|
waffles99
|
 |
April 19, 2016, 10:19:59 AM |
|
DNET looks ripe for some extra FUD. 400 satoshi, here we come.
580 was the bottom, motherfucker. This is accumulation zone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
jakiman
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
|
April 19, 2016, 10:21:23 AM |
|
500k DNET will be used to fund development? Will you dump all 500k at market prices?
Probably. It would be nice to see more info about how the trustless untraceable transactions would work before voting. Thanks for caring to explain. I guess I'm out then. Good luck, don't dump all developers funds at once.. lol. You do realize that in the last 24 hours, Bittrex had 3 BTC trade volume. That means 500K of DNET was sold/dumped today alone! and that's considered low! It's been like this nearly every day. So why you out now shocked about 500k of DNET? If a coin gets rattled by that and dies, that coin wasn't worth it in the first place.  |
|
|
|
|
|
bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
|
April 19, 2016, 12:15:24 PM |
|
Thanks for caring to explain. I guess I'm out then. Good luck, don't dump all developers funds at once..
I also heavily prefer solomining but you can always poolmine. |
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
|
WayToGo
|
|
April 19, 2016, 12:32:52 PM |
|
The current marketcap is only BTC168. Definitely time to accumulate. How low can this go?  |
|
|
|
|
|
kokokoin
|
|
April 19, 2016, 12:44:55 PM |
|
Could you explain why DASH anonymous transactions are still traceable?
|
|
|
|
|
aloeva
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
April 19, 2016, 12:47:31 PM |
|
The current marketcap is only BTC168. Definitely time to accumulate. How low can this go? its only marketcap, everything can chnged within second |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BitBitterBitterer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
April 19, 2016, 02:15:59 PM |
|
Thanks for caring to explain. I guess I'm out then. Good luck, don't dump all developers funds at once..
I also heavily prefer solomining but you can always poolmine. I'm in it for the decentralized aspects of cryptocurrencies, not for some guy not being able to implement the utmost basic of all things in crypto. No solo mining possible? Don't want to be an a$$, but I guess I have to.. You must be f'ing kidding us. It all stinks of centralized mining of the devs, to get the Masternodes running to make them money for nothing. Why the premine? You "need" Masternodes now, right? gtfo |
|
|
|
|
motherfucker123
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
April 19, 2016, 02:38:41 PM |
|
The current marketcap is only BTC168. Definitely time to accumulate. How low can this go? You realize only about 20% of the coins for the first year have been mined so far? |
|
|
|
|
4x13 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
|
|
April 19, 2016, 02:47:37 PM |
|
Here is a new proposal to gather funding to create a truly untraceable transaction. The previous proposal was voted in, but was not paid as the initial budget fund was paid first.
I have done some research and have devised a means to create a truly untraceable transaction in a 100% trust-less manner. Utilizing the same masternodes that we have right now.
Proposal to Add to Darknet Untraceable Transactions;
hash=7ab87af4eb15979b0e542e389a37022feedf0455abf0494bb3df2fcadab210eb
"mnbudget vote 7ab87af4eb15979b0e542e389a37022feedf0455abf0494bb3df2fcadab210eb yes" to vote in favor
"mnbudget vote 7ab87af4eb15979b0e542e389a37022feedf0455abf0494bb3df2fcadab210eb no" to vote against
"mnbudget getinfo untraceable-tx” to check the status
500k DNET will be used to fund development? Will you dump all 500k at market prices? I have yet to sell a single DNET. That amount may also be used to obtain help from other developers as well, this is a huge undertaking. If it was easy it would of been done already.. But No, I personally will not sell any DNET. I have stated before I would not sell any until after the PoS change and then I would only sell the stakes or rewards. |
|
|
|
|
4x13 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
|
|
April 19, 2016, 02:51:54 PM |
|
still got no luck with solo mining.
should I use a different miner?
checked for the port and ip, all matches.
help would be greatly appreciated
To my understanding the wallet uses a different protocol of communicating with miners so it doesn't work. Here is a new proposal to gather funding to create a truly untraceable transaction. The previous proposal was voted in, but was not paid as the initial budget fund was paid first.
