In what way, genius?  Got any actual relevant comments or clarifications with all your medical field expertise?

One suspects probably not.  You'll just go get whatever happens to be in the needle because big brother loves you.

Both of my statements are compatible and identical.

Neither of your statements are correct:

1) adenovirus is a DNA virus.  It's genome is DNA.  RNA has nothing to do with things.

2) I said 'alongside' (not '+') as in the adenovirus DNA+designer DNA packages lives as a plasmid ALONGSIDE the subjects own chromosomal DNA inside of the cell nucleus.   The 'chromosomal DNA' does not pass through anything.  It is always in the nucleus.  The adenoviruse DNA+designer DNA package 'transfects' the cell and brings the new DNA package into the nucleus.

You 'program' the cell with either DNA or RNA.  If you do it with DNA, a copy is made to RNA first.  RNA gene therapies use RNA directly where DNA ones rely on the normal celular machinery for transcription.

If a cell isn't normally programmed to make SARS-cov-2 spike protiens and you feed in a program to make it do so (via either RNA or DNA) it is 're-programmed'.


It vectors designer DNA into the nucleus.  The 'non-replicating' part means that new copies of the DNA are not made within the victim's body;  only the DNA which is injected in (as part of the hacked adenovirus genome.)


Yup.  That's what I'm saying.  It's not 'debunked'.  That's how this form of gene therapy works.

---

Ever notice that the so-called 'doctors' on this forum don't come to your defense franky1?  You know why?  It's because your are wrong and you are an embarrassment.  I'm sure they don't like it that you are getting your ass kicked, but there is not much they can do.

You made the accusation that I claimed ribosomes process DNA.  You find the quote upon which you made this accusation.  I know how this stuff works so there is no way I would have made such a statement.

Obviously you have no compunction about pulling anything you think would make some point straight out of your ass.  It need have no basis in fact or logic for people like you.  To people like me who are careful and precise it's disgusting, but for your type it seems to be part of your religion or something.  You guys actually seem to take pride in lying if people fall for your bullshit, and if they don't you get indignant about it.  Passive/aggressive little fuck-tard.

Still waiting for the quote where I said ribosomes process DNA?  Whassa matta?  Couldn't find it after making the accusation?  Thought so.

As usual, you are trying to imply that I said something which I did not.  I never said that 'DNA goes through the ribosome' and you will not find me saying so which is one of the reasons you won't provide a quote.

I'll go ahead are break this down for the benefit of those who might be wishing to inform themselves about the technology before getting the injections:

The RNA is typically copied off of the DNA so it codes the same information.  It's like me taking one .mp3 song off an album collection from my HDD (DNA) and putting it onto a thumb drive (RNA) for transport to a mp3 player (ribosome).

 - RNA vaccines gene therapies (Pfizer, Moderna) are basically the shot being the thumb drive with the song on it and getting it into the cell somehow.  The 'song' then plays on the cells player (the ribosome.)

 - DNA vaccines gene therapies (AstraZeneca, J&J) are basically the shot giving you a whole album in the form of an animal virus.  Some of the songs on the album were synthesized in their lab.  The virus then inserts the whole album onto your central hard drive (cell nucleus.)

    -  The designers expect that from time to time you will load up the right song from the album they gave you, put it on a thumb drive (RNA), transport it to a player (a ribosome in your cells cytoplasm) and it will make their music.

    - When the player makes their music, the cell starts expressing parts of the SARS-cov-2 virus.  Your immune system is then supposed to recognize these virus parts and develop an immune reaction.

As I said in an earlier explanation, it's fairly unknown what the regulatory mechanism is which keeps the song from playing to often, or keeps it from playing long after it is needed.  If the developers even tried to figure this stuff out it's a trade secret.  It seems like they intend to answer some of these questions simply by seeing what happens to the people who got the jab.

---

Now to a contentious issue about 'changing DNA':

The adenovirus vector delivers DNA to the nucleus but it is supposed to be in it's own self-contained little ring (plasmid).  It is not supposed to mix with your cell's chromosomal DNA.  You could think of it as the chromosomal DNA is on the C: partition and the new album data is going onto the D: partition.  That's the theory anyway.

