io8621
Member
 Offline
Activity: 149
Merit: 11
|
 |
May 17, 2016, 05:12:50 PM |
|
Ok, understand, another question genoil with stratum is incompatible with dwarfpool?
When i try to connect with pool soft crashes.
|
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
May 17, 2016, 05:33:57 PM
Last edit: May 17, 2016, 05:48:39 PM by Amph |
|
with the stratum mode the hashrate displayed is less then the one with dwarf plus stratum, 1 mega less for each of my 970, there is a reason for this?
edit, it's higher now, a little to slow to reach full hashrate...i also noticed more cpu usage in stratum mode
|
|
|
|
|
feriq2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 17, 2016, 06:45:07 PM |
|
Hello there, Thank you for the new version of the miner! Is the number of stales I'm getting ok (46 vs 270 accepted)? I'm not using stratum but getwork. Should I try to avoid stales? If so.. how can I do that? http://imgur.com/WB25j25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Genoil (OP)
|
|
May 17, 2016, 08:35:15 PM |
|
Hello there, Thank you for the new version of the miner! Is the number of stales I'm getting ok (46 vs 270 accepted)? I'm not using stratum but getwork. Should I try to avoid stales? If so.. how can I do that?  It's a bit high. You could try lowering --farm-recheck or try the stratum mode and see if it makes any difference. Two actual Fails there. Much overclocking and heat going on there? |
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d
BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
feriq2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
May 17, 2016, 09:03:38 PM
Last edit: May 17, 2016, 09:40:13 PM by feriq2 |
|
not much overclocking tbh - 3 cards are @ stock cores but downvolted by about 0.05V. 2 of cards are overclocked about 10 percent and @ stock volts. Temps are between 60°C and 70°C and one card is about 80°C. What --farm-recheck value should do the job? What's the default --farm-recheck vaule? I'm going to try 200  Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
smaxz
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 430
Merit: 253
VeganAcademy
|
|
May 17, 2016, 09:47:40 PM |
|
still trying to get answers for why additional DAGs are created for some pools.. while nicehash manages to accept shares on a single DAG.
recently i have noticed an additional dag is created in my .ethash directory even when solo mining, except its not reported to console and there is no progress % updated. although it hogs an antire core of cpu usage for the time it takes for creation.
|
- NGdTwHRSdnThdi1drQuHGT3khAHRtZ1HMq -
|
|
|
skyboyextreme
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
May 18, 2016, 09:02:04 AM |
|
why i can't seem to download this off of github
|
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
May 18, 2016, 09:46:30 AM |
|
genoil why with the stratum mode, the cpu increase the usage to 50% when running the miner? talking about cheap g1840, with the non-stratum the cpu usage is much lower, half of that....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genoil (OP)
|
|
May 18, 2016, 10:00:55 AM |
|
genoil why with the stratum mode, the cpu increase the usage to 50% when running the miner? talking about cheap g1840, with the non-stratum the cpu usage is much lower, half of that....
Are you sure it wasn't generating a DAG file while you were testing stratum? On my i5 dev box the stratum implementation actually seems to use a little less CPU. On the other hand, the stratum implementation is asynchronous multi-threaded, which your G1840 maybe doesn't really like as much as my i5 does. Perhaps I should do a synchronous stratum implementation some time. |
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d
BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
May 18, 2016, 10:24:03 AM |
|
genoil why with the stratum mode, the cpu increase the usage to 50% when running the miner? talking about cheap g1840, with the non-stratum the cpu usage is much lower, half of that....
