Thanks for even more evidence the moderator who keeps doing this is only interested in censoring/gaslighting.
Thanks for even more evidence that you can't be taken seriously under any circumstances. Twitchy makes a post - censoring! Twitchy's post gets deleted - censoring! Is there any scenario (aside from everyone you don't like just shutting up) that you wouldn't complain about? It's a rhetorical question, don't bother. Deleted are they? Odd. As of now they are still up, but I suppose it only matters when the people you disagree with "break the rules". Of course do be sure to report them after the fact again, now that I have called it out to maintain the illusion of consistency. |
|
|
|
But I'm not the one to make an argument here, I am only interesting in refuting arguments, and only if it can be done with 8th grade science.
Now that your "free-fall" nonsense is refuted, what are you going to do? Revert to a ridiculous "Well now it has to be falling FASTER THAN GRAVITY" like someone else here, or simply admit you were wrong about that? You haven't refuted anything, you just obfuscated the issue and proclaimed the laws of physics "debunked". |
|
|
|
I didn't offer anyone a bet. I used a figure of speech.
So that makes you what - a figurative chicken? For somebody who's never ever wrong you're weirdly afraid to put your money where your mouth is. No, it makes me smart enough to not openly engage in criminal activity with people who have demonstrated very clearly they will do anything they can to attack me, interestingly enough simply because they don't agree with me. |
|
|
|
China might be winning the current "economy battle" as a result of Covid, there's no chance they'll win a trade war with the US, and they know it. The technology in question is American, but China is not the only country where American companies can manufacture stuff affordably. Any retaliatory measures the Chinese can take will only cause more damage to their economy in the long run. Almost like they benefited from the over reaching domestic policy put in place, if only temporarily isn't it? What does U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan and Chinese Dictator Xi Jinping have in common? They both think they just need to biden their time until November!   Weird, it is almost like you are suggesting there is an element of conspiracy of international organized crime involved with this. You aren't a conspiracy theorist are you? |
|
|
|
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. this one got reported and removed in spite of being censored... Funny how that works.
[img ]https://i.imgur.com/yd8vf2A.png[/img]
That's....pretty funny. KLYE should start a porn site or something. Where did you post it? Thanks for more proof your clown friends and their mod enablers are only interested in censoring me. Funny how that works, the rules only seem to be important and need to be enforced (regardless of any rule being broken or not) when it can be targeted at me. I thought the moderation was improving, I guess I was wrong. Thanks for even more evidence the moderator who keeps doing this is only interested in censoring/gaslighting. |
|
|
|
This is a very old argument people always default to when people abuse the trust system around here. Doing good things doesn't erase doing bad things. Furthermore their participation in your project has nothing to do with their abuse of the trust system. Lauda has a habit of manipulating people and subverting them into doing their bidding via hook or crook. Don't fall into that trap, I assure you that is what they are attempting to do with you here.
Agree with you, it does not erase the harsh feedback (if this is the bad you meant) she left for others and this is why she is still in my distrust list. Isn't it clear that my trust rating reflects my judgement of the feedback she left? Of course this project has nothing to do with that and this is why we are working together. If you do not agree with someone's feedback leaving judgements then just distrust them. The current DT voting allows you to do that. Bud look, there is a reason that you and others are in my trust list on the other hand Lauda and some others are in my distrust list.  No explanation needed here, I guess? I am a grown up man, able to make my own decisions, this will be very insulting for me, a defeat of my own self - if someone else comes in my life and starts manipulating me. Not happening bud. I am not that weak character. The day I will lose my interest on bitcoin, I will not care about anything in here. So far you seem to be making your own choices, but I think you underestimate the lengths this person will go to in order to subvert the people and the systems around here to get control. I am not judging your character, simply giving you a friendly warning. Don't give them any opening to exploit you, because they will at the drop of a hat. |
|
|
|
I am not the one who needs a bunch of butt buddies to be their hype beast.
Oh don't start topic sliding now. You're the one who chickened out of a bet you proposed yourself. I didn't offer anyone a bet. I used a figure of speech. Another peanut fragment to add to your fecal smattered collection I am sure. Besides that point, you don't even need us to be your hype beast, a good butt buddy takes on that role out of their own volition. And a real man doesn't need a collection of chumps to constantly follow him around reassuring him of his convictions little girl. No. I will be perfectly satisfied to laugh at you when they do replace Biden though.