It is worth note that the RNA platform folks (Pfizer, Moderna) point out that the advantage of their methods are that it avoids the danger associated with the DNA platform (AstraZeneca) of unintended mixing of the synthetic DNA (their special song) with the chromosomal DNA.  Whether this is a real danger or a marketing ploy I do not know.  If adenovirus never mixes with chromosomal DNA, it's probably a fair bet that this theoretical danger is not that big a deal with the AstraZeneca gene therapy I would say.  I've not run across research on this one way or another.  But there are plenty of OTHER dangers which have nothing to do with genetic material mixing.

---

Edit:  Important note on dis-info agents and plants.

Be very careful of ANYONE saying the vaccine will 'change your DNA'.  It is a well known and obvious psychological warfare technique to insert agents who pretend to be on one side but who's purpose is to sew confusion.

IF someone wants to point out the 'danger' of 'changing people's DNA' they need to either present it as a theoretical danger OR they need to link to high quality and credible research demonstrating this occurance.  I've not yet seen that happen.

There are well meaning people with valuable technical information who might 'slip up' and take things farther than they should, but for the most part if I see someone actually say this without proof I write them off of my list of credible persons.  It is VERY common for someone who may or may not be well meaning titling a vid something like 'scientists say it will change your genes', but when the content is viewed, the scientist said nothing of the sort or simply talked about the theoretical dangers.

Probably the most critical thing to understand about this whole scamdemic (and almost every other event of importance) is the informational warfare element.  It's sad but true.  The good news is that this element works similarly across a wide variety of situations so when you understand it in something like 9/11, you more or less understand it for the covid-19 scamdemic.  Understanding these informational warfare techniques is a valuable and necessary skill here in the world of 2021 even more than ever.

I really appreciate content at this level of detail.  It gives a person a good starting point for research should one decide to do so.  Thanks!

(BTW, I'll be sad if you lose in the upcoming Russian Roulette game vis-a-vis human trials for the gene therapy developments.  More so than or most people since I've got a lot out of your input here over the years.)

Gah...'NPR Cadence' propaganda that had me fucked in the head for 30 years and still afflicts most of my friends and family.  I background listened to a fair bit of it.

Here's the problem:  I live in a country with a president who is, for whatever reason, not a favorite of the 'globalists'.  I see wild stories from Western state-sponsored propaganda outlets like NPR and all of the corp/gov media rags about how the guy is running around shooting people in the head for not wearing masks and blah, blah, blah.  The problem is that I am on-the-ground and can see with my own eyes that it is completely fabricated horse-shit.

I take anything from the corp/gov mainstream media with a heaping tablespoon of salt, and especially when they are trying to color-revolution some country in furtherance of the global government project (which is about all that foreign policy is these days.)

There has never been a globalist program more pernicious and devastating to the world than the current globalist 'covid-19' scamdemic.  Any 'leader' playing ball with it is a traitor to his/her people and nation as far as I am concerned.


The globalists are big into commie style genocide and ethnic 'population movements'.  Sounds like the bitch's 'election' was a big boon for their operations and she wasted no time getting right to work.

---

BTW, Myanmar was on my short-list of places to go to escape the inevitable controlled demolition of the U.S..  I sort of wrote it off because I anticipated that the Globalist would use the Chinese boots that they control to pave it over in construction of the 'belt and road' program.

So, I never really put a lot of research into the politics and history of Myanmar.  I would like to have a 'third option' and it is still on my list of countries to look into.  I'm relatively serious that a 'military junta' is not, to me, a negative thing compared to a globalist-friendly 'democratically elected' leader.  What the global mainstream media says about one faction or the other means exactly ZERO to me.  I do my research using other mechanisms.

Not as Israel-first as Trump?  Um...that's not...exactly...a compelling endorsement.

Biden is so incredibly filthy that the chances of the Israelis not having a ton of dirt on him are nill.  Nobody could get the U.S. presidency unless he was owned by the chosen, but Biden is surely over-qualified in this respect.  If the Israeli's told him to bomb Iran it would happen within hours.  And it well might.

The particularly nasty ones often pass themselves off as something else.  Often 'Catholic', and when so usually of the 'Jesuit' variety.  Some say that that sect was created by and for 'conversios'.  I wouldn't pretend to know.

Anyway, let's say it is true and my source (the Jerusalem Post IIRC) is all washed up.  Even 5/18 is a pretty high ratio when one considers that Jews are supposedly 2% of the population.  That's 1/50 for the mathematically challenged.  Must the the superior intelligence that they go on about perhaps?  I'm sure it has nothing to do with influence from the financial sector and Jewish lobbying groups or anything like that.

