I wondered where this little bitch went.  I guess when I mentioned on the feedback that he's a gullible retard and probably vulnerable (since he fell for the O_I_L_I_O fake doctor's scam here) someone tried hacked him.  And, unsurprisingly, succeeded.  Didn't thermos give him a commit bit on this forum once?  Lol.

I think it would be a good policy to kill off trust system feedback from an account which has been terminated.  Probably all of them since it would take human effort to weed through ones which an asshole like the dearly departed left simply because of a disagreement rather than as a result of a business transaction.  That would be for the meta board though, and I don't care enough to bother to suggest it.

Better understand and consider the 'Samson Option.'

Some people are sore losers, and technology (esp, biological) is such that it might be possible to get such an effect as a mishap of a development program.  For decades I have heard a fairly diverse set of people mumble a very similar fever dream about wiping out all of humanity if they, as an ethic group, feel threatened.  Or maybe even thwarted.  A sufficiently screwed up mind can conflate the two words.

Do you think that anyone did NOTE recognize this way back before this exersice went live?  I wonder how many dead children it takes before people understand, in general figures,  the numbers of souls that the game designers consider desirable.

The interesting thing is that seriously mentally fucked up people probably make BETTER technocrats than normal humans.  Those who don't cut deeply enough into their wrists and thus survive long enough to perform a useful function in the 'new normal' could well be one of the things being cultivated here.

In my analysis there is not a lot of difference between 'big banks' and 'government'.  'government' is, for all intents and purposes, the arm by which the financial powers exert their wills.

Everyone's situation is different.  Such a thing may make sense to some people but probably not for most.  I did so (for a variety of reasons) and am damn glad for it.

I anticipated that one of the Trump clan would have been running the show from 2021-> when I decided to leave, and that was a big factor.  Had I predicted Biden (or whatever degenerate the Dems picked) my decision to leave would have been that much easier.

The epiphany which caused me to split was that anyone who had a snowballs chance of being installed as U.S. president, and in most important seats in what is mis-understood as the 'US government', would be assigned the task of imploding what is left of the shell.  The only difference between it being the Zionists or the left-wing Luciferians who did the 'pull it' would be certain of their methods.

Good!  That adds credibility in my opinion.  I consider any service which even can operate in or interoperate with those who control the U.S. herd to be basically broken by default.

If one does find some U.S. based or operative service who is getting away with providing results, plan on it being a pretty transient affair.  For instance, Coinbase started out providing me with pretty decent service in their earlier days.  Ultimately, as they grew and got under the thumb of the USD banksters (or simply showed their true colors as the case may be) they became useless to me.  And I'm a completely non-criminal who paid all my taxes and didn't have a problem with KYC!

Other services in other countries have demonstrated to follow the same pattern by the way.  Relatively few countries have the political muscle to stand up to the enforcement frameworks controlled by those who use the BIS.

My opinion is that if one is a U.S. citizen the only realistic option to maintain some modicum of service is the partner with someone who is not a U.S. citizen and avail of whatever secure communications channels one might be able to find.  It's simply not worth the risk, cost, etc for most users.  But then most users won't really be bothered by the crippling policies that US hampered institutions will throw up either.

Datapoint about my friend's experience with Bitfinex recently:

 - A number of reasonably large USD transfers have gone through without incident over the last half year.  I would specify that it is without incident from Bitfinex's side...the banks themselves are chronic sources of grief and delay.

 - A recent incident with a new bank saw a wire be 'returned' by the bank to the sender, whatever that means.  The funds went missing.  After some legal threats to the bank, my friend got the tracking info.  Only then did friend bother Bitfinex support.  Upon doing so, they were very efficient and informative in tracking down the funds and getting them back to the appropriate wallet.

I've talked smack about Bitfinex over the years even though I've never been a customer.  I think it important to also relay positive information when the vendor does provide exemplary service so that is what I am doing.  As always, YMMV, but this is my friend's recent experience.

One interesting thing I picked up on from Ronald Bernard's interviews were that international sanctions are one of the main ways to get money moved into and out of the shadow banking system.  When he mentioned this it got me thinking about various observations and memories of the 10 years of sanctions on Iraq and the like.  His suggestion fits pretty well actually.

I have less confidence in who/what Bernard is than I have in the generals (and specifics) of stories he tells.  Many of them have great explanatory power.  And there are a variety of reasons why having fake people tell real stories could be of certain uses.  I have seen nothing which really convinces me that he is _not_ more-or-less legit either.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w12IksIQQn0

You will have chronic medical problems which could become acute at any time if you wear a mask a lot.  In addition to decreasing oxygen and increasing CO2,  mask trap, host, and re-circulate a whole ecosystem of microorganisms.  Especially cotton masks.  The trick has been to:

 1. claim that 'covid-19' causes every possible malady known to man.

