Sorry, only denominated coins.  But I do have a non denominated gold plated bar.

Well can we get some placeholders? It is easy. Here is an example of an AES encrypted private key.

Public Key
1QJow1aDX17EDWS5WKDzCdtQXxPkPatKTs



Private Key
5JM8AjZ9AtaHaPcbmTEYQVkjkDn89Vmz6u7Vi8D5Thi1Rxf6uwK




Private Key AES 128 bit using Pass Phrase "Marry Had A Little Lamb"
U2FsdGVkX18R7NzIXKPOUMayZy2tM6Vx39Tr8EXcL6HwSy9YYthOwam01wPxAV2j
lmnPgtpRUD18I52ETJElsUgA1U+tgoyNhaiBQqKJuSI=

That's a programming issue for the guy doing the printing program based on these designs. Why bother the designers here.

Don't use running clients as a guide. I am sure I'm not the only one who uses BTC without the client because it brings my netbook to it's knees when I try to run it. Instawallet works fine.

voted

116 for bitcoin..

Let me know when one of you built a vending machine or something cool.

Binary border with the middle logo.
Named it paper wallet for this time and put the QR code in the corner so you can fold it over for safety 

I like the role your own idea. Do you have any coins without the number of BTC printed on it?

This design gets better with every iteration. Keep up the good work!

I think "Bitcoin Wallet" is more accurate than "Bitcoin Account". Although an "account" generally implies an ID and password which could be interpreted as public key and private key, in the case of Bitcoin, "Account" is analogous with bank account and/or Bitcoin "Address".

It's not clear (since Bitcoin is unprecedented) but I believe these are the terms we should consider:
1) Bitcoin Wallet
2) Bitcoin Financial Instrument
3) Bitcoin Certificate
4) Bitcoin Bearer Bond

The first two, I feel, are accurate in their own right. A bitcoin wallet is a financial instrument.
I believe an argument could be made for certificate as in "certificate of ownership". The certificate would essentially make you the owner of that bitcoin address but not the owner of any specific amount of BTC.
Similarly, "bearer bond" could be used because whoever is the bearer of that paper has control of that bitcoin address. However, a bearer bond is a debt instrument and bitcoin is not a debt instrument.

Regarding "LOAD & VERIFY" and "SPEND ALL" compared to "ADDRESS" and "PRIVATE KEY". The first set of terms provides some usability for those new to bitcoin it helps them understand what each "number" is for, which is nice :-)

If we look at money from a century ago on Wikipedia we can see that sometimes full sentences appear. We should consider that this type of financial instrument requires instruction to use and re-use and we should consider 1 or 2 URLs be placed on the design, especially bitcoin.org

Also, I wonder what it would look like with a WIF private key instead of mini key.

I understand the reason for the curve... however I think it distracts from the bill and makes it look un-tidy.

So I tried to combine some of the feedback. The size is based on an euro bill this time. There is a lot of going on in this one. Something on the foreground might be a great idea but wanted to share this already.
On the left you got the load/verify qr code and the background is marked with the text: BITCOINCASHBITCOINACH...
Middle is all watermarked with lines and with the BTCitcoin cash 'logo'.
The amount portion is also marked with the BITCOINCASH and lines.
Right side has the other QR code and got some binary code combined with the BTCitcoin cash.
Can easily change the colors of the bill so made some variations.







If you got a idea to add something or delete. Plz share

Is it "SPEND ALL" or "REDEEM" (I could import without spending for a time) ?

LMAO 25 of web experience and a bitcoin mixer is out of your league LMAO

@rjk stupid question, why would the freshness of the coins make any different in a mixer? Are you solely going off the part that older coins can be mixed more cause of the low tx fees?

Let me show my age.  I remember when gas was less than $1/gallon.

I also remember when gas first went over $1/gallon:  People were totally freaked out and thought the world was ending.

No, although they are very close to what I am thinking of. The key part of my idea is the variable fees, with a rebate for brand new coins based on a selection algorithm.

I might add that this probably should have wallet functionality like torwallet, because that means it will be harder to correlate inputs and outputs based on size alone. This correlation could be done with a straight mixing service, even with randomized fees, but having wallet functionality means that customers will be more likely to have a large input and several small outputs, since they can use the wallet to pay people instead of having to launder all the coins at once.