|
popcorn1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
|
|
June 26, 2015, 06:04:50 PM |
|
thanks bud I REST MY CASE MISSILE just what i always thought never seen that video in such slow motion i tried slowing it down on me ps3 in the past but not quite like that TOTAL PROOF a MISSILE plus why on earth would the FBI try and confiscate all the video evidence around the pentagon even the petrol stations video if plane hit the pentagon then you would just show it to the american people not try cover it up you would say here is the video from the petrol station and here is the plane hitting the pentagon the towers i knew blew up 97% sure just a little thought thinking hmmm fire 3% fire but i was 99% sure a plane never hit the pentagon but after seeing that video i am 100% sure now no plane hit the pentagon thanks bud
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
|
|
June 26, 2015, 07:35:21 PM |
|
thanks bud I REST MY CASE MISSILE just what i always thought never seen that video in such slow motion i tried slowing it down on me ps3 in the past but not quite like that TOTAL PROOF a MISSILE plus why on earth would the FBI try and confiscate all the video evidence around the pentagon even the petrol stations video if plane hit the pentagon then you would just show it to the american people not try cover it up you would say here is the video from the petrol station and here is the plane hitting the pentagon the towers i knew blew up 97% sure just a little thought thinking hmmm fire 3% fire but i was 99% sure a plane never hit the pentagon but after seeing that video i am 100% sure now no plane hit the pentagon thanks bud You guys need to just use your brain a bit. now where is the "missile?" please do a screen clip and show us, because I did not see a "missile." I saw a long metallic thing that was blurred, but pretty darn long. Cruise missiles are quite small, you know. About 10-15 feet long. I am not aware of 100 foot long "missiles" that fly horizontal. Oh, except airplanes used as missiles. Oh yeah...
|
|
|
|
popcorn1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
|
|
June 26, 2015, 08:11:33 PM |
|
thanks bud I REST MY CASE MISSILE just what i always thought never seen that video in such slow motion i tried slowing it down on me ps3 in the past but not quite like that TOTAL PROOF a MISSILE plus why on earth would the FBI try and confiscate all the video evidence around the pentagon even the petrol stations video if plane hit the pentagon then you would just show it to the american people not try cover it up you would say here is the video from the petrol station and here is the plane hitting the pentagon the towers i knew blew up 97% sure just a little thought thinking hmmm fire 3% fire but i was 99% sure a plane never hit the pentagon but after seeing that video i am 100% sure now no plane hit the pentagon thanks bud You guys need to just use your brain a bit. now where is the "missile?" please do a screen clip and show us, because I did not see a "missile." I saw a long metallic thing that was blurred, but pretty darn long. Cruise missiles are quite small, you know. About 10-15 feet long. I am not aware of 100 foot long "missiles" that fly horizontal. Oh, except airplanes used as missiles. Oh yeah... AAARRRRRRRR WHAT EVER I DON,T CARE IT WAS NO PLANE NO MORE FOR ME COZ YOUR BORING ME NOW av a nice day you sheep
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
|
|
June 26, 2015, 09:49:25 PM |
|
thanks bud I REST MY CASE MISSILE just what i always thought never seen that video in such slow motion i tried slowing it down on me ps3 in the past but not quite like that TOTAL PROOF a MISSILE plus why on earth would the FBI try and confiscate all the video evidence around the pentagon even the petrol stations video if plane hit the pentagon then you would just show it to the american people not try cover it up you would say here is the video from the petrol station and here is the plane hitting the pentagon the towers i knew blew up 97% sure just a little thought thinking hmmm fire 3% fire but i was 99% sure a plane never hit the pentagon but after seeing that video i am 100% sure now no plane hit the pentagon thanks bud You guys need to just use your brain a bit. now where is the "missile?" please do a screen clip and show us, because I did not see a "missile." I saw a long metallic thing that was blurred, but pretty darn long. Cruise missiles are quite small, you know. About 10-15 feet long. I am not aware of 100 foot long "missiles" that fly horizontal. Oh, except airplanes used as missiles. Oh yeah... AAARRRRRRRR WHAT EVER I DON,T CARE IT WAS NO PLANE NO MORE FOR ME COZ YOUR BORING ME NOW av a nice day you sheep Sure, you have a nice day too. Wait, you are not going to give us all a screen clip from the videos showing TOTAL PROOF MISSILE? I was so hoping...
