much anger there, eh Gestas? As for OP, good on you, hope your mother takes to it! lol
|
|
|
That's great news! It will be interesting to see how other communities react, particularly the haters.
excatttlllyyyyy...
|
|
|
This is a young Bruce Wagner if you get Mt Gox to as a sponsor I will die, I will have an heart attack right at that moment LOL
dude I know I look like a troll but serious I been watching episodes keep doing it up!
Try and get some sponsors maybe start small and stuff.
In some sick sense him acting like Bruce Wagner ( messing up stuff, not knowing much lol ) make me watch it ...its like some sick pleasure . This dude is like the prodigy of Bruce Wagner with some Roger Ver mixed in.
|
|
|
I'll report him as a scammer as soon as I get access to the rest of the forum, but I've got a feeling that I'm not getting that 50$ back. I thought you did escrow?
|
|
|
Why should the US be the only country that says who can own nukes ?
Why shouldn't everyone be a bully? I don't think protecting your sovereignty is equivalent to being a bully. If you have no nukes, you can be conquered by anyone who does. You are correct. They didn't start this. Someone else did. The problem with that logic is that we all end up with bullies protecting our sovereignty, to the point where we wonder what good it is anyway. Will the U.S is a responsible nation. Other nations have proven very unresponsible.
|
|
|
<----
|
|
|
"You sir, are completely wrong and FOS."
"What? Never! I challenge you to a DeBit in a public forum."
"Very well, we shall settle the matter like gentlemen!"
"Good, prepare to lose your coins my friend."
*DeBit ensues*
Basically, this ^^. It's almost like a way to arbitrate issues and get a verdict on all the drama that goes on here in this here forums.
|
|
|
good idea about the deposit upfront. (if later development required it)
but i was thinking this would be more useful if it was a fee to pledge their attendance only (to avoid no-show's) where they get it back just by turning up.
if i had to pay upfront and know not only voting profit, but my initial fee was on the line if i didnt win/was a crap speaker. my emotions would be heightened as id be even more concerned about losing. so professionalism would go out the window, as would temptations to even participate if there was a 50% chance id lose out.
id prefer a deposit redeemed purely to ensure successful attendance. and have the votes as the 'treat'. That way by debating valid points, and making valid argument rebuttals earns you more money then the other guy. without any risk of loss to cause an emotional outburst.
basically knowing if i sound like a knob, not many will vote for me. so it only requires the votes to keep emotions in-check.
Agreed with this. What I'll do is put a "deposit address" next to the date/time scheduler idea you thought of. This way we know they are serious about debating. Also, more skin the game brings out the best in people ......OR the worst.....
|
|
|
To keep things prefessional, timely and better regulated, require a deposit from presenters that they get back if they win the debate, unless someone on their team who also makes a deposit can do a better job at making the point and followup arguments, in which case they get both deposits.
Good thinking. Keeps everyone honest, professional and regulated good point. At first, since I'm sure there will be hiccups to start , I'll probably keep to pure bitcoin votes to start and go from there.
