Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2024, 06:23:16 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: .
.
.

Pages: « 1 ... 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 [383] 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 ... 541 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][PIVX] - PRIVATE INSTANT VERIFIED TRANSACTION - PROOF OF STAKE - ZEROCOIN  (Read 782133 times)
Redni
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 370
Merit: 255


View Profile
April 24, 2017, 06:33:34 PM
 #7641

Bad news – PoSWallet:

"With the PIVX rewards system, it is more profitable for users to have PIVX in their own staking wallet, especially with > 10,000 as a masternode. Because of this, we are going to delist PIVX from POSWallet.com. Please start withdrawing your PIVX now - we will make sure all users have the ability to withdraw all of their coins. If you need a larger daily withdrawal amount, please open a support ticket. We apologize for the inconvenience this may cause, but think it is more important for the community as a whole to earn as much as they possible can staking."
1711693396
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711693396

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711693396
Reply with quote  #2

1711693396
Report to moderator
1711693396
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711693396

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711693396
Reply with quote  #2

1711693396
Report to moderator
1711693396
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711693396

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711693396
Reply with quote  #2

1711693396
Report to moderator
The block chain is the main innovation of Bitcoin. It is the first distributed timestamping system.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711693396
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711693396

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711693396
Reply with quote  #2

1711693396
Report to moderator
bathrobehero
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1050


ICO? Not even once.


View Profile
April 24, 2017, 07:57:04 PM
 #7642

Bad news – PoSWallet:

"With the PIVX rewards system, it is more profitable for users to have PIVX in their own staking wallet, especially with > 10,000 as a masternode. Because of this, we are going to delist PIVX from POSWallet.com. Please start withdrawing your PIVX now - we will make sure all users have the ability to withdraw all of their coins. If you need a larger daily withdrawal amount, please open a support ticket. We apologize for the inconvenience this may cause, but think it is more important for the community as a whole to earn as much as they possible can staking."


I'd say it's good news. More home staking operation = more nodes and decentralization of funds instead of holding all coins at the mercy of a centralized service that is PoSwallet...

It's not ideal for people who don't run their computers 0-24 though. In that case pick up a cheap old laptop, format it, install OS, firewall, antivirus, PIVX and stake with the added benefit of the battery acting as a UPS for uninterrupted staking.

Or use a Raspberry Pi.

Not your keys, not your coins!
luka4x
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 24, 2017, 09:23:26 PM
 #7643

Bad news – PoSWallet:

"With the PIVX rewards system, it is more profitable for users to have PIVX in their own staking wallet, especially with > 10,000 as a masternode. Because of this, we are going to delist PIVX from POSWallet.com. Please start withdrawing your PIVX now - we will make sure all users have the ability to withdraw all of their coins. If you need a larger daily withdrawal amount, please open a support ticket. We apologize for the inconvenience this may cause, but think it is more important for the community as a whole to earn as much as they possible can staking."


I'd say it's good news. More home staking operation = more nodes and decentralization of funds instead of holding all coins at the mercy of a centralized service that is PoSwallet...

It's not ideal for people who don't run their computers 0-24 though. In that case pick up a cheap old laptop, format it, install OS, firewall, antivirus, PIVX and stake with the added benefit of the battery acting as a UPS for uninterrupted staking.

Or use a Raspberry Pi.

maybe is one of that reason why the price drop a bit, if i´m not mistaken dash had some no good news with masternodes reward...both coin with high hype...
bitcoinsay
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 255


Presale starts on 28th of April!


View Profile
April 24, 2017, 09:35:42 PM
 #7644

I think that with Gnosis PIVX has been given less chance of entering poloniex.


