I agree. I know it might sound a bit harsh and maybe insensitive, but the more I think about it, the more it seems to me that suicide as a way out is only for cowards. Then again, I've never been in that kind of situation, and I hope I never will be, but I believe that no matter what life throws at us, we have to gather our strength and face it head-on. That's the only way.

I gotta say, I don't agree with that. For starters, USDT and other stablecoins are still considered cryptocurrencies, no matter how you slice it. They're not officially backed by any country or central bank, so comparing them to fiat currencies just doesn't fly. And as for KYC, it's not just limited to fiat casinos. Any casino with a legit license from an authorized institution - whether they accept pure crypto, pure fiat, or a mix of both - will require KYC from their players if it's mandated by law.


No, the math is: No license = No government = No regulations = No KYC.

I believe that this graph is not an accurate representation. For example, some online casinos accept US dollars, British pounds, and euros, while others may accept currencies such as Canadian dollars, Australian dollars, Japanese yen, etc. All of these are fiat currencies used in various regions around the globe. So it goes without saying that players from different countries will prefer to use their own currency to play and make transactions. While the USD is likely the most widely used, the significance of the others should not be overlooked. For instance, I would never use the term "USD gambling" in my search.

It is truly sad to hear of such tragic cases of suicide due to gambling addiction and debt, and it is worrying that some people feel trapped and helpless in their situation and see suicide as the only way out. While it may seem simple to say that debt can be solved, the truth is that for some people it can be a huge burden that they feel they cannot overcome. We have to admit that we don't know what others are going through. Everyone's circumstances are unique and we never really know what someone feels inside and how deeply they struggle.

In situations like this, I think the people who can make the most significant difference are those in the immediate environment, such as family members, friends and colleagues. They need to be there to listen to their struggles and give them support and encouragement to seek help. Suicide is never a solution and only leads to more pain and suffering for the loved ones left behind. That's why we should all make an effort to support and care for those around us, especially those who may be going through difficult times.

Thanks for sharing the list of finalists and the odds for the contest winner. It's interesting to see Finland and Ukraine also have strong odds for the win. However, I'm curious as to why the odds for only a few candidates were shared. Is it because those are the only bets available on your platform, or could you provide odds for all the finalists?

It's a common misconception that an AI cannot predict the outcome of sports events with accuracy. In fact, there are several companies and organizations that use AI algorithms to analyze data and make predictions on various sporting events. For example, the sports data company Stats Perform uses AI to analyze data on various sports such as soccer, basketball, and American football, and has been shown to have a high level of accuracy in predicting outcomes. Additionally, Google's DeepMind has developed an AI that can predict the likelihood of a player scoring in a soccer game with 48 hours of training data. These examples show that AI has the potential to be an effective tool for predicting sports outcomes.


Of course, AI predictions are not perfect. The algorithms used are only as good as the data they are given. sports events can be very unpredictable, with factors like injuries and unexpected performances from players or teams that can impact the outcome. So, while AI can be helpful in providing information and guiding decisions, it should not be solely relied upon when it comes to sports betting or making predictions.

It might be best to send them an email to their designated official address. You can locate a contact form in the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section of the website.

Oh, pardon me! I must have missed that this is your own personal playground and not a platform for public discussion. Clearly, everyone should just keep their opinions to themselves and not engage in any public discourse whatsoever. And hey, guess what, Sherlock? People are allowed to have their own opinions, whether you agree with them or not! Shocking, I know. But let me make this clear - there is absolutely no justification for calling for violence or issuing death threats against another member of this forum. I don't know what kind of sick individual you are, but it takes a special kind of coward to hide behind a keyboard and spew such vile words. I highly doubt you would have the courage to say those things in person. It's easy to feel safe and powerful in your mom's basement, isn't it?



All this time and you still haven't learned how to use the forum properly? Pathetic.

Thanks! I see it now.


I swear that I saw 20.00 USD there just a minute ago... No matter, $100 is way too high and too risky for me. I'm not comfortable depositing that amount just to try out a new gambling platform that has no reputation in the community.