 2. milk the early 2020 common cold out for a year with falsified data and mainstream media propaganda until people started to get good and sick from the masks then blame that on 'covid-19' (or 'covid-2[012345]') as well.

If you have to wear one as a term of employment, you are pretty well fucked.  It's just a matter of time before you fall.  I suggest to anyone in this situation to try to find a very thin mask made of some inert inorganic material and wear that if your employer doesn't pitch a bitch.  Hopefully you'll not be one of the losers in this phase of the game.

Like I said in a different post, I really didn't have the creative insight to recognize that a 'pandemic' could be completely fabricated.  I was anticipating a real biological weapon rather than a virtual one to get the games started.  My bad.

For me it is a case of the following:

 - Understanding the goals of people who end up in positions of power.  (Mostly these are names nobody will ever hear.)

 - hypothesizing that biological means of achieving some of these goals would be the most effective.

 - having hypothesized that an 'epidemic' would be the most workable means of achieving the fine-grained control which might be desired.  (I'll admit that the idea of a 'mock-epidemic' or 'scamdemic' did not occur to me.)

 - Having put years of research into vaccination issues which necessitated becoming familiar with the biological science in use for 'normal' vaccines which are bad enough.

 - Having observed and (correctly) identified enough of the predictive programming that by Q1 2020 I was confidently predicting that the fallout of so-called 'covid-19' would be mass testing of genetic methods which, in normal circumstances, would have taken a decade or two longer to test and deploy.

For me this whole thing has been a very unpleasant set of stepping stones along a path which I could see fairly clearly from early on in this scamdemic and before.  By the end there will be implanted devices which can be programmed over the 5G network to produce any genetic material in any person, and on an individual basis.  Complete control of who gets what 'programming' will be in the hands of what is euphemistically called a 'public/private partnership'.  I often call this 'corp/gov'.

India was relatively clear that Pfizer wasn't inclined to do the kinds of tests the Indian govt wanted (on India populations...every population has prevailing genotype issues, common regional infective threats, nation-wide nutrition and sanitation profiles, etc.)  If a government is doing their job right, they would be requiring such diligence.  That doesn't mean it was the whole story behind the rejection of course.

(Note that rotavirus vaccine works poorly in Indian babies because the mother's milk is particularly potent in that country.  The technocratic solution:  Don't breastfeed so that this one particular vaccine can work...and Dr. Paul Offit can get his royalties.)

AstraZeneca and J&J work by inserting custom DNA into the cell nucleus using viruses and letting the natural processes of the cell produce mRNA programmed to make designer proteins.  I'd want to see decades of real-world observations before taking such a thing.  Also, and very importantly, I'd want an independent analysis (and with adversarial independence) of every bit of genetics in every batch of 'vaccine'.  To say I don't trust J&J, who sold AIDS tainted blood products to other nations so they didn't have to dump it, just got found guilty of making carcinogenic baby powder, etc) is a VAST understatement.

Covaxin is plain old inactivated virus.  Even given that all such efforts (coronavirus vaccines) over the past 20 years killed the lab animals in startling numbers, I would still consider it the 'safest', and it looks to me as though all countries will have a small number of 'old school' vaccines.  I suspect for their 'elite' to use and still get their 'immunity passports' in case they are not elite enough to buy a private jet.

Noravax is a 'subunit' vaccine.  This is like inactivate, but it just makes antigen parts in the lab/factory (rather than re-programming one's own cells.)  This technology seems to me like it might hold promise for safer vaccines...which is all most of us so-called 'anti-vaxxers' really want.

Many of these folks consider themselves to be Luciferians.  Here's about the most suger-coated description of that belief system one can find (and it's the first thing one finds on Google.)

https://www.learnreligions.com/luciferian-principles-95784

Lots and lots of companies who had new drug or 'platform' that they wanted to test out for free (govt money, govt tracking, and legal indemnity) jumped on the band-wagon with 'covid-19'.  Obviously most had been in development for a while, and some of them are claiming that they got an infusing of extra money in the middle of 2019 to get ready.  Got it from the expected players (Gates Foundation, GAVI, etc.)

