Yes, it spends the same outputs, but due to the RBF flag most nodes will see this as intended behaviour and thus "allow" it.

RBF also allows you to spend the same outputs to other "addresses" much easier, which is why 0-conf services (casino's) will usually only accept non-RBF transaction to be eligible. (to prevent the "double-spending" of unconfirmed transactions.)

Doesn't bunq, (and any other european bank for that matter) require KYC / SSN?

If so, does this mean you're selling accounts verified with someone else's KYC, unbeknownst to them?

I mean, legalities aside, wouldn't this be extremely impractical?

I imagine your account will get blocked at the slightest suspicion of fraud, and there'd be no way to get your money back, no?

That should be the standard before even starting one imo, either that, or it has to be a really, really trustworthy person running the bot (even then though, i'm still not too fond of these "Automatic profit"-esque bots).

I did however like the concept that ARAKNE had about giving realtime read-only access to api keys. (although the data they gave really didn't support ARAKNE's case, imo, and it looks like that has been somewhat demonstrated now..)

If only it was a trustworthy person with perhaps a background in machine learning with an actual business case / plan that he can explain in lay-man terms w/ similar (but in this case real) evidence to support his case, i'd be willing to hear him out.

(Using hidden markov models for example)

I don't see how, even if the OP has been cheated on, this warrants theft of who knows how much (or how little) funds in the first place...? Just because he/she is a supposed woman that is supposedly cheated on?

These seem like very seperate issues. I actually don't see any reason why we should help OP steal something that isn't his/hers.

Anyhow, if it's encrypted with a basic password and you don't know much about decryption tools, i doubt you'll get far anyway.

I don't think there are actually that many reputable custodial wallets out there, except for ones linked to exchanges. (Binance, Coinbase, et al.), so i'm not really sure what wallets your'e referring to here.

Blockchain.info/com isn't a custodial wallet.

No... ?

I was more thinking about other scenario's, such as leveraged shorting using a platform such as Bitmex, as in the event of a 51% attack, you'd expect the price to go down.
I'm not sure if there's a possibility to short smaller coins such as ETC suffficiently enough though. (Although, looks like they have quite some liquidity on Bitforex etc.. -- 81 million in the last 24h? lol...)

Hmmm. I think you can look at it a number of ways.. If you actually plan on buying all your machines, a simplified version would be something like

 number of miners = ( total network hashpower ) / hash power per miner
 number of miners * price per miner = $$$$$$


If you rent them, i guess it could be significantly cheaper.

Nicehash offers 1PH/s on the bitcoin chain for ~ 0.0168BTC

Bitcoin sees ~ 120 exahash. https://www.blockchain.com/charts/hash-rate
 = 120000 pentahash (?)

120000*0.168 = ~141.120.000 $ (For, lets say - a month?) to get 51% hashing power (this doesn't seem that expensive.)

Although they obviously don't have that much mining power for rent (I see nicehash only has ~ 180 PH).

Purely theorethically speaking (if we forget about the practicalities of renting 120 ph worth of hashing equipment/however many hashes/s a chain has, (let alone buying it, in which case i highly doubt it would be profitable.)) i could see a number of scenario's where it could definitely be profitable to do a 51% attack.

I don't think Amazon has ever seen more orders than as of right now though (by the looks of their hiring stats? https://blog.aboutamazon.com/company-news/amazon-hiring-for-additional-75-000-jobs ?).

You'd think that would also correlate with an increase in Purse.io usage.

I don't think it's necessarily bad humor that does the trick, but rather the fact that untrustworthiness might stem from this ""dark humor"", resulting in a negative trust..

If you go around with a username related to the holocaust and state some controversial things (or lies, rather) in the name of "dark humor", well, i doubt that that would do wonders for your reputation, or your perceived trustworthiness (Which i would say what the trust system is for.)


I fail to see any "dark humor" in this, but rather see the words of a simple troll, which i think would be worthy of a red trust

I would probably rather leave a neutral footnote that I myself wouldn't be comfortable trading with you, but JayJuanGee took another approach which i personally don't have a problem with either.

---

---

As to whether it's against the rules,

You are making some disguised death threats.... but they aren't personal...

that's (probably?) rule #8 you're breaking.. and, as i said, I think general consensus would classify you as a troll, breaking rule #3

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0

I think this is the main reason they shut down. Always seemed to me like it would be too easy for people with hacked giftcards or giftcards received through scamming to cash out using them.

Perhaps they got pressured by certain authorities about this very issue? My best guess.

I basically meant if the company would come with a (lease?) to an estonian office + a board of directors located in estonia, as would be required by the new regulations put in place. Or if that was something that the buyer would need to figure out himself. Although, - I guess that'd be fair too, as i would assume that you'd need to pay your nominee / B of D / office on a yearly basis anyway.