Are you sure it wasn't generating a DAG file while you were testing stratum? On my i5 dev box the stratum implementation actually seems to use a little less CPU. On the other hand, the stratum implementation is asynchronous multi-threaded, which your G1840 maybe doesn't really like as much as my i5 does. Perhaps I should do a synchronous stratum implementation some time. no it's clearly the stratum implemented thing that has something to do with it, i tried with my other i7 4790k and i noticed an increase of the cpu usage as well up to 10%, 25% on the g1840 when i mine at dwarf pool using their stratum i'm not getting this usage, the cpu is sitting at 3% the g1840 a bit higher, but it's normal |
|
|
|
|
skyboyextreme
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
May 18, 2016, 10:39:52 AM |
|
guys what is the ideal configuration for R9 290s, HD 7900s and HD 6900s
|
|
|
|
|
fr4nkthetank
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2294
Merit: 1182
Now the money is free, and so the people will be
|
|
May 18, 2016, 01:21:27 PM |
|
why i can't seem to download this off of github
yeah.......click on get raw or something on the bottom |
|
|
|
|
|
DragonSlayer
|
|
May 18, 2016, 08:24:13 PM |
|
What kind of hash rate should I expect from a gtx 980? I think that I am going to give this a shot over at ethermine.org. Anyone got a good bat for the pool?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
MinerDudeRigs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
May 18, 2016, 11:39:42 PM |
|
Thanks a lot for this miner it is my workhorse.
|
|
|
|
|
Ayers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1024
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
|
|
May 19, 2016, 05:56:14 AM |
|
What kind of hash rate should I expect from a gtx 980? I think that I am going to give this a shot over at ethermine.org. Anyone got a good bat for the pool?
Thanks
not much, not really worth it, i think around 25 mega, better to use a 970 imho |
|
|
|
|
Pustul
|
|
May 19, 2016, 12:46:03 PM |
|
Genoil, do you think the new 1080 and 1070 will hash as fast on a win10 rig as a linux or win7 one? It will be nice to get my computer back  You mean as slow? Oh I read it too fast and didn't understood that it was 650 KH/s  Hope they fix the TLB problem before the release... |
|
|
|
|
|
Genoil (OP)
|
|
May 19, 2016, 02:00:08 PM |
|
Genoil, do you think the new 1080 and 1070 will hash as fast on a win10 rig as a linux or win7 one? It will be nice to get my computer back You mean as slow? Oh I read it too fast and didn't understood that it was 650 KH/s Hope they fix the TLB problem before the release... With current Linux drivers the 1080 hashes at 23MH in OpenCL. So ~24MH I guess in CUDA. After a win10 July update, there is a chance of much higher speeds because of the 2MB page size support. But I can't promise anything |
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d
BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
|
Pustul
|
|
May 19, 2016, 02:27:49 PM |
|
Oh nice, thank you for the reply. I'll buy one for gaming anyway. Let's hope for the best  |
|
|
|
|
Flanalog
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
May 19, 2016, 03:01:01 PM |
|
Hi, Anybody have this problem before while compiling? (33%) /home/ethrig02/cpp-ethereum/libethash-cl/ethash_cl_miner.cpp:40:40:/home/ethrig02/cpp-ethereum/libethash-cl/ethash_cl_miner.h:12:21: fatal error: CL/cl.hpp: No such file or directory compilation terminated. libethash-cl/CMakeFiles/ethash-cl.dir/build.make:59: recipe for target 'libethash-cl/CMakeFiles/ethash-cl.dir/ethash_cl_miner.cpp.o failed and so on and so forth... it continues to compile until 69% then I get Makefile:116: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** (all) Error 2 Ive tried deleting everything and starting from scratch but its not helping.. I followed the build instructions for Ubuntu here https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereumon a side note, i had no troubles building the miner on a different rig.. what is different on this rig, no clue. I would greatly appreciate any help! Thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
|
|
melloyellow
|
|
May 19, 2016, 03:29:13 PM |
|
Genoil, do you think the new 1080 and 1070 will hash as fast on a win10 rig as a linux or win7 one? It will be nice to get my computer back You mean as slow? Oh I read it too fast and didn't understood that it was 650 KH/s Hope they fix the TLB problem before the release... With current Linux drivers the 1080 hashes at 23MH in OpenCL. So ~24MH I guess in CUDA. After a win10 July update, there is a chance of much higher speeds because of the 2MB page size support. But I can't promise anything Will the 2mb page size support affect amd cards? |
|
|
|
|
|
