fenomenhaa
|
|
May 05, 2016, 08:07:02 AM |
|
which are the required dlls?
amdocl.dll for sure what else?
amd_opencl32.dll amd_opencl64.dll amdocl.dll amdocl12cl64.dll amdocl64.dll thanks for your answer You're welcome. Problem gone?
|
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Longsnowsm
|
|
May 05, 2016, 03:33:57 PM |
|
Can anyone point me to a "for dummies" version of how to install this on Windows? I downloaded the github, the VS, and cmake... But getting an error about crypto++. I downloaded that, but it still acts like it cannot find the cryptopp. Is there a step by step for doing this? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
tolazy
|
|
May 05, 2016, 05:32:25 PM |
|
Can anyone point me to a "for dummies" version of how to install this on Windows? I downloaded the github, the VS, and cmake... But getting an error about crypto++. I downloaded that, but it still acts like it cannot find the cryptopp. Is there a step by step for doing this? Thanks!
why not download the precompiled https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/tree/master/releases
|
|
|
|
Longsnowsm
|
|
May 05, 2016, 06:29:13 PM Last edit: May 05, 2016, 09:06:23 PM by Longsnowsm |
|
I get a error when running the precompiled versions for some reason. Google isn't helping me come up with an answer why I am getting this:
jsonrpc::JsonRpcException std::exception:: what: Exception -32603 : INTERNAL ERROR: : {'id":999,"jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": false,"error": "Invalid JSON request"}
Maybe someone can help me decipher this error?
I went back and reread the instructions on compiling and made it a few steps further(attention to detail counts). However I am now at the step in studio where you set Ethminer as the startup project, and then do Build Run. I however don't see a build run option. I do see a Build option, and that seems to run without errors. However when I look for a subdirectory for ethminer I am not finding one... So I am not sure if it is built correctly, or I am just not locating that directory where it is putting the build.
UPDATE: found that the port info for QTminer is different for ethminer on ethermine.org. I changed the port # and now the binary works. Sorry to bother you guys! I had an ID10T problem.
|
|
|
|
SS2006
|
|
May 07, 2016, 08:58:55 PM |
|
so its a month early, but do you think ethminer will be able to support the new GTX 1080 and 1070? They are CRAZY powerful and efficient. I'm excited
|
|
|
|
Genoil (OP)
|
|
May 08, 2016, 07:10:43 AM |
|
so its a month early, but do you think ethminer will be able to support the new GTX 1080 and 1070? They are CRAZY powerful and efficient. I'm excited
Don't expect miracles from the 10x0 wrt ETH mining. The memory bandwidth is about on par with the 980Ti, so unless they have made fundamental changes to the memory controller, resulting in better random access bandwidth, it will be just about as fast. But because of its compute power, a dual-algo miner with ETH (like Claymore's for AMD) seems the best use of its resources.
|
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
Kettler
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
May 08, 2016, 07:35:43 AM |
|
so its a month early, but do you think ethminer will be able to support the new GTX 1080 and 1070? They are CRAZY powerful and efficient. I'm excited
Don't expect miracles from the 10x0 wrt ETH mining. The memory bandwidth is about on par with the 980Ti, so unless they have made fundamental changes to the memory controller, resulting in better random access bandwidth, it will be just about as fast. But because of its compute power, a dual-algo miner with ETH (like Claymore's for AMD) seems the best use of its resources. Even for the same hash rate, would it consume about half the power/energy? It is 14 nm process, so more efficient.
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
May 08, 2016, 08:25:04 AM |
|
GTX 1080 is GDDR 5x, has a noticeable increase in memory bandwidth. 1070 is GDDR5 at similar bandwidth to the 980ti from what I've seen.
I'd guess 40% faster just from the increase in clock rate for either.
Probably 30-50% lower power consumption, at a guess.
I'd guess don't bother with the GTX 1080, for whatever reason the Nvidia cards scale up even worse than AMD cards (the Nano in theory should kick serious hashrate on Ethereum, but in fact it's barely if any better then the R9 380).
It's not a question of Etherminer supporting them, the question is "when will NVidia drivers get updated to support them" (answer - should be by the time the cards are released).
I'm planning to build a multi-970 machine in June, not for Ethereum-specific but I'll probably try mining on it to see how well they do. I just wish I could find a SANE motherboard with 16x slots at positions 1/4/7 instead of the stupid common 2/5/7 spacing MOST 3-slot motherboards have - but as cool as these cards are supposed to run I might go 4x with one of the 1/3/5/7 MBs around (Biostar "Racer", MSI and ASUS and I think Gigabyte have same config on slots on at least one MB each and I'm not real fond of Biostar or the fancy wastage on fancy LED lights with the Racer boards).
