Kudos to you for mentioning Davor Suker! He was one of my favorite players when I first started following international football as a kid. I still perfectly remember "Sukerman" and the Croatian team destroying Germany 3-0 in the quarter finals of World Cup 1998.   

I think this is a good suggestion as well. Bounty managers should give merit points more meaning in their campaign conditions. Merits should be used for other purposes than just requirement for ranking up.

I generally support both suggestions. Newbies should really be active in the community before they can apply for bounty campaigns. This would significantly reduce cheating and bounty farming. Regarding the second suggestion, I agree with dkbit98. Each case should be looked at individually because some negative tags may be unfounded.


This is the tricky part. Even if all existing bounty managers agreed to this, what's to stop new bounty managers who don't want to follow these community rules? Tagging them may be a solution, although I'm not sure everyone will agree on this. But even after that, they can still continue with bad practices. Case in point: 1xbit campaigns.

The OP said that he made 4 deposits, so I'm guessing he didn't deposit all of the €2400 at once. But you're right: It would have been wiser not to proceed with a new deposit without first testing withdrawals - and being sure that there is no problem! I guess he just wasn't expecting the casino to have a problem with his withdrawal request.

---

He already did. You can find it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5417972.0

---

@n1betscam, I think it would be best if you locked this thread since you created an identical one in the Scam accusations board. You can find the option to lock a topic in the lower left corner of your screen.

As others have already mentioned, your trust feedback should not prevent you from becoming a more active or participating member of this community. The fact that your trust rating is low with some members does not mean you aren't trustworthy; it just means that there have been some concerns raised about your behavior or conduct, and it can be changed if you work hard to improve it.

You haven't contributed much to the forum in recent months - more than a year has passed since your last post - and although there are many good reasons why you might not have posted in so long, this is a clear indicator that you are not being an active member of the community and this is one of the main reasons why you cannot participate in signature campaigns or other forms of advertising on bitcointalk. Every campaign manager will have a different set of rules for their campaigns, but the majority will require that you post regularly on bitcointalk and will be looking for the same thing: a high-quality posts with good content. Your trust rating has very little to do with this.

I agree with this. It's not that I don't care about Bitcoin, it's just that there will be more immediate concerns to worry about. I think we can all agree that if there is a nuclear war, the immediate concern will be survival. If you can't survive, then Bitcoin doesn't matter. I think we can also agree that after survival comes sheltering in place and food and water supplies. Then comes the need for communication, which is a problem because we can assume that there will be no power or internet in the immediate aftermath of a nuclear war.  We also need to consider what would happen if the world's financial institutions collapsed as a result of a global catastrophe. At this point, it will be necessary to start working on getting these things back up and running again.

For many, a few hundred dollars is not an extraordinary amount of money. For such a small amount, I would not be willing to give up my personal information. The fact that only 13% of people here are ready to lose their money because they do not want to provide their personal data says a lot about our attitude towards privacy. I think that many people simply don't understand what they actually lose by doing KYC.

I agree. It would be good to hear their side of the story and how Galaxy.bet casino is related to other gambling websites from the same group - if they are even all owned by the same people or company at all. Their online reputation isn't great, so I think they should consider focusing on fixing that if they want to attract new customers at their site in future. Otherwise people might be worried about depositing money on the platform after reading so many bad things from others.
 

Live chat support can't help you with that. The only thing you can do until you receive a definitive response from their security department is to wait and try to be patient.
If you still don't hear from them after a reasonable amount of time has passed, open your case in the Scam accusation section ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0 ) and include as much information as possible about your situation. This may help speed things along in getting you an answer.

It is understandable that online casinos need to collect our personal data to verify it and prevent any fraudulent activity, I completely understand this point of view. But, I don't necessarily want every casino I gamble on, to know everything about me considering the inherent risks of these platforms leaking information or being hacked. Remember how we were talking about passing information between the casinos? Well I don't necessarily want every single one of them to have access to my personal information, especially if they are not trustworthy. The problem with this, is that there is no way to verify whether or not the casino you are playing at will keep your information safe and secure. If they are not transparent about what data they collect and how it will be used then I would advise against using their services.

As Bitcoin is decentralized it makes sense to believe that it could survive a nuclear war. However, there are no guarantees and the disruptions caused by a nuclear war could be enough to cause a major disruption in the internet. This means that, in theory, Bitcoin could survive a nuclear war but it would be unlikely to function properly. This is because Bitcoin relies on the internet to operate and if this is disrupted then there is no way for transactions to be verified by miners.

