Ok, so it's like playing 3 card poker at the casino, not real poker? But this still implies they developed an RNG, right? It is like video holdem poker, yeah. No, I think they still kind of use the NY lottery drawings. But I have no idea, no specifications are yet released! Will be intresting though  I know they use the NY lottery drawings for the lotto. What I'm saying is that if they developed a poker game they must have developed an RNG. |
|
|
|
Venetian and I have been working on new single-player casino games that we hope to have ready soon. Here's a screenshot of the poker game we're working on:
Great work! Community should take action now! Hey Guys, I have some specific questions about the poker game. There is a very big online poker community at 2+2 http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/and I think this could be a great way to get CHA noticed. If you have developed an RNG for the card game, why can't you make a totally decentralized lotto game? Is the poker game against a real opponent or the house? Does it work like real Holdem? Is there betting on every street? No Limit? Limit? HEy fellow poker player It is single player for now, so you play against the house, but magician talked about implementing a p2p game later on (also for sportsbetting!) So, let me get this straight. I get to play poker against the house? Like real poker?  $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ I'm having fish tonight! You can't beat the house, only lower the house edge (if implemented correctly) Its like blackjack. Ok, so it's like playing 3 card poker at the casino, not real poker? But this still implies they developed an RNG, right? |
|
|
|
Venetian and I have been working on new single-player casino games that we hope to have ready soon. Here's a screenshot of the poker game we're working on:
Great work! Community should take action now! Hey Guys, I have some specific questions about the poker game. There is a very big online poker community at 2+2 http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/and I think this could be a great way to get CHA noticed. If you have developed an RNG for the card game, why can't you make a totally decentralized lotto game? Is the poker game against a real opponent or the house? Does it work like real Holdem? Is there betting on every street? No Limit? Limit? HEy fellow poker player It is single player for now, so you play against the house, but magician talked about implementing a p2p game later on (also for sportsbetting!) So, let me get this straight. I get to play poker against the house? Like real poker? $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ I'm having fish tonight! |
|
|
|
Venetian and I have been working on new single-player casino games that we hope to have ready soon. Here's a screenshot of the poker game we're working on:  Great work! Community should take action now! Hey Guys, I have some specific questions about the poker game. There is a very big online poker community at 2+2 http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/and I think this could be a great way to get CHA noticed. If you have developed an RNG for the card game, why can't you make a totally decentralized lotto game? Is the poker game against a real opponent or the house? Does it work like real Holdem? Is there betting on every street? No Limit? Limit? |
|
|
|
Nice topic change.  |
|
|
|
Do you guys think we are missing a third leg up in this small uptrend? If feels to me like it was abruptly cut...
Stop looking for reasons the price hasn't gone higher. 3 touch points on a trend line is common. It went up 40% or so since yesterday. That's a lot and has nothing to do with what's going on here. So your saying that its over priced because it has nothing to do with anything on in here? Am I understanding this correctly? I'm just asking from a pure trading perspective: usualy there are 3 legs up and 2 down, but this one only has 2 up...so if feels to me that a third one is missing. I don't care about all this FUD. Trading 101: Nothing usually happens. If it did we would be at home trading in our underwear and never have to go to work again. I guarantee you if I search through thousands of charts I can show you instances of any number of legs in a move. 1, 2, 3 , 4, 5,etc. Also, a 3rd leg fail is called what? A double top. |
|
|
|
Do you guys think we are missing a third leg up in this small uptrend? If feels to me like it was abruptly cut...
Stop looking for reasons the price hasn't gone higher. 3 touch points on a trend line is common. It went up 40% or so since yesterday. That's a lot and has nothing to do with what's going on here. |
|
|
|
Give it time. Dev did say he/she is not sure about the legality of Dark market. I for one wouldn't want VOOT to be associated with something illegal. First order of business is anon which is still currently on track.
Then you should think about exactly what you expect VOOT to be without the Dark Market. It will be a coin with centralized mixer, right? We have plenty of those already. I know OP just took over a coin associated with a scam, so it's understandable if the direction isn't 100%. But, I'm very cautious when it seems like one of the main marketing points is going to be scrapped and the lead manager seems unsure what the next step is going to be. I just think it's starting to have that pump and dump feel to it. That's it. I'm still holding so I have some faith. |
|
|
|
I think it is time for atcsecure to back his claims with a real BTC bounty.
I understand some of the nuance of the technology (by no means am I an expert), but I know semantic games when I see them. Lay out a verifiable challenge, and see if chaeplin can deliver.
Stop with all of this "that is only part of the answer" bullshit. Set up a very concise challenge and see.
