|
This situation has been discussed so many times on here. And most suggestion users give is to get a lawyer to get a lawyer. Involving a third party isn't a good idea in my opinion as this takes away the purpose of Bitcoin which is decentralization.
Another problem is volatility, asset may become worthless(maybe) at the time of inheritance.
Using wallets that offers such might be a good idea though there's centralisation. Others suggested it but I haven't tried it myself.
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't been easy since the introduction of the merit system but I was very happy when I received my first merit and I'm sure that's how others feel too when they earn merit on their post.
Making helpful topics has made me earn good merits but lately, I haven't earned much merits because I have been somehow lazy about making topics like I used to. I'm good when it comes to making good topics.
|
|
|
|
1. Nothing is certain in crypto space
I've learned this a long time ago. You can't rely on the current situation of what you're benefiting from. You need to explore new things. 4. Don't hold new altcoins and stay offline, they need close watch Better not buy into new coins and start to monitoring for highs/low when you could spend less time on top coins with potentials. 7. Take profit when you see one, don't be too greedy For me, I take profit whenever I see. 1% profit on an asset is something. Waiting for big profit is greed which must be worked on at early stage. |
|
|
|
|
I guess the reason for the freezing was because the terms and conditions was not complied with. Which brings us to the reason why it's good to go through terms and conditions of whatever we're signing up for.
In this though, the fund might be from a scam, Which made it to get frozen. There is a valid reason because this doesn't happen. Reports like this is rare.
|
|
|
|
|
This post is actually unnecessary because that's the style of management the manager's want to adopt to reduce spam even though it's 10 posts per week. Now, it's seems this post made the BM reduce the posting gap to 1 hour which in my opinion would turn to spam if the minimum post requirement is alot. The better word I would have used was "do not make all ten posts in a day".
It's not bad if a participants makes 30 posts even if 10 is required but making all the minimum in a day and no post afterward should be a disqualification.
|
|
|
|
|
Bounty Detective should be more careful when choosing bounties next time or they go down the rail like other bounty managements. They should be strict about this.
And I think same thing is going to happen with the recent bounty they just added. Huge allocation for a four weeks bounty, shitty price on exchange, no much. What's the guarantee the price won't be more worthless if it's distributed to hunters?. I wouldn't even sign up for such bounty.
|
|
|
|
anyone wondering how the cheat worked, it wasnt hacking at all.
it was the koi princess slot by netent i cheated at, NOT dawn of olympus. like i said before, that 171 btc win WAS REAL.
but i was playing with money won on koi princess.
there was a cheat where if you activate bonus bet, and spin until you get the 5-hit fish bonus, and immediately restart the game before stopping the symbol selector whee, your session will continue as if you had the bonus bet on (extra bonus chance) but not have to pay double for spins anymore that entire session.
even bitcasino account are welcome to confirm, did i not, have a big win on koi princess prior to my olympus REAL win?
Daym this took me back in time when me and my buddies were trying to find game glitches this way. (trial and error) When the game's logic gets over-complicated, there happens to be some unintended but "legit"* ways to cheat the game. I guess what you did was similar to this. (unless you are not lying again) *It was legit since you did not use any external tools. You only used the games faulty logic against it. (of course that doesn't mean you deserved to get paid, not legit in that way) You're right about, if a user finds a glitch, he can use it to his own gain, and maybe get away with it if possible, the responsibility is on the website for allowing such to happen. It's just that the winning is from a user known to have used their glitches against them. But in this case, LAngel can't allowed because he's been accused of cheating, I don't know if it's through external tools. Bitcasino painted you as a genius. Made a TLDR version of bitcasino's post. ...LAngel’s winnings are not legitimate and are a result of fraudulently manipulating GameArt’s Dawn of Olympus.
This is not the first encounter we’ve had with this person and this was made crystal clear when we uncovered a 100% match to a previous user
who had been investigated and subsequently blocked for tampering with games.
We use a wide array of industry-leading detection tools, 100% across them is unambiguously a match.
Previously, this user managed to extract a large amount of BTC from ourselves and also hit a few other crypto casinos in a very similar manner.
For this reason this person is widely known to ourselves, other crypto casinos and at least GameArt, if not other game providers.
...
Given the 100% match, our fraud team’s extensive findings supported by GameArt’s investigation and the history we have with this user
the account will not be unfrozen and the funds will not be paid out. There is no settlement, this is false information.
...
There are plenty of red flags that can be seen in the original thread, from the YouTube video to now being private to the very fact that the
user has been withdrawing 25BTC over the past few days - something which has already been noted by Bitcointalk members.
These parts carry some important data. Now... who's lying? I guess both parties aren't saying something about this whole thing. This user's IP should have been banned since they noticed he extracted some huge amounts of BTC and also have the game providers fix the glitches. |
|
|
|
|
Do not feel so bad because at least, you tried mining with your resources and the only problem(not a problem though) is that you didn't sell at the right time hoping you would make profit it in the future just like some early miners of bitcoin. I would have done the same too.
You could try mining big coins if you have enough mining power to mine some coins though you will be needing a big budget to get that set up.
|
|
|
|
|
A shitcoin will always be a shitcoin no matter what name it is. Only the first sets of BTC folks performed well, though there are still some known to be shitty among them. BCD all time high and all time low shows a huge price difference which explains why it's shitty.