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
June 27, 2015, 02:33:00 AM |
|
thanks bud I REST MY CASE MISSILE just what i always thought never seen that video in such slow motion i tried slowing it down on me ps3 in the past but not quite like that TOTAL PROOF a MISSILE plus why on earth would the FBI try and confiscate all the video evidence around the pentagon even the petrol stations video if plane hit the pentagon then you would just show it to the american people not try cover it up you would say here is the video from the petrol station and here is the plane hitting the pentagon the towers i knew blew up 97% sure just a little thought thinking hmmm fire 3% fire but i was 99% sure a plane never hit the pentagon but after seeing that video i am 100% sure now no plane hit the pentagon thanks bud You guys need to just use your brain a bit. now where is the "missile?" please do a screen clip and show us, because I did not see a "missile." I saw a long metallic thing that was blurred, but pretty darn long. Cruise missiles are quite small, you know. About 10-15 feet long. I am not aware of 100 foot long "missiles" that fly horizontal. Oh, except airplanes used as missiles. Oh yeah... AAARRRRRRRR WHAT EVER I DON,T CARE IT WAS NO PLANE NO MORE FOR ME COZ YOUR BORING ME NOW av a nice day you sheep Sure, you have a nice day too. Wait, you are not going to give us all a screen clip from the videos showing TOTAL PROOF MISSILE? I was so hoping... Come on, Spendy. If it was the plane that it was supposed to have been, one of those frames would have shown some of it rather than the tiny puff at the far right, or the big ball of fire at the Pentagon wall. And since this part of 9/11 was a total bust, the rest of it was, as well.
|
|
|
|
Ammate
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
June 27, 2015, 02:39:31 AM |
|
that allien
|
|
|
|
Possum577
|
|
June 27, 2015, 05:35:05 AM |
|
Some other group.
What are they called? Fuck, I always forget...ummm....oh shit, yeah it's AL QAEDA.
Why do people insist on believing all the other fairytales?
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
|
|
June 27, 2015, 05:36:26 AM |
|
thanks bud I REST MY CASE MISSILE just what i always thought never seen that video in such slow motion i tried slowing it down on me ps3 in the past but not quite like that TOTAL PROOF a MISSILE plus why on earth would the FBI try and confiscate all the video evidence around the pentagon even the petrol stations video if plane hit the pentagon then you would just show it to the american people not try cover it up you would say here is the video from the petrol station and here is the plane hitting the pentagon the towers i knew blew up 97% sure just a little thought thinking hmmm fire 3% fire but i was 99% sure a plane never hit the pentagon but after seeing that video i am 100% sure now no plane hit the pentagon thanks bud You guys need to just use your brain a bit. now where is the "missile?" please do a screen clip and show us, because I did not see a "missile." I saw a long metallic thing that was blurred, but pretty darn long. Cruise missiles are quite small, you know. About 10-15 feet long. I am not aware of 100 foot long "missiles" that fly horizontal. Oh, except airplanes used as missiles. Oh yeah... AAARRRRRRRR WHAT EVER I DON,T CARE IT WAS NO PLANE NO MORE FOR ME COZ YOUR BORING ME NOW av a nice day you sheep Sure, you have a nice day too. Wait, you are not going to give us all a screen clip from the videos showing TOTAL PROOF MISSILE? I was so hoping... Come on, Spendy. If it was the plane that it was supposed to have been, one of those frames would have shown some of it rather than the tiny puff at the far right, or the big ball of fire at the Pentagon wall. And since this part of 9/11 was a total bust, the rest of it was, as well. Gee, I don't know. A video cam in 2001? What, maybe 320 x 240 resolution, something like 15 or 30 frames per second? Not exactly something made for capturing real time video of high speed aircraft. We could agree that the video showed SOMETHING headed horizontal. Let me know where that missing aircraft went to and where all the people on it went in your theory of how things happened.
