A čekaj... Što je onda s recimo Monerom? Znam da nije mixer ali je kriptovaluta kojoj su cilj transakcije koje nije moguće pratiti. Možda sam sad bubnuo glupost jer nisam baš proučavao Monero, ali znam da na neki način omogućuje privatne transakcije. Je li moguće da netko odjednom zabrani XMR?

Examples of things that are not banned mixers include exchangers (unless they have a mixing function), CoinJoin-supporting non-custodial wallets, and Monero.

They literally have only one achievement in their history which is an Olympic championship in 1920.

Especially in Euro rather than World Cup they can be more successful. It isn't impossible for them to win a title despite the existence of very challenging opponents. management.

US customers buying and selling crypto is a privilege, not a right?

My concern is that should i be worried about this ? I do not live in the US and the funds are in my Electrum wallet. Can law enforcement agencies can approach me  

Another downtime for bitcointalk was observed today. I did not know that exact duration but roughly it was for an hour or so.

Still, we do not have the exact reasons for these downtimes but anyways the good thing is that we are back online and there is nothing to worry about.  

This solution is incredibly stupid. This will kill the entire forum ecosystem  

I already removed all funds from Binance so nothing can be frozen.

Ne brini, cirkus dolazi u grad kako je i bilo planirano  

Ukratko ovo, da. Mene zanima ulaze li u to i dex p2p servisi, recimo smije li se spomenuti, linkati, štoveć nekakav Uniswap.

Upravo tako. Ili recimo freebitcoin? Nije casino, nema KYC (iako su u TOS stavili da mogu zatražiti), možeš deponirati sredstva i odmah povući ako želiš, čak i bez minimalnog zahtjeva za kockanjem. Ako se ne varam, to se prema ovom tumačenju može smatrati mikserom

Even though you can sometimes use non-mixers to mix coins by depositing and then withdrawing, this doesn't make it a mixer because this is an incidental use of the service; the service isn't advertised as privacy-enhancing.

I must admit that it was a good bet for you mate but you were unlucky. Because I really liked their effort in the first half. Their goal expectation was around 1.20 but there was still no goal. If they scored first things could have been easier for you. But they couldn't. The red card they got after a goal conceded was the end of the hopes for Astana.

So what's next?
Are you going to ask all members to perform KYC on bitcointalk?  
There are plenty of legit websites you can use without kyc, virtual cards, vpn services, casinos, etc.

Are you all saw now that how much this forum is decentralized?  

Bitcointalk.org aims to allow about as much freedom as is reasonably possible. But this is not a darknet forum, and with mixers looking "grayer and grayer", it's no longer reasonably possible to allow linking to mixers. Even though "a cryptocurrency mixing service is not necessarily illegal," a clear pattern has emerged where mixers pop up, last for a little while, and then get taken down by law enforcement once they get too big. Allowing mixers to be posted on bitcointalk.org before they seemingly-inevitably get declared illegal and seized is not sustainable. Therefore, linking to mixers will no longer be allowed, just the same as linking to darknet sites is already not allowed.

To avoid disruption, there will be a grace period: Nothing will change until Jan 1, 2024.

Starting Jan 1, 2024:
 - Existing mixer announcement topics (and a few topics that have no value without mixer-links) will be locked and archived.
 - Going forward, directing people to mixers in new posts/edits will be totally disallowed, and doing so could lead to a ban. Many mixer URLs will be wordfiltered-out, and if you bypass the wordfilter, then that'll definitely be ban-worthy.
 - Any remaining mixer signatures (etc.) may be deleted. Anyone persisting in advertising mixers will be banned.
 - In most cases, old posts will not be deleted. Nobody should be banned for old posts.

You do not need to go edit/delete your past posts. Links will be automatically wordfiltered-out as of Jan 1, or in a few cases mods will archive or delete posts, but you will not be banned for old mixer-related posts.

It will continue to be OK to discuss mixers in a general sort of way. Just don't direct people to mixers: don't link to a mixer, don't link to a directory with links to mixers, don't tell people to "Google ASDFmixer", don't link to a mixer's telegram, etc.

Definition of a mixer

For clarity, here is a detailed definition of what we mean by a "mixer". Most people know intuitively what a mixer is and don't have to read this.

