nyanhtet
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Bawga
|
|
December 11, 2016, 10:20:24 PM |
|
Why Max and developers, still did not remove the voices from delegates? Why they told lies? They promised to make it at once.
They do it that the circle of their friends could catch enough free Lisk to vote the friend for the friend?
It is corruption. Developers should not vote. The community has to solve.
He will devote soon. I thought he is not working in weekend.
|
|
|
|
tuvok007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 11, 2016, 10:53:19 PM |
|
Total distribution 5315 addresses.Thats not much but finally a little growth after months on around 5200 addresses. Cant wait when there will be 50 000 addresses and more and more and more...
|
|
|
|
BitPotus
|
|
December 11, 2016, 10:57:31 PM |
|
so just 100 lucky forgers can make new lisk?
and for you to be a forger, you need to get voted for?
|
|
|
|
|
hmachado
|
|
December 12, 2016, 01:13:26 AM Last edit: December 12, 2016, 02:47:23 AM by hmachado |
|
This is, what i hope, the last update on the Consensus issue. Adding the -Q and -Z option, LiskAK will check the average consensus % on your nodes and will switch according to your settings. Ex. -Q 65 5 - ZIn this case it will switch if your forging node is under 65% Consensus, in case another node have a higher % (average of the last 5 values). When not synching, consensus is usually high, so you need to add the -Z flag. This way LiskAK will ignore consensus on nodes showing syncing = false. You can tweak the values as you wish, but be careful not to set it to aggressively or they will be switching all the time. My current (experimental) settings: -P 3000 -w 3000 -Q 55 5 -ZIf you take the -Z out, it will switch a lot. P.S. - Please be careful when using multiple scripts. I would recommend using LiskAK alone. There is no need to add other scripts and it can make you vulnerable to conflicts between scripts. https://github.com/filipealmeida/liskakThanks to @stoner19 @SpaceTrucker @Phoenix1969 @djselery @GreXX @Isabella for the donations. Happy forging (with no missed blocks). Delegate Votting Add & Donations : 8858064098621060602L
|
|
|
|
spendawgs
|
|
December 12, 2016, 03:44:42 AM |
|
Can someone please advise me, how often will one need to vote for the sharing pools to achieve maximum rewards? And wxactly which ones please. Thanks
It is one time vote! Not often. You can cost 1 Lisk to vote maximum 33 delegates. If you have 10000LSK they all get 10000 votes equal. If you need maximum rewards of pool, you need to have maximum amount of LSK. So how many votes would get you into the top 100 delegates? It is hard to say, it can change every time. You can check here: https://explorer.lisk.io/delegateMonitor . Now rank 1 got 19.91% and rank 101 got 8.18% approval. It depends on their voters holding amount increase, decrease. Alright Il check it. Thanks
|
Woof woof!!
|
|
|
Ullukapatha
|
|
December 12, 2016, 07:21:30 AM |
|
Why Max and developers, still did not remove the voices from delegates? Why they told lies? They promised to make it at once.
They do it that the circle of their friends could catch enough free Lisk to vote the friend for the friend?
It is corruption. Developers should not vote. The community has to solve.
He will devote soon. I thought he is not working in weekend. What about your personal LISK account max?
|
|
|
|
Ullukapatha
|
|
December 12, 2016, 07:26:31 AM |
|
Should change the name of the project from LISK to Max? Max is the CEO, he holds all the funds, he is a delegate too, he uses advisory fund to vote for himself and his friends, he uses his own account to vote for his friends. Where is decentralisation in LISK?
|
|
|
|
BitBanksy
|
|
December 12, 2016, 08:53:51 AM |
|
Why Max and developers, still did not remove the voices from delegates? Why they told lies? They promised to make it at once.
They do it that the circle of their friends could catch enough free Lisk to vote the friend for the friend?
It is corruption. Developers should not vote. The community has to solve.
Max has started to unvote folks. Thanks to his backup, trustworthy delegates (who proved so with testnet) were selected & prioritised ahead of opportunists to secure the mainnet in its early days. Now that the network is stable, the community will progressively take over. I wonder if you would still talk like this if you would have been selected... obviously your anger reflect differently
|
|
|
|
BitBanksy
|
|
December 12, 2016, 08:57:52 AM |
|
Should change the name of the project from LISK to Max? Max is the CEO, he holds all the funds, he is a delegate too, he uses advisory fund to vote for himself and his friends, he uses his own account to vote for his friends. Where is decentralisation in LISK?
As the CEO, Max rightly hold some funds but he's far from the only one and obviously your are not one of them
|
|
|
|
leepfrog
|
|
December 12, 2016, 10:11:16 AM |
|
Can someone please advise me, how often will one need to vote for the sharing pools to achieve maximum rewards? And wxactly which ones please. Thanks
It is one time vote! Not often. You can cost 1 Lisk to vote maximum 33 delegates. If you have 10000LSK they all get 10000 votes equal. If you need maximum rewards of pool, you need to have maximum amount of LSK. So how many votes would get you into the top 100 delegates? It is hard to say, it can change every time. You can check here: https://explorer.lisk.io/delegateMonitor . Now rank 1 got 19.91% and rank 101 got 8.18% approval. It depends on their voters holding amount increase, decrease. So the rich will get richer as usual. It is kind of sad tbh.
