This coin is pure bullshit, just look at it here :
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/1irstcoin/

their biggest volume came from p2pb2b exchange, the well-known wash-trading, and scammy exchange. not only that, the spread is almost half of the price,
there is no way this project will survive. And the price itself is outrageous or ridiculous or even stupid.

That is not very encouraging and personally, I think. It does not look professional at all, how could you say that in your social media?
you are telling people to buy your coin because the price will increase for three folds? and look at this :

July 8th, 2020? or 2030? If you do not know, we are in August right now not in July anymore.

It is so stupid to think it this way. Just like China did to cryptocurrency 2 years ago. What happened afterward? nothing. It's a huge factor for those who used that platform(because you are not able to do any transaction). But for the overall situation? it does not have that much impact. Some coins might get burned in the process, but it does not mean everything will turn into chaos because of this.

Keeping Bitcoin is like buying a house because the price keeps increasing from time to time. But if you are buying altcoin, it is like you are buying a cow.
you can get a lot of profit if your cow is matured. But the probability for it to die is higher too. So which one is it?
honestly speaking, choosing the safest way is always the best option. Because a trader does not look for a huge profit, but instead he/she looks for a steady profit for every transaction that she/he made.

People still use it but they do not use it as their main platform but mostly they are using it as their stepping stone. More than a hundred project moved up their project from ERC20 smart contract into their own. Just like Vitex for example.
people did that because ETH did not make any improvement for a couple of years. While their competitors are ready to shake the world with their scalability and sustainability. Will you use a platform that offers you 100 transaction per second? while you are aiming for the world? there is no way, they would satisfy. Because there are a billion/s people out there.

I have a question, as you said before. You are self-funded project, does not that mean the cost and everything come from you?
but why right now, you said
it is self-funded or an ICO/Pre-sale/IEO project? and your contact us on your website does not work, please check it again.

Dude, did you really expect us to believe this?
"Hey peoples out there, here is my team and they are working very very hard right now. You can see them here [insert your image]". And then you BLUR THEM ALL?
did you think us as three years old children or even a retard?
how could we believe something if you are afraid us to know who you are and your team. This is madness.

It was like a buyer trying to buy something in the market. Will you prefer a clean one or a dirty one? I choose it because of this.
and based on this logic too, we should never trust them fully because you OWN your asset if you are storing it yourself. I do not recommend nor forbid anything but I will remind you, this. You can use every exchange around the world, but after you use them. Do not forget to take all of your assets from that exchange, because everything can happen.

Libra use BFT algorthim with POS system :

that means, there is a limit for its transaction. But again, why would we compare them? Libra is a stable coin and XRP is an unstable coin. Both of them are different in the first place.
another thing, will you really put your life into it? because zuckerberg knew everything about your life and now you are going to give him your wallet too?

Burning the token might be good for its price, but it will not last that long. Remember, the most important thing that we need to consider whenever we are joining something is distribution. What is the point of joining something if only 5~10 peoples are holding it?
ideally, the token/coin should be spread fairly to the community to increase the demand, value, and usability. It is technically impossible for any token to survive if the token holders are only around 5~10 peoples. It is because the token/coin itself has nothing other than the number, nobody is using it for their daily basis.

That was not a mistake but the problem with the bot trading itself and It involved a hundred of peoples because the bot pumped the price to 96BTC and forcing the exchange to roll-back the trade.
well about the chance, nobody knows. If we are lucky enough, we might see something interesting tomorrow or a couple of days later?
and of course, if we are talking about the probability for NPXS to stabilize its price by around $1 in the future. I should say, that it is very unlikely but it does not mean it is impossible.
the team made a questionable move by increasing the supply caused the price to fall harder from before and at the same time creating a fear inside of their supporter.
for those who are looking for organic growth in price and development should take their leave, because this project is not up to standard.

Seems like you did not do something called research beforehand, right?
read this up if you have not heard anything about it at all: https://fintab.io/blog/1-syscoin-96-btc-how-did-it-happen-what-is-a-cryptocurrency-pump/
1BTC is too cheap because the price went up for more than 96BTC/syscoin a year ago. That was why it has a probability to reach that level even though it won't last that long.

Take it easy my friend, even though its current market cap is around $100 million right now. It still has a possibility to reach that level, everything is possible in cryptocurrency.
did you remember when Syscoin went up to 1BTC for each 1 Syscoin a year ago? the same thing applies to this project as well.
but the probability for it to stabilize itself in around $1 is almost 0 because they increased their total supply again before. There is no guarantee that the team will not increase it again in the future.

Oi oi oi, he did not ask you to scold him but instead he was asking you a solution to his problem.


Your tokens are on his wallet right now, what do you mean by stuck? it is impossible for you to take it back if you do not know his private key.
and do not forget that your PC might be affected by some malware, it would be better for you to wipe it out first before using it again.

I bet you are talking about LYFE project, based on the data that I gathered from the team and the participant. They did that in order to avoid any dumpage from the bounty hunters. but from the other side(bounty hunter point of view), they did this because they wanted to minimize the cost.
there are so many reasons why would they do that, logically speaking. If they wanted to stabilize the price, they could pay them(the hunters) with BTC or ETH directly. But they did not, does not that mean they did it on purpose?

1. It is correct partially, they were leaving it because it is no longer profitable for now and they are waiting for the momentum. Last year the price got pumped so hard and the price was ridiculously high, based on investment logic. The higher it gets, the bigger it falls. So they're waiting for it to get dumped so hard, and here we are.

2. It is more like interest instead of trust, traders and investors are always looking for profit. As long as it goes back to its profitable range, the investors and traders are going back to the ship absolutely.

I hate to say that this is very true if we are looking at our current market sentiment, development, news and the community itself. Basically, people are losing their patience and hope because of this winter. This is the longest bear market in cryptocurrency history, the only hope for us to get another good movement is halving which will happen in 2020 or next year.
of course, as long as Bitcoin and other altcoin survive.

do not expect Bakkt and ETF live or approved this year, because it is very unlikely to happen.

Those things are good for bounty hunters instead of investor, they do not really care about the KYC but instead, it is all about its use case and idea.
giving them a discount is good if they have an interesting project with an actual program, it will boost the demand. Basically, the investor does not really care whether it is handled by a trusted manager or not. Most of them are not here though.

The investor needs the team to give them assurance about their investment, and project progress. If the team can provide it with a solid and clear backup, I believe the investor will start to invest their money into this project.

Logically speaking if everything is fine, we can do that and this thing is called arbitrage. But, the problem is YOLOBIT aka YOBIT is not a trustworthy site. They scammed a lot of people, and it is not surprising to see your deposit on hold because of some issue with their wallet.
I have been seeing some people complained about their deposit issue and it has been a year, they have yet to fix it up. Even though everything went normally a few days later, I do not recommend you to go to that scammy site. It is not worth, your time and your money.

Volume has its own role in determining the demand, but creating a conclusion based on the volume alone is not justifiable. The volume reflects its total demand, but as long as the project keeps delivering something to the project itself and the community, it can not be considered as a dead project.
we can tell whether it is dead or not based on the development, if they are getting close to their goal but they are lacking the volume. It might be happened due to accumulation phase, in most case, the whales were suppressing the price in order to push the price down so they could get a lot of coins cheaply.