Something is considered a mixer if it meets all of these requirements:
 1. It has a feature advertised for taking property, improving its privacy somehow, and then returning roughly the same type of property.
     a. Even though you can sometimes use non-mixers to mix coins by depositing and then withdrawing, this doesn't make it a mixer because this is an incidental use of the service; the service isn't advertised as privacy-enhancing.
     b. If a site is not primarily a mixer but has a mixer function, such as a mixer function on a gambling website, then the whole site is considered a mixer.
     c. If the site takes coins, gives you a possibly-transferrable IOU, and will convert this IOU back into mixed coins much later, then the temporary conversion into a different type of property does not prevent it from being considered a mixer.
     d. If the site internally converts your deposit into other things as part of its mixing, but ultimately the point of the product is to get your original type of property back, then that's a mixer, not an exchanger.
 2. It is possible for the mixer to steal property passing through it. Assume that the sender does everything as correctly as possible. Also assume that no miners/verifiers on the base-layer cryptocurrency are evil. But assume that every other actor involved is evil (everyone able to vote in a DAO, every coordination server, every counterparty, every member of a multisig, etc.). Ignore short-term software bugs which are expected to be quickly fixed.
 3. The service does not collect KYC-type info from all users.

Examples of things that are not banned mixers include exchangers (unless they have a mixing function), CoinJoin-supporting non-custodial wallets, and Monero.

Is it unsafe for me to keep on Google Drive? I've been keeping my seed phrase in google drive for quite some time now but so far I haven't had a problem.

Here I want to say that I have not given anyone access to my google drive, if I don't give anyone access, how can they access my google drive?

Working for a mixer and depositing what they pay you in a CEX, even more by doing it just like that, without going through a previous coinjoin for example, I don't quite understand, I would appreciate it if someone could explain it to me.

Yes I agree with you but in his initial message bbc.reporter was talking about movies he watched likely to receive Oscars according to him.

And from what I understood he isn't thinking that Killers of the Flower Moon is good enough to receive one main Oscar. I think the opposite, for me this movie is "cinematically" better than Oppenheimer. Oppenheimer is not surprising, and looks too much like other movies such as The Imitation Game, I believe.

Is that number serious? compare with CZ's personal fine some time ago of around $50 million

Je li to bilo vezano za uplatu primljenu od sig. kampanje? Vrlo je zajebana situacija…

Vjerujem da ima veliki broj članova koji svoju tjednu zaradu šalju direktno na mjenjačnice i mijenjaju u lokalnu valutu.

Ja ne prodajem svoje coine, ali sada moram razmišljati o načinima da "operem" coine koje sam zaradio od kampanje, a na način da ne koristim usluge mixera jer to ovdje gubi smisao.

Da nejasno je, kao sto je nejasno sta Binance zahteva od njega. Traze nekakve dokaze, ali ne pise koje.

@Rikafip can give us an analytical view, but through my weekly visits to that LB and the presence of a merit source, I believe that the minimum limits of merit ^* are met.
Adding more sources would be good, but there is no need to complain at the moment.

Sasvim je moguce da je tako. Cini se da su bolje zastitili sebe nego sto je to radio CM svojevremeno. Bice ovde zanimljivo.
Bas su se oglasili i najavili zvanicno saopstenje.

Ich könnte mir vorstellen, dass die Sinbad Kampagne da vielleicht schon noch ein Nachspiel haben wird, zumindest hat mich Binance heute folgendes gefragt:



Dem aufmerksamen Leser dürfte die Adresse bekannt vorkommen, ist nämlich die Escrow Adresse der Sinbad Kampagne.

It's obvious people cant read. What do you think is hidden here. I have gone through the individual links I see on the forum. And read all pinned topics. I am not new to technology. I know how to navigate a platform even if I just new it. This is the 21st century there is nothing hidden in search engines. I could know much about the forum if I just asked google to tell me what I need to know.

I don't know if they were dropped on their head or something, but did 2 DT members just tagged a LE representative on this platform?

I'd suggest they remove their feedback immediately if they don't want to be associated with a sanctioned service and having their names blacklisted.