Good to hear that you managed to get your money out after a few days of waiting and I am sure that it hasn't been a pleasant experience at all.

Since issue has been sorted, you should update the topic title saying that issue has been resolved and lock the topic in order to avoid unnecessary spam.

If you checked the topic, you would see that member in question even admitted that he took someone else's image and presented it as his own. Also, it doesn't matter from where it was taken as if you copy text from outside of bitcointalk you will still get banned so this argument is not valid.

---

Even if someone did that, it still won't get banned. Here is the direct answer from mprep, plagiarism rule doesn't apply to images, no matter the source.




I agree, it dooesn't make sense and I don't think that we ever got an explanation for that exception.

Are you sure about that? I am asking because I remember that when bitcointalk had some issues recrntly, some people had way more issues than the others so there might be some difference depending from where you are.


He said that other sites and apps are working normally and the only issue he has is with bitcointalk.

Nope, you won't get banned on bitcointalk for image plagiarism even if its proven that you took image from someone else and presented it as your own.

For example of something like that, take a look at this case from few years ago when I exposed someone who took someone else's image and explicitly presented it as his own in order to fish some merit. Even though it was proved that it wasn't his image (I contacetd the original creator who confirmed me that) and he even admitted plagiarism, mods did nothing and all he got were few tags.

Don't listen to those YouTube "cryptocurrency experts" as their sole role on YT is to shill shitcoins, (hence why they say that its too late to invest in bitcoin) and especially don't listen them when they try to predict future bitcoin price.

 
Days when you could become millionaire by investing few hundreds of dollars in bitcoin are (most likely) gone, but that still doesn't mean that its too late to invest in bitcoin. Imho, as long as bitcoin keeps beating inflation (which he is doing with no problem), its definitely worth it to invest instead holding fiat that losses value constantly.

Back in late 2013/early 2014 I also thought that I was too late since BTC price was ~$1k so instead buying 0.1-0.2 BTC I bought shitcoins for a couple of hundreds of dollars. Luckily, a bit later I realized my mistake and that I am far from too late and started buying bitcoin instead. So, don't make the same mistake I did.

No issues here whatsoever, bitcointalk working preety smoothly on both mobile phone and PC. By the way, using Mozilla on both of those devices and located in Europe so your location might be the issue.

Not anymore. Since my Binance Visa debit card is expiring in a few months and Binance didn't find another card partner I withdraw everything i had there (which was not much btw) so no, I personally won't be affected much.


Drop will be significant indeed, but only in the short-middle term. Bitcoin price would eventually recover and everything would be back to normal, like it happened in the past.


Some will maybe losse fait in crypto, but you would have to be very ignorant to loose "faith" in bitcoin just because you trusted some centralzied entity to store your money, going directly against everything bitcoin stands for.

A ja sam nekao imao dojam da se on pojavi kad je BTC na dnu da likuje kao i svi ostali trolovi pa se onda pokupi kad bitcoin krene pumpati. Sigurno zna da je bitcoin pred halveningom sto znaci da ce cijena poceti rasti pa se pojavio da se malo zabavi dok moze. Jedino me cudi da ovaj put nije navratio kod nas, da nam malo napumpa statistiku.

How many different tools you used to try detect it whether he used AI to write those posts, as one is usually not enough and can give you a false positive results.

I am asking because if those posts that you shared are made with AI, this guy used the shittiest chatbot I've seen so far.

OP is a troll and ban evader who is exploiting the fact that forum stuff is not easy on banning so he can continue with his little scheme of showing up few times per year with a new account, spreading his nonsense and enjoying the attention he gets every time.

What people here don't understand is that it's pointless to try have any kind of serious conversation because he is not interested in that at all.

@fillippone

Ancora un'altra fantastica panoramica e vorrei avere la volontà di realizzarne una simile per il mio consiglio locale.Quei tavoli sembrano davvero fantastici e dovrei davvero prendermi un po' di tempo per realizzarli anche per la panoramica del mio consiglio locale.

Avviso amichevole: ho già iniziato a lavorare sulla nuova panoramica lunare! 

All your arguments were addressed numerous times before and every time you come back with yet another alt sharing the same old stuff. What I don't understand is how are you not bored with it and do you really believe that you will change anyone's opinion here?


I do agree that its funny to watch this show but not for the reasons you might think.  

Tbh, I don't think that Trofo and cryptofrka should make an exception in this case. Rules were clear so all of us that were slacking should bare the consequences and might even be a good lesson for the future.

Its not easy to run something like this so its better to make things as simple as possible.

Whether signatures are personal endorsement or not doesn't really matter because by wearing a signature you are getting paid for spreading the awareness about something you think is extremely damaging/negative etc and that's what makes you a hypocrite.

But if it makes it easier for you to rationalise your stance and wear the gambling signature, be my guest.

Oh lol, they are really scamming their clients if they managed to sell those one liner shitposters made by brand new accounts for that price. There is some poetic justice there, scammers scamming dodgy projects that choose this type of "marketing technique".


While I was maintaning list of ANN threads that are using bumping services I used to leave negative feedback to accounts that were part of that shilling group but eventually I got bored of that whack a mole game as people behind them just used new accounts once current ones were tagged. Imho, better approach is to report those posts and in expalantion write that they are part if paid shilling group which should be enough for ban/nuke.

I have a bad memory about bitcoin, but as a matter of fact i don't want to forget it because it tought me a valuable lesson how to store my bitcoin propely.

So, back in late 2017 (just a few days before Christmas) I fell for a phishing attempt and lost almost everything I had at the moment (it was ~0.1 BTC which for some may not be much but at that point it was a lot for me). When that happened I almost have up on bitcoin all together but after few days I managed to calm myself down and luckily continue my bitcoin journey.

What this experience thought me was that I should use proper wallet to store my bitcoin (read hardware wallet) instead of a shitty online wallet that I used up until then so in a way it was a blessing in disguise as it coul;d have hapepned to me later when I had more bitcoin.

You are right, quality of discussion is really low and altcoin lovers found other places to discuss. Then again, if there are more merit sources present there maybe people would put more effort into their posts while now they know that no one really cares so they don't bother.

Altcoin board is in such a big mess that lack of merit sources is least of its worries, imho.

Oh for fuck sake. Its been a while since I forgot to submit my answers and like the last  time I blame my wife again for giving me chores and making me forget. Anyway, congrats to ILuckyGuyI for an easy win. 

Looks more like he is doing that by himself rather than hiring one of those shilling services because they usually use older accounts with some priot activity of like in case of the most known shilleers 'Vitor Services", accounts created years ago with no activity.

Either way, you should just report those accounts for paid spam and they will be most likely nuked.

As a matter of fact, that 0.05 merit/post ratio is actually pretty decent for Altcoin Discussion as their total average since 2018 up until now is only 0.02. To put things into perpsective and to show how low that is, even Off Topic board has higher overall merit/post ratio (0.07) and we all know about generally poor quality of posts there.

Anyway, if you are curious about some other boards merit/post ratios, you can find them on Merit Dashboard.