Turns out that most people won't play Russian Roulette for no very good reason.  Who could have guessed?

The old folks trapped in institutions are easy because they are often senile and even those who are not are to weak to get away, and it's easier to write off the deaths to 'old age' or whatever.  The nursing home staff are staying away from the needle even more than regular doctors and nurses.  These staff have first-hand experience with the aftermath of influenza 'vaccines' and what that one does to oldsters and it's pretty easy to see that the new gene therapies posing as 'vaccines' are much worse.

It's starting to look like they are just going to 'do' the developed countries with vaccines since the West is already looking like a next-day civil war battlefield photo from the fallen vax victims.  I mean it's not like the slants, brownies, and blackies don't have the internet and cannot read. 

Even before the vax is here in my SE Asian country people are saying 'fuck no!' at a rate of 50% or so so I read.  The social media commentary seems to validate this.  I would anticipate that them's revolution numbers if 'they' force the issue.  These people have been on the wrong end of population growth limiting globalist vaccination campaigns for a while now and are not stupid about this stuff.

The bad news (to me) is that it probably just means that they'll do the developing-world culling in a different way.  Like Gates' mosquito vaccines or some such.

I know my own words very well because I don't make up shit.  I don't know that any of the vaccines commonly (or uncommonly or deliberately or accidentally) modify a person's chromosomal DNA.  Thus, I know I didn't say it does.  This is NOT what I said in the statement (which you've cut out again.)  This is NOT the only way to 're-program' a person's cell.

All of the DNA and RNA vaccines gene therapies 're-program' a person's cells.  This is fundamental to how they work and the designers and makers of the therapies are very proud of that fact.


Do just a tiny amount of fuckin research for Christ's sake!  This is basic and very commonly known.  AstraZeneca transfects designer DfuckinNfuckinA into the victim's cell nucleus using adenovirus as a vector.  It forms a plasmid there and spins off mRNA.
 
  https://www.verywellhealth.com/rna-vs-dna-vaccine-5082285

YOU are working with outdated info because adenovirus techniques have been used in certain older vaccine technologies.  The way they are use in gene therapy (splicing in designer DNA) is what is new here (AstraZeneca, Sputnik V, J&J, others.)

There is a reason why they are labeled 'DNA' here:  https://covid19.trackvaccines.org/vaccines/

---

Edit:  A bit more from:  https://www.who.int/teams/health-product-and-policy-standards/standards-and-specifications/vaccines-quality/dna


That really should be clear enough even for you frank-n-beans.  In fairness, it is somewhat difficult to see any mainstream media admit that AstraZeneca puts DNA into the victim's cell...and it's funny as hell to see them tap-dance around the issue.

I get most of my info from researching scientific papers where they don't normally have to play silly semantic games.  I can see how drooling retards like franky1 could be confused though.

Our two resident <cough>doctor<cough> friends probably learned something too complements of yours truly.  Haven't seem much of them lately.  The ones who claim to have gotten their so-called 'vaccines.'  Most real doctors won't touch the damn things.  At least those who figured out a way to work for real money in the West.

If 'space lasers' are in the U.S. military arsenal then they are 'Jewish', or at least that is a viable short-hand.

After 100 years of 'Jewish' central banking (lending thin-air 'money' to the government at interest) those who own the central bank own the country.  It's pretty clear once one understand the basics of 'Babylonian Money Magic.'

'Talmudic' would be a better term than 'Jewish', but that's imperfect as well.  'Jews', both religious and quasi-secular, are themselves tools of those at the top of the banker class most likely.

It is funny that some 2% minority can be a whopping percentage of the 'elected' government, the media, corporate board membership in our corp/gov form of control, etc, etc, yet it is bordering on illegal to even mention it.  Then we get one person elected to congress as a counter to the other 500 dick-eaters who gladly bend over for their 'Jewish' masters and she gets brutally attacked.

It kind of seems like there is a terrified fear of someone pulling on the one string on top of the bag of dog food which, when pulled, splits the top wide open.