Anyone here should be demanding the same!
Not really. No other coin is publicly testing. |
|
|
|
In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you? All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it. It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
he already posted something. check it now and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me evtrmm, where are you now. need you here. All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two +1 like the last 500 test, so can you idiots please stop backstabbin your own dev for once. We aren't backstabbing anything. ATCSecure put a test out there. I'm not looking for a pump and dump here. If you are worried about what you are going to find out from a test then you should sell. You are obviously here just for a higher price so you can sell now. |
|
|
|
chaeplin already answered at unmoderated thread
is it correct?
Why do I have a feeling he got it right?  |
|
|
|
Any news about the DarkvootMarket market?
Nothing yet. I am split between illegal or legal . I understand why the Developer is slow to act as you are a public figure, but I believe that if we want VOOT to succeed we need a decentralized darkmarket. This is how we differentiate our sleeves from the top anon coins out there. As of right now every Tom, Dick and Harry coin out there is trying to be anonymous. VOOT needs something to make it different or we will just be another anon coin. If we are going to fundraise let start by paying for someone to get this decentralized darkmarket done. +1 it definitely needs something to make it stand out from the crowd. VOOT without DarkMarket? Next trivial coin? I cut my position by 50%. I wasn't impressed with some of the recent responses from MsCollec. I've changed from very bullish to watching my position and this thread closely. Just saying. |
|
|
|
How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without. Yeah that was stupid, why even work towards these idiot, no other anon coin has to prove shit but xc, he will find the adress only with md5, he will NEVER admit that xc anon works, NEVER. read his post history Completely agree, why are people so hung up on this? All he should need is the receiving address and tx id. If he can't do it with just that then it works, period. Stop feeding the trolls its the mentality of alot of nice people to work towards the assholes in this world. and since we have the nicest people in xc community we attract more FUDster than others cause some of us subconciously feed them again and again expecting them to change eventually. reality check: won't happen. chap isn't giving constuctiv critisism and he will NEVER stop. I think he will stop. He already won't confront ATCSecure in this thread. If he can't get this correct I think it all ends here. I'm sorry, but I think if we can shut up the biggest critics, then the victory is enormous. I posted the new challenge in the uncensored thread. |
|
|
|
ATCSecure? do whatever md5, sha, anything.
like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'
and post result.
Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.
Again, I'm not doing that, if he knows the address then he should post it |
|
|
|
ATCSecure? do whatever md5, sha, anything.
like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'
and post result.
Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.
|
|
|
|
same tx
sender -------- > mixer ----> payee change<--------| First tell dev to post md5 of whateverattached_senderaddress. If he knows the address he should post it... ATC is right not to post the MD5, someone could write a scrypt scanning the blockchain for all used addresses & checking there MD5. With both start & begin addresses finding the route between is easy. If md5 posted it should be in a encrypted file we can all download first. After the answer has been given, release the password. there is no need, when/if somebody posts the address, I will provide the details to the other side of the transaction which will either prove they are correct or prove they are wrong Yet, Cheaplin keeps insisting for the MD5, makes me wonder how he got his answers on earlier tests. Yes he reverse MD5 every address on the block chain. Do you hear yourself? Also dev never posted a MD5 before. Not sure why is he dogging now. Can we get over this already and move on? No, we can't move on. Trolls from the DRK thread have been all over the fact that Chaeplin can backtrace the address. I won't stop until someone folds. |
|
|
|
I didn't quote everything. I only kept what I thought was relevant. As you can see, I deleted all of my other posts. I will post in the other thread. |
|
|
|
same tx
sender -------- > mixer ----> payee change<--------| First tell dev to post md5 of whateverattached_senderaddress. If he knows the address he should post it... ATC is right not to post the MD5, someone could write a scrypt scanning the blockchain for all used addresses & checking there MD5. With both start & begin addresses finding the route between is easy. If md5 posted it should be in a encrypted file we can all download first. After the answer has been given, release the password. there is no need, when/if somebody posts the address, I will provide the details to the other side of the transaction which will either prove they are correct or prove they are wrong |
|
|
|
same tx
sender -------- > mixer ----> payee change<--------| First tell dev to post md5 of whateverattached_senderaddress. If he knows the address he should post it... ATC is right not to post the MD5, someone could write a scrypt scanning the blockchain for all used addresses & checking there MD5. With both start & begin addresses finding the route between is easy. If md5 posted it should be in a encrypted file we can all download first. After the answer has been given, release the password. there is no need, when/if somebody posts the address, I will provide the details to the other side of the transaction which will either prove they are correct or prove they are wrong |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