▄▄███████▄▄
▄▄██▄▄ ▀▀   ▀▀ ▄▄██▄▄
▄████████▄     ▄████████▄
███████▀▀  ▄   ▄  ▀▀███████
██████▀  ▄█████████▄  ▀██████
██████  ▄█████████████▄  ██████
█████  █████████████████  █████
██████  █████████████████  ██████
█████  ███████████████████  █████
█████  ███████████████████  █████
████  ███████████████████  ████
▀▀█▀   ▀███████████████▀   ▀█▀▀
▄      ▀█████████████▀      ▄
█▄   ▄    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀    ▄   ▄█
▀  ████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████  ▀
▀█████████████████▀
▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████
               ▄▄▄
         ▄▄▄██████
   ▄▄▄███████▀████
▀█████████▀ ▄████
   ▀████▀ ▄██████
      ▀ ▄███████
        ██▀█████
        █   ▀██


        ▄▄▄▄
      ▄█████
      ███
    ▄▄███▄▄
    ███████
      ███
      ███
      ███
           ▄▄▄
 █▄       █████▄▀
 ███▄▄ ▄▄██████▀
  ▀█████████████
   █████████████
    ▀██████████
    ▄████████
▄▄████████▀▀


 ██▄     ▄██▄
 ████▄  ▄█████
 ███████████ █
 ██████████ ██
 █████████ ███
 ████▀███ ████
 ████  ▀ █████
 ▀███     ▀▀██
████
  ██
  ██
  ██
  ██
  ██
  ██
  ██
  ██
  ██
  ██
████
endchat
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 269
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 24, 2017, 10:48:18 PM
 #7645

I think that with Gnosis PIVX has been given less chance of entering poloniex.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=613862918819876&set=p.613862918819876&type=3&theater

https://ibb.co/kiCg35

aqzu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 01:01:29 AM
 #7646


it is more like not official by poloniex that post that. look at that logo on write your comment. which means it is your id that published that comment, not polo.
mfgex
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 01:08:07 AM
 #7647


it is more like not official by poloniex that post that. look at that logo on write your comment. which means it is your id that published that comment, not polo.

lol caught him
bathrobehero
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1050


ICO? Not even once.


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 02:16:00 AM
 #7648


Poor level 2 fud.

Not your keys, not your coins!
berron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 727
Merit: 501



View Profile
April 25, 2017, 04:59:22 AM
 #7649

Someone has updated the IPv6 multiple node arragement? I'm getting crazy trying to know what, where and haow decompress to update them...  Huh Huh Huh

vultr 5 instance?

if yes shutdown all instances:

systemctl stop pivx_n1
systemctl stop pivx_n2
systemctl stop pivx_n3
systemctl stop pivx_n4
systemctl stop pivx_n5
sleep 15

download and extract the new binaries to a temp folder like this:

cd ~
wget https://github.com/PIVX-Project/PIVX/releases/download/v2.2.0/pivx-2.2.0-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
mkdir ~/ctempClient
tar -vxzf ~/pivx-2.2.0-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz -C ~/ctempClient

optional save the old binaries:

mv /usr/local/bin/pivxd /usr/local/bin/pivxd_o
mv /usr/local/bin/pivx-cli /usr/local/bin/pivx-cli_o
mv /usr/local/bin/pivx-tx /usr/local/bin/pivx-tx_o
mv /usr/local/bin/pivx-qt /usr/local/bin/pivx-qt_o

copy the binaries to  /usr/local/bin/ like this:

cp ~/ctempClient/pivx-2.2.0/bin/pivx* /usr/local/bin/

not sure if optional or not but i did it and would recommend to do it: delete the chain and load it from a 2.2.0 client for every instance

restart the deamons:

systemctl restart pivx_n1
sleep 5
systemctl restart pivx_n2
sleep 5
systemctl restart pivx_n3
sleep 5
systemctl restart pivx_n4
sleep 5
systemctl restart pivx_n5
sleep 5

remove archive and temp folder:

rm -R ~/ctempClient
rm pivx-2.2.0-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz

restrat all nodes with controller wallet, after that you need to activate all nodes on vps too like this
pivx-cli -rpcport=444[xy] -rpcuser=[username] -rpcpassword=[pw] masternode start

xy is the instance number ofc

Thnaks a lot, DRPD.

Have you tried a real DEX??? But a real DEX like this!!!
jordan coins
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 208
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 05:31:53 AM
 #7650

The price will be back to $1 
coinwider
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 184
Merit: 101


Put the fun back into banking!