|
|
|
|
abyrnes81
|
|
December 12, 2016, 10:29:26 AM |
|
Can someone please advise me, how often will one need to vote for the sharing pools to achieve maximum rewards? And wxactly which ones please. Thanks
It is one time vote! Not often. You can cost 1 Lisk to vote maximum 33 delegates. If you have 10000LSK they all get 10000 votes equal. If you need maximum rewards of pool, you need to have maximum amount of LSK. So how many votes would get you into the top 100 delegates? It is hard to say, it can change every time. You can check here: https://explorer.lisk.io/delegateMonitor . Now rank 1 got 19.91% and rank 101 got 8.18% approval. It depends on their voters holding amount increase, decrease. So the rich will get richer as usual. It is kind of sad tbh. Like in the real world, nothing of different. If you have a lot of money, you'll make a lot of money.
|
|
|
|
leepfrog
|
|
December 12, 2016, 10:55:24 AM |
|
Can someone please advise me, how often will one need to vote for the sharing pools to achieve maximum rewards? And wxactly which ones please. Thanks
It is one time vote! Not often. You can cost 1 Lisk to vote maximum 33 delegates. If you have 10000LSK they all get 10000 votes equal. If you need maximum rewards of pool, you need to have maximum amount of LSK. So how many votes would get you into the top 100 delegates? It is hard to say, it can change every time. You can check here: https://explorer.lisk.io/delegateMonitor . Now rank 1 got 19.91% and rank 101 got 8.18% approval. It depends on their voters holding amount increase, decrease. So the rich will get richer as usual. It is kind of sad tbh. Like in the real world, nothing of different. If you have a lot of money, you'll make a lot of money. It shouldn't be marketed as a fair system then. It is as rigged as it comes!
|
|
|
|
nyanhtet
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Bawga
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:27:02 AM |
|
Can someone please advise me, how often will one need to vote for the sharing pools to achieve maximum rewards? And wxactly which ones please. Thanks
It is one time vote! Not often. You can cost 1 Lisk to vote maximum 33 delegates. If you have 10000LSK they all get 10000 votes equal. If you need maximum rewards of pool, you need to have maximum amount of LSK. So how many votes would get you into the top 100 delegates? It is hard to say, it can change every time. You can check here: https://explorer.lisk.io/delegateMonitor . Now rank 1 got 19.91% and rank 101 got 8.18% approval. It depends on their voters holding amount increase, decrease. So the rich will get richer as usual. It is kind of sad tbh. True, it is real world, but you have a chance if you are talent and work hard for LSK, community will choose you. Not all 101 delegates are rich.
|
|
|
|
Medow
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:58:05 AM |
|
Can someone please advise me, how often will one need to vote for the sharing pools to achieve maximum rewards? And wxactly which ones please. Thanks
It is one time vote! Not often. You can cost 1 Lisk to vote maximum 33 delegates. If you have 10000LSK they all get 10000 votes equal. If you need maximum rewards of pool, you need to have maximum amount of LSK. So how many votes would get you into the top 100 delegates? It is hard to say, it can change every time. You can check here: https://explorer.lisk.io/delegateMonitor . Now rank 1 got 19.91% and rank 101 got 8.18% approval. It depends on their voters holding amount increase, decrease. So the rich will get richer as usual. It is kind of sad tbh. True, it is real world, but you have a chance if you are talent and work hard for LSK, community will choose you. Not all 101 delegates are rich. Not many people have the luxury of working hard for a maybe. Most of us are fighting to stay alive. This project is doomed after a few pump and dumps.
|
|
|
|
vlom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1117
|
|
December 12, 2016, 12:17:57 PM |
|
Crypti vs. Lisk 0:1 ARK vs. Lisk 0:1
Lisk crashed Crypti. But Ark could not destroy Lisk. Will there be an other attempt of Crypti- or desperate ex-Lisk guys?
|
|
|
|
Vega
|
|
December 12, 2016, 01:09:22 PM |
|
Crypti vs. Lisk 0:1 ARK vs. Lisk 0:1
Lisk crashed Crypti. But Ark could not destroy Lisk. Will there be an other attempt of Crypti- or desperate ex-Lisk guys?
Ex-lisk guys? I certainly didn't leave lisk, neither are the majority of Ark members. Since when can you be only part of one projects community? (if you go to lisk chat, there are quite a few shift guys that are also there, and the other way around too. same for rise, and others.) I'm willing to be part of anything that has prospects let that may be promising technology or promising investment, preferably both at the same time. But again, I'm a man without any ideology besides rationality.
|
|
|
|
mashcom
|
|
December 12, 2016, 01:34:46 PM |
|
Should I buy some lisk now ( < ico price)?
|
|
|
|
Bitdonator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1223
Merit: 1002
|
|
December 12, 2016, 02:18:07 PM |
|
Should I buy some lisk now ( < ico price)?
Good choice to buy now, currently Lisk is undervalued and good news comming around new year
|
|
|
|
Laulurastas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2016, 03:02:08 PM Last edit: December 12, 2016, 04:15:18 PM by Laulurastas |
|
Can somebody help me with my transfer problem? Trying to send lisk to exchange, but i'm just getting "An error occurred while sending the transaction." message. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|