Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
July 03, 2016, 01:44:54 PM |
|
getting this error with a 1070
Using device: GeForce GTX 1070 (Compute 6.1) Cuda error in func 'set_constants' at line 143 : invalid device symbol.
-U -S coinotron
|
|
|
|
giagge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 03, 2016, 02:44:18 PM |
|
getting this error with a 1070
Using device: GeForce GTX 1070 (Compute 6.1) Cuda error in func 'set_constants' at line 143 : invalid device symbol.
-U -S coinotron
Amph you have gtx1070 now ? .
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
July 03, 2016, 03:31:17 PM |
|
getting this error with a 1070
Using device: GeForce GTX 1070 (Compute 6.1) Cuda error in func 'set_constants' at line 143 : invalid device symbol.
-U -S coinotron
Amph you have gtx1070 now ? . no another user had this issue and i posted for him here, but i'm planning to buy one soon
|
|
|
|
generalt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1096
Merit: 1021
|
|
July 03, 2016, 03:32:57 PM |
|
getting this error with a 1070
Using device: GeForce GTX 1070 (Compute 6.1) Cuda error in func 'set_constants' at line 143 : invalid device symbol.
-U -S coinotron
Shouldn't the 1070 be Computer 8.0?
|
BTC: 1GENERALrtBAjEv2Ps5cmEW1FADnXh1bCZ
|
|
|
ol92
|
|
July 03, 2016, 09:19:47 PM |
|
getting this error with a 1070
Using device: GeForce GTX 1070 (Compute 6.1) Cuda error in func 'set_constants' at line 143 : invalid device symbol.
-U -S coinotron
Shouldn't the 1070 be Computer 8.0? Cuda version 8 with compute 6.x
|
|
|
|
merc84
|
|
July 04, 2016, 01:51:13 AM |
|
Is it possible to use this miner to mine eth clones eg expanse on suprnova?
Yes. Ethereum uses the Dagger algo, those all use Dagger as well. Having trouble connecting to suprnova expanse, probably i have missed something simple in batfile any help appreciated. ethminer -U -S exp.suprnova.cc:4000 -o mercuryminer.1:x i 23:32:11|main Connecting to stratum server exp.suprnova.cc:4000 X 23:32:13|stratum Could not connect to stratum server exp.suprnova.cc : 400 0 , No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it ethminer -U -S exp.suprnova.cc:4000 -u <YourAccount>.<YourWorker> -p <your worker password> Still have same error using above format.
|
|
|
|
giagge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 04, 2016, 06:36:42 AM |
|
getting this error with a 1070
Using device: GeForce GTX 1070 (Compute 6.1) Cuda error in func 'set_constants' at line 143 : invalid device symbol.
-U -S coinotron
Amph you have gtx1070 now ? . no another user had this issue and i posted for him here, but i'm planning to buy one soon Ok thanks for the info .
|
|
|
|
adamvp
|
|
July 04, 2016, 09:48:48 PM |
|
Forgot to implement a +2% speed increase (7950) that @Wolf0 hinted me at a while back. Will likely make it to 1.1.8
only for 7950 increase ? I liked your miner most, but another miner is still about 1mhs/card better than yours
|
I am looking for signature campaign pm me
|
|
|
Genoil (OP)
|
|
July 05, 2016, 05:01:06 AM |
|
Forgot to implement a +2% speed increase (7950) that @Wolf0 hinted me at a while back. Will likely make it to 1.1.8
only for 7950 increase ? I liked your miner most, but another miner is still about 1mhs/card better than yours Went from 15.1 to 15.7 on ye olde 7950, so on a 390 it could be that MH that you were looking for. Don't know, we'll see once it is released. If it is released
|
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 05, 2016, 05:38:21 AM |
|
Can someone share how to use latest 1.1 branch with Dwarfpool?
Adding "how to with examples" to the first post (yes, Claymore style) will be very helpful.
|
|
|
|
Genoil (OP)
|
|
July 05, 2016, 07:59:58 AM |
|
Can someone share how to use latest 1.1 branch with Dwarfpool?