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 06:31:33 AM
 #7651

till yet i have used the 2.1.3.0 wallet version on LinuxMint 64bit   Kernel 4.8.0-49-generic without any probs

updated yesterday to Pivx 2.2.0 wallet + sync from Scratch but now i always get the same error when starting pivx 2.2:

pivx-qt: main.cpp:2300: bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock&, CValidationState&, CBlockIndex*, CCoinsViewCache&, bool): Assertion `hashPrevBlock == view.GetBestBlock()' failed.
Aborted




any advice what I can do? sync from Scratch did complete well...




edit: to be more clear, i've downloaded the correct linux version x86_64

Put the fun back into banking! Use cryptocurrencies.  --- PivX --- TenX --- Lisk --- Factom --- Siacoin ---
DRPD
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 07:11:10 AM
 #7652

till yet i have used the 2.1.3.0 wallet version on LinuxMint 64bit   Kernel 4.8.0-49-generic without any probs

updated yesterday to Pivx 2.2.0 wallet + sync from Scratch but now i always get the same error when starting pivx 2.2:

pivx-qt: main.cpp:2300: bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock&, CValidationState&, CBlockIndex*, CCoinsViewCache&, bool): Assertion `hashPrevBlock == view.GetBestBlock()' failed.
Aborted




any advice what I can do? sync from Scratch did complete well...




edit: to be more clear, i've downloaded the correct linux version x86_64

no problem on ubunt 16.04 here with version 2.2.0. i would go to slack and ask for help there. i guess it has to do with mint?
coinwider
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 184
Merit: 101


Put the fun back into banking!


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 07:24:21 AM
 #7653

till yet i have used the 2.1.3.0 wallet version on LinuxMint 64bit   Kernel 4.8.0-49-generic without any probs

updated yesterday to Pivx 2.2.0 wallet + sync from Scratch but now i always get the same error when starting pivx 2.2:

pivx-qt: main.cpp:2300: bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock&, CValidationState&, CBlockIndex*, CCoinsViewCache&, bool): Assertion `hashPrevBlock == view.GetBestBlock()' failed.
Aborted




any advice what I can do? sync from Scratch did complete well...




edit: to be more clear, i've downloaded the correct linux version x86_64

no problem on ubunt 16.04 here with version 2.2.0. i would go to slack and ask for help there. i guess it has to do with mint?

nope i don't think it has to do with Mint - maybe it relies to the new 4.8 Kernel Version 49 which i just upgraded...
trying 4.8 46 now instead and will post progress

Put the fun back into banking! Use cryptocurrencies.  --- PivX --- TenX --- Lisk --- Factom --- Siacoin ---
coinwider
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 184
Merit: 101


Put the fun back into banking!


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 08:01:43 AM
 #7654

till yet i have used the 2.1.3.0 wallet version on LinuxMint 64bit   Kernel 4.8.0-49-generic without any probs

updated yesterday to Pivx 2.2.0 wallet + sync from Scratch but now i always get the same error when starting pivx 2.2:

pivx-qt: main.cpp:2300: bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock&, CValidationState&, CBlockIndex*, CCoinsViewCache&, bool): Assertion `hashPrevBlock == view.GetBestBlock()' failed.
Aborted




any advice what I can do? sync from Scratch did complete well...




edit: to be more clear, i've downloaded the correct linux version x86_64

no problem on ubunt 16.04 here with version 2.2.0. i would go to slack and ask for help there. i guess it has to do with mint?

nope i don't think it has to do with Mint - maybe it relies to the new 4.8 Kernel Version 49 which i just upgraded...
trying 4.8 46 now instead and will post progress

restarted with Kernel 4.8 Version 46 but the same error


pivx-qt: main.cpp:2300: bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock&, CValidationState&, CBlockIndex*, CCoinsViewCache&, bool): Assertion `hashPrevBlock == view.GetBestBlock()' failed.
Aborted



i don't want to open a slack account, i'll gonna post it via an github issue..