No. You can laugh only if either Michelle Obama or Killary [take] his spot
Chickenshit. Heh, lol. I can't beleive TecShare literally is doing this right now. He's been added to my ignore list (again) after his big red letters comment, or whatever exactly that said. Unsure on why he doesn't understand that this isn't going to happen. If it does, it'll happen WILLINGLY by Biden stepping aside, which looks a lot better then Biden just being forced out kicking and screaming. Yes, how dare I literally challenge you with ideas you don't like or want to hear. The nerve. Funny, suddenly you seem to agree it is possible Biden will step aside. Biden has no leverage with which to kick and scream even if he wanted to. He is a puppet in a little box, and he will do as he is told, and when he is told to step aside, he will. |
|
|
|
China might be winning the current "economy battle" as a result of Covid, there's no chance they'll win a trade war with the US, and they know it. The technology in question is American, but China is not the only country where American companies can manufacture stuff affordably. Any retaliatory measures the Chinese can take will only cause more damage to their economy in the long run. Almost like they benefited from the over reaching domestic policy put in place, if only temporarily isn't it? |
|
|
|
Nasty little habit you of going into adhominem mode and lying when you are prove wrong. ...you maroon... Yeah, only chumps with no argument do that. |
|
|
|
~
This is a very old argument people always default to when people abuse the trust system around here. Doing good things doesn't erase doing bad things. Furthermore their participation in your project has nothing to do with their abuse of the trust system. Lauda has a habit of manipulating people and subverting them into doing their bidding via hook or crook. Don't fall into that trap, I assure you that is what they are attempting to do with you here. |
|
|
|
(angry rant sidestepping the main issue)
None of this changes the fact that you keep putting forward a fabricated timeline. If you keep lying about the order of events, I'm going to keep correcting it. - In the week preceding 9/7, you added Kalemder, helping him to reach DT1 1, and he added you.
False, again. 04-09-2019 The date I was DT1. After this date, I added TECSHARE ( 07-09-2019). So I was not dt1 thanks to him. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying he only added you because you had just been added to DT1. You were on DT1 with 0 net inclusions. His inclusion bumped you up to +1. I am not side stepping anything, I am directly addressing your baseless accusation. Since you have chosen to attempt to make a lie truth through repetition, I am just going to start quoting some of the many responses I have already given to your argument which you refuse to actually address in lieu of repeating yourself like a parrot who desperately wants a cracker. In order to "manufacture timelines", one has to first operate on the assumption that your timeline means anything other than more assumptions on your part. You feel you have some kind of right to not only demand I explain why I included these people, but that it must be done in such a manner commensurate with your demands, or else I am "manufacturing timelines". It is not that you are making baseless assumptions, no, not at all, it is because I am "manufacturing timelines" that my replies don't meet the standards of your demands. Not only that there were private communications as well, there is also the fact that I thought their trust lists were also positive additions. Some of the users I added for the simple reason that I agreed with their trust list. Is this where you tell me again what is a valid reason for me deciding who I do or don't include based on your own personal preferences? Nothing you are accusing me of is anything that couldn't literally be applied to any other member actively using custom trust lists. Much like a fed uses process crimes to charge people with crimes when they have no evidence, you are using the idea that I don't meet your arbitrary standards in your interrogation as "proof" of my guilt. This is all just a game you are playing to pursue your own vendetta. I am not manufacturing anything. Your continual accusations are based on nothing. I was adding and removing users. Case closed! Again, this is proof of nothing other than the fact I was using the trust system like everyone else has a right to, unless of course you and the clown car disagree with those inclusions, then I am "manipulating" the trust. According to you, if I add some one, I am fishing for reciprocal inclusions, if I remove some one it was because I didn't get an inclusion or for retaliation, if some one adds me and I add them later, I only added them because they added me. |
|
|
|
No. I will be perfectly satisfied to laugh at you when they do replace Biden though.
