Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 12:09:12 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: .
.
.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 ... 541 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][PIVX] - PRIVATE INSTANT VERIFIED TRANSACTION - PROOF OF STAKE - ZEROCOIN  (Read 782156 times)
BitcoinFX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1720


https://youtu.be/DsAVx0u9Cw4 ... Dr. WHO < KLF


View Profile WWW
February 27, 2016, 04:23:48 PM
Last edit: February 28, 2016, 04:47:46 PM by BitcoinFX
 #601

s3v3nh4cks posted a forum message last week with regards to 'testing' anonymity and privacy settings for this crypto, when using Tor.

Being interested in this project purely from the network perspective of a crypto-currency towards digital-cash, herewith some example configurations;

CLIENT only (example);

.conf

Quote
listen=0
port=989
proxy=127.0.0.1:9150
maxconnections=8
onion=127.0.0.1:9150
addnode=y5kcscnhpygvvnjn.onion:989
addnode=5bmhtjvn2jvwpiej.onion:989
addnode=pyfdxkazur3iib7y.onion:989
addnode=ok3ym5zy6m5klimk.onion:989

Allows .exit traffic (pushes peer connectivity through Tor for anonymity) and addnode=.onion connectivity (within the Tor network).

torrc (example);

Quote
ClientOnly 1

SOCKSPolicy accept 127.0.0.1/8

LongLivedPorts 21, 22, 706, 989, 1863, 5050, 5190, 5222, 5223, 6523, 6667, 6697, 8300

ExitPolicy reject *:*

EDIT: SOCKSPort 9150  and  ControlPort 9051 are already set in torrc-defaults in TBB, removed from above to avoid confusion / start-up conflicts.

N.B. 'Default' LongLivedPorts + Port 989
See: https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html

- Using SOCKSPort 9150 allows connectivity through the Tor Browser Bundle. 'Expert' Tor package is still SOCKSPort 9050.
See: https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html#TBBSocksPort

CLIENT only addnode=.onion (example);

.conf

Quote
listen=0
port=989
maxconnections=4
onion=127.0.0.1:9150
onlynet=onion
addnode=y5kcscnhpygvvnjn.onion:989
addnode=5bmhtjvn2jvwpiej.onion:989
addnode=pyfdxkazur3iib7y.onion:989
addnode=ok3ym5zy6m5klimk.onion:989

N.B. addnode=.onion's / maxconnections=8 (you don't need more than 8 connections - more connections are worse for privacy.)

Disable wallet UPnP. Disable incoming connections.


'Dual Stack' Nodes and/or Masternode (example);

See: How-to set-up Tor on a Linux VPS: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1374919.0

Regular dual stack node .conf (example) ;

Quote
listen=1
port=51472
maxconnections=256
onion=127.0.0.1:9050
addnode=y5kcscnhpygvvnjn.onion:989
addnode=5bmhtjvn2jvwpiej.onion:989
addnode=pyfdxkazur3iib7y.onion:989
addnode=ok3ym5zy6m5klimk.onion:989

or dual stack masternode .conf (example) ;

Quote
listen=1
daemon=1
server=1
port=51472
externalip=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
rpcport=51471
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcuser=long random username
rpcpassword=longer random password
maxconnections=256
onion=127.0.0.1:9050
addnode=y5kcscnhpygvvnjn.onion:989
addnode=pyfdxkazur3iib7y.onion:989
addnode=ok3ym5zy6m5klimk.onion:989
addnode=5bmhtjvn2jvwpiej.onion:989
logtimestamps=1
masternode=1
masternodeprivkey=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Linux masternode VPS / Tor torrc (example);

Quote
ClientOnly 1

SOCKSPort 9050

SOCKSPolicy accept 127.0.0.1/8

Log notice file /var/log/tor/notices.log

ControlPort 9051

HiddenServiceDir /var/lib/tor/dnet/
HiddenServicePort 989 127.0.0.1:51472

HiddenServiceStatistics 0

ORPort 9001

LongLivedPorts 989

ExitPolicy reject *:*

DisableDebuggerAttachment 0

NumEntryGuards 8

N.B. example config. enables your addnode=.onion incoming address located here:

Code:
sudo nano /var/lib/tor/dnet/hostname

- Port 989 (ftps-data) example presented for better network transition over Tor, which is not really designed for P2P usage.
- https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy

...