I DID finally find a few viable cases for such a build, and a couple of them are even somewhat affordable - but I'm sure I'll want to install some REAL fans, not the junk low-flow "quiet" wastage most case makers put in their boxes.
Anyone else notice that the GTX 1080 reference designs are only using a SINGLE 8-pin PCI-E power connector? I think I saw 180 watts TDP mentioned somewhere too, but not sure if that was the 1080 or the 1070....
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
May 08, 2016, 09:42:15 AM |
|
GTX 1080 is GDDR 5x, has a noticeable increase in memory bandwidth. 1070 is GDDR5 at similar bandwidth to the 980ti from what I've seen.
I'd guess 40% faster just from the increase in clock rate for either.
Probably 30-50% lower power consumption, at a guess.
I'd guess don't bother with the GTX 1080, for whatever reason the Nvidia cards scale up even worse than AMD cards (the Nano in theory should kick serious hashrate on Ethereum, but in fact it's barely if any better then the R9 380).
It's not a question of Etherminer supporting them, the question is "when will NVidia drivers get updated to support them" (answer - should be by the time the cards are released).
I'm planning to build a multi-970 machine in June, not for Ethereum-specific but I'll probably try mining on it to see how well they do. I just wish I could find a SANE motherboard with 16x slots at positions 1/4/7 instead of the stupid common 2/5/7 spacing MOST 3-slot motherboards have - but as cool as these cards are supposed to run I might go 4x with one of the 1/3/5/7 MBs around (Biostar "Racer", MSI and ASUS and I think Gigabyte have same config on slots on at least one MB each and I'm not real fond of Biostar or the fancy wastage on fancy LED lights with the Racer boards).
I DID finally find a few viable cases for such a build, and a couple of them are even somewhat affordable - but I'm sure I'll want to install some REAL fans, not the junk low-flow "quiet" wastage most case makers put in their boxes.
Anyone else notice that the GTX 1080 reference designs are only using a SINGLE 8-pin PCI-E power connector? I think I saw 180 watts TDP mentioned somewhere too, but not sure if that was the 1080 or the 1070....
with those specs, they would hash ethereum with 30mega and 80watt consumption, a beast basically, and this would be for 1070 not even 1080, assuming your 50%-50%
|
|
|
|
lawrencelyl
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
May 08, 2016, 12:12:52 PM |
|
Does this miner support 750Ti? If yes, what's the correct config to run it? Sorry if this question was asked earlier
|
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 08, 2016, 04:36:46 PM |
|
Does this miner support 750Ti? If yes, what's the correct config to run it? Sorry if this question was asked earlier Only on linux, and the speed is slow. Around 4mhash. You bether mine something else.
|
|
|
|
SS2006
|
|
May 08, 2016, 11:58:49 PM |
|
so its a month early, but do you think ethminer will be able to support the new GTX 1080 and 1070? They are CRAZY powerful and efficient. I'm excited
Don't expect miracles from the 10x0 wrt ETH mining. The memory bandwidth is about on par with the 980Ti, so unless they have made fundamental changes to the memory controller, resulting in better random access bandwidth, it will be just about as fast. But because of its compute power, a dual-algo miner with ETH (like Claymore's for AMD) seems the best use of its resources. well i currently have a GTX 980, so I guess it would be an update for me. I primarily game though, and mine overnight, so its a win win. I hope maybe these new cards with the new drivers make Windows 10 mining issues a thing of the past? or do you foresee me still having to boot into windows 7 or linux
|
|
|
|
lawrencelyl
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
May 09, 2016, 12:11:33 AM |
|
Does this miner support 750Ti? If yes, what's the correct config to run it? Sorry if this question was asked earlier Only on linux, and the speed is slow. Around 4mhash. You bether mine something else. Unfortunately I'm running Windows
|
|
|
|
Ayers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1023
Seabet.io | Crypto-Casino
|
|
May 09, 2016, 06:35:35 AM |
|
Does this miner support 750Ti? If yes, what's the correct config to run it? Sorry if this question was asked earlier Only on linux, and the speed is slow. Around 4mhash. You bether mine something else. Unfortunately I'm running Windows you can easily install linux on a dual boot and try with your gpu, it will take few minutes, or virtual machine but gpu won't wrk there unless you do passthough i think
|
|
|
|
Genoil (OP)
|
|
May 09, 2016, 10:05:43 AM |
|
so its a month early, but do you think ethminer will be able to support the new GTX 1080 and 1070? They are CRAZY powerful and efficient. I'm excited
Don't expect miracles from the 10x0 wrt ETH mining. The memory bandwidth is about on par with the 980Ti, so unless they have made fundamental changes to the memory controller, resulting in better random access bandwidth, it will be just about as fast. But because of its compute power, a dual-algo miner with ETH (like Claymore's for AMD) seems the best use of its resources. well i currently have a GTX 980, so I guess it would be an update for me. I primarily game though, and mine overnight, so its a win win. I hope maybe these new cards with the new drivers make Windows 10 mining issues a thing of the past? or do you foresee me still having to boot into windows 7 or linux That's what I'm also most curious of. All i know is that Nvidia engineers are aware of the issue. See this comment: https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/878455/cuda-programming-and-performance/gtx750ti-and-buffers-gt-1gb-on-win7/post/4842553/#4842553I'm afraid that if they have to solve this on a hardware level, Pascal came too early. But it could also be that Pascal's TLB is already larger by design because of the larger RAM support. We'll see. If the problems persist, the driver hack currently used on Win10 will become almost impossible, as Pascal wasn't around when WDDM 1.x drivers were.
