They may not be as big as people think they are, that's the topic here. I mean if they were big enough then they would have done a million dollars worth marketing and listed everywhere and they would be doing awesome, who could have stopped them?

But, if they are not rich enough then what it is the point of it all? This is why I believe that we should be focusing on a bit more letting this place go and do whatever they want and not put them at a such high esteem. I get that there is a good chance betfury could grow bigger in the future, but for the time being their "bigness" doesn't match with how people see them and they do not have enough funds to do any of this.

Wagering here is great because of this exact reason. Why do you think they are getting so many wagering amounts and people wager here more than probably any other place or at least one of the top ones when they have such a huge house edge?

I mean in any other place if you say %5 house edge then people would run away but this place keeps getting more and more people wagering here, must be a reason. That reason is literally the free things and the possibilities. Between reward points, the tokens, the investment returns when you are not wagering, the golden ticket, the regular weekly ticket they are basically showering you with extra stuff at all times.

It would be very helpful but by the end of the day we are talking about Russia wanting ruble to get a lot more attention and used hence why crypto probably won't be used so much. Everyone wanted Russia to use bitcoin for this situation and like use it for hundreds of billions of dollars worth of deals but the reality is that it would have helped Europe because nobody would have dealt with Ruble in that case.

Thanks to them ignoring crypto and focusing more on Ruble and demanding Ruble payments for the transactions, that resulted with Russia to keep their money valuable. I mean imagine being sanctioned off and hated by the whole world and still keeping a good economy, that is a success if you ask me.

You only saw his success, how? He showed you his trade history and you only saw successful trades or you just assumed that he’s always being successful in his trades because he told you that?

Before you got into trading did you care to learn about trading or you just work one day and felt maybe you should become a trader and start trading cryptocurrencies? You know this market is not as easy as some people will make it seem to you, there are difficulties when it comes to trading crypto, so you need to learn and practice and with time you will get perfect. Even the best traders do experience loss, so it’s normal, but learn and get better.

As long as you win the game, there is nothing that you should be worried about. The real worry is that they have a few good players that look to be promising and with the way they are playing, those players will want to get out, and even if they could convince bigger clubs to pay a good sum for them, they are not going to be able to build a team with that money that would be at least this good, probably will be worse because convincing great players to come to Nice wouldn't be easy.

All in all I see this as a temporary year and I fear that they will do a lot worse in the upcoming periods, which would be difficult but not permanent, they need to get better.

It shouldn't be temporary if you ask me. Anyone who has money to wager should do so without any limitations. I personally believe that if you have a million dollars and want to wager with it then you should be allowed to.

If Stake could make money off that then it was great for stake, if not then do not allow anyone to do it, instead of just a few people. In this case Drake could be understood since he has some connection and a world famous person, I mean he is literally world famous, I doubt there is a single place on earth where someone doesn't know him even if one doesn't the other would. But, this happens with other gamblers as well, and I say either let everyone gamble with a huge max limit, or do it for nobody.

This depends on how long you can be in front of your PC and how long you could trust Cake as well. If you could just lock it and leave it at there and you have the money for waiting that much, then it shouldn't really be a problem. I mean think about it, if cake price doubles, and you have 200% return at the same time, we are talking about a huge increase. Your 1k could turn into 8k right? I am sorry if my calculation is wrong but if Cake goes up and you wait it out then you will be profiting a lot.

But, if you do not trust cake or if you do not have the money to wait it out, then you are not going to like the current system and will want the old one back.

I wouldn't say never wager on Villareal, if you want to do it then its fine, its gambling and anything could happen. However, I would highly suggest that you should do it with a small amount so that when you lose (which is a big possibility) you do not lose a small amount.

What I mean by "small amount" depends on the person, someone who has $100 shouldn't play more than 5 bucks whereas someone with 100 million could wager whatever and would probably fine since even the max would be smaller than what they should wager at max. Liverpool will 99% chance win the game, but that 1% chance is the reason why people may end up wagering on Villareal.

The frustration that the coin you wanted to see at a certain level didn't reach that level does change a lot of our perspective to the market. We could be too greedy in our minds and sometimes that blocks us from seeing the reality.

I am not saying that it shouldn't be going up, whatever you bought hopefully goes up, but if you see it stuck somewhere, do not have some dreams that it will be insanely higher. I mean when something is 2 bucks at the best time ,and you hope for 20 bucks, that is not realistic and you are going to end up being upset about it as well. This is why I believe we should be focusing on a bit of real prices that could be achieved.

Legal tender seems like a too big of a step for the time being, especially during a war time like this. I believe that there is a good chance we could end up with bitcoin becoming some sort of lax regulated legal thing and people could deal with crypto without any problem at all.

But, at the same time legal tender is just way too much, that would be like letting it be a foreign currency and even closer to home than that. Which is why I doubt that it would happen, I believe that it will not happen and something lesser but still allowed will be the case. Russia needs people to move money out of their nation, especially foreign money like dollars, and bitcoin would help with that.