Put the fun back into banking! Use cryptocurrencies.  --- PivX --- TenX --- Lisk --- Factom --- Siacoin ---
borris123
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 08:12:57 AM
 #7655

till yet i have used the 2.1.3.0 wallet version on LinuxMint 64bit   Kernel 4.8.0-49-generic without any probs

updated yesterday to Pivx 2.2.0 wallet + sync from Scratch but now i always get the same error when starting pivx 2.2:

pivx-qt: main.cpp:2300: bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock&, CValidationState&, CBlockIndex*, CCoinsViewCache&, bool): Assertion `hashPrevBlock == view.GetBestBlock()' failed.
Aborted




any advice what I can do? sync from Scratch did complete well...




edit: to be more clear, i've downloaded the correct linux version x86_64

no problem on ubunt 16.04 here with version 2.2.0. i would go to slack and ask for help there. i guess it has to do with mint?

nope i don't think it has to do with Mint - maybe it relies to the new 4.8 Kernel Version 49 which i just upgraded...
trying 4.8 46 now instead and will post progress

restarted with Kernel 4.8 Version 46 but the same error


pivx-qt: main.cpp:2300: bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock&, CValidationState&, CBlockIndex*, CCoinsViewCache&, bool): Assertion `hashPrevBlock == view.GetBestBlock()' failed.
Aborted



i don't want to open a slack account, i'll gonna post it via an github issue..

The 2.2.0 qt has a memory leak problem. Presstab thinks he knows the prob. If you build from master source it may have been fixed as alot of new commits are on there.

The Daemon works fine no probs. You have to delete all block data and resync from scratch.
coinwider
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 184
Merit: 101


Put the fun back into banking!


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 08:23:39 AM
 #7656

till yet i have used the 2.1.3.0 wallet version on LinuxMint 64bit   Kernel 4.8.0-49-generic without any probs

updated yesterday to Pivx 2.2.0 wallet + sync from Scratch but now i always get the same error when starting pivx 2.2:

pivx-qt: main.cpp:2300: bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock&, CValidationState&, CBlockIndex*, CCoinsViewCache&, bool): Assertion `hashPrevBlock == view.GetBestBlock()' failed.
Aborted




any advice what I can do? sync from Scratch did complete well...




edit: to be more clear, i've downloaded the correct linux version x86_64

no problem on ubunt 16.04 here with version 2.2.0. i would go to slack and ask for help there. i guess it has to do with mint?

nope i don't think it has to do with Mint - maybe it relies to the new 4.8 Kernel Version 49 which i just upgraded...
trying 4.8 46 now instead and will post progress

restarted with Kernel 4.8 Version 46 but the same error


pivx-qt: main.cpp:2300: bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock&, CValidationState&, CBlockIndex*, CCoinsViewCache&, bool): Assertion `hashPrevBlock == view.GetBestBlock()' failed.
Aborted



i don't want to open a slack account, i'll gonna post it via an github issue..

The 2.2.0 qt has a memory leak problem. Presstab thinks he knows the prob. If you build from master source it may have been fixed as alot of new commits are on there.

The Daemon works fine no probs. You have to delete all block data and resync from scratch.

ah okay, thx for info. but i already resynced from scratch with the new wallet; but still have the problem

i wrote an issue on github       https://github.com/PIVX-Project/PIVX/issues/148

Put the fun back into banking! Use cryptocurrencies.  --- PivX --- TenX --- Lisk --- Factom --- Siacoin ---
NorthPixel
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 314
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 25, 2017, 10:07:43 AM
 #7657

News from PosWallet should not significantly lower the price, but rather create a more distributed network.
endchat
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 269
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 01:39:59 PM
 #7658


it is more like not official by poloniex that post that. look at that logo on write your comment. which means it is your id that published that comment, not polo.

not sure what you are saying, I just posted screencaps of a post I found.

I have never even posted to FB, ever.
imconfusedman
Copper Member
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 114
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 01:42:49 PM
 #7659

The price will be back to $1 

$0.50 - $0.25 hopefully...
That's when I'll buy.
klimsss42
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 01:47:05 PM
Last edit: April 25, 2017, 03:02:40 PM by klimsss42
 #7660

The price will be back to $1  

$0.50 - $0.25 hopefully...
That's when I'll buy.

That will never happen. I'm afraid at $5 you'll regret that you didn't take the current buying opportunity.
Pages: « 1 ... 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 [383] 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 ... 541 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!