"* The DROIDZ-V2 2.5 Client is ready , I have opted out the blocking of previous versions due to users might not have enough clients on the network to get their client synced , none the less this will have the swap features.


sounds like you dont need to update yr clients to operate as seednodes.

hmm, well i'm not really interested in swapping the whole shebang of BARR. as amusing as that would be.
there is a quantity of the BUMBA premine that is still targeted for distribution. issuing those coins as swap/burn coins would be highly entertaining.

swapping Bumba for Barr could help strengthen both currencies apparently.

i have swapped names form this excerpt from your OP ..
  – If BUMBA offers an exchange for BARR and the BARR supply is only partially destroyed, then BUMBA and BARR can both benefit.  BUMBA can gain users and adopt the value of the absorbed coins which were burned, while BARR can continue with a higher value.

seems like a win win


edit.
although i believe you have a stupendous amount of BARR in the burn fund, that even if we did burn the entier current circulated quantity of BARR, you would attempt to keep issuing BARR until some time next century?

cool thank you.
i look forward to seeing it

well, that's good then


sure, but weird is good. lol

i'm considering offering to burn BARR for Bumba, i will have to look at teh figures and see what sort of ratio i can offer.

here's what i find positive about Cube.

good usage for buying real products, la stake stick wedgie Catbot etc.
positive people getting excited about Cube

and negative

- excessive interest/return that will require a much stronger cap to maintain health in the long term
- murky coin distribution, 
- lack of communication/transparency, not just the vague distribution method but also all through the stake sticks there has been an obvious lack of communication between spots and the purchasers, once the order has been placed no further communication took place - not even a "yes you're stakestick is in the mail". and of course the whole "anonymous" dev who never actually denied ever being spots.

i have compiled current git source into a mac OSX wallet

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5j8d4FSc7dreE1CM0FqQlNBUUk/view?usp=sharing

please enjoy

why are you burning coins with active devs ?

bowscoin dev posted on the 24th jan.
actively advertising goods for bowscoin.

just weird how you're promoting the death of shitcoins as a good thing, when you're working on a coin which is obviously alive and seems to have more going for it than BARR
ie you can use it to purchase real world goods.


edit.
lol please burn BUMBA. 20 million coins is obviously far too many in this day of shitcoin bloat

swap wallet sounds good,

it sounds like you should withdraw from trex as soon as possible, probalby dont stake.
when soopy will release a new wallet .. at this point old 2.4 wallets staking may fork.

ideally you should be able to use the new soopy wallet without having to resync from scratch, but if there is a 2.4 fork then maybe you will.

to prevent any worry of fork, you could probably withdraw to the 2.4 wallet, then just leave it switched off until the new wallet arrives, then it will sync from where you left off.

although, you should probably prevent all de wallets from staking.
the diff will probably drop, and when you turn on your new wallet to swap, the coins may have gotten old enough to stake almost immediately and then you will have to wait for them to become available again.

---
to prevent your wallet from staking add this line to your droidz.conf
staking=0


---
i just sent yobit a list of d3 nodes, seems they didnt have any :p

lol. ok.
there's a bunch of "suspicious" looking amounts being transacted during the early days, but i've been focusing on #1 cos it's so impressive.

here's how to look for "suspicious wallets dumping on your face"
peruse recent transactions on the chain  and look for amounts being withdrawn from staking wallets, trace that wallets origin back to see what how it was initially funded.
comparing the amount it was funded against time frame of coin including the then current coin supply.

it may be useful to look at exchange records to see when coins are dumped, and then see if you can trace those coins on the explorer

exchange addresses might be recognised by the outputs from the address, when you withdraw coins from an exchange, they can be inadvertently mixed with a bunch of other addresses,
this makes an exchange wallet look busy.

change addresses make this sort of work arduous, where change from a transaction go to a new address.
also the ability to get regular fresh deposit addresses from the exchange make it difficult too.

alternatively, start at the beginning, and look for largish transactions (for the time) and see where they end up.

there is software out there to help track coins, never even looked for it before, could be fun
hardcore analysis takes a lot of work.


.
at this point, you see a few features lacking on presstabs explorer,
it is a great explorer to see rich people getting richer, but it isn't so good at tracing dodgy transactions.

cryptoID explorers, for example, have a feature which links addresses that combine inputs into single transactions, this is a great way to trace exchange wallets.

staking age has always been capped at 100 days.

one thing i realised about my prior posts on staking, is that the minimum stake age (of one day) is deducted from coinage..

what that means is that superficially it appears that an input of > 10,000 coins could be staked daily for 2000% reward
(2% of 500,000 is 10,000)
however when you factor in minimum stake age being deducted,

a 10,000 Cube input would need to be 2 days old. 1 day for minimum stake age, and 1 day to get minimum coinage for 2,000%.