This request coincided with the release of Bitcoin Core version 0.12.0 ...

Automatically use Tor hidden services
-------------------------------------

Starting with Tor version 0.2.7.1 it is possible, through Tor's control socket
API, to create and destroy 'ephemeral' hidden services programmatically.
Bitcoin Core has been updated to make use of this.

This means that if Tor is running (and proper authorization is available),
Bitcoin Core automatically creates a hidden service to listen on, without
manual configuration. Bitcoin Core will also use Tor automatically to connect
to other .onion nodes if the control socket can be successfully opened. This
will positively affect the number of available .onion nodes and their usage.

This new feature is enabled by default if Bitcoin Core is listening, and
a connection to Tor can be made. It can be configured with the `-listenonion`,
`-torcontrol` and `-torpassword` settings. To show verbose debugging
information, pass `-debug=tor`.


Thus, as to how exactly alt. crypto-currencies like DASH - with an existing focus towards privacy and anonymity of transactions were already handling this in terms of user required know-how - was interesting research.

...

It will also be interesting to see how the developers here can manage to successfully transition from PoW to PoS , with masternodes.

~ True anonymity and privacy of transactions will probably always remain less than 98.9% 'snake-oil' anyway ...

- Privacy and Money
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTRFuWtxawM - not a 'crazy' person  Cheesy

- 'CASHLESS SOCIETY'
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbLJ_ztxxAs - "from a non-practising agnostic"   Roll Eyes   ~ SWIM
  

"Bitcoin OG" 1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp | Bitcoin logo™ Enforcer? | Bitcoin is BTC | CSW is NOT Satoshi Nakamoto | I Mine BTC, LTC, ZEC, XMR and GAP | BTC on Tor addnodes Project | Media enquiries : Wu Ming | Enjoy The Money Machine | "You cannot compete with Open Source" and "Cryptography != Banana" | BSV and BCH are COUNTERFEIT.
1715256552
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715256552

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715256552
Reply with quote  #2

1715256552
Report to moderator
1715256552
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715256552

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715256552
Reply with quote  #2

1715256552
Report to moderator
1715256552
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715256552

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715256552
Reply with quote  #2

1715256552
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715256552
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715256552

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715256552
Reply with quote  #2

1715256552
Report to moderator
4x13 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011


View Profile
February 27, 2016, 08:01:54 PM
 #602

Everyone, We now have 5 Proposals on the Docket. If you run a Masternode, please vote. Check the ANN for the Specifics.

Thanks,

s3v3n
shkbits
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 295
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 28, 2016, 06:21:07 AM
 #603

We are getting close to the first budget payout, s3v3nh4cks and I have decided we should see how people feel about throwing a bunch of coins into a general fund address. This could be used for just about anything related to the advancement of the coin, and we wouldn't have to wait until the next budget payment cycle. There have already been a few ideas regarding its use, paying to get listed on a larger exchange, funding a faucet, paying the fellow we have working on the new website, maybe a different block explorer, those types of things. Any money spent from the general fund would be done so with complete transparency.

I am breaking these 3 proposals into 3 posts. They will all be for a filling of the general fund's coffers, just for different amounts. The monthly budget allows for a total of 1,080,000 DNET, Vote for the amount of that you would like to see go into the general fund. I will edit each one of these with the voting information for it in just a bit.

#1 Proposal to add 1 million DNET to the general fund
hash=322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8
"mnbudget vote 322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8 yes" to vote in favor
"mnbudget vote 322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8 no" to vote against


Excellent idea, I will upvote proposal#1 with all my master nodes.

I have the below doubts:
When will the voting end.
If more than 1 proposal gets more than 10% vote, which one will be approved and how the funds will be distributed.

           ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
       ▄▄█▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀▀█▄▄
     ▄█▀ ▄▄█████████████▄▄ ▀█▄

    █▀ ▄███████▀   ▀███████▄ ▀█
   █ ▄████████▀     ▀████████▄ █
  █ ▄████████▀       ▀████████▄ █

 █ ▄████████▀    █    ▀████████▄ █
▄▀▄█████        ▄█▄        █████▄▀▄
█ ██████▀▀▀     ███     ▀▀▀██████ █

█ ██████▄▄     ▄███▄     ▄▄██████ █
█ ███████▀     ▀▀▀▀▀     ▀███████ █
▀▄▀█████▀                 ▀█████▀▄▀

 █ ▀███▀      ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄      ▀███▀ █
  █ ▀██      █████████      ██▀ █
   █ ▀██▄  ▄███████████▄  ▄██▀ █

    █▄ ▀███████████████████▀ ▄█
     ▀█▄ ▀▀█████████████▀▀ ▄█▀

       ▀▀█▄▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▄▄█▀▀
           ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
AppCoins










[.
WHITEPAPER
][.
CROWDSALE
]
wonderloops
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 228
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 28, 2016, 06:22:39 AM
 #604

I have a proposal too.

Sell.
NextGenCrypto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
February 28, 2016, 06:24:12 AM
 #605

I have a proposal too.

Sell.

Vetoed.

shkbits
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 295
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 28, 2016, 06:43:48 AM
 #606

I have a proposal too.

Sell.

Yey, wonderloops is back. Now price will go up Smiley.

Please keep bumping the thread.

           ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
       ▄▄█▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀▀█▄▄
     ▄█▀ ▄▄█████████████▄▄ ▀█▄

    █▀ ▄███████▀   ▀███████▄ ▀█
   █ ▄████████▀     ▀████████▄ █
  █ ▄████████▀       ▀████████▄ █

 █ ▄████████▀    █    ▀████████▄ █
▄▀▄█████        ▄█▄        █████▄▀▄
█ ██████▀▀▀     ███     ▀▀▀██████ █

█ ██████▄▄     ▄███▄     ▄▄██████ █
█ ███████▀     ▀▀▀▀▀     ▀███████ █
▀▄▀█████▀                 ▀█████▀▄▀

 █ ▀███▀      ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄      ▀███▀ █
  █ ▀██      █████████      ██▀ █
   █ ▀██▄  ▄███████████▄  ▄██▀ █

    █▄ ▀███████████████████▀ ▄█
     ▀█▄ ▀▀█████████████▀▀ ▄█▀

       ▀▀█▄▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▄▄█▀▀
           ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
AppCoins










[.
WHITEPAPER
][.
CROWDSALE
]
StakeBox
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
February 28, 2016, 06:52:06 AM
 #607

We are getting close to the first budget payout, s3v3nh4cks and I have decided we should see how people feel about throwing a bunch of coins into a general fund address. This could be used for just about anything related to the advancement of the coin, and we wouldn't have to wait until the next budget payment cycle. There have already been a few ideas regarding its use, paying to get listed on a larger exchange, funding a faucet, paying the fellow we have working on the new website, maybe a different block explorer, those types of things. Any money spent from the general fund would be done so with complete transparency.

I am breaking these 3 proposals into 3 posts. They will all be for a filling of the general fund's coffers, just for different amounts. The monthly budget allows for a total of 1,080,000 DNET, Vote for the amount of that you would like to see go into the general fund. I will edit each one of these with the voting information for it in just a bit.

#1 Proposal to add 1 million DNET to the general fund
hash=322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8
"mnbudget vote 322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8 yes" to vote in favor
"mnbudget vote 322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8 no" to vote against


Excellent idea, I will upvote proposal#1 with all my master nodes.

I have the below doubts:
When will the voting end.
If more than 1 proposal gets more than 10% vote, which one will be approved and how the funds will be distributed.

Voting ends at block 43200. If multiple proposal receive enough votes to be approved the one with the most yes votes is paid first, and then the one with the second most yes votes is paid. This continues until all budget proposals are paid or there is not enough left in the budget to pay the next proposal in line.

