Bitcoin Forum
May 21, 2024, 12:44:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 [1699] 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 ... 2269 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers  (Read 3073044 times)
nyanhtet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


Bawga


View Profile
December 11, 2016, 10:20:24 PM
 #33961

Why Max and developers, still did not remove the voices from delegates? Why they told lies? They promised to make it at once.

They do it that the circle of their friends could catch enough free Lisk to vote the friend for the friend?

It is corruption. Developers should not vote. The community has to solve.



He will devote soon. I thought he is not working in weekend.

  Develop Custom Decentralized Blockchain Applications in JavaScript with LISK!         
  Website | Blog | Reddit | Chat - Be part of the decentralized application movement!
  Lisk Delegate - Communitypool: 80% reward sharing delegate
Transparency Report
tuvok007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1001


View Profile
December 11, 2016, 10:53:19 PM
 #33962

Total distribution 5315 addresses.Thats not much but finally a little growth after months on around 5200 addresses. Cant wait when there will be 50 000 addresses and more and more and more...
BitPotus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 604


View Profile
December 11, 2016, 10:57:31 PM
 #33963

so just 100 lucky forgers can make new lisk?

and for you to be a forger, you need to get voted for?

Gr33nDrag0n
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 12:02:30 AM
 #33964

Hello Liskers, This week-end I've work on 2 new scripts.

## Script 1 - snapshot.lisknode.io improvement.

Automatically check each 2 minutes for a new snapshot (for now: gr33ndrag0n, mrv or isabella) and update new files latest.gz and latest.txt

Homepage: https://snapshot.lisknode.io/

More Infos: https://snapshot.lisknode.io/README.txt`

Usage Example:
Code:
bash lisk.sh rebuild -u https://snapshot.lisknode.io/ -f latest.gz

## Script 2 - https://lisknode.io/mirrors/ creation and auto-update.

lisknode.io now have an auto-updated mirrors section for high availability redundency.

Homepage: https://lisknode.io/mirrors/

More Infos: https://lisknode.io/mirrors/README.txt

Usage Example:
Code:
bash lisk.sh rebuild -u https://lisknode.io/mirrors/snapshot.lisknode.io/ -f latest.gz
hmachado
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 279
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 01:13:26 AM
Last edit: December 12, 2016, 02:47:23 AM by hmachado
 #33965

This is, what i hope, the last update on the Consensus issue.
Adding the -Q and -Z option, LiskAK will check the average consensus % on your nodes and will switch according to your settings.

Ex. -Q 65 5 - Z

In this case it will switch if your forging node is under 65% Consensus, in case another node have a higher % (average of the last 5 values).

When not synching, consensus is usually high, so you need to add the -Z flag.
This way LiskAK will ignore consensus on nodes showing syncing = false.

You can tweak the values as you wish, but be careful not to set it to aggressively or they will be switching all the time.

My current (experimental) settings: -P 3000 -w 3000 -Q 55 5 -Z
If you take the -Z out, it will switch a lot.

P.S. - Please be careful when using multiple scripts.
I would recommend using LiskAK alone.
There is no need to add other scripts and it can make you vulnerable to conflicts between scripts.

https://github.com/filipealmeida/liskak

Thanks to @stoner19 @SpaceTrucker @Phoenix1969 @djselery @GreXX @Isabella for the donations. Happy forging (with no missed blocks).

Delegate Votting Add & Donations : 8858064098621060602L
spendawgs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 03:44:42 AM
 #33966

Can someone please advise me, how often will one need to vote for the sharing pools to achieve maximum rewards? And wxactly which ones please. Thanks
It is one time vote! Not often. You can cost 1 Lisk to vote maximum 33 delegates. If you have 10000LSK they all get 10000 votes equal. If you need maximum rewards of pool, you need to have maximum amount of LSK. Cheesy

So how many votes would get you into the top 100 delegates?