--
in other exciting news
#1 richlist

combined all coins into a single 234,409.9960  input, this then staked for a nice 12,865.3729 coin reward.

http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CUBE/tx.php?tx=fd0b14c3692731a4d6b180b3f19c06e15cc5255daba1700cd58e40a20e487f4a

-
input was created  01 Feb 2016 09:25:47
and staked            02 Feb 2016 09:28:09

after deducting minimum stake age of 1 day, that particular input staked in under 3 minutes.
it's coinage would have been roughly  time in seconds divided by a day in seconds
multiplied by input size of 234,409.9960

(142/86400)*234,409.9960 = 385

if that was after block 500,000 then it does not mean minimum requirements being under 10,000
instead it would have to been another 41 minutes older to meet those requirements.

however, because it would have been capped to 5,000 coins reward, it needed to be divided into 3 stakes, of 78,136
these then would need to be 1 day + 126 minutes old and each would have been received an uncapped 2000% return.

this splitting of stakes does unfortunately reduce compounding interest as the coins are taking "slightly" longer to stake and compound.

what this means, is anyone with sufficient amount of coins, will still be able to stake almost daily and get 2000% return.


but we're still a long way from block 500,000
would anyone like to guesstimate how many coins #1 will have by the time block 500,000 comes along?
and how many inputs it should be divided into to receive 2000%?

just remember to keep an eye on #1 richlist. http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CUBE/address.php?address=CZDkAUACJ1ntNdxhbpo4ut8eVDiymfd7NC

all coins were just combined into a single input,
it's next stake should be very impressive for Spots
(all coins were given away for free, including these with dodgy beginnings and no 'literal' claim or denial to ownership)

with 29% of the coins supply (total cubes in existence), the next stake should be one of the biggest ever.

yes. fork doesnt take place for a very long time

137686 blocks away at 30 secs a block, 47 days away ....

there is really no urgency in updating
or worrying about how your coins will stake,
or how you will have to manage anything to get 2000%
or how much it will influence coin supply ....




lolz. so many amusements.
i give spots full cred for his dedication though

lol you're quite correct.
i blame google docs, either that or my poor google doc skills.

i don't know how i managed to do coins twice. but i know i must have screwed up the thread links when i was doing an A->Z format and only did a set range rather than the entire page.
i thought i'd fixed it but obviously either i didn't or someone else is to blame.

at the moment i'm not doing any nodes. other than my own

mac wallet built
enjoy your OSX super turbo staking

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5j8d4FSc7drdHAxTGpsN1FJX3M/view?usp=sharing


..

for any appreciation ther is a STRB addr in sig link below

should make a new thread soon?

i just realised something glaringly obvious i missed. lol. amusingly foolish i feeel
i cant be arsed reading back what i wrote before and changing.. will do later. heh
i apologise for completely mis-understanding what i was talking about previously


all stakes under 10,000 stake age = 1 coin reward.

so for a 1000 cube input.
sstake age has to be > 10,000 ( 2% of blockheight, 500,000)
so should be greater than 10 days old to get the full 2000%

by that point, it's hard to predict the difficulty  and therefore how long a 1000 coin input will actually take to stake is an unknown?
it might take 3 days to stake, or it might take  month.  << then you will have to adjust how often you run your wallet

it seems quite hard to see what size stakes will be beneficial to rewards.


..
block height increases with about 20160 blocks per week or 2880 a day.
after block 500k
coinage requirements for 2000% will then increase by 403 /week (20160 blocks)

projecting then.
1 month after block 500k will be block (roughly) 580,640
coinage required will be 11612

for 1000 cube, it will take 11.612 days to get required age

for full 2000% reward the requirement is that coinage be over 2% of blockheight.
coinage is simply the staking input size * the input age, so 10 coins from 1 week ago has an age = 10 * 7

at block 500,000 that is required coinage of 10,000 (2% of 500k)
10,000 = 10,000 coins @1 day, or 5000 coins @2 days, or 3,333 coins @ 3days

reward is then based on size and 2000%/input age (as the annual 2000% is worked out depending on your stake age, 1 day is roughly 2000/365)

1 day is about 5.5%, all of those examples above should return similar rewards as it is then 5.5% per day. (eg 2 days is 11%)
then that reward (for 10,000) is 550. (5.5% of 10k)

to be effected by the cap.
a stake of 100,000 @ 1 day is necessary to be capped by the 1% of blockheight. max reward of 5000
(because 5.5% of 100k would mean 5500 - which is 1% of 550k)

other variations of coinage of 100,000 would be
50k @ 2 days
25k @ 4 days
10k @ 10 days

. . . . .
block height increases with about 20160 blocks per week or 2880 a day.
coinage requirements for 2000% will then increase by 403 /week (20160 blocks)

projecting then. 1 month after block 500k will be block (roughly) 580,640

coinage required will be 11612
reward cap will effect stake age of 116,128 and rewards of > 6387


PLESE NOTE these numbers are pretty loose.
daily stake of 5.5% is a closer figure to the truth than 5% but it is still not correct


edited fro clarity

bump for joy