Adding "how to with examples" to the first post (yes, Claymore style) will be very helpful.
-S eth-eu.dwarfpool.com:8008 -SP 1 -O 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d.workername -SE optional@email.comI don't know what it is with dwarfpool but for some strange reason I get a lot of rejects with them.
|
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
merc84
|
|
July 05, 2016, 08:16:58 AM |
|
What is correct -SP <n> for suprnova? Its not listed with --help.
|
|
|
|
Genoil (OP)
|
|
July 05, 2016, 08:39:36 AM Last edit: July 05, 2016, 09:11:26 AM by Genoil |
|
What is correct -SP <n> for suprnova? Its not listed with --help.
can't find any stratum support on their website. does it support stratum? otherwise just use the -F flasg as dispalyed in their help. btw ran some more tests between 1.1.7 and upcoming 1.1.8. For some reason the speed improvement has vanished. It's weird because when I was building them, I saw the improvement, but when I take the old 1.1.7 and set it up against 1.1.8, they perform equally. And when I disable the improvements in 1.1.8, I get less performance than 1.1.7 while the code should be the same. I guess playing compiler is not always the best thing to do Will release it soon then. Big boost in DAG creation on OpenCL for sure. From 7 down to 4 seconds on 7950.
|
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
July 05, 2016, 09:56:24 AM |
|
so are the new pascal working good on win 7? or it will be done with 1.1.8 release?
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 05, 2016, 10:11:15 AM |
|
What is correct -SP <n> for suprnova? Its not listed with --help.
Suprnova is closing their ethereum pool, so go mine elsewhere
|
|
|
|
Genoil (OP)
|
|
July 05, 2016, 10:17:49 AM |
|
It's good to be without a CUDA device for a while. noticed that on Tahiti and Tonga, the VGPR usage exploded (112) somewhere along the line. That would also explaing the lower performance of my kernel against Clay (and Wolf). Guess I'll have to fix that, too.
|
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
_javi_
|
|
July 05, 2016, 10:31:50 AM |
|
what would be the cause for the miner to freeze after generating EXP dag?? I tried Claymores and thought it was miner´s fault. But after trying yours, it happens the same.
Some rigs do EXP fine, but others hangs after dag creation. (same OS/mem, same cards/drivers). 280x do fine.. 7950s seems to be more affected (although some 7950s work fine)
Any help or tip will be appreciated. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
merc84
|
|
July 05, 2016, 11:34:13 AM Last edit: July 05, 2016, 12:11:32 PM by merc84 |
|
What is correct -SP <n> for suprnova? Its not listed with --help.
Suprnova is closing their ethereum pool, so go mine elsewhere I wanted to mine Exp on suprnova, they claim to have stratum port for Exp. what would be the cause for the miner to freeze after generating EXP dag?? I tried Claymores and thought it was miner´s fault. But after trying yours, it happens the same.
Some rigs do EXP fine, but others hangs after dag creation. (same OS/mem, same cards/drivers). 280x do fine.. 7950s seems to be more affected (although some 7950s work fine)
Any help or tip will be appreciated. Thanks!
I have some issue with dag creation on 7950 using claymore's miner on Exp, haven't tested with Genoil yet will look into that and report back. Edit: Seems i have same issue with genoil dag creation on the 7950's 2/3 of the 7950's fail to create the dag error 4 something...
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 05, 2016, 12:37:11 PM |
|
Be sure to set all variables: GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
Ether dag size is now ~ 60% of 3GB. So 7950 shoeld be run with GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100. 2Gb cards need this parameter since Dag was ~ 1.4-1,5GB
|
|
|
|
merc84
|
|
July 05, 2016, 01:03:44 PM |
|
Be sure to set all variables: GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
Ether dag size is now ~ 60% of 3GB. So 7950 shoeld be run with GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100. 2Gb cards need this parameter since Dag was ~ 1.4-1,5GB
When using these with setx they are saved in reg, no need to apply them every time?
|
|
|
|
|