Not just for another decade, in fact I think this is their best performance during their time in the Bundesliga. They were truly extraordinary, how they played as a very good team and that was thanks to the touch of Xabi Alonso who was very successful in finding the best game that Leverkusen could show this season.

I hope they can do the same, maybe getting through the season without losing will be difficult and maybe even impossible for them to do again. But at least they can still show promising performances like this season.

Vincent Kompany will definitely feel this pressure, because the club he manages is a big club, so he will receive all the pressure and he will even receive criticism in pre-season matches perhaps. That is very open to happening, and it is Kompany's job to ensure that he will not work under pressure, I mean he doesn't care about all that and only focuses on making Bayern Munich successful.

Yes, Al Nassr is a big club and they are playing well, it's just that this season they are no better than Al Hilal which means they have failed in all competitions. Several times they faced Al Hilal, they always got unsatisfactory results this season, even their last chance to become champions failed because they lost to Al Hilal in the King's Cup final. This makes them have to swallow a bitter pill because they cannot be better than Al Hilal this season.

Next season they will try their best to play better, one of the steps they are taking now is trying to target several well-known players in Europe who play as defenders. Several names also emerged, such as Antonio Rudiger from Real Madrid and even Virgil Van Dijk from Liverpool. but until now I have not heard whether they have established communication or not. What is clear is that now they are trying to bring in defensive players to improve their position in the back line which has been their problem this season.

The European League is the second caste after the Champions League, so here it is only inhabited by clubs which can be said to be capable clubs which are below the clubs in the Champions League. I don't mean to say they aren't better, that's not my point. but in fact we see based on their ranking in the domestic standings that they have to go to the Europa League. And also when a club fails in the Champions League group stage, others will go to the European League.

However, what is interesting is that when a club is in the Champions League and has to go to the European League, it cannot easily dominate and become champions. They even had to lose when they faced a club that was actually no more favored than them. This season, one example is Liverpool. They are the favorites and in fact they are the biggest favorites to become champions. However, they failed when they faced Atalanta and were eliminated from the European League.

I think they still have a lot to do, because will they want to be at the same level every season? whereas other clubs make changes that will make them improve, I think that would be very dangerous for them. And also do they only want to be able to compete in Serie A and not want to compete more fiercely in the Champions League? I think they really want to compete in the Champions League, and that will make them do a lot for next season.

This season they were only good when they were in Serie A, while in the Champions League they still struggled to provide anything good and they had to be eliminated in the knockout stages at that time. Obviously this is a very valuable lesson for them, because they were not that ready when they were in the Champions League. I understand that the Champions League is different, but they have to work even harder to achieve success in Europe's biggest competition.

It's difficult if the coach doesn't make changes, because they also definitely have differences in playing style and that means they have to make small changes to make the squad what they want. That is something that will definitely happen, because even though the two coaches may have the same philosophy in the game, they will also definitely have different characters, including differences in seeing the character of a player who is suitable for them.

In football there will always be changes, even though they may have played very well in the previous season. like Leverkusen with Xabi Alonso, they have been extraordinary this season, but won't they make changes or a few touches for next season? I don't think so, they will still do it, because they need it. There are definitely gaps that they have to fix that make them have to do that.

Sponsorship is one way they can get out of the problems they are currently facing, but it will also definitely go through a fairly long process or in other words it will take time for them to fully recover. Another problem is that they (the sponsors) sometimes also look at the conditions experienced by a club before they decide to collaborate.

If you look at their status as a big club, they shouldn't have any difficulty getting sponsors who are ready to help them. But once again it's not easy at all, because sponsors will also take into account what they will get from the collaboration.

In my opinion, management must now be clever in convincing the relevant parties. Because one way they can do this is this. And this is also a very common thing because sponsorship is a part of football. Now it's just a matter of how they can convince their targets.

I won't rule out the possibility that they will play together in the future, but for now I think they will continue to play at the clubs they currently play for, Haaland at Manchester City and Mbappe at Real Madrid. I wonder, why do some people expect them to play together? Isn't it more interesting when 2 young players who have very good abilities are at different clubs? I even hope they will become rivals in the same league in the future, for example El Clasico or the Manchester derby for example. Lol

This reminds me of Ronaldo and Messi, who until now have never played for the same club. Even though many people want to see them at the same club at the end of their careers. But that doesn't seem to be happening and they will never work together at the same club. Same with Haaland and Mbappe, although these are clearly in different situations.

The appearance of Leverkusen and Bayern Munich is the performance that most people are waiting for now, and that is normal because these two clubs are the clubs that won the title for the first time with very good performances and the other is a club that has just experienced disappointment after their record was broken. They are both awaited by many people, Bayern Munich has a new coach and their new coach is a coach who is often talked about, because some people think that Vincent Kompany is not very experienced.

Leverkusen is a club that I think everyone would like to see. Apart from us being curious about what they will do, this cannot be separated from their extraordinary performance this season, even without losing in the Bundesliga and only losing 1 time in all the competitions they have played. Xabi Alonso will get a lot of attention if he succeeds in bringing Leverkusen to a consistent performance.