|
|
|
|
Possum577
|
|
June 27, 2015, 05:39:31 AM |
|
Use your brain man, if that's possible. When you watch the video do you notice how it doesn't flow seamlessly, but is more of a series of still pictures? That's usually how security cameras work, they take 1 pic every 3, 5, 10 seconds. It's clear that there are seconds missing between each picture in the video, so it's completely plausible (and realistic and believable) that the plane impacted the building during one of those seconds not captured and all we see is the resulting explosion. If you want to find a conspiracy there's always a way to believe one happened, what you won't have are the facts to back it up.
|
|
|
|
DLCseller
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
( -_・)ノ-=≡[$(∞)$]
|
|
June 27, 2015, 09:54:06 AM |
|
There's a high chance that the Illuminati did 9/11. MH370 might planned by the Illuminati.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
June 27, 2015, 09:53:50 PM |
|
There's a high chance that the Illuminati did 9/11. MH370 might planned by the Illuminati. Probably there is no top dog in the world as of yet. Odds are that there are several families who are on top. Yet among them all, even though they act as one much of the time, there is probably some fighting for top position... RULER OF THE WORLD. Nine/eleven was probably a thing that one top group did to another just to say, "See? I got away with it." They all make moves like chess players on a big, worldwide "chess game." If there IS a top player among them, one who is bigger than all of the rest, he/she has to allow some freedom to retain a quasi-peace among his/her circle of top underlings. One day he/she just might become big enough that he will rule us all, and that's the day we need to watch out for.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
June 27, 2015, 10:04:34 PM |
|
Use your brain man, if that's possible. When you watch the video do you notice how it doesn't flow seamlessly, but is more of a series of still pictures? That's usually how security cameras work, they take 1 pic every 3, 5, 10 seconds. It's clear that there are seconds missing between each picture in the video, so it's completely plausible (and realistic and believable) that the plane impacted the building during one of those seconds not captured and all we see is the resulting explosion. If you want to find a conspiracy there's always a way to believe one happened, what you won't have are the facts to back it up. Now, look at the above post that I have quoted here. The post starts out with the words "Use your brain man, if that's possible." This is the kind of thing that trolls do. One of the major tactics of a troll is to discredit a person while attempting to push him into an emotional frenzy so that he makes mistakes in the things that he says or writes. Obviously this forum is full of average people who need to vent now and again. Because of this it is difficult to determine which of them are trolls. The point is, when you see people attempting to tear down another's self-confidence and self-esteem by defaming him in front of the whole group, there's a good chance you are looking at a troll, especially when the defamation is the first words out his mouth in his post. Extremely little debris in the whole explosion.
