Assuming theymos accept the patch at all. 

Still, it's a great initiative, @PowerGlove, and It's great that you've designed something to help make Bitcointalk a better place. It's not a trivial amount of work. I hope that the patch, if it is accepted by theymos, will be implemented into the forum software.

Why do you think such a subforum would be beneficial? It would be a bad idea in my opinion. There are already some good threads that you can check out if you want to read a bit more about Satoshi. Just follow the white rabbit.

• My investigation on satoshi
• "Who is Satoshi?" Should we put an end to this discussion?
• Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
• Was Satoshi from USA? (during 2009-2010)
• Who is Satoshi Nakamoto?
• ...

OP, besides these 3rd party archives that Rikafip mentioned, you can find some of your posts (even deleted ones) inside your drafts page.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=drafts

He should be banned for repeatedly violating the forum rules by ban evading (while begging for an unban of his main account).

I remember noticing Crypt0S0ul from the Reputation section. These are some of the topics he started:

Does He evade Ban? Is It Sufficient Proof?
Three Connected Accounts || FanEagle - darewaller - Captain Corporate
Need Community Feedback About Exposing Old Accounts
tomos81 Changed Hands?
CPNpr Changed Hands?
Merit Abuser || Bounty Cheater || Alt farmar

And all this while he was ban evading himself. I think it says enough about the kind of person he is.

Elon Musk is arguably one of the most successful entrepreneurs in the world, and if anyone can take a risky venture and make it viable, he can. I think, however, that I have more faith in the community and the development of bitcoin and its adoption as the reason why $100K is achievable in the future. Whether Elon supports it or not, it won't change anything on my side at all. Now Elon is a joke to Dogecoin, but he can't do it with Bitcoin and he shouldn't be.

With Bitcoin gaining popularity and different businesses around the world accepting it as a means of payment, cryptocurrency exchanges will still be needed to make the whole process more accessible and easier to use. That is because a lot of people are still new to making transactions using digital currency and even if in the future, when everybody would be using it, the process would still need exchanges for them to trade their bitcoins into fiat (digital) currencies. The reason why is because it will always be useful for businesses and individuals to convert between the local fiat currency and their preferred cryptocurrency.

According to his post history, @len01 is a clear case of a signature spammer. Your post history looks much different, so you shouldn't be comparing your posts to his.
You'd better open your own topic and ask the moderators for their opinion, because I don't see any particular reason for deleting your posts. It's possible that the moderators made a mistake in their assessment. They're only human, after all.

And what about the individuals who fight against spam? Don't you think that is also one of the most thankless, time consuming and frustrating jobs out there? I think it is. And it's not just the job itself that's tough, but also the posts you have to deal with on a regular basis. Those people also deserve our respect and appreciation because they work hard to keep the forum clean and safe.

That's a bad example. It has already been discussed here showing that it was probably an alt account of the same member.
You still haven't shown any examples to prove your point. Please show me an example of a quality post from a newbie member that you think was under-merited.


So what exactly was the point of this thread? You accused senior members of abusing the merit system and being selfish, but now you say that wasn't your intention?

I won't have any thoughts when all the bitcoins are mined... because then I'll be dead for a long time. Unless something miraculous happens, of course!

If you are really putting yourself in the right mindset to quit, you can do it anytime. No money needed if you don't want to spend it. As long as you're sure that you don't have a gambling problem, then there's no reason why you can't have a bit of fun with it. If your gambling is causing financial problems, then it might be time to take a step back and reevaluate your relationship with the casino. That's why it's important to have fun and enjoy yourself in the process instead of trying to win big.

In any case, it's a very good idea to take a break after such a big win rather than rushing back in and immediately putting money on the next game. Do whatever makes you happy, but you don't want to get burned out or lose your edge. The next time you play, you'll be more focused and disciplined because you'll have had a little bit of time to cool off.

I understand that some people might want to change their critical account passwords frequently, but I don't think changing crypto wallets on a regular basis would be a good idea. It would be like changing your phone number or email address every month. It would be extremely inconvenient and would make it much harder for people to reach you. Furthermore, the frequent transfer of all coins and tokens creates added risks. The more times you move your coins around, the greater the chance that something will go wrong.

I think it would be safer to have a few major wallets for different purposes. For example, one wallet could be used for day-to-day transactions, another wallet could be used for long-term savings and investment, and another wallet could be used exclusively for ICOs.

I'd like to continue arguing in favor of leaving history on the forum intact. If we delete a user's account and its past posts, then we not only run into issues with referencing those past posts but also with preventing the community from viewing and accessing any questions that were answered by them. As such, admins should only delete a user's account in the case of extreme misconduct; deleting them simply because they left the community is not grounds for removal.

The same goes for influencers - people who have a strong following on social media or blogs and whose recommendations carry weight with their audience. Anyone can tweet something, but if it's someone who has a significant following, then it's more likely to be noticed and can get a lot more attention. If people see something on their timeline that they agree with or find interesting, they'll share it with their own followers. If enough people do this, then the tweet becomes more popular and is seen by even more people. Projects that otherwise no one would have heard of can now enjoy a burst of interest just because of a celebrity endorsement. It's a symbiotic relationship, benefiting both parties.

It's my understanding that every wallet, hardware or software (mobile), needs a private key to be able to sign transactions. The private key is most likely stored internally in encrypted form that requires your password or pin to unlock the wallet. Passwords/pins are not a substitute for private keys but an additional layer of security. If someone gets access to your wallet, they won't be able to use it without knowing your password or pin. However, what you should take away from this is that if someone manages to get a hold of your private key, they can access your funds without needing to enter your password or pin.

In light of all of this, I think it's safe to suggest that a hardware wallet is the best choice for long-term storage of your cryptocurrency because it's an offline device that keeps your private keys safe from hackers. It also protects against issues like malware, which can steal your coins if private keys are stored on a computer or phone.

Yeah. I think the same. And some people make the same mistakes over and over again. The last pump didn't last long and many people lost a lot of money. I don't understand why people think this time will be different?

Overall, the choice between a traditional casino website and a mobile app is an individual one. They both offer a different set of advantages and disadvantages, and both can be useful depending on your preferences and circumstances, and if you are in the market for an online gambling experience I recommend that you weigh all the options before settling on what's best for you.

In short, casino apps are great for those looking to play casino games on their phones and tablets and to have fun and play the casino’s games on the go. On the other hand, some casinos don't offer an app at all, and instead direct players to their website. The website is still an excellent way to play online casino games, but it's not as convenient as having an app on your phone or tablet. But, at the end of the day, I think a web-based casino is a better option if you ask me.

Bitcoin has been a long road, one filled with its fair share of criticism and danger in the past. But now things are different. Bitcoin is slowly becoming mainstream and will make its mark on history as one of the most important inventions in modern times. It's also one of the most secure forms of payment available today, which makes it a great choice for those looking to protect their assets.
The world is changing, and Bitcoin is at the forefront of this change, but Bitcoin's success is definitely due to its users. It's up to you whether you want to be a part of this change or not.

Yeah. Investing in bitcoin today is a bet on the future. One shouldn't expect to make quick gains, but instead should invest in what one can afford to lose. Bitcoin has proved to be stronger and stronger with every bull run in its history. Every time it hits a new record high. The $100 investment will grow in time, provided you are patient enough to hold it for at least 3-5 years.

But I would still recommend the DCA method, i.e. invest gradually in small amounts over a period of time. This way, your investment will grow steadily over time and will be less affected by market volatility.