|
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
Genoil (OP)
|
|
May 12, 2016, 11:36:11 AM |
|
1.0.8 is out.
- work timeout (fails over when working on the same block too long) - send stale shares (potential poolside sharerate increase up to 1%) - shorter log output (mostly fits 1 line on fixed-width win console) - counting shares [A0+0:R0+0:F0] (A= accepted+accepted stales, R=rejected+rejected stales, F= fails) - longer default hashrate update interval when using stratum - cleaned up loads of Linux build warnings. not all I'm afraid. - fixed --opencl-device bug - i may have accidentally fixed the DAG switch crashes. let me know if it still crashes on next epoch change.
what's up for 1.0.9?
- investigate GPU load drops. - Pascal support
Of course i want dual-mining and on-GPU DAG building too, but I don't have much time...
|
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1793
Merit: 1028
|
|
May 12, 2016, 01:01:42 PM Last edit: May 12, 2016, 01:19:21 PM by scryptr |
|
1.0.8 is out.
- work timeout (fails over when working on the same block too long) - send stale shares (potential poolside sharerate increase up to 1%) - shorter log output (mostly fits 1 line on fixed-width win console) - counting shares [A0+0:R0+0:F0] (A= accepted+accepted stales, R=rejected+rejected stales, F= fails) - longer default hashrate update interval when using stratum - cleaned up loads of Linux build warnings. not all I'm afraid. - fixed --opencl-device bug - i may have accidentally fixed the DAG switch crashes. let me know if it still crashes on next epoch change.
what's up for 1.0.9?
- investigate GPU load drops. - Pascal support
Of course i want dual-mining and on-GPU DAG building too, but I don't have much time...
OUTPUT IN CONSOLE IS ACTUALLY READABLE!!! -- Cleaning up the console output is enough of an improvement to justify a release in itself! THANKS! Are there any new command-line switches? --scryptr P.S. -- Sent a small donation your way, it is overdue. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
alenevaa
|
|
May 12, 2016, 01:08:07 PM |
|
1.0.8 is out.
- counting shares [A0+0:R0+0:F0] (A= accepted+accepted stales, R=rejected+rejected stales, F= fails)
Thank you for the stats!
|
|
|
|
BitMinerN8
|
|
May 12, 2016, 01:15:37 PM |
|
1.0.8 is out.
Thank you for this build. So far working great on Ubuntu 14.04 and Mint 17.3 rigs.
|
|
|
|
Genoil (OP)
|
|
May 12, 2016, 02:15:45 PM |
|
1.0.8 is out.
- work timeout (fails over when working on the same block too long) - send stale shares (potential poolside sharerate increase up to 1%) - shorter log output (mostly fits 1 line on fixed-width win console) - counting shares [A0+0:R0+0:F0] (A= accepted+accepted stales, R=rejected+rejected stales, F= fails) - longer default hashrate update interval when using stratum - cleaned up loads of Linux build warnings. not all I'm afraid. - fixed --opencl-device bug - i may have accidentally fixed the DAG switch crashes. let me know if it still crashes on next epoch change.
what's up for 1.0.9?
- investigate GPU load drops. - Pascal support
Of course i want dual-mining and on-GPU DAG building too, but I don't have much time...
OUTPUT IN CONSOLE IS ACTUALLY READABLE!!! -- Cleaning up the console output is enough of an improvement to justify a release in itself! THANKS! Are there any new command-line switches? --scryptr P.S. -- Sent a small donation your way, it is overdue. --scryptr Thanks a lot! There's a new cmdline switch --work-timeout. Defaults to 90. If stratum works on block longer than this value in seconds, it will failover. Works great on Windows, just got a bug report in on Ubuntu. If you get it, just set the value so high that it won't ever time-out.
|
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
|