Notice how one of the 'gifts' Trump gave us was equating Zionism to Semitism then making it illegal to criticize 'Jews' in any way (the first amendment to the constitution be damned.)  Notice also how Biden did NOT revoke that in his famous first day.  To busy plugging 'Jews' into practically every cabinet position available I guess.  It's not hard to see who he takes orders from, and it's only a little be harder to see that it is the same group who gave Trump his orders.  It's the people with the board member seats in the U.S. corporation.  And you could call them 'Jewish' without being to awfully wrong...although it could be a criminal act to think this.

Quit trying to obfuscate.  This stuff is not that hard.

 - The genetic material tells the ribosome how to make what protein.

 - The gene therapies work by getting custom genetic instructions into ribosomes.  When these custom made instructions 'execute' in the ribosome the ribosome pumps out the proteins that the designer coded for.

First you try to flat out deny things.  When that doesn't work you try to overly complicate with a bunch of nonsense.  Lack of capitalization and punctuation is feature and not a bug for a word-salad spam specialist.  Your technique is OK with me because sometimes it provides a good opportunity to make things clear and hopefully help a few people resist being injured.

---

Oh, by the way, I guess you gave up on trying to find one of the 'many' instances of me saying that the vaccines gene therapies modify the victim's DNA? 

Nope.  You run a program in memory.  It usually comes off the disk, but not always.  When you load up an mRNA into a ribosome it makes no difference whether it was transcribed off chromosomal DNA from the nucleus, plasmid DNA from the nucleus (AstraZeneca) or mRNA pumped into the cell via some gene therapy technique (Pfizer, Moderna.)

As for saRNA I meant what I said.  It is identified as so by the Imperial College developers and it means Self Amplifying RNA.  The idea is that you don't need to create and transfect as much mRNA because, via the 'secret sauce' of this developer, it spins off some copies of itself before loading into the ribosome.

You don't know what I'm talking about and you don't know what you are talking about.  You are operating at a very primitive level of understanding when it comes to this technology.

That's about the size of it.

I just found a new favorite congresswoman.  You go, girl!  It's about time there was one swing'n dick in the place to provide some balance against the ocean of dual citizen 'fellow whites' and their minions.  Amash is still fighting the good fight so it seems.

It's a particularly bad one since it says (and means) nothing about modifying the cell's DNA.

Try again.  It should be easy if there are so many examples.

What you found is, in fact, questions (with no answers) from a presentation of the principle scientist working on the (now defunct...for the Gate's 'first one' ailment) saRNA idea at Imperial Collage.  'sa' stands for 'self amplifying'.  After re-watching the presentation I see that at least the damage to the genetics of an infected cell is implemented as a segment of the designer genetic material so it can be hoped that not EVERY cell in the body loses it's ability to recognize and kill of instances where a cell has run amok, is pumping out virus parts, and won't quit.  The fact that the body has mechanisms to kill off such 'gone haywire' cells is a big problem for this form of gene therapy technology and it makes it so that boosters don't work for shit.


They do it by inserting designer genetic material inside the cell.  This designer code 'runs' in the ribosomes to produce designer proteins.  This is as close as it gets to 're-programming', and everyone on either side will describe it as such.

Nobody changes a 'whole chromosome' you nit-wit.


Tell it to ASGCT (American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy) trade organization which I linked to above.


Dead wrong.  I never said that and in fact I strongly cautioned AGAINST doing so unless it could be demonstrated.  So far it has not been to the best of my knowledge.

I have pointed out that retroviruses work by doing inserts of RNA into DNA.  Whether I ever mused that retroviral infections and reverse transcriptase molecules could splice in some of the designer mRNA from time to time (either by accident or design) I don't recall.  Someone should do it however.