Three years is a long enough time that I would say 6 digits will definitely happen by that time. I believe that 100k+ is something that would be not a shock but also not really close neither. Sure it will be 100k, but not like 105k or something, I am guessing more like 180k or so would probably happen.

This is why I believe that we should be investing right now, having investment that would triple in price in 3 years is not that bad, even less than three years more like two and a half years. This means that whatever we invest until that time, will return as rewards for us when it finally happens. We shouldn't take bitcoin for granted, it is definitely a great investment.

City will definitely have a great chance at beating Leeds. Not that Leeds is a horrible team but City beats almost everyone they face whereas Leeds is a team that fought to stay up this year, already managed it of course but at the same time still a very low level team for sure.

Liverpool had a bit of a hard time beating newcastle, it is obvious that newcastle will be a team that will provide some challenge to the league's elite next season when they have better chances to acquire more players with the money they have, they are the team with the richest owner in the whole world, it's said the owner has 300+ billion total, but since it's kings family it is not public information. It could provide useful to build the greatest assembly of players ever seen in under 10 years.

Your first point is a good one, no one really knows the right time to make an investment. it’s just all about how prepared you are, and whether you have the money to invest in the market. Someone who doesn’t have money to invest in the market will never be able to invest no matter if they are being told is the right time or not.

So, what really matters here is that you have that money to invest, and you can invest it in the market and not minding whether it will go down or up, because the market is a really volatile one, so you can’t predict for sure what is going to be happening the next.

I wouldn't say "all". I mean there are so many bad ones that it would take a lot of time and expertise to find the really good ones and if a newbie is trying to learn than they wouldn't really know which one is the better one right?

So, I agree that a newbie should be staying away from paying courses, if there is a free youtube one then it wouldn't hurt, well it would if it teaches something wrong but I doubt something with millions of views and a ton of comments could be too bad. If you can find cheap or free ones then just go with them, there are some paid and amazing ones but finding them would be a big pain and wouldn't really worth it.

If you qualify is the biggest problem. Drake is drake and he would be playing with whatever he does because it would be forcing casinos hands to not let him do that, you have to give him the rights to wager whatever he wants.

If you and me asked support to do that, we wouldn't get as unlimited as he would, even if we are rich and capable of paying since it requires deposit first. I mean you could get a higher level, that part is true but that doesn't mean that we could get them to do millions, like if it is for example 10k, you could maybe get 50k but that's about it, there is a limit to what we can get. After a while, after you lost some money, it will grow though.

Governments could also use that to their advantage if they just smarten up a bit. I mean crypto is a decentralized thing and could be private for many people but considering the KYC we have right now and how people are willing to share that and even pay taxes for it just so they could have crypto as a taxable and regular thing, then we could see governments use that to their advantage.

You have everyone who owns crypto thanks to KYC, you know how much they have from the exchanges, you know this because they file it when they are paying taxes to you and you collect more money from people this way as well. It is a great benefit for any nation to accept it, and tax it.

This is what people have missed about NFT, they all focused on art and images and this is where "I took a screenshot of it" joke came from. People tried to defend like "you do not own mona lisa just because you took a screen shot of it" but the reality is that the art they were holding weren't mona lisa, it was some ape, and that is why it worth absolutely nothing at all and they were just kidding themselves.

With the introduction of other stuff, and NFT being used as ownership papers instead of just saying so, it would make things al to better and that is why I believe that we should be focusing a bit more on the alternative uses of NFT instead of the art world.

They should have been verified long long time ago with those kind of numbers. I have to admit that I didn't know they weren't verified, but I have worked with some projects before and they got verified in 6 months thanks to being non-gambling website I suppose.

The only reason I could think of why bitcasino.io wasn't verified must be regarding both crypto and gambling together, shouldn't be that difficult if you ask me. Kudos to them for finally getting it, you guys deserved it long time ago and you guys have been doing a great job, the support is great, games are great, never had any shady deals, always on top of the game and that is why we love you.

The period when they had only blackjack and no provider was a period I liked the most. I am not saying that do not add other stuff, because it means they would probably make more money and attract more people. However, in my mind this website is pure blackjack website. For all the other games I went to other places, but for blackjack I never played anywhere else since I found this place early when they first started.

These type of provider problems ends up not being their responsibility and they would just shit the blame to provider. That is not really an alright thing with me but since I do not play other games it is also not something that would matter to me at all.

Using crypto just so you could make apr of it based on inflation is a good idea, but even when there is no inflation or low inflation, crypto is greater because of the tech behind it. Remember, when there was no inflation, we still managed to do well, in 2017 what was the world going through? Did we have any wars? Any pandemic? Anything bad globally? We didn't have any of that and we still managed to break ATH and reach 20k during that period.

So, with or without any global danger, crypto is still great, with or without high inflation crypto is still great. No matter what happens in the world, good or bad, we should still stick with crypto to make the most out of our money.