Termie
|
|
April 20, 2016, 11:00:44 AM |
|
if I want to open the 1.0.7 zip, my virus scanner (Avast) alerts: ethminer.exe > Win64:Malware-gen ?
|
|
|
|
Genoil (OP)
|
|
April 20, 2016, 11:06:43 AM |
|
if I want to open the 1.0.7 zip, my virus scanner (Avast) alerts: ethminer.exe > Win64:Malware-gen ?
Yes my AVG also alerts me occasionally about my own bins. Nothing to worry about. But if you don't trust it, just build from source
|
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
Termie
|
|
April 20, 2016, 11:37:09 AM |
|
ok no problem then, I´d just wondered because I never get this with previous of your zip's.
|
|
|
|
Pustul
|
|
April 20, 2016, 12:38:27 PM |
|
Heyy guys,
What is the -E bench and -Z 1335005 options in the default .bat file? And the -O 0xeXXXX is the adress to mine stratum without proxy?
First time mining ETH. Thanks
|
|
|
|
alenevaa
|
|
April 20, 2016, 12:52:25 PM |
|
What is the -E bench and -Z 1335005 options in the default .bat file?
You don't need this options. You can skip both of them. DAG file management: -E bench erase all DAG files older than current epoch but keep epoch 0 for benchmarking
Simulation mode: -Z [<n>],--simulation [<n>] Mining test mode. Used to validate kernel optimizations. Optionally specify block number.
|
|
|
|
Genoil (OP)
|
|
April 20, 2016, 02:51:40 PM |
|
Oh that bat file wasn't supposed to end up there
|
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
Pustul
|
|
April 20, 2016, 03:00:24 PM Last edit: April 20, 2016, 03:26:33 PM by Pustul |
|
Haha ok, thanks for the explanations! Also what kind of performance should I expect from a GTX 670 2GB? Unfortunately I'm on Win10. I've tried downgrading to 347.52 using the cuda 6.5 miner but I only have either 1 or 2 Mh/s (quite strange behavior). Does this seems correct: ethminer.exe -S eu1.ethermine.org:4444 --farm-recheck 2000 -O 0xe63b45d2f0c5fc089e42ea6805b9b8c9fe443d99.P8Z77V -U -R "D:\Program Files\Geth\ethereum\DAG" --cl-global-work 8192 --cl-local-work 128 Overclocking doesn't seem to affect the hashrate. I also have a 7970 on another PC but I haven't finished downloading the blockchain there.
|
|
|
|
davembg
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 340
Merit: 251
Smell the glove.
|
|
April 20, 2016, 03:31:30 PM |
|
Hello, when I use this command: "-R E:\Crypto\DagETH", the CPU load is 50%. When I remove it, it's 0,5%. The problem is that my drive C is almost full and I want to change the DAG folder in drive E, but this 50% CPU load is a big problem. What CPU are you using? AMD Phenom II X2 560 @ 3.6GHz. Yeah, very low-end dual core CPU, that makes sense. I'm afraid you'll need a more capable CPU to accommodate the miner.
|
|
|
|
Genoil (OP)
|
|
April 20, 2016, 04:30:39 PM |
|
Haha ok, thanks for the explanations! Also what kind of performance should I expect from a GTX 670 2GB? Unfortunately I'm on Win10. I've tried downgrading to 347.52 using the cuda 6.5 miner but I only have either 1 or 2 Mh/s (quite strange behavior). Does this seems correct: ethminer.exe -S eu1.ethermine.org:4444 --farm-recheck 2000 -O 0xe63b45d2f0c5fc089e42ea6805b9b8c9fe443d99.P8Z77V -U -R "D:\Program Files\Geth\ethereum\DAG" --cl-global-work 8192 --cl-local-work 128 Overclocking doesn't seem to affect the hashrate. I also have a 7970 on another PC but I haven't finished downloading the blockchain there. I don't know about the 670, I guess around 10MH/s? You don't need to download the blockchain for pool mining.
|
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
Pustul
|
|
April 20, 2016, 04:44:52 PM |
|
Ok, thank you for the help.
My other pc with the 7970 is ok with about 18 MH/s. But I can't get more than 2 MH/s with my GTX 670... Maybe because of Windows 10 even with 347.52 and cuda 6.5? The pool doesn't even see the worker!
|
|
|
|
Genoil (OP)
|
|
April 20, 2016, 04:56:00 PM |
|
Ok, thank you for the help.
My other pc with the 7970 is ok with about 18 MH/s. But I can't get more than 2 MH/s with my GTX 670... Maybe because of Windows 10 even with 347.52 and cuda 6.5? The pool doesn't even see the worker!
Win10 could very well be the cause. I know GK104 GPUs hash fine on Ubuntu. Not sure about Win7.
|
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
malekbaba
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1026
|
|
April 20, 2016, 05:59:19 PM |
|
Ok, thank you for the help.
My other pc with the 7970 is ok with about 18 MH/s. But I can't get more than 2 MH/s with my GTX 670... Maybe because of Windows 10 even with 347.52 and cuda 6.5? The pool doesn't even see the worker!
I think 670 should do 8-10 mHashes
|
|
|
|
Pustul
|
|
April 20, 2016, 06:21:18 PM |
|
Ok, thank you for the help.
My other pc with the 7970 is ok with about 18 MH/s. But I can't get more than 2 MH/s with my GTX 670... Maybe because of Windows 10 even with 347.52 and cuda 6.5? The pool doesn't even see the worker!