|
|
|
|
popcorn1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
|
|
June 27, 2015, 10:13:29 PM Last edit: June 27, 2015, 11:21:58 PM by popcorn1 |
|
Use your brain man, if that's possible. When you watch the video do you notice how it doesn't flow seamlessly, but is more of a series of still pictures? That's usually how security cameras work, they take 1 pic every 3, 5, 10 seconds. It's clear that there are seconds missing between each picture in the video, so it's completely plausible (and realistic and believable) that the plane impacted the building during one of those seconds not captured and all we see is the resulting explosion. If you want to find a conspiracy there's always a way to believe one happened, what you won't have are the facts to back it up. so why would the FBI REMOVE THE PLANE FROM THE VIDEO if they want you to think a plane hit the building and why would the video maker remove the plane from video if he wants to know the truth his dad died in the towers HE WANTS THE TRUTH plus are you saying you know more than this guy and he loves his country more than you www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PIIrQ35E3ktell this guy he is wrong www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dgfQv-6pus NO PLANE
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
|
|
June 28, 2015, 01:53:39 AM |
|
Use your brain man, if that's possible. When you watch the video do you notice how it doesn't flow seamlessly, but is more of a series of still pictures? That's usually how security cameras work, they take 1 pic every 3, 5, 10 seconds. It's clear that there are seconds missing between each picture in the video, so it's completely plausible (and realistic and believable) that the plane impacted the building during one of those seconds not captured and all we see is the resulting explosion. If you want to find a conspiracy there's always a way to believe one happened, what you won't have are the facts to back it up. so why would the FBI REMOVE THE PLANE FROM THE VIDEO if they want you to think a plane hit the building and why would the video maker remove the plane from video if he wants to know the truth his dad died in the towers HE WANTS THE TRUTH plus are you saying you know more than this guy and he loves his country more than you www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PIIrQ35E3ktell this guy he is wrong www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dgfQv-6pus NO PLANE I got news for you, it's okay to say that you know more than some guy that posts a youtube video. We're not exactly talking 4k resolution 120 frame per second video on those old security cams. Maybe 320x240, 15 frames per second. They likely weren't even CCD, but tube. So you might be asking too much here, to try to say "No plane"...based on those videos... There's another layer of video degradation that happens when the video is uploaded to youtube, by the way. So what else tells you that it couldn't have been a plane that hit the Pentagon? I don't see the point, frankly. Four planes went missing that day, four planes hit different places. If they didn't, then why? Where did they go? Where did the people go that were on them? What about their cell phone calls?
|
|
|
|
popcorn1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
|
|
June 28, 2015, 02:07:50 AM |
|
Use your brain man, if that's possible. When you watch the video do you notice how it doesn't flow seamlessly, but is more of a series of still pictures? That's usually how security cameras work, they take 1 pic every 3, 5, 10 seconds. It's clear that there are seconds missing between each picture in the video, so it's completely plausible (and realistic and believable) that the plane impacted the building during one of those seconds not captured and all we see is the resulting explosion. If you want to find a conspiracy there's always a way to believe one happened, what you won't have are the facts to back it up. so why would the FBI REMOVE THE PLANE FROM THE VIDEO if they want you to think a plane hit the building and why would the video maker remove the plane from video if he wants to know the truth his dad died in the towers HE WANTS THE TRUTH plus are you saying you know more than this guy and he loves his country more than you www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PIIrQ35E3ktell this guy he is wrong www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dgfQv-6pus NO PLANE I got news for you, it's okay to say that you know more than some guy that posts a youtube video. some guy... major general ..plus no plane..so the firemen are liars and a major general who states very clearly no plane hit the pentagon so what did and in the 2 videos you can see the pentagon with a hole and no plane and you don,t know more than a major general he seen it all you sheep and stop winding me up you know your buzzing off me now .. for sure
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
|
|
June 28, 2015, 02:13:34 AM |
|
Use your brain man, if that's possible. When you watch the video do you notice how it doesn't flow seamlessly, but is more of a series of still pictures? That's usually how security cameras work, they take 1 pic every 3, 5, 10 seconds. It's clear that there are seconds missing between each picture in the video, so it's completely plausible (and realistic and believable) that the plane impacted the building during one of those seconds not captured and all we see is the resulting explosion. If you want to find a conspiracy there's always a way to believe one happened, what you won't have are the facts to back it up. so why would the FBI REMOVE THE PLANE FROM THE VIDEO if they want you to think a plane hit the building and why would the video maker remove the plane from video if he wants to know the truth his dad died in the towers HE WANTS THE TRUTH plus are you saying you know more than this guy and he loves his country more than you www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PIIrQ35E3ktell this guy he is wrong www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dgfQv-6pus NO PLANE I got news for you, it's okay to say that you know more than some guy that posts a youtube video. some guy... major general ..plus no plane..so the firemen are liars and a major general who states very clearly no plane hit the pentagon so what did and in the 2 videos you can see the pentagon with a hole and no plane and you don,t know more than a major general he seen it all you sheep and stop winding me up you know your buzzing off me now .. for sure Four planes went missing that day, four planes hit different places. If they didn't, then why? Where did they go? Where did the people go that were on them? What about their cell phone calls?