Low power dedicated staking hardware, learn more at StakeBox.com
Raspberry Pi wallets at github.com/StakeBox
shkbits
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 295
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 28, 2016, 07:07:10 AM
 #608

We are getting close to the first budget payout, s3v3nh4cks and I have decided we should see how people feel about throwing a bunch of coins into a general fund address. This could be used for just about anything related to the advancement of the coin, and we wouldn't have to wait until the next budget payment cycle. There have already been a few ideas regarding its use, paying to get listed on a larger exchange, funding a faucet, paying the fellow we have working on the new website, maybe a different block explorer, those types of things. Any money spent from the general fund would be done so with complete transparency.

I am breaking these 3 proposals into 3 posts. They will all be for a filling of the general fund's coffers, just for different amounts. The monthly budget allows for a total of 1,080,000 DNET, Vote for the amount of that you would like to see go into the general fund. I will edit each one of these with the voting information for it in just a bit.

#1 Proposal to add 1 million DNET to the general fund
hash=322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8
"mnbudget vote 322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8 yes" to vote in favor
"mnbudget vote 322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8 no" to vote against


Excellent idea, I will upvote proposal#1 with all my master nodes.

I have the below doubts:
When will the voting end.
If more than 1 proposal gets more than 10% vote, which one will be approved and how the funds will be distributed.

Voting ends at block 43200. If multiple proposal receive enough votes to be approved the one with the most yes votes is paid first, and then the one with the second most yes votes is paid. This continues until all budget proposals are paid or there is not enough left in the budget to pay the next proposal in line.

Thanks for clarifying that.

           ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
       ▄▄█▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀▀█▄▄
     ▄█▀ ▄▄█████████████▄▄ ▀█▄

    █▀ ▄███████▀   ▀███████▄ ▀█
   █ ▄████████▀     ▀████████▄ █
  █ ▄████████▀       ▀████████▄ █

 █ ▄████████▀    █    ▀████████▄ █
▄▀▄█████        ▄█▄        █████▄▀▄
█ ██████▀▀▀     ███     ▀▀▀██████ █

█ ██████▄▄     ▄███▄     ▄▄██████ █
█ ███████▀     ▀▀▀▀▀     ▀███████ █
▀▄▀█████▀                 ▀█████▀▄▀

 █ ▀███▀      ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄      ▀███▀ █
  █ ▀██      █████████      ██▀ █
   █ ▀██▄  ▄███████████▄  ▄██▀ █

    █▄ ▀███████████████████▀ ▄█
     ▀█▄ ▀▀█████████████▀▀ ▄█▀

       ▀▀█▄▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▄▄█▀▀
           ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
AppCoins










[.
WHITEPAPER
][.
CROWDSALE
]
Joshua kingpin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 28, 2016, 11:49:58 AM
 #609

Is setting up a masternode any profitable now?

▰   SEMUX   -   An innovative high-performance blockchain platform   ▰
■▬▬▬▬▬      Powered by Semux BFT consensus algorithm      ▬▬▬▬▬■
Github   -   Discord   -   Twitter   -   Telegram   -   Airdrop to BTC holders
wonderloops
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 228
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 28, 2016, 02:38:40 PM
 #610

Profitable? Sure.
But then again.. so is prostitution.
Doesn't mean you have to sell ass.
What kind of man runs a masternode anyway?


waffles99
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 275
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 28, 2016, 05:32:53 PM
 #611

What kind of man runs a masternode anyway?
A. Freeman

kokokoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 638
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 29, 2016, 03:28:25 PM
 #612

I can find all of my "masternode outputs" listed in "masternode list" and "masternode start-many" didn't show any error. Does it mean all my MNs runing ok and receiveing fees?
And how much DNET could i get with 1 MN per day?

Yes. That sounds good.

Here's the formula for MN payment: 50 x 1440 / (total MN count) = 1 MN payment per day
Where total MN count can be figured out by running "masternode count" on your wallet.

284 masternodes total, so it's around 250 DNET per masternode per day now.
I launched 5 masternodes 2 hours ago and didn't get any payment yet. I should get around 25 blocks per day. Ok, i'll wait and watch.
3 of my 5 masternodes received payments during the night. I checked "masternode outputs" and "masternode list". Only 2 of my masternodes were in the list. I typed "masternode start-many" and 3 masternodes were added to the list again.
Why could they stopped during the night?
So after starting 5 masternodes 23 hr ago i received only 5 payments.