Forks are created by developers to make money, then dump the project. Won't advise buying coins from folks.
|
|
|
|
As answered above, your coins are in your wallet once the transaction gets mined. You don't have to be online for it to land in your wallet. Nothing is lost in the blockchain as long as long as it can be tracked with a TX ID. I got prompted by CEX to send a selfie with my payment card for extra security.
Shocked by that requirement from CEX, it would completely reveal your identity. Do they have such requirement for all withdrawals or solely to the big ones? Wouldn't be better to subdivide or even to use the intermediate coin to avoid that "selfie"? I am guessing this could be Binance. They have a lot of policy when it comes to using card to purchase crypto. Don't know about other CEX. |
|
|
|
There is nothing to be surprised. Still there are a lot of people around the world even did not hear about Bitcoin and American people are no different of course. Even those who heard about bitcoin to them it's a scheme or something which will pop up soon.
We are sill in the early stage of bitcoins.
I am more surprised because as big as America is; they have some of the biggest channels which information is passed through across the world. A simple Google check up of what Bitcoin is wouldn't cost a thing. We are still in the early stage of BitcoinI think I have to go with this. Like you said, "we are still in the early stage of Bitcoin". Not just Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency in general. You won't believe that some countries in some continents doesn't no clue about what a Bitcoin or cryptocurrency is, Even USA. And shows how far back we are in pushing crypto to get adopted by people. |
|
|
|
|
Latoken is know for using fake volume and listing bad IEO. It always look like they have a share with IEO project in scamming people.
Vindax is known for listing shitty projects. They listed a lot of deflationary token last year. None of them had volume.
I won't advise keeping funds on this exchanges, especially LATOKEN, because they will come up with an excuse to ban your trading account.
|
|
|
|
|
There is no reason other than wallet being compromised.
Some friends experienced same thing in 2018 but in their case it was their tokens. Some sort of script was programmed in their wallet whereby any incoming transaction gets sent out automatically to a wallet address.
I guess in that guy's case, the script was not written well, making the fee high instead of the amount.
My advice is for the guy not to use the wallet or even the PC because it might have some malware in it.
|
|
|
|
|
Great list, not going to lie but I'm going to give my honest review/opinion.
Latoken doesn't belong to the group here. That 10$ isn't going to worth anything and they are going to ask for KYC. LA airdrop that was organised by them since last year February have not been distributed.
Airdrops only give pennies. Don't have high hopes because most on that list worth nothing except they start trading. And one thing will surely happen. Either it dumps or it pumps but dumps is mostly the result.
|
|
|
|
Close this thread. It was my mistake.
Wow. And you sounded so sure. Can't believe you're about to rub mud on an innocent user. I was even thinking you and the other user were up to something. Please lock thread |
|
|
|
Some are appalling. I mean, where would we categorize guys like this one?: Proof of Authentication
Telegram :@ddmr_1
Regards
#proof of join telegram
bitcointalk username : DdmrDdmr
telegram username : @ddmr_1
spreadsheet number : 570
ETH address : 0xa87dd2418c29a99D0DCA894Cd21449Ac46aB1c9B
Telegram Username: @ddmr_1
ETH Address: 0xa87dd2418c29a99D0DCA894Cd21449Ac46aB1c9B
Check-out the amount of shitcoins in the ETH address! I mean, what can we expect from this individual on this forum really? A Legendary-to-be? Come on ... Edit: There's a tiny twist to the examples above, just in case it slips a quick reader.Wow, didn't know you also participated in alot of bounties. Even saw Helbiz (HBZ) token in that wallet, you didn't sell off. A Legendary to be member with a good reputation. I guess you realized the importance of contributing to this great forum. This is the reason why I advise newbies that comes looking for how to make money on this forum to rather do good by contributing because there's alot to gain from it aside having bunches of pages full if bounty reports. |
|
|
|
|
Google should be blamed here for accepting such clone into it's app store. It's a finance app which would have cost some users some loses. I now see reason why iOS stores are very strict when accepting apps into in store, especially finance apps. No one would have spot the difference here except for the developer's name, download count and rating.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry about his death. RIP.
Firstly, his parents are/seems old school and now isn't now the right time because it'll be a bit a big time to put. Even now, you aren't sure of where is private key is stored and what if he has a 2fa on his wallet. It's going to be difficult to access such wallet.
|
|
|
|
Even now that there is no undo button for transactions, a lot of people are still being scammed because they sent their money to a scammer or they sent to a wrong address.
Sending to wrong address doesn't means you got scammed, it's stupidity. That's why it's better to request for both qr code and wallet address of sender when sending a transaction. All you need is two devices, a PC and a mobile phone that you're going to send the coin from. |
|
|
|
|
This is very funny and relatable. Exactly the experience of every bounty/airdrop participants. Some would send tokens but won't worth something at the end of the day. Some don't care about what the reward worth, they would submit their ID for any amount. And don't know some of this projects sells KYC to dark web.
The only way forward is if bounty hunters refuses to give their personal details out. I've seen where hunters unite together to oppose an agenda of a project.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