|
|
|
|
popcorn1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
|
|
June 28, 2015, 03:10:33 AM Last edit: June 28, 2015, 05:42:37 AM by popcorn1 |
|
Use your brain man, if that's possible. When you watch the video do you notice how it doesn't flow seamlessly, but is more of a series of still pictures? That's usually how security cameras work, they take 1 pic every 3, 5, 10 seconds. It's clear that there are seconds missing between each picture in the video, so it's completely plausible (and realistic and believable) that the plane impacted the building during one of those seconds not captured and all we see is the resulting explosion. If you want to find a conspiracy there's always a way to believe one happened, what you won't have are the facts to back it up. so why would the FBI REMOVE THE PLANE FROM THE VIDEO if they want you to think a plane hit the building and why would the video maker remove the plane from video if he wants to know the truth his dad died in the towers HE WANTS THE TRUTH plus are you saying you know more than this guy and he loves his country more than you www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PIIrQ35E3ktell this guy he is wrong www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dgfQv-6pus NO PLANE I got news for you, it's okay to say that you know more than some guy that posts a youtube video. some guy... major general ..plus no plane..so the firemen are liars and a major general who states very clearly no plane hit the pentagon so what did and in the 2 videos you can see the pentagon with a hole and no plane and you don,t know more than a major general he seen it all you sheep and stop winding me up you know your buzzing off me now .. for sure Four planes went missing that day, four planes hit different places. If they didn't, then why? Where did they go? Where did the people go that were on them? What about their cell phone calls? i get back to u on the phone calls but you also stated no malting steel do you know more than this guy www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQrpLp-X0wsis this guy talking shit too www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXA-enq65ngand last videos for you to watch i can say no more www.youtube.com/watch?v=afUS_58XC5Iwww.youtube.com/watch?v=l47D5ISemdsand the phone calls are fake easy for me to ring your phone and say anything and after watching all these videos you still think your government told the truth then you are.. sorry for saying it.... A DICK BRAIN STUPID SHEEP av a nice day and take it easy
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
|
|
June 28, 2015, 01:02:30 PM |
|
Use your brain man, if that's possible. When you watch the video do you notice how it doesn't flow seamlessly, but is more of a series of still pictures? That's usually how security cameras work, they take 1 pic every 3, 5, 10 seconds. It's clear that there are seconds missing between each picture in the video, so it's completely plausible (and realistic and believable) that the plane impacted the building during one of those seconds not captured and all we see is the resulting explosion. If you want to find a conspiracy there's always a way to believe one happened, what you won't have are the facts to back it up. so why would the FBI REMOVE THE PLANE FROM THE VIDEO if they want you to think a plane hit the building and why would the video maker remove the plane from video if he wants to know the truth his dad died in the towers HE WANTS THE TRUTH plus are you saying you know more than this guy and he loves his country more than you www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PIIrQ35E3ktell this guy he is wrong www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dgfQv-6pus NO PLANE I got news for you, it's okay to say that you know more than some guy that posts a youtube video. some guy... major general ..plus no plane..so the firemen are liars and a major general who states very clearly no plane hit the pentagon so what did and in the 2 videos you can see the pentagon with a hole and no plane and you don,t know more than a major general he seen it all you sheep and stop winding me up you know your buzzing off me now .. for sure Four planes went missing that day, four planes hit different places. If they didn't, then why? Where did they go? Where did the people go that were on them? What about their cell phone calls? i get back to u on the phone calls but you also stated no malting steel do you know more than this guy