Youtube just scrubbed the Valuetainment interview with Dr. Mikovitz I linked previously today. I wonder what they are so concerned about hiding?
its been debunked the only purpose it a paid old retired doctor is using her old title to fame up fake conspiracies by saying they are real just to cause misinformation lot of people are not happy with lockdown and think if they can cause one of the government advisers to look bad he will release the lockdown. it dont work like that so wasting time trying So your premise is this doctor was putting on a fraud since the 80's in order to bring herself fame now and plant misinformation? Who do you claim is the conspiracy theorist here? Nothing has been debunked, you didn't even watch the interview so stop pretending to be authoritative about something you know absolutely nothing about. People who need to censor opposing viewpoints have no argument to stand on, that is why they require their opposition to be silenced. If you love censorship so much, tickets to China are really cheap right now. You will love it there, all speech is vetted and censored. Speaking of conspiracy, lets take a quick look at the CEO of Youtube, Susan Wojcicki's sisters: "Anne, 45, is the chief executive of Silicon Valley-based 23andMe, which is valued as high as $2.5bn (£2bn), while Susan Wojcicki, 50, is the chief executive of YouTube. Third sister Janet Wojcicki, 48, is an associate professor of epidemiology at the University of California, San Francisco, where she helps lead efforts to tackle everything from obesity to HIV." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-46361764I am sure Susan has no vested interest in this at all right? No, the one with vested interest is an AIDs scientist from the 80's of course. |
|
|
|
Just to start, I identify myself as a conservative.
Wouldn't that go the same way if Conservatives were going farther and farther to the right? The people on the left would look more moderate. You're literally arguing based on your own viewpoint, that's it. I would assume that Twitchy and Flying Hellfish would both sit here and argue that the people on the left are moderate while the people on the right are bat shit crazy. Good for you. Yes it would go the same way, and last time that was the case I identified as a liberal. That isn't the case now and hasn't been for some time. You are mistaking straying from the median as a form of relativism, that is not my premise at all. I presented you the evidence, I suggest you review the Pew stats. |
|
|
|
Youtube just scrubbed the Valuetainment interview with Dr. Mikovitz I linked previously today. I wonder what they are so concerned about hiding? "Former AIDS Scientist Exposes Dr. Fauci’s Medical Corruption" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgnBldI7KPYWatch this other related interview before it is censored too: "Dr Buttar Accuses Fauci, Gates & The Media For Using COVID-19 To Drive Hidden Agenda" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnbf9wccdxE |
|
|
|
Typical thing for law enforcement to do, they'll tell you that you don't need a lawyer and its kinda on you to figure out if you should have a lawyer present. I think the issue with him is that he was most likely under the impression that he was there regarding an administration matter, and nothing that would come back to haunt him personally.
But yes I did see that he had to put his house up for sale and all that, that's rough. Tough part of the US legal system is that everyday it feels like more and more that its on you to prove innocence instead of the prosecutor having to prove guilt.
Guy has spent years defending himself, and he has to spend LARGE deals of money paying for lawyers. Pretty sure you can't sue a legal entitiy for false accusation, cause then they'd be charging no one with crimes. He can't sue the FBI, but he can sue the criminals who were acting under color of law and committed criminal acts in order to manufacture these charges. Hey TwattySqueal, where did you go? Why don't you bless us all with some more of your ideological blindness fueled delusions and topic sliding. |
|
|
|
Do you agree or not that anyone brought into the federal court system by the FBI is a fucked monkey?
And also. Where is this headed and why? You seriously pushed anti-trump stuff. Anti-kavanaugh. Impeach Trump. Blah blahblaH.
Now it's as if you are denying the facts that Flynn is trying to reverse his guilty plea by proving he's guilty on the internet, while the lying corrupt bunch that tried to do him in have all been fired and many are under criminal investigation.
Seriously, are you track with the actual real world status of the Flynn investigation? He knows. He would just rather feel right than be right, hence the constant deflection and topic sliding. |
|
|
|
If we're going to have a rational discussion, we have to figure which facts we agree on.
Are you willing to do that?
When I post data with sources, and the response is 'nice cherry picking' followed by an argument....do you understand why it doesn't make sense to continue the discussion until we figure out what the actual facts are that we agree on?
I didn't intentionally cherry pick the data. Maybe I missed something, it's possible - and I'll apologize and admit I made a mistake if so. It is cherry picking because you picked one year as opposed to the average which is even higher. Again, it is irrelevant to the premise anyway. The fact is if the feds charge you you have a sliver of a hope of spending years in court and being bankrupted if you are lucky. |
|
|
|
With the newly revised CDC death rates, the percentages are even lower than that in the US.