I have done some research and have devised a means to create a truly untraceable transaction in a 100% trust-less manner. Utilizing the same masternodes that we have right now.
Proposal to Add to Darknet Untraceable Transactions;
hash=7ab87af4eb15979b0e542e389a37022feedf0455abf0494bb3df2fcadab210eb
"mnbudget vote 7ab87af4eb15979b0e542e389a37022feedf0455abf0494bb3df2fcadab210eb yes" to vote in favor
"mnbudget vote 7ab87af4eb15979b0e542e389a37022feedf0455abf0494bb3df2fcadab210eb no" to vote against
"mnbudget getinfo untraceable-tx” to check the status
500k DNET will be used to fund development? Will you dump all 500k at market prices? Probably. It would be nice to see more info about how the trustless untraceable transactions would work before voting. Why probably?? I have yet to sell a single DNET. I have either purchased or mined my own DNET just like everyone else. |
|
|
|
|
4x13 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
|
|
April 19, 2016, 02:54:53 PM |
|
Could you explain why DASH anonymous transactions are still traceable?
It is simple, regardless of how convoluted you make the transaction by using coinjoin (Which it is) all of the details still exist on the blockchain, so given enough time/effort someone could trace the transactions. |
|
|
|
|
|
kokokoin
|
|
April 19, 2016, 02:57:23 PM |
|
You realize only about 20% of the coins for the first year have been mined so far?
About 41% of total PoW supply is mined already. But yes, we still need supply decreasing curve or we'll see 300 satoshi per DNET soon. |
|
|
|
|
4x13 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
|
|
April 19, 2016, 03:01:14 PM |
|
still got no luck with solo mining.
should I use a different miner?
checked for the port and ip, all matches.
help would be greatly appreciated
To my understanding the wallet uses a different protocol of communicating with miners so it doesn't work. Here is a new proposal to gather funding to create a truly untraceable transaction. The previous proposal was voted in, but was not paid as the initial budget fund was paid first.
I have done some research and have devised a means to create a truly untraceable transaction in a 100% trust-less manner. Utilizing the same masternodes that we have right now.
Proposal to Add to Darknet Untraceable Transactions;
hash=7ab87af4eb15979b0e542e389a37022feedf0455abf0494bb3df2fcadab210eb
"mnbudget vote 7ab87af4eb15979b0e542e389a37022feedf0455abf0494bb3df2fcadab210eb yes" to vote in favor
"mnbudget vote 7ab87af4eb15979b0e542e389a37022feedf0455abf0494bb3df2fcadab210eb no" to vote against
"mnbudget getinfo untraceable-tx” to check the status
500k DNET will be used to fund development? Will you dump all 500k at market prices? Probably. It would be nice to see more info about how the trustless untraceable transactions would work before voting. Well, without going into specifics, which I will be happy to do after it is released. By using side channel communications between the masternodes, we will be able to achieve a "Trustless air-gap" essentially removing the transaction details in the middle of the transaction from the blockchain. If a portion of the transaction details are not on the blockchain how would you trace the transaction from point 'a' to point 'b'? |
|
|
|
|
motherfucker123
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
April 19, 2016, 03:07:18 PM |
|
You realize only about 20% of the coins for the first year have been mined so far?
About 41% of total PoW supply is mined already. But yes, we still need supply decreasing curve or we'll see 300 satoshi per DNET soon. You are even more pessimistic than I am  I was having 400 sats pegged as the bottom. |
|
|
|
|
|
kbhutto
|
|
April 19, 2016, 03:08:45 PM |
|
What if during side channel communication between the masternodes, one MN deliberately decides to go offline? Will there by any adverse effects?
Well, without going into specifics, which I will be happy to do after it is released. By using side channel communications between the masternodes, we will be able to achieve a "Trustless air-gap" essentially removing the transaction details in the middle of the transaction from the blockchain. If a portion of the transaction details are not on the blockchain how would you trace the transaction from point 'a' to point 'b'?
|
|
|
|
|
|
borris123
|
|
April 19, 2016, 03:27:11 PM |
|
still got no luck with solo mining.
should I use a different miner?
checked for the port and ip, all matches.
help would be greatly appreciated
To my understanding the wallet uses a different protocol of communicating with miners so it doesn't work. Here is a new proposal to gather funding to create a truly untraceable transaction. The previous proposal was voted in, but was not paid as the initial budget fund was paid first.