|
|
|
Working on it! Need some name suggestions for the site for right now just borrowing a subdomain. I have like BitBrawl, BitDebate! don't know ...but will get a formal domain shortly for it. I'll throw up a landing page tomorrow. Also, the first topic will be the pro's and con's of Bitcoin of course have to start off with that topic of course so if you are interested in debating leave a message below. Be prepared to speak on both sides of it 15 minutes in length then you and your opponent will switch sides. There will be a voting system as suggested by Franky1 as the following: 0.1BTC if you agree 0.3BTC if you strongly agree 0.5BTC if that guy completely "pwnd" the other debater. This will be one of many topics I'll offer everything from sports to the gun debate to whatever is the latest hot topic of the day! edit: provide a clean bitcoin payment address also. bitbrawl sounds a good name and the 0.01btc 0.03btc 0.05btc would work great, then if for instance there is 2BTC total at the end of the debate you know thats 200 votes (based on a 0.01 per vote) where obviously some have strongly agreed = 5 votes in one shot(button press). good suggestion on reducing high vote prices lol (which i put forward ) so all you need to do is have the API to show total received and divide it by 0.01 to get vote totals (well blockchain.info's API gives u satoshis so it would be divide by 1million to give you how many 0.01's got submittted). and at the end of the debate you will obviously need to have a 10minute 'pause for anticipation' of final results (just to get all vote submits 'confirmed' to avoid double spenders fixing votes). overall it seems like a easy to use platform with minimal coding/maintenance from how its described. cant wait to see it in action Yes, going to do BitBrawl. Yes, there is a real-time running count total so can tally up all votes after 10 minutes 'pause for anticipation' of final results! 10 minutes or so for all the confirmations I try to make it pretty dead simple with any kind of coding/maintenace ( its really just to be fun!) and obviously if people like it will build it out properly I think you'll enjoy it! I'll post the landing page here tomorrow morning maybe have 1st debate Friday night or Saturday night! wish me luck! Now that I think about it might be hard to round up some people to debate the issues haha .... I have a feeling we'll have a lot of people in masks!
|
|
|
Wear a mask and change your voice! Haha whatever get'r done!
|
|
|
First suggestion bitbrawl would be a cool name but I think something like coinonyourside.com (not registered) could work as well. Also maybe just take those amounts to .01, .03, .05 just given the current market value, remember this is voting. Or you could also have like a button voting system, but have the coins count much more so maybe voting by button is half a vote and the coins are equalled to whole votes. So if I vote .01 that would be one vote .03 that be 3 votes and on and on.
BitBrawl was one that jumped out at me also. Coinonyourside.com is pretty good also will take that into consideration. Hmm good point smaller means more votes I'll adjust to those amounts to reflect more then one vote. I currently have a button voting system. I didn't want to make this to complicated and let everyone's bitcoins do the talking so to speak .
|
|
|
Working on it! Need some name suggestions for the site for right now just borrowing a subdomain. I have like BitBrawl, BitDebate! don't know ...but will get a formal domain shortly for it. I'll throw up a landing page tomorrow. Also, the first topic will be the pro's and con's of Bitcoin of course have to start off with that topic of course so if you are interested in debating leave a message below. Be prepared to speak on both sides of it 15 minutes in length then you and your opponent will switch sides. There will be a voting system as suggested by Franky1 as the following: 0.1BTC if you agree 0.3BTC if you strongly agree 0.5BTC if that guy completely "pwnd" the other debater. This will be one of many topics I'll offer everything from sports to the gun debate to whatever is the latest hot topic of the day! edit: provide a clean bitcoin payment address also.
|
|
|
gave a few bits of coin to you! At least someone is trying haha
|
|
|
Yes, should all work now!
|
|
|
Lol go to bed son your making up stuff
|
|
|
Bitcoin gets a bad rap I wonder why!
|
|
|
I have verified this is not a scam. MoneypakTrader loaded my card with $300 and it was not disputed with greendot. Danieldaniel is out of control. Moneypak can only be reversed if you deny ownership of the moneypak, as BCB did. There are lots of retarded people who don't know any better or don't care, who pay huge markups to trade moneypaks for bitcoins. My thread buying moneypaks is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=105179.0You realize for any scam to work they have to have one or two things "work" first then the flood of others follow and thus the scam moves forward.
|
|
|
Could you give any specific examples of applications that indirectly allow for the purchasing of physical goods using in-app purchases?
You are trying to reason with someone unwilling to reason. Aside from reporting this to the app store, another plausible idea is baiting scammers and attracting them to this so both he and Apple will be overwhelmed with scams. Better it happen in the form of a rush than a slow trickle, the quicker it will be dealt with, and the more bitcoins this overconfident fool will lose as well. Dude you sound like some Fascist freak get a FUCKEN life. You a scammer aremen ?
|
|
|
|