I think 670 should do 8-10 mHashes Thanks for the info! I'am now getting 4 MH/s with a fresh install of the latest drivers and cuda 7.5 on WIn10 and the worker is seen by the pool. I've tested a lot of settings and overclock but I can't seem to go much higher than 4.5MH/s. I guess I should try on Win7 or Ubuntu but I don't really want to install a dual boot now.
|
|
|
|
crazyearner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 20, 2016, 08:12:02 PM |
|
I have SAPPHIRE NITRO Radeon R9 380X 4G D5. I use ethminer-0.9.41-genoil-1.0.4b3 setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 C:\Mine\ethminer107\ethminer.exe --farm-recheck 2000 -G -F http://127.0.0.1:8080/dw1 --cl-local-work 256 --cl-global-work 16384 And i have 20.9 m/s. What settings can i change to improve that result? change the --farm-recheck 2000 to 200 think might of added an extra 0 by mistake as that is 2 sec and can lose out a lot of shares in that 200 ms is far better on getting shares unless changed it to be improved for 2sec delay. everything else seems to be fine with your settings you have.
|
|
|
|
spiete
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
April 20, 2016, 08:14:58 PM Last edit: June 02, 2016, 05:50:06 PM by spiete |
|
I have pc with 1x Sapphire r9 380x + 1x MSI r9 370 Using ethminer-0.9.41-genoil-1.0.7 Mining without overclocking. Here are the settings setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 C:\Mine\ethminer107\ethminer.exe --farm-recheck 1200 -G -F http://127.0.0.1:8080/dw1 --cl-local-work 256 --cl-global-work 20384 --mining-threads 2 Getting float result from 30.2 to 34.5 to 38.9. What can i do to make it more stable? And what can i do to gain more H/s? Is --farm-recheck 1200 good timing or i need to reduce it and why?
|
|
|
|
spiete
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
April 20, 2016, 08:39:31 PM |
|
I have SAPPHIRE NITRO Radeon R9 380X 4G D5. I use ethminer-0.9.41-genoil-1.0.4b3 setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 C:\Mine\ethminer107\ethminer.exe --farm-recheck 2000 -G -F http://127.0.0.1:8080/dw1 --cl-local-work 256 --cl-global-work 16384 And i have 20.9 m/s. What settings can i change to improve that result? change the --farm-recheck 2000 to 200 think might of added an extra 0 by mistake as that is 2 sec and can lose out a lot of shares in that 200 ms is far better on getting shares unless changed it to be improved for 2sec delay. everything else seems to be fine with your settings you have. When i change farm-recheck to 200 i get 20.3 m/s. Thats a little less. Or that doesnt gains for me more shares?
|
|
|
|
malekbaba
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1026
|
|
April 20, 2016, 09:19:06 PM |
|
I have SAPPHIRE NITRO Radeon R9 380X 4G D5. I use ethminer-0.9.41-genoil-1.0.4b3 setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 C:\Mine\ethminer107\ethminer.exe --farm-recheck 2000 -G -F http://127.0.0.1:8080/dw1 --cl-local-work 256 --cl-global-work 16384 And i have 20.9 m/s. What settings can i change to improve that result? change the --farm-recheck 2000 to 200 think might of added an extra 0 by mistake as that is 2 sec and can lose out a lot of shares in that 200 ms is far better on getting shares unless changed it to be improved for 2sec delay. everything else seems to be fine with your settings you have. When i change farm-recheck to 200 i get 20.3 m/s. Thats a little less. Or that doesnt gains for me more shares? it is good hashes for 380x , I think
|
|
|
|
Pustul
|
|
April 20, 2016, 10:31:05 PM Last edit: April 20, 2016, 10:51:27 PM by Pustul |
|
I am trying to build the miner on Ubuntu 15.10 to test if it works better there but unfortunately I've got the following error: Makefile:116: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2 When I tried to build the version without CUDA it works so I guess it is related to that. I have driver version 352.79. Has anyone built the miner with Ubuntu 15.10? EDIT: I've got more info by rerunning the make, it is due to the version of gcc being too recent. I've got it working by installing gcc 4.9.
|
|
|
|
kohonez
Member
Offline
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
|
|
April 20, 2016, 10:46:19 PM Last edit: April 21, 2016, 02:42:44 AM by kohonez |
|
I build ethminer 1.0.7 for linux and when i start the bash file: ([OPENCL]:cl GetProgramBuildInfo(-33) [OPENCL]:clEnqueueWriteBuffer(-38) With 1.0.6 it worked perfectly but stratum was inestable. I'm using 5x r7 265 cards on Lubuntu 14.04 LTS. My bash file: #!/bin/bash export GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR=0 export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100 export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 export GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 ethminer -G -S coinotron.com:3344 -O user.worker:x --cl-local-work 128 --cl-global-work 8192 -E old i did the test with same bash file using official ethminer and it works fine Any idea?
|
|
|
|
Pustul
|
|
April 20, 2016, 11:16:43 PM Last edit: April 21, 2016, 12:08:36 AM by Pustul |
|
Ok, I've got my 670 working on Ubuntu. Hashrate is 13-14 MH/s with farm-recheck at 2000 and it is oscillating between 10.2 and 20.5 (one or the other, never in the middle) when using farm-recheck 200. Which one should I use?
Thanks for the great miner Genoil!
Another question: is it possible to connect to other pools than ethermine? I can connect to nanopool or dwarfpool but I get endless Waiting for work package... Do I need to remove DAG file or something?
|
|
|
|
|