I have done some research and have devised a means to create a truly untraceable transaction in a 100% trust-less manner. Utilizing the same masternodes that we have right now.
Proposal to Add to Darknet Untraceable Transactions;
hash=7ab87af4eb15979b0e542e389a37022feedf0455abf0494bb3df2fcadab210eb
"mnbudget vote 7ab87af4eb15979b0e542e389a37022feedf0455abf0494bb3df2fcadab210eb yes" to vote in favor
"mnbudget vote 7ab87af4eb15979b0e542e389a37022feedf0455abf0494bb3df2fcadab210eb no" to vote against
"mnbudget getinfo untraceable-tx” to check the status
500k DNET will be used to fund development? Will you dump all 500k at market prices? Probably. It would be nice to see more info about how the trustless untraceable transactions would work before voting. Well, without going into specifics, which I will be happy to do after it is released. By using side channel communications between the masternodes, we will be able to achieve a "Trustless air-gap" essentially removing the transaction details in the middle of the transaction from the blockchain. If a portion of the transaction details are not on the blockchain how would you trace the transaction from point 'a' to point 'b'? Time frame you looking for it being completed? |
|
|
|
|
4x13 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
|
|
April 19, 2016, 03:38:00 PM |
|
What if during side channel communication between the masternodes, one MN deliberately decides to go offline? Will there by any adverse effects?
Well, without going into specifics, which I will be happy to do after it is released. By using side channel communications between the masternodes, we will be able to achieve a "Trustless air-gap" essentially removing the transaction details in the middle of the transaction from the blockchain. If a portion of the transaction details are not on the blockchain how would you trace the transaction from point 'a' to point 'b'?
While that is a lot of information to discuss here in detail, the same securities and functionality of the masternode system would stay intact as it is when using Obfuscation (Darksend) and SwiftTX (InstantX). here is the link to the explanation of how the PoS (Proof of Service) is carried out, and how the network is kept safe from attacks and such. (Yes I know we need our own white paper, and it is on the list of things to do.. ) https://www.dash.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dash-WhitepaperV1.pdf |
|
|
|
|
4x13 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
|
|
April 19, 2016, 03:40:26 PM |
|
still got no luck with solo mining.
should I use a different miner?
checked for the port and ip, all matches.
help would be greatly appreciated
To my understanding the wallet uses a different protocol of communicating with miners so it doesn't work. Here is a new proposal to gather funding to create a truly untraceable transaction. The previous proposal was voted in, but was not paid as the initial budget fund was paid first.
I have done some research and have devised a means to create a truly untraceable transaction in a 100% trust-less manner. Utilizing the same masternodes that we have right now.
Proposal to Add to Darknet Untraceable Transactions;
hash=7ab87af4eb15979b0e542e389a37022feedf0455abf0494bb3df2fcadab210eb
"mnbudget vote 7ab87af4eb15979b0e542e389a37022feedf0455abf0494bb3df2fcadab210eb yes" to vote in favor
"mnbudget vote 7ab87af4eb15979b0e542e389a37022feedf0455abf0494bb3df2fcadab210eb no" to vote against
"mnbudget getinfo untraceable-tx” to check the status
500k DNET will be used to fund development? Will you dump all 500k at market prices? Probably. It would be nice to see more info about how the trustless untraceable transactions would work before voting. Well, without going into specifics, which I will be happy to do after it is released. By using side channel communications between the masternodes, we will be able to achieve a "Trustless air-gap" essentially removing the transaction details in the middle of the transaction from the blockchain. If a portion of the transaction details are not on the blockchain how would you trace the transaction from point 'a' to point 'b'? Time frame you looking for it being completed? That is a hard answer to give and I would not want to be one of those guys who puts a specific time frame on something that has not been done before. |
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