It is hard to say, it can change every time. You can check here: https://explorer.lisk.io/delegateMonitor . Now rank 1 got 19.91% and rank 101 got 8.18% approval. It depends on their voters holding amount increase, decrease.

Alright Il check it. Thanks

Woof woof!!
Ullukapatha
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 07:21:30 AM
 #33967

Why Max and developers, still did not remove the voices from delegates? Why they told lies? They promised to make it at once.

They do it that the circle of their friends could catch enough free Lisk to vote the friend for the friend?

It is corruption. Developers should not vote. The community has to solve.



He will devote soon. I thought he is not working in weekend.

What about your personal LISK account max?
Ullukapatha
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 07:26:31 AM
 #33968

Should change the name of the project from LISK to Max? Max is the CEO, he holds all the funds, he is a delegate too, he uses advisory fund to vote for himself and his friends, he uses his own account to vote for his friends. Where is decentralisation in LISK?
BitBanksy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 08:53:51 AM
 #33969

Why Max and developers, still did not remove the voices from delegates? Why they told lies? They promised to make it at once.

They do it that the circle of their friends could catch enough free Lisk to vote the friend for the friend?

It is corruption. Developers should not vote. The community has to solve.

Max has started to unvote folks. Thanks to his backup, trustworthy delegates (who proved so with testnet) were selected & prioritised ahead of opportunists to secure the mainnet in its early days. Now that the network is stable, the community will progressively take over.

I wonder if you would still talk like this if you would have been selected... obviously your anger reflect differently
BitBanksy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 08:57:52 AM
 #33970

Should change the name of the project from LISK to Max? Max is the CEO, he holds all the funds, he is a delegate too, he uses advisory fund to vote for himself and his friends, he uses his own account to vote for his friends. Where is decentralisation in LISK?

As the CEO, Max rightly hold some funds but he's far from the only one and obviously your are not one of them  Wink
leepfrog
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:11:16 AM
 #33971

Can someone please advise me, how often will one need to vote for the sharing pools to achieve maximum rewards? And wxactly which ones please. Thanks
It is one time vote! Not often. You can cost 1 Lisk to vote maximum 33 delegates. If you have 10000LSK they all get 10000 votes equal. If you need maximum rewards of pool, you need to have maximum amount of LSK. Cheesy

So how many votes would get you into the top 100 delegates?

It is hard to say, it can change every time. You can check here: https://explorer.lisk.io/delegateMonitor . Now rank 1 got 19.91% and rank 101 got 8.18% approval. It depends on their voters holding amount increase, decrease.

So the rich will get richer as usual. It is kind of sad tbh.
abyrnes81
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:29:26 AM
 #33972

Can someone please advise me, how often will one need to vote for the sharing pools to achieve maximum rewards? And wxactly which ones please. Thanks
It is one time vote! Not often. You can cost 1 Lisk to vote maximum 33 delegates. If you have 10000LSK they all get 10000 votes equal. If you need maximum rewards of pool, you need to have maximum amount of LSK. Cheesy

So how many votes would get you into the top 100 delegates?

It is hard to say, it can change every time. You can check here: https://explorer.lisk.io/delegateMonitor . Now rank 1 got 19.91% and rank 101 got 8.18% approval. It depends on their voters holding amount increase, decrease.

So the rich will get richer as usual. It is kind of sad tbh.


Like in the real world, nothing of different.  If you have a lot of money, you'll make a lot of money. 
leepfrog
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:55:24 AM
 #33973

Can someone please advise me, how often will one need to vote for the sharing pools to achieve maximum rewards? And wxactly which ones please. Thanks
It is one time vote! Not often. You can cost 1 Lisk to vote maximum 33 delegates. If you have 10000LSK they all get 10000 votes equal. If you need maximum rewards of pool, you need to have maximum amount of LSK. Cheesy

So how many votes would get you into the top 100 delegates?

It is hard to say, it can change every time. You can check here: https://explorer.lisk.io/delegateMonitor . Now rank 1 got 19.91% and rank 101 got 8.18% approval. It depends on their voters holding amount increase, decrease.

