[ANN][DCR] Decred - Community Governance | Bitcoin Devs | Lightning Network

[Wind_FURY]

Will be ready for this one

thanks, agreed let's hardfork this dogshit scamcoin reeeeeee

Gembitz has never left/will never leave? Hahaha.

What is it with Decred that causes you to lose your peace of mind in your crypto-life? You're like an ex-girlfriend who would never moved on.

[gartmah]

The Decred Journal for September was released, which included all the updates for the month
https://medium.com/decred/decred-journal-september-2020-fb6608ff74be

[Wind_FURY]

The Decred Journal for September was released, which included all the updates for the month
https://medium.com/decred/decred-journal-september-2020-fb6608ff74be

It's so disappointing to see newbies' interests are attracted more to DEFI and other shitcoins, than real experiments on decentralized protocols, governance, and development.

[cryptomaxsun]

The Decred Journal for September was released, which included all the updates for the month
https://medium.com/decred/decred-journal-september-2020-fb6608ff74be

It's so disappointing to see newbies' interests are attracted more to DEFI and other shitcoins, than real experiments on decentralized protocols, governance, and development.

Newcomers to cryptocurrency are attracted primarily by the hype, the opportunity to make money quickly.
Few people are interested in real technologies.
We see this on the example of many altcoins, whose price is steadily going down with active development, new solutions and technologies.
Decred has a very low profitability for pos-mining, only about 5.6% per year.
And at the same time the price goes down, which makes it extremely unattractive for investment.
As a result, we have what we have.

[Wind_FURY]

The Decred Journal for September was released, which included all the updates for the month
https://medium.com/decred/decred-journal-september-2020-fb6608ff74be

It's so disappointing to see newbies' interests are attracted more to DEFI and other shitcoins, than real experiments on decentralized protocols, governance, and development.

Newcomers to cryptocurrency are attracted primarily by the hype, the opportunity to make money quickly.
Few people are interested in real technologies.
We see this on the example of many altcoins, whose price is steadily going down with active development, new solutions and technologies.
Decred has a very low profitability for pos-mining, only about 5.6% per year.
And at the same time the price goes down, which makes it extremely unattractive for investment.
As a result, we have what we have.

What would have happened to Bitcoin, and its development if the people of 2010 who came in cared only about it as an investment, not as a new technological form of how we trade with each other and store our wealth.

[cryptomaxsun]

The Decred Journal for September was released, which included all the updates for the month
https://medium.com/decred/decred-journal-september-2020-fb6608ff74be

It's so disappointing to see newbies' interests are attracted more to DEFI and other shitcoins, than real experiments on decentralized protocols, governance, and development.

Newcomers to cryptocurrency are attracted primarily by the hype, the opportunity to make money quickly.
Few people are interested in real technologies.
We see this on the example of many altcoins, whose price is steadily going down with active development, new solutions and technologies.
Decred has a very low profitability for pos-mining, only about 5.6% per year.
And at the same time the price goes down, which makes it extremely unattractive for investment.
As a result, we have what we have.

What would have happened to Bitcoin, and its development if the people of 2010 who came in cared only about it as an investment, not as a new technological form of how we trade with each other and store our wealth.

I like this coin decred, I am from the beginning with this coin.
But, did anyone need bitcoin if it was used by no more than a thousand people and the price was steadily decreasing, but at the same time it would be technically more perfect?
I think this is a rhetorical question.
Technology and investment are a good symbiosis.

[musketeer_athos]

I like this coin decred, I am from the beginning with this coin.
But, did anyone need bitcoin if it was used by no more than a thousand people and the price was steadily decreasing, but at the same time it would be technically more perfect?
I think this is a rhetorical question.
Technology and investment are a good symbiosis.

I like this DCR coin too. I believe that Decred deserves attention as an investment asset.

[Wind_FURY]

The Decred Journal for September was released, which included all the updates for the month
https://medium.com/decred/decred-journal-september-2020-fb6608ff74be

It's so disappointing to see newbies' interests are attracted more to DEFI and other shitcoins, than real experiments on decentralized protocols, governance, and development.

Newcomers to cryptocurrency are attracted primarily by the hype, the opportunity to make money quickly.
Few people are interested in real technologies.
We see this on the example of many altcoins, whose price is steadily going down with active development, new solutions and technologies.
Decred has a very low profitability for pos-mining, only about 5.6% per year.
And at the same time the price goes down, which makes it extremely unattractive for investment.
As a result, we have what we have.

What would have happened to Bitcoin, and its development if the people of 2010 who came in cared only about it as an investment, not as a new technological form of how we trade with each other and store our wealth.