This did not happen. Do you understand? So you are arguing this CDC page is lying? "It is important to remember that death certificate reporting may not meet mandatory reporting requirements for reportable diseases; contact the local health department regarding regulations specific to the jurisdiction.In cases where a definite diagnosis of COVID–19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely (e.g., the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed.”" https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm |
|
|
|
Arguing with your fantasies is not very high on my priority list. If you don't have anything even remotely related to the 2020 presidential election you should find another thread to troll. Clearly arguing for your fantasies are a priority. You silly twats don't have a chance in hell in November exactly because you take every opportunity to be as delusional as possible, and even those within your own party are walking out as a result. Keep dreaming as you see yourself out. |
|
|
|
What do you expect to gain from passive aggressively insulting squatz' intelligence?  No argument against the point? Topic slide to tone policing. |
|
|
|
Do you have a point? If so, what? That the 2% that went to trial 83% depleted all their financial resources, that 8% got their cases dismissed by ratting on someone up the chain?
The entire reason you are talking about a Flynn case at all is because he didn't have anything to rat on Trump about because Trump was doing nothing wrong. So your lying cunts that were trying to entrap Trump failed. Of course he doesn't have a point, which is why he is desperately trying to topic slide. His premise is meaningless no matter which years numbers you look at. My premise still stands. Anyone facing federal charges has only a sliver of a chance of defending themselves, and those who do will spend years doing so resulting in bankruptcy. This was exactly the reason they threatened to charge his son in the hopes of leveraging Flynn to plea bargain and bear false witness against Trump. They were DESPERATE to cover up their own treasonous crimes. They figured once Killary was in it would all just go away. Ooopsey poosey doopsey. |
|
|
|
Oh don't beat yourself up about your failed 2018 predictions. I'm sure you have more than a sliver of a chance this year. No argument? Reject reality and substitute your own, and project. That is the Suchgoon way. |
|
|
|
I understand that things have changed, yes, but these thinkers are now deemed Republican and Conservative and that's what people are going to refer to them as. If liberal people with similiar thoughts to RBG was appointed and confirmed to the court, we would say that the court is moving towards the left.
Unsure on what your argument really is here. I feel like this is an argument for just the sake of arguing. I am very sorry you don't understand the meaning of The Overton Window, and how an extremist left would make moderates appear more conservative in comparison. |
|
|
|
Come on guys, you can't be so conservative (or right) to the point of thinking conservative thinkers are moderates. Why exactly? It is a fact. 20 years ago I was considered a liberal. Today some people call me a right wing Nazi for moderate stances. The Overton Window has been shifted so far left by extremists, it is a fact a large portion of conservatives are simply moderates.  |
|
|
|
What did I cherry pick? I don't understand.
Do you think I cherry picked the year 2018? I can't find the numbers for 2019 - if you can let me know.
Disingenuouscherrypickingtwatsayswhat? Yes, that is the definition of cherry picking. The hilarious part is you are arguing over single digits in difference when the whole point is you have a sliver of a chance of defending yourself, and even then you will almost certainly have years of your life wasted and be bankrupted doing so. Why would anyone fear that for their children? |
|
|
|
Calm down. Squatz isn't an idiot or a fucking liar. Why not be civil? Fuck you and your tone policing you disingenuous twat. So many delusional people here dreaming they have a sliver of a chance of winning in November. Just like last time, you will hang yourself with your baseless overconfidence. |
|
|
|
Did you even read it? Data for the week ending 5/2 and lagging by 1-2 weeks. Other sources, like the Johns Hopkins map, had 44k deaths around April 23 so it all adds up. 10 days from now CDC will show 60k+ like currently shown by real-time (or close to it) sources. These stats are still inflated no matter how you cut it, because they include "with COVID" deaths as dictated by CDC reporting standards. "It is important to remember that death certificate reporting may not meet mandatory reporting requirements for reportable diseases; contact the local health department regarding regulations specific to the jurisdiction.In cases where a definite diagnosis of COVID–19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely (e.g., the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed.”" https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm |
|
|
|
The whole blaming the democrats for the lock down is such a weird argument to me. Perhaps because the most egregious, heavy handed, and nonsensical lock downs are all in Democrat controlled districts? Why aren't they mad that Trump is allowing this to happen and isn't doing everything he can to protect their freedom? He's already made it clear he has absolute power over the situation - why isn't he using it? While I would consider myself a republican and would say that I do love freedom and liberty and all of that, I don't understand people who are complaing about the stay at home orders. I get it -- people are being hurt economically and they want everything to go back to normal. But there isn't going to be a way to go directly back to normal. I don't care if you open up tomorrow or in two months, your business isn't just going to magically be back up and amazing again b/c people are just not going to want to go out as much for sometime. If you opened up all the restaurants in my town, it wouldn't magically fill them up. If we just begin to open up everything willy nilly and tell everyone its okay though, we're going to kill more people -- lets not. Yeah, why can't Trump stop disease! Death of any kind is his responsibility! Tornadoes? TRUMP! Floods? TRUMP! Locusts? TRUMP! TRUMP! TRUMP! You don't understand Squatz? You claim to have expertise in economics but you don't understand? You are either a fucking idiot or a liar. Also, side note, the false choice between the state mandated closing of everything except huge corporate chains vs "opening everything up willy nilly" is a false choice logical fallacy. Why would people object to being bankrupted, impoverished, made homeless, and starving by force of state mandate of which they have no authority to do in the first place right? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