Even if the internet survived, it’s likely that there would be a huge amount of damage to infrastructure such as power stations. This would mean that electricity to run computers would be limited and could cause major disruption for mining operations. It is also possible that the environment may become so radioactive that it is uninhabitable for centuries. As a result of all this, it is hard to say what would happen to Bitcoin in the event of a nuclear war.

Apparently, Galaxy.bet is just another brand of the Galaxy Group Ltd company. Before you deposit your money, do some research on these companies so you can make an informed decision. Some of the reviews that can be found online are quite worrying:

Hahaha! That's hilarious!

OP, you're trying to rent banner space on your site and can't even afford cheap cPanel hosting for it? I know you're trying to make a big impression, but this makes it seem like you're cutting corners at every turn. You're probably using some kind of cheap shared hosting. If you want to make money from your website, then the hosting should be a priority. You can't expect people to view your site if it is offline most of the time or slow to load. It's not exactly going to make people want to do business with you.

Well, that would be pretty hard to achieve, I would say.

I think it's fairly safe to say that such a system of governance would be incredibly difficult to create. In fact, I hardly think such a system would be even slightly possible, given the current state of technology and the nature of human beings. However, even if such a system were created and it worked, I doubt that it would be the best form of government for humanity as a whole. As an aside, I don't think there is such thing as "the best form of government." Each system has its own strengths and weaknesses, and what works for one society may not work for another. Of course, I suppose this is only one interpretation. The idea makes for some good philosophical debates, at least.

Most casinos have some form of "fair use" clause in their terms of service. This means that if a casino believes a player is abusing their platform, they reserve the right to block or suspend any accounts. These clauses are often vague, so it's hard to know exactly what constitutes as "fair use", but faucet and bonus farming are two forms of abuse that are fairly common and clearly against the rules. While there's nothing wrong with playing the casino games for free, some people will go to great lengths to get as much money out of it as possible. This can include setting up multiple accounts and using them simultaneously, or opening new accounts every time they're blocked so that they can continue farming without having to wait for a cooldown period. Casinos are aware of these tactics, so they often employ algorithms that detect suspicious activity and suspend or ban players who abuse their platform. So it's important to know what qualifies as fair use before you start using a casino's services.

The hypothetical question of whether Bitcoin could survive a nuclear attack is really impossible to answer. Both sides of the argument have merit, but it's impossible to know how an extensive nuclear war would affect our society, let alone the technology behind Bitcoin. For example, would it be a limited strike or full-scale? How many nukes are we talking about here? Would it be targeted at financial hubs like New York City or London, or spread out across the globe? Would banks and other financial institutions survive? What would the world economy look like?

Ultimately, the answer is that it's impossible to know. Even if the internet survived a nuclear war, which is very unlikely, there is no way of knowing how much damage would be done to our society and infrastructure.

The size of the shadow cast by an object is the same size as the object regardless of how high it is above the ground. That's because the sun is very far from the earth, so the sun's rays are effectively parallel when they reach the surface of Earth. The only difference you will notice is that the edges of the shadow are less sharp the further away the object is from the surface.

Yeah. It's been a while since I've been following the daily wagering contest, and this is my first time seeing someone betting so aggressively. He probably has great experience with freebitco.in and knows exactly how freebitco.in algorithm works, and he uses it to his advantage. Just hope he doesn't get too much into the game and don't forget what he is playing for.

Commercial antivirus software can only do so much to avoid these threats because most of them are designed to be as discreet as possible. Until they are caught in the act by AV software, they can carry out their malicious activities without being detected. All it takes is one bad software or email attachment to infect your computer with malware that could cause serious damage. In order to avoid these kinds of situations and make your Bitcoins or other cryptocurrency even more secure than it is now, first you should use a hardware wallet. A hardware wallet is similar to a software wallet, but unlike it, hardware wallets cannot be easily hacked (as of yet) and they are also immune to keylogging software. In a nutshell, hardware wallets are one of the most secure ways of storing your Bitcoins and other cryptocurrencies for many reasons. The main reasons for that are that a hardware wallet can not be hacked remotely and, like I have said before, it is immune to all keylogging software and other malicious scripts. Of course, you may bring your hardware wallet with you wherever you want and you will always have instant access to your Bitcoins and other altcoins stored in it.

So, if you're the lucky winner of the lambo, remember to cash out your Bitcoin. 

Either way @soslex, it's up to you! Do whatever makes you happy. Just remember, you might be sitting on hundreds of thousands of dollars now, but that could be worth a million in no time.