So the rich will get richer as usual. It is kind of sad tbh.


Like in the real world, nothing of different.  If you have a lot of money, you'll make a lot of money. 

It shouldn't be marketed as a fair system then. It is as rigged as it comes!
nyanhtet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


Bawga


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:27:02 AM
 #33974

Can someone please advise me, how often will one need to vote for the sharing pools to achieve maximum rewards? And wxactly which ones please. Thanks
It is one time vote! Not often. You can cost 1 Lisk to vote maximum 33 delegates. If you have 10000LSK they all get 10000 votes equal. If you need maximum rewards of pool, you need to have maximum amount of LSK. Cheesy

So how many votes would get you into the top 100 delegates?

It is hard to say, it can change every time. You can check here: https://explorer.lisk.io/delegateMonitor . Now rank 1 got 19.91% and rank 101 got 8.18% approval. It depends on their voters holding amount increase, decrease.

So the rich will get richer as usual. It is kind of sad tbh.
True, it is real world, but you have a chance if you are talent and work hard for LSK, community will choose you. Not all 101 delegates are rich.

  Develop Custom Decentralized Blockchain Applications in JavaScript with LISK!         
  Website | Blog | Reddit | Chat - Be part of the decentralized application movement!
  Lisk Delegate - Communitypool: 80% reward sharing delegate
Transparency Report
Medow
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 357
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:58:05 AM
 #33975

Can someone please advise me, how often will one need to vote for the sharing pools to achieve maximum rewards? And wxactly which ones please. Thanks
It is one time vote! Not often. You can cost 1 Lisk to vote maximum 33 delegates. If you have 10000LSK they all get 10000 votes equal. If you need maximum rewards of pool, you need to have maximum amount of LSK. Cheesy

So how many votes would get you into the top 100 delegates?

It is hard to say, it can change every time. You can check here: https://explorer.lisk.io/delegateMonitor . Now rank 1 got 19.91% and rank 101 got 8.18% approval. It depends on their voters holding amount increase, decrease.

So the rich will get richer as usual. It is kind of sad tbh.
True, it is real world, but you have a chance if you are talent and work hard for LSK, community will choose you. Not all 101 delegates are rich.

Not many people have the luxury of working hard for a maybe. Most of us are fighting to stay alive. This project is doomed after a few pump and dumps.
vlom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1117


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 12:17:57 PM
 #33976

Crypti vs. Lisk 0:1
ARK vs. Lisk 0:1

Lisk crashed Crypti. But Ark could not destroy Lisk. Will there be an other attempt of Crypti- or desperate ex-Lisk guys?
Vega
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 739
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 01:09:22 PM
 #33977

Crypti vs. Lisk 0:1
ARK vs. Lisk 0:1

Lisk crashed Crypti. But Ark could not destroy Lisk. Will there be an other attempt of Crypti- or desperate ex-Lisk guys?

Ex-lisk guys? I certainly didn't leave lisk, neither are the majority of Ark members. Since when can you be only part of one projects community? (if you go to lisk chat, there are quite a few shift guys that are also there, and the other way around too. same for rise, and others.)
I'm willing to be part of anything that has prospects let that may be promising technology or promising investment, preferably both at the same time.

But again, I'm a man without any ideology besides rationality.
mashcom
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 189
Merit: 100



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 01:34:46 PM
 #33978

Should I buy some lisk now ( < ico price)?
Bitdonator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1223
Merit: 1002


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 02:18:07 PM
 #33979

Should I buy some lisk now ( < ico price)?


Good choice to buy now,
currently Lisk is undervalued and good news
comming around new year Smiley
Laulurastas
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 03:02:08 PM
Last edit: December 12, 2016, 04:15:18 PM by Laulurastas
 #33980

Can somebody help me with my transfer problem? Trying to send lisk to exchange, but i'm just getting "An error occurred while sending the transaction." message.
Thanks.
Pages: « 1 ... 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 [1699] 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 ... 2269 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!