included federal racketeering and bank robbery.
The indictment covered the Oct. 20, 1981, attack on the Brink's truck by a band of people that included members of the Weather Underground and the Black Liberation Army. The security guard was killed in the Nanuet Mall, and the two police officers were killed in a roadblock shootout. The robbers took $1.6 million. Federal investigations later showed that Ms. Rosenberg lived for a year in New Haven with Marilyn Jean Buck, the driver of the getaway car.
In the explosives case, Ms. Rosenberg was convicted in 1985 of eight counts of possessing explosives, weapons and fake identification cards. She was sentenced to 58 years in prison. The length of the sentence gave Rudolph W. Giuliani, then the United States attorney, reason to drop the charges in the Brink's robbery. Ms. Rosenberg objected at the time, but to no avail."

https://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/21/nyregion/former-terrorist-among-those-pardoned-freed-clinton-s-final-acts-office.html

Yet that is exactly what you do when you assert my premise is not true. Your argument consists of

"These facts aren't true because these other independent facts over here exist."

That is the post YOU shared BTW, and didn't even bother reading the Wikipedia link you posted. This is your source.




She is in fact a convicted felon. She was convicted of having several hundred pounds of explosives. Again, with no tenable defense of all these facts, you can only resort is to try to distract from that conviction by sliding the topic to the other charges. Hey TwattySqueal, speaking of being wrong, what state is Minneapolis in? Also how does it feel to be defending murderers and terrorists? Do you ever stop and ask yourself "Are we the baddies?"

[Shes not a terrorist! She was only convicted of having hundreds of pounds of explosives! Don't look at that though, look over here away from the inconvenient facts and look at the squirrel over here.]

You denying Thousand Currents directly funds Black Lives Matter doesn't magically make it cease to be fact.



That is exactly what you are doing, defending a convicted terrorist felon. Everything I said about her is true and I provided multiple sources for each part of the claim. Don't pretend you care about the truth as you use it as a shiny object to distract from the felony conviction. I don't need to prove that, I already proved she is a convicted felon caught with large amounts of explosives.

You two are desperate to distract from this fact aren't you? I wonder what you would say if even the "MAGA Bomber", a man who injured no one, nor intended too, was fundraising for Donald Trump? Might your heads explode with the collective reverberations of the REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEing?

You two are so cute when you are defending convicted terrorists. The charges were not dropped, her sentence was commuted, which is only an ending of a prison sentence, not remedy from guilt. She was still convicted and guilty of terrorist activity.

 "Susan Lisa Rosenberg (born 5 October 1955)[1] is an American activist, writer, and advocate for social justice and prisoners' rights. From the late 1970s into the mid-1980s, Rosenberg was active in the far-left revolutionary terrorist May 19th Communist Organization ("M19CO"), which according to a contemporaneous FBI report "openly advocate[d] the overthrow of the U.S. Government through armed struggle and the use of violence".[2] M19CO provided support to an offshoot of the Black Liberation Army, including in armored truck robberies, and later engaged in bombings of government buildings.[3]

After living as a fugitive for two years, Rosenberg was arrested in 1984 while in possession of a large cache of explosives and firearms. She had also been sought as an accomplice in the 1979 prison escape of Assata Shakur and in the 1981 Brink's robbery that resulted in the deaths of two police and a guard[4], although she was never charged in either case.

Rosenberg was sentenced to 58 years' imprisonment on the weapons and explosives charges. She spent 16 years in prison, during which she became a poet, author, and AIDS activist. Her sentence was commuted to time served by President Bill Clinton on January 20, 2001[5], his final day in office.[6][7]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Rosenberg



"In 2016, representatives of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement approached Thousand Currents for fiscal management and administrative assistance. [26] This partnership led to a fiscal sponsorship agreement that launched the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation. [27] The W.K. Kellogg Foundation provided a three-year grant of $900,000 thorough Thousand Currents to help organize local BLM chapters. [28] [29]

...

Thousand Currents reported $3,354,654 and $2,622,017 in donor-restricted assets for the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation in audits covering fiscal year 2019[31] and 2018,[32] respectively. These audits also showed that 83.3 percent of Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation total expenditures were for personnel, consultant, and travel costs during the three year period from 2017-2019.[33] About 6 percent of expenditures were in the form of grants to outside organizations, including to local Black Lives Matter chapters.[34]"

https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/thousand-currents/



"As of June 2020, the vice chair of Thousand Currents board of directors was Susan Rosenberg, a former member of the Weather Underground and May 19th Communist Organization who spent 16 years in federal prison before having the remainder of her sentence commuted by President Bill Clinton in 2001.[56]"

https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/thousand-currents/#people


As you can see they directly provide funding for BLM, and that money is being laundered through various PACs, Super PACS, and 501 C3 tax exempt organizations into the Democrat campaign. There is no denying BLM is a political group.