No. You can laugh only if either Michelle Obama or Killary [take] his spot
Chickenshit. I am not the one who needs a bunch of butt buddies to be their hype beast. |
|
|
|
What do you think there was some kind of conspiracy with CNN? What are you a conspiracy theorist? |
|
|
|
this one got reported and removed in spite of being censored... Funny how that works.  That's....pretty funny. KLYE should start a porn site or something. Where did you post it? Thanks for more proof your clown friends and their mod enablers are only interested in censoring me. Funny how that works, the rules only seem to be important and need to be enforced (regardless of any rule being broken or not) when it can be targeted at me. I thought the moderation was improving, I guess I was wrong. I didn't mean to trigger or offend you TECSHARE. It was really fucked up of me to make a porn joke in your very serious thread about post reporting being used as a form of censorship on bitcointalk.org I sincerely, from the bottom of my heart, apologize. You couldn't upset me if you tried TwattySqueal. You are simply too dense to realize what I am actually talking about. |
|
|
|
This whole drama created by a few Turkish members seems to be affecting the Local board overwhelmingly. Most Turkish users are interacting in Local and there view about Global is being manipulated by those caught in scamming activities. They are sowing general discord amongst the community with stupid conspiracy theories. I have been trying to talk with the people over at Turkish local. Here is a step-wise evolution of the matter. 1. REMOVAL OF KALEMDER The whole thing started because Kalemder was removed from the ChipMixer campaign after he was found to have some "Mutual trust inclusion/ exclusion" affair with TECHSHARE. He says that he did it because he trusted TECHSHARE as he was speaking out against racism. Bullshit. There was never any shred of evidence to support that idea, and it was based completely on an assumption on Nutilduhh's part, as they later admitted publicly. Not at all. You have every much a right to include who you want as I do to assume you were fishing for reciprocal inclusions. I mediated a dispute between Timelord and some members of the Turkish community, they added me, as a result I ended up back on the default trust list. Being the angry little ass clowns they are, they mobilized to invent several stories across multiple threads simultaneously to try to slander myself and others who had decided to add each other. Not because of mutual inclusions, but because our interaction had cultivated trust. Liar. This is the 3rd time I have to correct your lies on this issue. Were you just hoping I wouldn't see this, or what was your plan exactly? That said, if you review the original thread Vod bases his accusation on, you will see I made an effort to mutually resolve a conflict between members of the Turkish community and Timelord. This lead to several interactions with several of the members of the Turkish community, of which I gained respect for because of how they handled the response. I must assume they felt the same way and this is why they added me. I didn't do anything I wasn't supposed to and these accusations are nothing but a tall tale designed to make sure I wasn't allowed to be put back on the default trust instigated by people with very long time, publicly documented animus against me. Your timeline is off. The trust trading was happening well before your involvement with Timelord's fake flag bonanza. The post you linked is dated September 7th, and you were playing trust games with Russian and Turkish local board posters from July through August. The only reason these users were on your radar was because they had recently been promoted to DT1, and like you, were either off or barely hanging on by 1-2 votes. Your other great rationale for adding local board posters is because somebody like Foxpup, suchmoon or myself distrust them, which according to you, "makes them interesting." Still a terrible reason to include someone in your trust list, and evidence you don't belong on DT. Your first interaction with the Turkish community was on Sept. 7th, 2019. - In the last week of July 2019, you added by rallier and PHI1618. - In the week preceding 8/10, you added bobita, helping him to reach DT1 0, and he added you. - In the week preceding 9/7, you added Kalemder, helping him to reach DT1 1, and he added you. All of these additions took place before your first comment on the matter. It was because you had added these members to your trust list that you decided to "mediate" their dispute with Timelord, NOT the other way around. As can be documented by your trust inclusion archive, you have a long history of adding people to your trust list as soon as they become DT1. It's obvious you are fishing for reciprocal inclusions. You're still doing it, BTW. 5/4/2020 10:16:29 PM DaveF is selected into DT1 5/6/2020 1:56:59 AM TECSHARE trusts DaveF Is it obvious, or just you confirming your bias? Could it be that I am adding people who might have an actual effect on the trust system? Of course not! IT HAS to be because I am "fishing for inclusions". Pay no attention to the fact that he is still there even though he hasn't added me. You are not correcting anything, you are simply repeating your own assumptions, assumptions which I have already responded to many times. In order to "manufacture timelines", one has to first operate on the assumption