Alright, we will figure it out. Also did you see my landing page mock? Anyways, Have Fun!

We have to find a name for the future, It has to be short and simple. I think that X is cool but to short and won't make sense in the future, XC is sweet & simple.

Think about these two:

"Hey can I purchase some of these X bonds?"

"Hey can I purchase some of these XC bonds?"

X sounds like something unknown, XC has some kind of meaning.

Dev, can we put a vote poll? I'm going for XC.

I sold some to buy a laptop at 0.0009 and starting to regret it now. I really hope that it doesn't become a $1m laptop but then again I kind of do.

At this current moment in time including NFC, I'm estimating the cost to be 12GBP (Top Boundary Estimate).

If that happens, I'm buying out an oil company.

In that way yes... but you know with the coinalliance (http://coinalliance.org/) thing I have to stay partial so just shhhh

Hmmm? I'm not part of the team..

Sure. It won't be this color:

Landing Page:

Quite possible but I'm counting for 0.005BTC .

Nope that's just shape-ways being overpriced but point still stands gold isn't cheap. To answer the other question at this current moment no, this more like titancoins instead of Casascius.

Thanks for the offer but I have a family member who produces wind turbines and owns a metal  3d printer.

PHYSICAL BLACKCOIN UPDATE: 3D PROTOTYPE ORDERED, MADE OUT OF POLISHED ALUMIDE.

After all of the great points raised, we have decided to re-collaborate and hold of till AUG 22. Sorry for the inconvenience, if you have any concerns, please contact me via PM.

I don't think people will be mad if it happens at 12:15

@TheMightyX I think that the points you raise are more than valid .I was thinking of implementing such a plan but thought it might be to high risk. I'm all for community feedback especially when it raises valid points or ideas.

I expect more from the SCRYPT-X investment but I want to manage expectations.

Here is what I think the best solutions would be in all of this to minimise risk. I believe that at least 25% of the funds should be put into a long term investments such as scrypt x. The rest of the money could be divided into 'sections' with 25% (of the total ) going to business and 50% going to cryptocurrency. So in a 10BTC scenario 2.5 to business and 5BTC to coins.

We would then change divdend payout to a quarterly basis. I would also be happy to relinquish voting power of the team to 25%.

Sounds good?

P.S : Sorry for jumping the gun on the accusations thing but I'm sure that you understand  considering you are on bitcointalk.

I'm willing to answer any concerns anyone has even if it means taking apart the plan word by word.

I see that your are on every IPO raising good concerns, shot answer is no.

Long answer:  I want to reward those who believed in the project from the very start. There would be no point in me looking over my shoulder because I run away with 100BTC. Im here for the long term growth as stated on a few occasions before this launch and making it clear that I believe I crypto.

I respect you're efforts in protecting the community as I try to protect it myself but please find out about the person you are accusing first. I've been here for over a year which granted is not that long in the scheme of things but I think that I have built enought trust to finally do this.

If the majority of people think this a bad idea, I will remove it. (adding a poll now)

Edit: I'm the founder of CoinAlliance and our transparency will be proven soon when the transactions report is published.

Prospectus Published: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxiQW4ETFMFDclN5UHRVWVJzTlE/edit?usp=sharing

All estimates of revenue are using funds only from the first IPO which is assumed as 25BTC.