This stuff is most relevant if it effects germ cells.  Someone (besides friends Epstein and Gates who fantasized about 'seeding future humanity' with their and/or their genetically superior friend's DNA) should probably be considering that as well.

https://www.asgct.org/research/news/november-2020/covid-19-moderna-nih-vaccine


'protein therapy' is plain old inactivated virus vaccines which have been in use for decades.  There are some fairly new techniques called, for example, 'subunit vaccines' which use synthesized proteins which were synthesized in a factory.  NOT by changing the genetics within one's cells and turning the cells themselves into a custom virus particle (and/or other protein) making factory.

Are you starting to get it now?

They are both gene therapy.  They both use genetic codes to hijack the cell apparatus and have it create designer proteins.

BioNTech and Moderna's mRNA techniques have been developed for a while as gene therapy supposedly targeting cancers.  At least that was the marketing pitch.  They largely failed because of the unanticipated effects.  So, what do to?  Add some adjuvants, call them 'vaccines', get the complete legal indemnification for damages granted to 'vaccines', and get the government to use their propaganda and legal apparatus to jam them into the peep's arms, and your product is all of a sudden wildly 'successful' and an endless fountain of profits.

AstraZeneca is almost the same as the non-multiplying mRNA ones above, but what they do is put designer DNA into the cell nucleus.  That then pumps out designer mRNA into the cytoplasm.  For how long it continues to do this is anyone's guess.  It will for sure stop when the victim dies.

This idiotic vid has been a gift which keeps on giving for a decade or so that I remember.  It tells you for sure that an uploader is a drooling idiot or a deliberated deceptive and disruptive actor.  Usually the latter.

I'm willing to entertain the notion that this is 'bill gates', or that the discussion has anything to do with 'vaccines' or 'fundamentalism' if there is even one tiny shred of evidence that either is true.  There isn't, and there hasn't been for a decade.  Anyone can take a random lecture, put up some laughable OSD and voice-over with none-sense.  At least the perps should try to get a lecture which is somewhat relevant to the scam in terms of presentation material and try to sync just a little bit better.  This is a joke, but it is very instructive about just how gullible the average person is.

As much as it pains me to say it, I cannot really disagree with this slimy little worm Harari's characterization of most people as 'hackable animals.'
 
  https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/dump-davos-1-data-colonialism-hackable-humans/

Enjoy your gene therapy because anyone who falls for crap like the above absolutely lacks the tools to avoid what's coming their way.  And fast.

Nope.  You are simplifying basic '101' levels of biology because it is easy and/or you are lazy.  There are bacteria which lack a lot of the basic machinery necessary for independent life as do viruses and rely on exploitation of other cells to perform basic biological functions.  One example would be mycoplasmas.  That does NOT make them 'viruses' although they do share some properties which are easily understandable with an understanding of their life-ways.

'Viruses' have long been used as a boogie-man to explain away other things which some people want hidden because viruses are difficult to study and understand.  The so-called 'Spanish flu' is a good example of this, and it works almost just as well 100 years later with the covid-19 scam.  But that doesn't mean that 'viruses don't exist.'

Although publicly accessible science has helped the public understand the details of various scientific and medical frauds on a technical level, other mechanisms are under development to offset the loss. One of these are psychological and social operations such as the 'viruses don't exist' operation which we are disusing now.  The 'flat earth' psy-op is a similar phenomenon.

I was distracted and doing a bunch of other things as I listened.  Will listen again when I have time.  Would like to find a vid without the input of that ignorant idiot who obviously threw away to many joints.

Mikovits is saying that no virus has the ability to make anything on it's own.  They rely on cellular infrastructure of the exploited host cell to do this.  That is an established fact.

Mikovits is saying that some viruses work by simply using, as their protective layer, a part of the host cell.  They steal it as bud off from the cell.  (Other's instigate assembly of the protective structure within the cell.)  That's just how they work.

Kaufman (a psychologist) is saying that because the virus contains part of the host cell it is not a virus.  This is like saying a bubble doesn't exist because it has a soap skin.  Kaufman probably is does know enough biology to understand this...and he knows enough psychology to understand that most people do NOT understand this.