The leaders of the world try out new programs in China first because it is a totalitarian dictatorship with good control over the people.  Then they roll it out to other countries: 

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/DFAjlBJAehdI/

When you bend over in order to fly the friendly skys, just remember, it's for the 'greater good' and to 'save Grandma'.

Actually, I expect that you will be given a choice:  This, or the Profusa injectable bio-sensor.

  https://profusa.com/injectable-body-sensors-take-personal-chemistry-to-a-cell-phone-closer-to-reality/

Choose wisely...if you even have a choice.

I'm doubtful that Israelis are getting 'normal' vaccines.  To the degree that they are, I'd bet money that the semites (Arabs and Sephardi) are getting it and the Khazars (Ashkenazi) are getting something else.  Prophecy calls for 1/3 of the chosen to eat the big one on the next round, but I doubt that this is the right time for that to go down.

For people who do not know, Israel is a pretty ethnic supremacist place.  I once asked an Israeli friend of mine the difference between Ashkenazi and Sephardi.  He said that the Sephardi are 'the dumb ones'.  He was joking...sort of...  To put things into American context, the Sephardi would be kind of like the 'spics' or 'niggers' to the pure-blood Ashkenazi.

The Sephardi are good for taking the blame for shit.  Like, say, some 10 year old Arab kid is set on fire and burnt to death by the settlers.  If it can be said that the perp was a Sephardi, it's the first thing which you'll read about in the mainstream (Israeli) media...you'll never hear of it in the U.S. media of course.

Pfizer's CEO, a veterinarian of Greek nationality, is a Sephardic Jew by the way.  He's the guy who, when asked if he got the shot, says that the Pfizer vaccine is not for 'his type.'  I anticipate a lot more mention of the guy's ethnicity when the true nature of the Pfizer vaccine is out.

That's sad.  Not surprising; just sad.

I have a pretty good understanding of how people work.  I borrowed the basic ideas from my knowledge of Joseph Gobbel's theories and practices and how the Nazi party motivated the German people both on their acquisition of power and maintenance of it.  Of course he didn't invent them.  The basic form of this propaganda is as old as civilization and governance.

Which happens to be exactly what I said.

The additional DNA added to the nucleus of whatever cell happens to get infected by the chimpanzee adenovirus spins off mRNA.  That RNA exits the nucleus into the cells cytoplasm, finds a ribosome, and instructs the ribosome to start pumping out whatever proteins the DNA designers intended.

BioNTech and Moderna's 'mRNA' gene therapy platform differs in that instead of having the cell transcribe the mRNA from the genetically engineered DNA transfecting the cells nucleus, they build the mRNA in the factory, wrap it in protective lipids, and get it into the cytoplasm only.  It's a somewhat more controllable process though it's still pretty random what types of cells in the body suddenly start going crazy and spitting out crazy shit.  Could be a neuron in the central nervous system, could be a cell which makes platelets for the blood, could be just about anything.  Random chance.  Whatever the case, the body starts to not like that whole class of cell...and you might get a healthy 56 year old doctor dieing in a few weeks of thrombocytopenia.

Now that we've established the basic function of the AstraZeneca (Oxford) DNA-based gene therapy platform, I'll take things a little farther.  This for the benefit of my 'developing-world' friends.  AstraZeneca is destined for the populous countries.  Rich people seem to be happy to dig deep into their pockets to get doses for the poor people.  That's mighty nice of them wouldn't ya say?

India happens to be one of the populous countries, and also for historical reasons associated with the empire upon which the sun used to never set is perhaps more aware than most of the kind of institution Oxford tends to be.  Small wonder the factory destined to pump out the doses caught fire.  Out of a billion people there will be at least a few patriots.

Anyway, we've established that the DNA plasmids introduced into the effected cell spin round-n-round pumping out mRNA which moves out smartly to coax the cells ribosomes into producing virus parts (and God only knows what else.)  The body is supposed to learn to fight these virus parts.

Ever read the story 'The Sorcerer's Apprentice'?  Ya, it's like that.

It's possible that Oxford has thought about how to regulate the process of RNA transcription and thus non-normal proteins to which the body has an increasingly strong immune reaction.  It's also possible that they have not and could not give a shit less.  Trade secret.  Lots of trade secrets these days.

