The most dangerous thing I have ever read on the Internet was a plan to combine AI with bitcoin. Think of what would happen if a bot had money? Money to improve itself by hiring programmers to write code. Money to buy server-space to live and expand. Money to order hardware on demand or do work to earn more money. Where would it end?

 

I don't think Bitcoin will come back to 200/300 USD.
but, maybe Jack Ma is right. from 20k to 5.8k in just few months is a clear symptom of a bubble.
it's like dot.com bubble. New really disruptive technologies suffer this...

The JULLAR project is Đapp or Decentralized application that interacts with the ethereum blockchain via smart contracts.

The global eradication of Shitcoins is burning (elimination) of the Shitcoin tokens on the GES platform for liquidation by Users, in reimbursement of funds to each individual User on Jullarwallet on conditions and rules of participation of Users in the eradication of Shitcoin tokens that are installed on the GES platform.

Liquidation of Shitcoins on the GES platform is a list of Users awaiting liquidation queue of Shitcoins, and payment of compensation to Users for at least 0.00004 ETH for each liquidated Shitcoin token on the GES platform.

Smart contact is responsible for the liquidation of the specified number of Shitcoins by the User and the payment of compensation to the User in the order of the queue, smart contract’s task is to perform the function of liquidation of Shitcoins and the function of payment of financial compensation in User’s Jullarwallet in the order of the queue for each liquidated Shitcoin token.

or maybe they dont understand yet about opportunity that available in cryptocurrency market.if compare the risk, it have same big risk.but cryptocurrency provide more profit potency.

It is worth noticing that the announcement last two days about ICE creating an exchange with big partners such as microsoft, and starbucks was probably a way to pump but this rumbles when Starbucks denied the annoucement made. But you know media can easily hype all this potential news. What I see here is they denying it due to the fact that no legal and initial talk abouts where discussed and agreed to the mentioned companies. Here is the link of news about it.

https://cryptodisrupt.com/starbucks-not-accepting-crypto-payments/

On my opinion, once an agreement is made this will announce themeselves. I know starbucks really want to venture into crypto project and will definitely wouldnt miss it. But due to upcoming decision approval on Bitcoin ETF they had no choice but to deny the matter.

Hopefully you can some insight about this.

I really like the way how you make your OP.
it may indeed be a bit harsh but we must also be firm on our decisions.
One thing thing panic sellers may be lacking though is that they perceived bitcoin just as an investment.
which is why they are quick on selling every time they see the market fall.
they must also remember that bitcoin has a greater goal for each of us and that is freedom from financial institutions.

the German government has done well since the beginning of the crypt development, Germany is one of the first countries to accept the crypto currency and support it, because it understands the value of crypto currency!

Agree bro. Bitcoin is not dependent on US dollars movement but it is dependent on the news scattered online through social media and also to the country that started adapting bitcoin as their direct option currency in the future. Great falls of US dollars doesn't mean bitcoin great losses.

What is the nature of the forum? Is the quality post the most important? In my opinion, if a forum is full of quality posts, then it becomes a scientific journal. The forum I like is an easy discussion environment.

You know what the major problem with his prediction is? Willy is comparing the current correction to 2014 and he doesn't seem to care about the fundamentals or news, all he focuses on is patterns. I read some of his theories and one of them is that BTC used to bounce 3 times before finding the bottom in 2014 so it has to do it now. The difference is that in 2014 the correction wasn't natural because it was the result of huge news about Gox insolvency and planned bans of crypto in China. This one is a healthy corection with no real bearish news and upcoming ETF decision. I think that he's wrong and we won't fall to 5k without ETFs being rejected first.

It became really boring to wait, i hope we don't need to wait end of 2018. and when the time is right i hope it will be better then last year. Paitent crypto investors deserves better. 

You cant blame them because sometimes they need money for their importants needs espacially in financial. Also me, I sell my bitcoin even if the price is low because already deadline of payment of my tuition. And after that i regret my decision that i make. But its ok i recovered alreafy on that loss.

So, if Bitcoin really takes off, we think we have an honest, state-free money.  No central bank, or anyone, can create bitcoins past the 21 million limit.

Correct?  In practice, no.

What Western central banks are doing now is getting us used to the idea of multiple cryptocurrencies being viable.  When they use their printed money to buy some new cryptos, their values go up.  

One simple example of how they can continue to expand their money supply is to have a basket of cryptos against which they 'manage' exchange rates with dollars, euro, etc.  Say, at first this basket contains 1 BTC, 10 ETH, and 100 LTC, and the Fed and US government have an official or unofficial policy of keeping this basket at the price of $100K, with a combination of keeping money printing and public debt under control, and selling the BTC/ETH/LTC in its vaults to scare savers away from moving their dollars into coins.

As time goes on, the Fed will want to create more dollars.  (As it always has.)  Then they will  buy up lots of new cryptocurrency XYZ (cheap) with their dollars, and raise the price of XYZ.  After XYZ has 'proven itself in the market with its technical superiority,' the Fed will add it to the basket, and the new basket will be priced at $120K.  Since the 'base money' has expanded by 20%, the number of dollars can also be expanded by 20%.

This is only one of many variations.  The Fed doesn't even have to declare a basket (as mentioned above.)  Whatever it buys will rise in value, and will become part of the 'basket'.  Whatever it abandons will die out.  It will have all the power.

The system will be no different from the early days of gold and silver standards, but with a new twist: there are an unlimited number of new gold and silver mines, and only central banks know where they are!

So, I'm still thinking that gold and silver, whose scarcity is secured by physics, rather than computer code, are the superior forms of money for improving our freedom from governments and bankers.

Unfortunately, the OP did not deem it fit to share where he got all that from. However, from my perspective, I feel these two does not have anything in correlation when it comes to value and as long as there would still be some who would prefer to invest in traditional assets, they will still have their own normal market conditions anyway. Silver and gold has been on for a while, they may be over valued, but those are the values placed by the holders which is the same thing we are having in the crypto space. So, because cryptocurrency is on the rise fundamentally does not mean silver will be losing ground.