Your port is set to 9332. Should be on one of these  for pool-x: 80, 8000, 8080, or 8337

edit: nvm, you already saw that.

You did nothing wrong, but whoever sent you these coins might have. Which is why we are all interested in hearing how you obtained those coins

Was this about the API?

If so (or even if not), Pirate, how often do you accept polling the API per day or per hour?

Perhaps you should have allowed multiple votes and rephrase the question to "what pools do you trust".  Being honest, if I understood what Ive read so far, is that p2pool is the most trustworthy bar none.
But I still voted for bitminter .

You dont mine x blocks per day. You produce x hashes per day. How many BTC that gives you depends on difficulty. Just assuming difficulty would remain stable is not very reasonable is it would imply the exact same hashrate would keep mining even at half the profit. Thats not gonna happen. I dont think anyone really knows what will happen though.

OS-X is actually a good reason to pay Apples premiums for a lot of people. 
I use linux myself, but I can acknowledge its not for everyone.  OS-X is actually pretty decent and the windows headaches it avoids alone would be worth the premium to me if I didnt have linux as an option. Add to that some pretty decent hardware and a hard/software stack that actually works together rather than fight each other, and one doesnt have to be crazy to buy one.

Likewise, ipad is still the best tablet out there IMO, mostly because of iOS. Android is catching up, but not quite there yet for big screens. 
RIM Playbook and HP touchpad could have been contenders if given time and a software ecosystem. I particularly like the playbook I ahmm.. played with. There is like no software for it, but Ive never seen a better GUI in my life.

iphones vs the competition is something else. Id say Android has become the superior option by now, and with a million implementations to chose from, iphone seems like a waste of money. A thing of the past, much like ipods.

Id certainly add bitminter to that list, and I have one concern with Slush; its not major, and I have no reason to distrust Slush, but I sure would like to see stats of shares submitted there. Must be the only pool that doesnt show it (expect for running round).

As for bitclockers, best I can tell their stats are still as fake as ever.
Maybe they thought faking a few short rounds would somehow be enough to disprove the mountain of evidence against them.

Where do I say I would expect compensation? The logical thing is not to pay out dividends since there would be no profit.

Still, if Goat for whatever reason, wants to pay out a dividend, he is free to give the company money out of his own pocket and use that to pay for one. But there is no reason that his willingness to do so, would somehow prevent him from providing transparent accounting data of actual revenue and costs to his shareholders. One has nothing to do with the other; goat makes it sound as if shareholders have to chose between a dividend and transparency.

Anyway, it sounds to me like this is not a company owned by shareholders, but more a long term mining contract thats being traded. If thats the case, other terms would be more appropriate.

Im in no hurry. bubble wrap will work. If it breaks, so be it.
Make my bid 5BTC shipped for the memory and cpus.

Really? Dont they fit in a bubble envelope? How much for shipping these along with the cpus?

2.5 BTC  if shipped to the EU.

2 BTC + 20 LTC
I assume you can put them in an envelope to send to the EU?

This.
To the above poster; rather than blaming hoppers for doing the mathematically sensible thing, you should direct your anger towards pool ops that (often I think deliberately) allow their members to be exploited, by not implementing a hop proof payout scheme. I say deliberate,  because they get their fees from hoppers and non stop miners alike.
 
TL;DR, You cant prevent hopping, you can avoid hoppable pools.

Im sure he does, but he wants to buy extra hashing power to hop with. Clearly that needs some predictable timing to work. If GPUmax ever makes that possible, it will have interesting consequences. In a way it would "democratize" hopping, since hoppers will bid for shares to the point they are profitable, and the profits will be distributed among all gpumax members.

Goat, you seem to be confusing a few things. Mining contracts and company shares for one, and full disclosure with a need for paying for revenue shortcoming as another.

Shareholders should not be forced to chose between full disclosures and you paying for shortcoming out of pocket.
Full disclosure of actual costs and revenue should be a given, its a legal obligation. Its one thing you dont follow all the fine print of GAAP rules, its quite another to not even attempt to follow *any* of its basic underlying principles.

Full disclosure wont prevent you from compensating losses out of pocket, should you feel thats wise.

For the record, you said "61.24 coins mined".  Apparently that was not very careful wording, since its just a hypothetical number.

Dividends are paid on a companies actual profits, based on actual costs and revenues, not based on  what one might expect if a certain business plan were to be followed - but isnt.  Share holders own a substantial part of your company, they are entitled to know exactly whats going on. Just making a blanket statement "12GH in theory ought to bring in x BTC so lets assume we did" is something quite different.

It doesnt matter if your losses due to downtime were offset by profits made hopping or from gpumax, it could be the other way as well, shareholders ought to know. Its not like Intel pays dividends based on theoretical costs and revenue with management pocketing (or paying out of pocket) the difference between theory and reality. The latter is what you do when running a proxy or pool as service to customers. Its not how you treat shareholder.

My 2 cents.

So you are buying hashrate from everyone else at 105-115% and making a profit on top of that by hopping and/or gpumax, but your own farm is only yielding ~98% PPS? Really?

How do your shareholders know you are not hopping with your farm, and frankly, why wouldnt you?

Since you have an obligation to maximize shareholder value, at the very least one would expect you to direct your hashes towards your GPUmax account where you will get significantly more than what you are stating.

You do remember correctly. If only linux would let ati and nvidia binary drivers coexist in the same machine, I would put some old nvidia card in my PC in a heartbeat for linux compatibility alone. It is a PITA with AMD .
Ironically, the OSS AMD drivers are maturing nicely, but useless for mining

Nice attempt at playing semantics; unfortunately, you fail. By your interpretation of the above definition, any ISP would be a bitcoin pool too.

Whats described above is not a definition of a pool, but an explanation of what pooled mining does. Its widely understood that a pool generates blocks. You dont.

And btw, until proven otherwise, neither does Clipse. If Clipse doesnt like being called a proxy service, then he should publish the blocks he has generated.

You should run that command every time you change the configuration, and obviously, only after youve changed it. Id also try with just 1 monitor hooked up first, or both monitors on the same GPU. Not sure how well LXDE handles multiple monitors on multiple GPUs.