How did you find out about the minimum deposit with BTC of $100? I'm still trying to verify their latest claims regarding fees, but to no avail. When I try to deposit BTC, all I see is this:



Either they completely disabled BTC deposits (other currencies work) or they use a crappy payment processor.

---

edit: fixed image

In that case, something is wrong with your payment processor.
I don't know if you have adequately tested your deposit process, but here is a concrete example:

Let's say I want to deposit $50 worth of bitcoins. This is what I get when I access the deposit page:



And when we convert that amount back into USD according to the current exchange rate:

(thanks to preev.com)

So, can you help me understand where that extra 44% ($22.29) difference went?

---

The 0.5% fee wouldn't be much of an issue if it were accurate. But the actual exchange rate being charged is outrageous, as evident from my example.

Btw, as far as I understand, they use nowpayments.io payment processor on their website.

---

edit: fixed images

Hmm, I'm not entirely sure if seed phrases were even around back then. I'm not sure when the first HD wallet was introduced, but as far as I know they weren't around in 2009.

I don't think it's a big deal if people use the Bitcoin protocol to create different things. It's open source, so anyone can do whatever they want with it. And honestly, I'm cool with there being a bunch of centralized exchanges, as long as people can choose which one they want to use. Ultimately, the market will decide which ones succeed and which ones don't. It's kind of like how multi-party democracy works in many countries.

If there was only one entity that controlled everything in the Bitcoin ecosystem, then that would be an example of centralization. It would mean that all decision-making power and control would be concentrated in the hands of that entity, and users would have little or no say in how the system operates.


I totally agree with you! But still, everyone should be able to choose what works best for them. Some folks might be into DEXs, but others might prefer centralized exchanges 'cause they have some cool perks that DEXs don't. It's totally up to each person to choose which exchange they wanna use based on their own preferences. The same goes for payment processors used by merchants and other services on the Bitcoin network. And that's one of the great things about open source - it allows for a variety of options and choices for people to use and benefit from.

Bitcoin and many other cryptocurrencies are meant to be decentralized, meaning that no single authority controls them. That's what makes them so unique and trustworthy. Introducing a centralized institution to oversee new projects could be seen as going against that principle. Any solutions to address scams and fake projects should be done in a way that doesn't compromise the security and integrity of Bitcoin.

We don't care either, so why this topic?

By the way, DireWolfM14's negative feedback on your account was within his rights and consistent with the standards of this community, and I think it was justified. If you don't like it, you're welcome to seek a loan from another source.

Hahaha! You have a great sense of humor!

I'm not sure what your investment portfolio looked like in 2009, but it's safe to say that Bitcoin wasn't a part of it at the time.

Have you tried contacting the customer support of the platform you sent the funds from? What do they say?


May I know how you were able to track down the Litecoin wallet (presumably the address) where the funds are being held? It's worth noting that it's possible for an address to receive funds even without a corresponding wallet created for it. This means that there's a chance that the funds might have been sent to an address that no one has access to.


It would be best if you directed that question to the platform through which you transferred the funds.

Yeah, that's right. The address is actually for an office building in Hong Kong that people can rent office space or virtual offices with all the business and administrative services. But here's the catch: without the full name of the company, they won't be able to receive any mail or packages. Loads of other businesses and offices are also located there, so the courier won't know where to deliver your stuff without the specific company name or office number. I have a feeling that they simply copied the t&c from another website, and then removed the company name from the address but kept the rest of the information.



It seems like the guy wants to keep his identity hidden, which is kind of weird considering that they are giving out a physical address for the company.  

---

Oh, I see. You're just going to completely ignore all the serious questions being asked here? Well, that's just fantastic. I mean, why bother being transparent when you can be as shady as possible, right?

Yeah! It's quite common to see this on this board. Many users tend to respond to posts without taking the time to read and understand the actual topic of the thread. It can be frustrating to see this kind of behavior... 

And to answer so98nn's post, last time I checked freebitco.in has no wagering requirements on our deposits. (We are not talking about bonuses here.)


+1

As for merit, I've got you covered.

Newdice, you continue to avoid answering some important questions regarding your gambling site. For example, why is the chat filled with bots and it is impossible to communicate normally with other players?

Check out these screenshots:



Can you explain that?

---

edit: fixed images