As the number of Masternodes increases it is becoming more and more difficult to find your Masternodes with "masternode list". A better way to check on your Masternodes is by using "masternode list-conf", it will show you the status of all Masternodes in your masternode.conf. Also, as opposed to using "masternode start-many", you should use "masternode start-alias XXX" replacing the XXX with the alias of the Masternode you want to start that you used in your masternode.conf. Using the start-many function causes all of you Masternodes to be moved to the end of the queue, resulting in lost payment opportunities. There are a variety of reasons for Masternodes to fall out of the list, start by double checking that the wallets are actually running, have sufficient connections, and that the appropriate configuration files are setup properly.

Thanks for useful post!
I have 4 masternodes on 4 VPS, they are working fine now. And i'm trying to run one MN on my controller wallet. It starts and in 20 minutes has status "MISSING".

Settings for this MN in masternodes.conf:
Code:
MN1 127.0.0.1:51472 MNPRIVATEKEY TX_ID TX_INDEX

Settings in darknet.conf:
Code:
rpcuser=USERNAME
rpcpassword=PASSWORD
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
listen=1
server=1
daemon=1
logtimestamps=1
maxconnections=256
masternode=1
masternodeprivkey=MNPRIVATEKEY

Am i missing something? Or running a MN on controller wallet is not allowed?

And one more question. If i want to release 10000 DNET from one masternode (leaving other masternodes untouched) which command should i type?
4x13 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011


View Profile
February 29, 2016, 04:07:18 PM
 #613

Read the ANN.. You must have a unique public IP for each Masternode. You can not use your loopback IP as the address.
jed78
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 29, 2016, 07:45:17 PM
 #614

Is solomining working for anyone? trying to gpu mine against the wallet, saying slow/down or wrong credentials.


Acidx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 356
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 29, 2016, 07:49:16 PM
 #615

What kind of man runs a masternode anyway?
A. Freeman



Damn, where can I get that t-shirt?

StakeBox
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
February 29, 2016, 07:55:25 PM
 #616

What kind of man runs a masternode anyway?
A. Freeman



Damn, where can I get that t-shirt?

I was wondering the same thing when I saw it. Google pointed me here, http://bitcoindoc.com/shop/product/details/948/byob-be-your-own-bank-t-shirt.

Low power dedicated staking hardware, learn more at StakeBox.com
Raspberry Pi wallets at github.com/StakeBox
bathrobehero
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051


ICO? Not even once.


View Profile
February 29, 2016, 11:31:38 PM
 #617

Is solomining working for anyone? trying to gpu mine against the wallet, saying slow/down or wrong credentials.

Doesn't work for me either with ccminer. Happens with very few wallets. But I'm curious if that's universal (cgminer/etc).

Probably unhelpful but ccminer with protocol debug:

> POST / HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Basic *
Host: *
Accept-Encoding: deflate, gzip
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 45
User-Agent: ccminer/1.7.3
X-Mining-Extensions: longpoll noncerange reject-reason
X-Mining-Hashrate: 0

< HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
< Connection: close
< Content-Length: 76
< Content-Type: application/json
* Server darknet-json-rpc/v1.0.1.0-cbcb549 is not blacklisted
< Server: darknet-json-rpc/v1.0.1.0-cbcb549
<
* Closing connection 0
JSON protocol response:
{
   "error": {
      "code": -32601,
      "message": "Method not found"
   },
   "result": null,
   "id": 0
}

Not your keys, not your coins!
Bank_sy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 450
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 29, 2016, 11:46:56 PM
 #618

This coin looks promising but supply/inflation is rather high... a change in max supply and inflation rates would guarantee moon.
jakiman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011


jakiman is back!


View Profile
March 01, 2016, 12:39:13 AM
 #619

I don't think the coin specs need any change.

But I do think that more promotion & information is needed to bring in some new money & increase its market cap. All in good time I guess.

avitas
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 302
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 01, 2016, 07:44:09 AM
 #620

I'm interested in how this proposal works.  I understand the masternodes from TX, but does one have to have DNET in order to vote?

Is there some way to check what the status of the proposals are?  and how does one submit a proposal and such.

thanks for taking newbie questions in advance, still researching. 
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 ... 541 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!