that your timeline means anything other than more assumptions on your part. You feel you have some kind of right to not only demand I explain why I included these people, but that it must be done in such a manner commensurate with your demands, or else I am "manufacturing timelines". It is not that you are making baseless assumptions, no, not at all, it is because I am "manufacturing timelines" that my replies don't meet the standards of your demands. Not only that there were private communications as well, there is also the fact that I thought their trust lists were also positive additions. Some of the users I added for the simple reason that I agreed with their trust list. Is this where you tell me again what is a valid reason for me deciding who I do or don't include based on your own personal preferences? Nothing you are accusing me of is anything that couldn't literally be applied to any other member actively using custom trust lists. Much like a fed uses process crimes to charge people with crimes when they have no evidence, you are using the idea that I don't meet your arbitrary standards in your interrogation as "proof" of my guilt. This is all just a game you are playing to pursue your own vendetta. But since I admittedly can't prove that I know what you were actually thinking or what your actual motivations were, I ask that people look at the body of evidence presented and come to their own conclusions. There is no "body of evidence". There are a string of assumptions, with accusations stacked on top of them upon which even more assumptions were based. That is not evidence, that is at best theorizing and nothing a trust rating should be based on. Once again, I manufactured nothing. You seem intent on this being some kind of deception, just like all your other assumptions here.
Some of the users I included because I thought their trust lists were beneficial, some of them I included because of their response to the advice concerning the removal of support from a frivolous flag. It is as simple as that, no "manufacturing of timelines" needed. This is purely a projection on your part designed to impugn my character to serve your own personal vendettas, and the vendettas of people like Vod.
Vultures like you saw I was achieving something positive and did a deep dive into my toilet bowl looking for any peanut fragments you could find in order to tarnish this effort that yielded positive results, because if I have a say in the default trust, I will erode the unilateral control and protection from being penalized for your own abuses that you and your friends currently enjoy. All the same people abusing negative ratings against me are all the same peanut hunters that are the most vocal in opposition to my calls for an objective standard of evidence before leaving negative ratings. This is about serving yourself, not about protecting the forum from me. Weird, you get to make assumptions and just pretend they are facts, yet when people point out you posted your account for sale and that you can't prove it wasn't sold, of course that is over the line because... well because we can't prove it happened (even though it is a fact you tried to sell it, which would put other users at risk). You don't give a fuck about anything but attacking me with your bullshit. Facts be damned. |
|
|
|
It's an interesting thought no? No. I will be perfectly satisfied to laugh at you when they do replace Biden though. |
|
|
|
That dumbass government sturgeon general says drinking alcohol when pregnant is bad. WAKE UP PEOPLE!!1! They just don't want you to know that drinking alcohol when pregnant will help sterilize the baby so they come out super healthy and non reliant on expensive procedures and medicines. If we didn't take their word for it, everyone would have to become medical personnel working in a maternity ward in order to confirm for themselves the effects of alcohol on unborn children. If everyone was a doctor, then no one would be. (gradually getting quieter) Booooooom.
On a related note, whats actually happening is China/Russia/etc is feeding false information to downplay the pandemic in order to trick you into thinking its not as bad as we think. That causes people to resent the shut down orders, sparking rebellion, and forcing the government to stop the shut down, leaving everyone sick so they can invade with less resistance. Its the ole fashion double screw, you think we're being setup by our own government, but its actually another government, setting up our government to setup us! Its the perfect plan! Because its a possibility, I'll just assume that my assumption is correct rather than the official story that can't be true because its official. Anyone that disagrees with me is a strawman, non sequitur, patsy. And I see you have totally given up on attempting to make any kind of logical argument and have gone full logical fallacy retard. At least you are exposing yourself for what you are this time instead of just pussing out and running away like you usually do when you give up. |
|
|
|
Dude. Go back and read the documents I posted.
I'll post them again if you want. But you have to promise to read them and be willing to discuss what they say. Hey look who it is! TwattySqueal here to die on this hill. Keep defending these frauds and lies regardless of how many facts come out proving it to be baseless and illegal. It is a good look for you. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