"BLM Co-Founder Appears To Violate IRS Laws On CNN"

https://thefederalist.com/2020/06/26/blm-co-founder-appears-to-violate-irs-laws-on-cnn/

Thanks for glaring proof you don't actually care about protecting anyone's health and just use masks as a form of enforcing group think conformity, political antagonism, and virtue signaling. If you did, you wouldn't be mocking it. Honk on clowns.

I like how you carefully edit out the part where the "protestors" are reckless and in the act of committing a crime. Yes, that is EXACTLY what it is like. Highways are explicitly restricted because they are expecting traffic to travel at a high rate of speed. What difference does a high rate of speed make you might ask?

It means increased braking distance. Which means if you park several dark vehicles across a highway, around the end of a curve further reducing vision, in the middle of the night, all dressed in black, while being in a place you are not expected to be, you create a very clear risk of injury or death of not only yourself, but other drivers. They just happened to be the ones to die this time.

The embarrassment of admitting this and the other "protests" have gone too far is too much for the woke cultural revolutionary soy ninja LAARPers and their supporters to admit. Instead they choose to ruin this black man's life in the name of black lives and continue to endanger other people and themselves. The injured parties are 187% responsible for these events. You know what all of this is called? Mental illness.

On another note:

Do you? Simple logic and reason does not require any of this. That's right, the media would never publish anything misleading now would they? P.S. the word is deduce. I am using a deductive reasoning process, not doing your taxes.




Ah, I see. So they prearranged to have a protest on the highway and had a permit? Oh no, more like these idiots blocked off a highway as the police desperately attempted to save them from their own stupidity in an emergency. Just because they tried to stop these retards from killing themselves doesn't make their actions, safe, reasonable, or legal.

Yes, you do want to ruin this black mans life. Of course that is fine because, repeat with me, "Black Lives Matter", thus as in the holy books, all sins are washed clean and all dangerous and idiotic actions are sanctified by virtue of cultural revolutionary diktat.

How is this?

"RCW 47.52.120
Violations specified—Exceptions—Penalty.

"(1) After the opening of any limited access highway facility, it shall be unlawful for any person to:...(e) stop or park any vehicle or equipment within the right-of-way of such facility, including the shoulders thereof, except at points specially provided therefor, and to make only such use of such specially provided stopping or parking points as is permitted...

(3) Any person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon arrest and conviction therefor shall be punished by a fine of not less than five dollars nor more than one hundred dollars, or by imprisonment in the city or county jail for not less than five days nor more than ninety days, or by both fine and imprisonment."

https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=47.52.120



"RCW 46.61.570
Stopping, standing, or parking prohibited in specified places—Reserving portion of highway prohibited.
(1) Except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic, or in compliance with law or the directions of a police officer or official traffic control device, no person shall:
(a) Stop, stand, or park a vehicle:
...
(4) It shall be unlawful for any person to reserve or attempt to reserve any portion of a highway for the purpose of stopping, standing, or parking to the exclusion of any other like person, nor shall any person be granted such right."

https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=46.61.570

I.E. The police don't have the legal authority to grant this right.

What state is Minneapolis in TwattySqueal?

That is funny, "parked cars" as if they were in a designated parking spot and not illegally blocking a highway. "Swerved around" is also known as avoiding an imminent collision. Also "fleeing the scene" in this case is also acting in order to prevent an reasonable expectation of a threat to life or injury from a violent mob chasing after him. If they had not blocked the roadway with vehicles no one would be dead. If they had not illegally been on the highway at night wearing all black, no one would be dead. The injured party in this case was not acting reasonably, which is the standard for liability for a defendant in a criminal case.

Yeah who, ever heard of applying the law in a criminal case right? Fuck his rights under the law, what is important is fucking morons endangering themselves are not at fault because wokeness. Black lives matter, but only as long as long as they fit the narrative of the cultural revolution. This black man is inconvenient so fuck his life.






"Make it ok to kill them" is not the standard. The fact that they were acting in an unreasonable and self endangering manner is the standard. As the legal precedent I linked states very clearly:

"The defendant may offer proof that the act of another person was a superseding or intervening cause of the accident, in which case he is not liable for the death."

You can't get more superseding than putting an illegal road block on a highway and LARPING soy ninjas on the highway at night. That fucking idiot ended THEIR OWN LIFE, and people like you want to run this man's life so you don't have to admit they are fucking idiots. Idiots which you support in their dangerous and illegal activities.