There are still many players who can fill the void left by Mbappe, but the question is whether these players can do their job well or not? I think this is a question that almost everyone has when looking at the Paris Sait Germain front line that Mbappe has now left behind. This is because the expectations for the players who fill that position will be very high, because they will see Mbappe as a comparison. Although personally I don't really like comparing, some people do.

Luis Enrique is expected to be able to do his job well, especially when implementing strategies on the front lines or he must be smart if he wants to bring in new players. The reason is that this position is a very vulnerable position, because it is directly related to their goal productivity. The reason is that if they have difficulty scoring goals, then they are in big trouble.

Yes, they have to lower their expectations of Liverpool a little because after all the new coach has to go through a process which will allow him to get to know his squad very well. Moreover, Liverpool has been with Jurgen Klopp for a long time, so perhaps it will take time for Arne Slot to implement the strategy he wants, because whether he likes it or not, if Jurgen Klopp has been in charge for a long time, what Jurgen Klopp implements will be attached to the team as a whole.

They have to give Arne a slot of time, they can't immediately give him a very high target in my opinion, because that would make them likely to make hasty decisions. They have to give opportunities like they gave Jurgen Klopp a chance, of course that has to be seen from the club's development. If there is a positive development, when they don't achieve anything next season then they have to give it another chance.

If we look at it in terms of risk then yes of course both have risks or that means investment and gambling are risky activities but of course there are differences in the amount of risk and benefit in these two things, in investment yes as you said that it is a place that can be used as an intermediary to accumulate wealth and it has been proven that many people have managed to achieve wealth by educating themselves in an investment, meaning that although investment has risks but also has the potential for greater rewards, that's a fact but it still depends on how someone manages and maintains his investment properly.

While in gambling, whoever you are and no matter how much money you allocate in some games, you will still end up in one of the two possibilities between winning or losing, and the result can never be known before you end the session. So I will explain simply that investing is a risky activity but has the potential for huge profits in the long run, while in gambling you will never know about the fate of the money you allocate because gambling is always an activity that can never be predicted by the results and also gambling is an activity that can never be learned so anyone will never know about any way that can really produce, the striking difference is that there is no element of consistency in terms of producing wins in gambling.

Parents have a very important role in the growth of a child and also the growth of the personality that a child has, it all depends on how parents educate their children and also how the environment they live in, I understand that a child is very likely to be affected by gambling because now we are in the digital era where gambling is something that we often find intentionally or unintentionally in an easy way, especially the spread of gambling on several social media where most children these days prefer to spend their time playing cellphones rather than reading and writing in the study room.

This means that what you said is quite true in this case that although gambling can reach everyone especially children easily but it all depends on how parents educate and look after their children, if for example they do not give full attention to a child most of the time then obviously there is a possibility that a child will fall into gambling unknowingly, And for the problem of addiction I think it will not be experienced by a child who is really underage, because addiction in gambling is when someone understands about how important money is in life while when someone is underage then usually they prefer to prioritize themselves with various things that are entertainment such as playing or watching cartoon videos.

As for the amount, yes, a gambler will definitely put a certain amount that he/she will bet but as for the limit on whether he/she will return to gambling when the session is lost it is something that cannot be known for sure, because often this is what happens where when a gambler loses the session then usually they will continue gambling because of the impetus of emotions and there is no limit applied in terms of how much budget should be bet at that time regardless of the results at the end of the session.

On the other hand I understand that even if someone for example applies bankroll management in their approach to gambling it is not always guaranteed that they will stick to the plan especially when emotions dominate, but of course having a plan that leads to prevention such as the bankroll management we are discussing is much better than nothing, because after all hopefully the existence of bankroll management can at least make it easier for them to reach the realization in themselves that continuing to gamble with the intention of chasing losses is too dangerous an idea.

Yes, simply put, gambling is a place that provides the opportunity to win but also has a significant risk impact, or in the sense that you can earn money but you can also lose large amounts of money. It's all up to you and depends on you, if for example you can manage your bankroll well and have good discipline then maybe you will remain in a balanced situation, in the sense of getting a little money from gambling but not experiencing the negative impact of losing a significant amount.

However and forever, gambling will always be a risky activity and the risk problem depends on how you manage and control your gambling activities, and apart from that, a gambler is also advised to have good responsibility in himself to minimize the possibility of emotions occurring when in a situation. A loss where this responsibility must also be helped with other things to make it easier to implement, such as risking a small amount that you are ready to lose. This means that any activity will not cause big problems if we do it correctly and according to our abilities

Of course, what this means is that even though I understand that betting is the best idea, it is no more than an effective idea, but it cannot be guaranteed that a gambler will always be able to apply this idea in his approach to his gambling activities, meaning as you said, it still depends. on how the gamblers themselves are, if for example they do have a strong level of discipline then yes maybe they will apply it consistently but that still cannot be guaranteed because as we know it is not easy to completely ignore the aspect of greed in oneself when it comes to making money. Money.