If one is relying on 'government oversight' to make sure that Big Pharma is looking out for the victims of their wares one has not been paying attention.  And lots of people will pay for this oversight with their lives I'm afraid.  Many more with their fertility I would guess.

---

I'll keep warning the peeps of the dangers as long as you keep prodding me frank-n-beans.  Maybe longer; it's good for the soul.

Billions of species survived for billions of years without masks.  That would include hominids for the last several million until 2020.

If you want to survive and thrive with nasty mask-mouth and try to avoid the inevitable bacterial pneumonia which is only a matter of time for chronic mask wearers, then 'God Bless, Move Forward.'  It's a free country.  It was not uncommon to see masks in some societies in Asia, but it was more about pollution and a condition called 'allergic rhinitis' which is highly associated with over-vaccination.  I'll just keep my family away from scary sicko's like you.  All I would request is to Just don't ask others to live your unhealthy and paranoid nightmare.

LOL.  You are literally stringing together random words.


Never said there was.  That's a straw-man which is not even close to what I, or anyone else I know of, ever said.  There is synthesized DNA spliced into the adenovirus' DNA.  The adenovirus vectors it into the nucleus of the victim's cells.

This is not 'old' AstraZeneca tech.  It's how the current gene therapy trials that they are running on millions of victims work.

As funny as your random word soup is it gets old fairly quickly so it's not worth keeping.  Thanks for playing.  Time to call in your team leader and ask for a replacement for your whooped ass and for a re-assignment to a different subject because bio-medical is obviously not something you are up to.

For future reference, viruses don't have a 'nucleus'.  They are not even prokaryotes, much less eukaryotes.

Wrong again Bob.  Gene therapy is about re-programing the subjects own cells to be the 'facility' in which designer proteins are 'manufactured.'

 - BioNTech and Moderna do it by inserting designer mRNA into the cytoplasm to program the ribosomes to synthesize proteins of the designer's choice.

 -  AstraZeneca creates designer DNA, splices it into adenovirus DNA, then allows the adenovirus to insert the plasmid into the cell nucleus alongside the chromosomal DNA.  From thence it transcribes to mRNA which exits the nucleus, finds ribosomes to program and does the same as the above.

There are 'new vaccines' where the antigens ARE made in manufacturing facilities such as the 'subunit' ones.  None yet authorized for emergency use yet to my knowledge.  These are NOT gene therapies.  They are polished versions of ordinary vaccines as we have known them until 2020.

---

Since you didn't answer last time:

Anyway, adenovirus is a DNA virus and it is designer DNA which is spiced in to be vectored into the nucleus of the victim's cells.

Agree or disagree Franky1?  Anyone else care to argue that AstraZeneca is RNA?

Interesting.  That vaccine tracker used to I think, but even if not it's a commonly known fact that AstraZeneca is DNA and is put into the nucleus neither of which is done with the mRNA vaccines like BioNTech or Moderna.  At least that is not their claim.  Like I say, there is full court press to avoid mentioning that AstraZeneca is DNA to the non-technical classes, but that doesn't change the facts.

Anyway, adenovirus is a DNA virus and it is designer DNA which is spiced in to be vectored into the nucleus of the victim's cells.

Agree or disagree Franky1?  Anyone else care to argue that AstraZeneca is RNA?

My zero-research take on things is that if the previous bitch was a favorite with the globalists, the people will probably be better served by the military cleaning up things for a while.

If 'exercise instructors' can stop wearing a mask during physical exercise, alone, and outdoors, under the new 'military dictatorship' then it's very solid evidence that the military is more on the side of the peeps than was the previous globalist certified dictatorship.

It's the fault of Chinese, and the people who don't want to wear masks, social distance, and resist their vaccines gene therapy trials.  These are the people who are putting us in danger.  They need to be punished and forced into government compliance before they can harm us even more.  It's obviously just self-defense, and the government needs more and better tools to help protect us more.

I'm very glad we have a government which has been able to protect us through their wisdom and foresight.  A brilliant strategy such as wearing TWO masks, one on top of the other, proves that we have had the right man in Tony Fausti at the helm the whole time.  He just needs another few weeks to flatten the curve...and the 99% to get their jabs...then we'll be back to normal.  For sure this time.