I follow this where they are tracking about 80 of these things:  https://covid19.trackvaccines.org/vaccines/

'Covid-19' is exactly the kind of problems that the 'vaccine' makers love to 'resolve'.  It's very easy to solve a problem which doesn't exist.  On top of that, there was gigantic amount of money and political pressure to build the non-problem into a scary monster in order to accomplish various things (economic devastation as a cover for shadow banking system problems, Gates' ID2020 digital identification program, etc) and a roadmap for having the monster disappear anyway (to be replaced by a series of 'waves' and 'strains' and what-not giving an additional benefit of a non-stop market for follow-on 'vaccines' as well as an easy out when the 'vaccines' don't seem to do shit for the 'disease.')

Many people have been scammed, and we're just getting started.

I agree with that.  The adjuvated ones (most of them) are more like nitro-methane and nitrous oxide for the immune system.  You have to drive the immune system into a state of confused overdrive in order to achieve the level of antibodies needed for regulatory approval.

It's very much like a manufacturer of piston rings and connecting rods (pharmaceuticals) having a side business of selling nitro-methane to dumb-shit kids to blast into their beater Honda.  Also having a 'tunning' side-business where the 'specialist' (doctor) chips the boost limiter to absurd levels.

The fall-out in the case of a car is that you get the dumb-shit kid into your store month after month for a new set of rings and fixes for their thrown rod.  In medical/industrial complex land it is repeat customers to try to deal with their multitude of auto-immunity issues.

Hopefully the same thing that happened to drugs when they were outlawed will happen to Bitcoin value-wise.  From a starting point of $40k when legal the value could easily go up into the millions when the supply-side drys up and newly minted 'criminals' are the only ones who can supply the desired item.

My bet 10 years ago was that BTC would be attacked by banking lobbies, their politician minions would make it 'illegal', and that was what would bring the price to high levels.  I really didn't expect to see $40k before this event.  I always welcome a pleasant surprise though.

At this point a LOT of non-criminals hodl, and some of them are quite well off.  I doubt that a criminalization of BTC would be very durable, and attempting one would spur many new communications channels between individual market participants.  Said channels and related 'innovations' could foster the exchange data of many types.

Yup.  That's how certain classes of viruses work including adenovirus.  That's why they are useful for transduction of DNA into the cell nucleus of a victim.  Here's just the first thing I pulled up which might help you understand the process better. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WX39LTVIEXQ

Maybe you are a person who fell for Kaufman's bullshit 'viruses don't exist' psy-op?  Or the flat-earth psy-op?  Or the global warming psy-op?  Gullible people who don't really have the mental machinery to understand basic science tend to fall for these idiotic things as a group.

'package' is a collection of genetic material.  In the case of AstraZeneca, it is genetic material from a chimpanzee adenovirus (a DNA virus) with additional DNA synthesized in a commercial scale factory facility now.

To 'vector', in this context, relates to moving a thing from point A to point B.  In this case, moving the 'genetics package' from the needle into the nucleus of some of the victim's cells.

HTH.

Wikipedia for 'transduction' has some nice diagrams which may or may not help you conceptualize things a little better, but since you don't seem to know the difference between bacteria and higher life forms, make sure you skip down to the part titled 'Mammalian cell transduction with viral vectors'.

"WANT TO LEARN ABOUT PFIZER’S CRIMINAL HISTORY?"

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/AXZwAghOkO04/

Happy Jab'n ya-all.

Looks like now over half of the American public is now wishing to either not get vaccinated or wait.  It's not just doctors and nurses who are having cold feet anymore.  For some reason 80% of the people on this forum who speak up cannot wait to get ANY injection no matter what technology it uses as long as it says 'covid-19 vaccine' on the label.  Go figure.

It's possible that Bitcoiners tend to be like Berwick (and me when I put on my evil hat) and do see a subtle advantage to be rid of the people who are stupid enough to trust corp/gov on this one.  Corp/gov did the heavy lifting to get millions of people so brainwashed, so why not go ahead and complete the cycle?

I said no such thing.  Quote it if you can.  You either misread something, or you are just making up accusations out of thin air again in desperation.

If you really are misunderstanding something it could be that there is a difference between 'the victim's chromosomal DNA' and 'the adenovirus and lab synthesized DNA'. 


By using the term 'package', I simply mean the gene payload of the hacked adenovirus DNA.  That would include genetic material native to the strain of adenovirus chosen and the synthetic genetic material to be ferried ('vectored') into the nucleus of the victim's cells.

I have no problem making corrections or clarifications.  Let me point out that the term used for using viruses to vector genes into a victims cells is typically referred to as 'transduction' rather than 'transfection' as I've occasionally used.

I don't remember either of them claiming to hold medical degrees.  Only two people I can think of who are currently active here claim to be working medical doctors and thus that their opinions carry more weight (while using their personas to advertise gambling sites and coin mixers.)