So does your company fullfill these new regulations? Otherwise, you'll  (or the person you will sell it to) lose your license in 2021?
(And that will render the value of the company as an "asset" of itself virtually worthless, no?)

But if you don't fulfill these regulations, what exactly are you selling right now? The company plus another service which will create a B of D & nominee/address?

Not sure if i would be interested in buying your company right now, but i'd be interested in understanding how it works?

So i buy your company from you ( I become 100% shareholder ?), and i assume you no longer would want to be the director of the company (or did you use a nominee, if so, how does that work?)

Also, don't you need to have a board of directors located inside Estonia to be eligible for a cryptolicense, (and an adress?)

Are all these things included?

I've supported it for now. (At least until Coinsbit.io gives a reply to this accusation.)

I should note: you haven't really provided us with any verifiable proof. (But due to previous accusations against this exchange I think it's time for them to at least respond. If they flatly deny your case; well that's another story.)

I think the other options are referring to the Finney & 51% attack. See https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4974/what-is-a-double-spend

(Finney; https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4942/what-is-a-finney-attack)
(51%; https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Irreversible_Transactions#)

You're not likely to execute either of these attacks as an individual nowadays.

I wouldn't see myself as having so much authority as to whether or not i could decide whether a mixer is legit or not. (Especially since i'm advertising a direct competitor)

I'm just unleashing some of my thoughts here in this thread, and it's really up to anyone themselves to give value to them, or not.

That would be good advice in general for every new service, yes. Although, getting your money back is not the only concern you should have with a service. (Again, is it functioning correctly? Does it mix funds adequately? -- And i simply don't have an answer to that question, so i guess i presume (until i have reason to believe otherwise) they do what they tell everyone they do -- which is adequately mixing funds. (Although......)

You should just keep in mind that there were lots of other mixers in the past that also said they did so, but actually didn't. Bestmixer (seized, but servers DID keep transaction logs!!!), Bitblender (exit scamming), Smartmixer (selective scamming), and there's lots more.

Again, not saying MyCryptoMixer.com has the same intentions (ofcourse i'm not saying that.), but it's something everyone should keep in mind. That of course also goes for mixers such as Chipmixer.com (I would always recommend anyone to swap their private keys received from Chipmixer ASAP, since there is always a risk they could get seized, etc..)

I know some people who bought from ATM's without any additional form of ID scanning, although that wasn't in spain so the operating laws might be different, again, i don't know if kyc is required for certain countries, but when i look at coinatmradar.com i also still see quite a few atm's which have ("NO VERIFICATIONS") in their bio (In my country of residence.), Though I guess if you use SEPA to make purchases your identity is also revealed/can be tracked.

I might be wrong though, and it very likely doesn't apply to OP's situation, so it's definitely smart to bring an ID if it's not explicitely mentioned on coinatmradar.

I don't think this is exactly right.

Just tested: Even on Tor with the safest settings, you still force users to load your (non-script) GTM tags. Users (I) will actually have to manually block the request. It seems to be the only thing that's actually working on your .onion site right now

---

---

Other than that;

I do think it's a good thing you're using a LoG w/ PGP, unlike some other mixers which didn't do so in the past (looking at you smartmixer.).

And i have no idea how solid your mixing process actually is, and whether you can actually weather a chainanalysis "analysis", I also don't understand how anyone here can claim they do, or have a "fantastic mixing service". I guess we will just have to give them the benefit of the doubt? (We've seen mixers with similar (or the same) mixing models been broken in the past.)

I would also like to add that this mixer is not revolutionary in any way (from what i can see) (and i don't see how your SEO ""guys"" are going to make it revolutionary either), and it really is just same old same old to me. I don't know. (Take my comments with a grain of salt.)

I think that depends on the supplier and the amount of BTC you want to buy. Some do ask for ID, where others don't (Although i think the norm nowadays is that most do ask for id one way or another.). Also note that you'll probably pay a high fee for either of these options (5-15%)

I don't want to get paid, please don't send me anything.

I just want to point out that your design makes me think of several other mixers, but that could just be a coincidence.

Just like those several other mixers, you also use Cloudflare on your clearnet address (bad practice!)
https://who.is/whois/mycryptomixer.com


That's not even the worst thing: You also embedded a google TAG MANAGER.
You basically let google track everything on your site. That's terrible. I don't see how you can tell you offer privacy when you have such intrusive tracking/analytical tools embedded on your site.

Unless i'm missing something, how exactly is this "Bringing privacy back to the users"

(Even for people who disabled javascript you added a GTM tag. That's just.. lol)