What really gets under my skin is that, yes, Mikovits uses 'big words'.  This is because she is a domain specialist and 'can't help it'.  I know from painful experience how this happens.  Kaufman (the psychologist) understands perfectly well that a large percentage of people can be 'brought around' because they simply cannot understand 'big words' and their reaction will be rejection and be drawn to a simple, and often totally retarded and counterproductive message (e.g., 'viruses don't exist').

The appropriate response when one runs across 'big words' is not to reject them but to study them.  People who cannot or will not do that should simple go back to school rather than jump on some band-wagon of someone who simplifies things down to their level.  What really pisses me off is to see how clearly Kaufman understand and exploits the psychological dynamics here.

Mikovits is a research scientist.  Not a medical doctor.  Use the right script from the notebooks that you've been provided for use in this persona.

 https://www.bitchute.com/video/oXLqKCVQWIPC/

Only watched half of this, but it's enough to add a lot of weight to the hypothesis that Kaufman's job is to sew a lot of confusion and he's distinctly on the side (and/or payroll) of the medical/industrial complex.  He's showing a lot of signs being deliberately dense about stuff which is really not that complicated for someone with a scientific background.

I've also been somewhat suspicious of Mikovits, but more and more I'm feeling like this is an artifact of the psychological operations against her which date back to things which happened a long time ago associated with the AIDS stuff.

Open-source almost all intelligence archives.  Take the data that anyone finds and properly adjudicate it in open court.

I suspect that Trump and a lot of other "American" politicians, bureaucrats, and contractors would qualify for death by firing squad upon rigorous completion of this work.  Others would be more adequately dealt with via incarceration.  Still others via citizenship revocation and deportation as undesirable aliens.

Accumulated evidence is not the only tool which currently exists.  Technology has brought us to a point where real-time evaluations of a subject are practical to the point of being admissible in court by the standards of the day.  The elite are sufficiently concerned about what they call 'the rats' gaining access to such technology that they will implement operations geared toward avoiding this eventuality.  If 'we' could somehow jump this hurdle we probably could have 'good governance' for about the first time in recorded human history.

Like I said, it is pretty much a prerequisite for being placed into the U.S. presidency.  Trump came up under the tutelage of Roy Cohn so there is probably no limit to what he was aware of on the perverted side.  How much he was a target of these creeps and a perp later on is unknown. 

One gets the impression that Trump kinda prefers a hairy beaver as a means of getting his rocks off (another reason why the left hates him), but not much to indicate he has anything against pedos either.  If he was diddling his daughter it could have been more of a religious thing than a sexual one depending on the age.  There are a lot of reasons to suspect that The Donald and his whole family are Sabbatean Frankists as well a lot of their friends and associates.

Yet another fake vaccination of a 'leader'.  At least according to the vid caption, and I've not spent any time trying to verify things.

 https://www.bitchute.com/video/adpwfuPepybi/

They absolutely could make things very much more believable and indeed, could hardly have made it look more fake.  They even have trick syringes with disappearing liquid if they want to use them.  They WANTED this out for some reason.  Again, the most logical reason would seem to me to be to warn some percentage of people not to get this fuckin thing.

These vids are in obscure places thanks to big tech censorship, and there are well tested ways to halt something from 'going viral' if it poses a danger.  People will only see this if they are actively scanning or more likely, if it is linked in a low-distribution social media channel.  Knowing who is availing themselves of what information also has some value and may be a partial explanation for the extraordinarily poor quality of the 'fake'.

I'd be pretty uncomfortable sharing my biological data with the 'authorities and their sub-contractors' and getting injections in Israel unless I was pretty darn sure that I was of a 'Khazarian Pure Supermen' blood-line.  Even the blue eyes and blond hair (and aerospace engineering degree) which got a person into Israel from the collapsing Soviet Union might not be enough to qualify as 'chosen' at the genetic material level.  Just sayn'.