I like this coin decred, I am from the beginning with this coin.
But, did anyone need bitcoin if it was used by no more than a thousand people and the price was steadily decreasing, but at the same time it would be technically more perfect?
I think this is a rhetorical question.
Technology and investment are a good symbiosis.

Yes, because there are sectors in the economy that needed to be served, but the banks did not want to serve. The dark markets/black markets for instance. Bitcoin is about finding inefficiencies.

[Iced]

It is so weird to see all this negativity around Decred 

By far Decred showed me real development instead of a series of bigmouths who we're telling that they would solve problem X and would leave with all your money to the moon..

[gembitz]

The Decred Journal for September was released, which included all the updates for the month
https://medium.com/decred/decred-journal-september-2020-fb6608ff74be

It's so disappointing to see newbies' interests are attracted more to DEFI and other shitcoins, than real experiments on decentralized protocols, governance, and development.

Newcomers to cryptocurrency are attracted primarily by the hype, the opportunity to make money quickly.
Few people are interested in real technologies.
We see this on the example of many altcoins, whose price is steadily going down with active development, new solutions and technologies.
Decred has a very low profitability for pos-mining, only about 5.6% per year.
And at the same time the price goes down, which makes it extremely unattractive for investment.
As a result, we have what we have.

What would have happened to Bitcoin, and its development if the people of 2010 who came in cared only about it as an investment, not as a new technological form of how we trade with each other and store our wealth.

hands open doors --feet kick them down ;-D ~ wheres my free "airdrop" coins you jackass ?

[gembitz]

It is so weird to see all this negativity around Decred 

By far Decred showed me real development instead of a series of bigmouths who we're telling that they would solve problem X and would leave with all your money to the moon..

they try to doxx people who call them out on their bullshittery :-D ~we never forget, we never forgive #ExpectUs

[Praxis]

It is so weird to see all this negativity around Decred  

By far Decred showed me real development instead of a series of bigmouths who we're telling that they would solve problem X and would leave with all your money to the moon..

Agree, DCR development is top notch.
Regarding the "negativity", if you're referring to gembitz, he's just the local troll.
Use the ignore function, he only posts incomprehensible gibberish.

[gembitz]

It is so weird to see all this negativity around Decred 

By far Decred showed me real development instead of a series of bigmouths who we're telling that they would solve problem X and would leave with all your money to the moon..

Agree, DCR development is nop notch.
Regarding the "negativity", if you're referring to gembitz, he's just the local troll.
Use the ignore function, he only posts incomprehensible gibberish.

why let's talk about the fraudulent "airdrop" that supposedly justified the PREMINE ++followed by campaign to dox users' info?

 :\ hmm TELL IT TO THE JUDGE!! the jig is up!====> I'M NOT THE ONLY ONE WHO GOT GYPPED ON THE FAKE AIRDROP !! <===

we never forget * we never forgive #ExpectOwlz

[Vanzetti]

why big green candle?

[Ferdo]

why big green candle?

Cause there was a red one for the past 3 years?

[Vanzetti]

why big green candle?

Cause there was a red one for the past 3 years?

fair enough

[DrBeer]

It is so weird to see all this negativity around Decred  

By far Decred showed me real development instead of a series of bigmouths who we're telling that they would solve problem X and would leave with all your money to the moon..

Agree, DCR development is nop notch.
Regarding the "negativity", if you're referring to gembitz, he's just the local troll.
Use the ignore function, he only posts incomprehensible gibberish.

And what are the real claims to the development of DCR? The project adheres to its roadmap, problems like many others have not been noticed, they may of course expect that it will replace Bitcoin - but this is stupid. DCR has occupied its niche, has good support and market indicators, and it seems to me that the "accusations" and claims to its development are not very objective. Or are there specific examples?

[gembitz]

It is so weird to see all this negativity around Decred  

By far Decred showed me real development instead of a series of bigmouths who we're telling that they would solve problem X and would leave with all your money to the moon..

Agree, DCR development is nop notch.
Regarding the "negativity", if you're referring to gembitz, he's just the local troll.
Use the ignore function, he only posts incomprehensible gibberish.

And what are the real claims to the development of DCR? The project adheres to its roadmap, problems like many others have not been noticed, they may of course expect that it will replace Bitcoin - but this is stupid. DCR has occupied its niche, has good support and market indicators, and it seems to me that the "accusations" and claims to its development are not very objective. Or are there specific examples?

bug found in GO ~ these chumps prolly didn't even patch it! ;-D lol

[DrBeer]

bug found in GO ~ these chumps prolly didn't even patch it! ;-D lol

Not every mistake can create a real problem. If there are real bugs, with euritic status, it is true that the fixes will be with the next system update. For every minor non-critical bug, there is no point in releasing updates

[Praxis]

1.6.0 soon.

Most important release in Decred's history.

Y'all hyped yet?