www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQrpLp-X0wsis this guy talking shit too www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXA-enq65ngand last videos for you to watch i can say no more www.youtube.com/watch?v=afUS_58XC5Iwww.youtube.com/watch?v=l47D5ISemdsand the phone calls are fake easy for me to ring your phone and say anything and after watching all these videos you still think your government told the truth then you are.. sorry for saying it.... A DICK BRAIN STUPID SHEEP av a nice day and take it easy Sure, you have a nice day too. Might try to discuss issues with people and not insult them. You know, a lot of people are talking shit on youtube. Youtube is not exactly an authoritative source, is it? But thanks for your links, I'll just keep examining issues directly by applying high school level chemistry, physics and math. Do I "know more" than this guy or that one? Hell I don't know. I would think that lots of people have gone through high school and therefore discussing a subject from the level of high school math, physics and chemistry would sort of be a level playing field.... I've done that with the "melting steel" question. Unless you refute my analysis, it stands. Linking to a Youtube video is not refuting the argument. Rather it's kind of like saying, "Oh YEAH? Well what about THIS, huh?"
|
|
|
|
Nemo1024
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
|
|
June 28, 2015, 02:52:36 PM Last edit: June 28, 2015, 03:58:50 PM by Nemo1024 |
|
thanks bud I REST MY CASE MISSILE just what i always thought never seen that video in such slow motion i tried slowing it down on me ps3 in the past but not quite like that TOTAL PROOF a MISSILE plus why on earth would the FBI try and confiscate all the video evidence around the pentagon even the petrol stations video if plane hit the pentagon then you would just show it to the american people not try cover it up you would say here is the video from the petrol station and here is the plane hitting the pentagon the towers i knew blew up 97% sure just a little thought thinking hmmm fire 3% fire but i was 99% sure a plane never hit the pentagon but after seeing that video i am 100% sure now no plane hit the pentagon thanks bud You guys need to just use your brain a bit. now where is the "missile?" please do a screen clip and show us, because I did not see a "missile." I saw a long metallic thing that was blurred, but pretty darn long. Cruise missiles are quite small, you know. About 10-15 feet long. I am not aware of 100 foot long "missiles" that fly horizontal. Oh, except airplanes used as missiles. Oh yeah... Exactly, but with an opposite sign. That "long metallic thing" is long because of the motion blur and trailing smoke. The object's height above grass is too low. Even if a plane was skidding on its belly towards the building, it would have occupied a significant part of the frame. In the video, it would hardly reach the top of the ground floor windows. The videos above are just one piece in a large jigsaw of evidence that debunks the official theory. Regarding Pentagon: They want us to believe that a trainee pilot, who according to his instructor, could barely handle a Cessna in straight and level flight, somehow performed an ideal descending spiral, which ended at Pentagon, skimmed above the ground, leaving the lamp posts on the approach unharmed, and slammed into the wall, leaving only a tiny hole, and some of the furniture inside intact (while two similar impacts allegedly brought down WTC, where nothing was left remaining from the buildings or furniture, save for the high-jackers' passports and a turbine from a wrong plane model). Does not compute. Here is some more (watch all 10 short parts): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czB_CWkqix4&list=PLWwb73xj88Z3bPFmJlse7T_JiW7wfWSOk&index=21Complete film with Spanish subs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQFQHKjH4t0&list=PLWwb73xj88Z3bPFmJlse7T_JiW7wfWSOk&index=29And also this, doing extensive audio and video analysis from an armature video recording of what I can only call a demolition. Watch especially 43 minutes in and onwards: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k&list=PLWwb73xj88Z3bPFmJlse7T_JiW7wfWSOk&index=5
|
“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.” “We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided.” “It is important to fight and fight again, and keep fighting, for only then can evil be kept at bay, though never quite eradicated.”
|
|
|
|