So of course the point is that even if, for example, they succeed in implementing the idea now, that doesn't mean they will still be able to apply the idea for the next few sessions, because it is clear that it is very unlikely for a gambler to only come to gambling once, especially if they have succeeded in achieving a win that really makes them feel happy, where an increase in dopamine can make someone make decisions without any consideration, in the sense that they might forget about the possible risks involved in gambling.

Yes, what he said made me laugh, friend, I agree with you on this. Thinking of gambling as a place or intermediary to change fate is a stupid idea, there are no significant results with just a little effort such as paying attention, guessing and pressing buttons , oh yes and there are also no significant results consistently in a place that always runs randomly without being noticed. based on any certainty and guarantee. There is no element of consistency in terms of winning, it will all just happen by chance when you are really lucky.

This means that I will never put stupid beliefs about gambling that can change fate, because if that were true then there would be no gamblers who would experience bad impacts in their lives such as losing a lot of money like those gamblers who are addicted, and also like you. say that if indeed gambling provided a guarantee of wealth or gambling was a place to get away from poverty then surely no one would want to work as a laborer which required them to put in a lot of sweat, energy and time to get a steady salary. The point is, however and forever, gambling can never be used as a place to get away from poverty, because after all there is no certainty or guarantee of always being able to produce wins while the possibility of defeat is always lurking.

Yes, that's true, and the point is that if we are involved in gambling, it is clear that as much as possible, never have excessive hopes for victory, because after all it is nothing more than just a chance in the sense that it will not always come true as you expect unless we are right. - really was in a lucky situation like you said. However and forever, gambling will always be a game of probability that will lead to one of two outcomes at the end of the session, namely winning or losing, and one of the reasons why we should not have excessive hopes for victory is because it is clear that the result at the end of the session will never be. You don't know whether you will win or lose unless you have completed the session.

Everyone has their own luck in life, where maybe your luck can be better than other people's luck. If other people can achieve big wins, that doesn't mean you also have to hope for the same number of wins, because after all, luck is something that humans can never control, simply put, it is something that flows without knowing its arrival. Another thing, of course, is that making a lot of money from winning with little effort is a result that should be appreciated and enjoyed, not everyone can be as lucky as you.

Yes there is no preparation whatsoever that leads to limitations regarding the budget before gambling, the majority of them only have the intention of playing and depositing the amount of money they want which sometimes there is always the idea of ​​trying to allocate a larger amount than usual with the mindset of "maybe with a large amount I can be lucky," meaning anything a gambler can think about, especially those who only see gambling in terms of the chance of winning.

On the other hand, whether you want to implement restrictions on the amount of budget for gambling or not is actually up to you, because the point is that as long as you can manage and control yourself in gambling activities then of course you will be able to avoid bad impacts such as losing money. in large quantities. This means that it is useless if from the start you set the budget you want to allocate but it turns out that you do not have the ability to control yourself, especially when you experience a loss, then in the end you will still end up depositing money again to gamble and chase losses. This is in accordance with your approach to gambling, and the point is that as long as you can control it well according to your abilities then of course you will avoid bad possibilities.

What you said is true and also the majority of addicted gamblers in my opinion do not realize that they are in danger due to involvement in gambling in the wrong way, they do not know about the magnitude of the impact of the situation because usually there is nothing else they think about but winning and winning. I would say that addicted gamblers will always end the session with regret and emotion, win or lose it will always be a bad outcome, because usually what I know is that when they manage to win then they always apply the greed aspect in their gambling activities in order to pursue bigger wins which because of this they end up losing again which makes them lose all the money from the previous win.

And that is a cycle of involvement in gambling that is at a chronic level which can increase emotions in themselves and it is also very likely that they vent their emotions or resentment to those closest to them, meaning that it is only natural that those closest to them hate them and stay away from them, which in addition to gambling has a bad viewpoint in the eyes of most people, meaning of course as you said that public trust in them will definitely decrease which when trust is lost then it will make it difficult for gamblers to establish relationships or seek help from others.

Yes, it means that it is the wrong mindset applied to gambling. The best thing is not to be too excessive in responding to the results of victory and still maintain the belief that the victory you managed to get is nothing more than luck, or that means luck came at the right time so that you managed to win. One of the reasons is because obviously the possibility of defeat will always lurk and it can happen at any time, especially when your luck is gone at that time.

And also I believe that by having a balanced understanding and belief in the sense of understanding that victory is nothing more than a lucky situation along with realizing that defeat will always be a part of gambling, it will make you more careful in every decision when you win or when you are in a winning situation, and this mindset will also be able to prevent you from various actions that lead to greed. In gambling, what should be prioritized is self-acceptance regarding the possibility of risk, because of course when a gambler is unable to accept the fact of losing then in the end it is like what you said where they will continue to gamble in order to catch up with the losses they have experienced, and that is a cycle that will make them lose even greater amounts of money.