ethminer-0.9.41-genoil-1.1

[finder]

how to get 1.1.8 

GENOIL HAS SAID THE NEXT VERSION IS 1.2--

Although LeChuckDe has forked the project and produced his own version 1.1.8.  I do not believe that LeChuckDe has made a public release, though.  And, Genoill said that his next release will likely be in August.       --scryptr

I have 1070 but I don't know how to dig the eth under Windows

[Amph]

how to get 1.1.8 

GENOIL HAS SAID THE NEXT VERSION IS 1.2--

Although LeChuckDe has forked the project and produced his own version 1.1.8.  I do not believe that LeChuckDe has made a public release, though.  And, Genoill said that his next release will likely be in August.       --scryptr

I have 1070 but I don't know how to dig the eth under Windows

we are stuck at 4mh hashrate for now, until proper driver are released on 2 august

[go6ooo1212]

Isn't it possible to rowback some older driver version on 1070s. Where is the problem with them ?

[Amph]

Isn't it possible to rowback some older driver version on 1070s. Where is the problem with them ?

we need new drivers, old one are even worse, it's about the windows display drivers, that need to be updated to correct version, 2.1, currently 2.0

[joaocha]

Using windows 7 with latest drivers,

Use -U instead of -G for nvidia

on cuda -U

1 x Gtx 770 16 Mh/s

On opencl -G

1 x Gtx 770 11 Mh/s

[giagge]

Yes but i think etc and eth is not profitable same lbry , i think lbry is very best algo for nvidia card .

[crazyearner]

I am haivng massive problems with mining with this miner currently. I am getting problem on dag loading and after dag it will load it really fast and stops at 94% crashes my system. Computer will freeze up and have to power down and back up. What is the cause to this? I tried to use -L sequential  but miner just exits and closes. Has this command changed to load in for AMD gpus?

Next problem if I get past it loading DAG file it will run fine for a number of days and then system will freeze up and lock up and crash no blue screen or anything have to power cycel reboot to get back on. Cards in system are on default clocks. Any idea what the cause to both these problems are?

[carlo_0000]

hello i have problem sins yesterday or 2 days

2 or 3 of my miners (all the r9380 2G)   stop mining get error

but weird  it s when i connect to the miner to ultravnc, few second later it start mining again

i m mining ETC on miningpoolhub.com, not sure if it s happen on eth

Code:

Could not resolve hosteurope1.ethereum.miningpoolhub.com:20555, LÆopÚration dÆen
trÚe/sortie a ÚtÚ abandonnÚe en raison de lÆarrÛt dÆun thread ou Ó la demande dÆ
une application  i  02:14:59|<unknown>  Reconnecting in 3 seconds...
  i  02:15:01|<unknown>  Connecting to stratum server europe1.ethereum.miningpoo
lhub.com:20555
Could not resolve hosteurope1.ethereum.miningpoolhub.com:20555, LÆopÚration dÆen
trÚe/sortie a ÚtÚ abandonnÚe en raison de lÆarrÛt dÆun thread ou Ó la demande dÆ
une application  i  02:15:01|<unknown>  Reconnecting in 3 seconds...
  i  02:15:02|<unknown>  Connecting to stratum server europe1.ethereum.miningpoo
lhub.com:20555
Could not resolve hosteurope1.ethereum.miningpoolhub.com:20555, LÆopÚration dÆen
trÚe/sortie a ÚtÚ abandonnÚe en raison de lÆarrÛt dÆun thread ou Ó la demande dÆ
une application  i  02:15:02|<unknown>  Reconnecting in 3 seconds...
  i  02:15:04|openclminer4  Solution found; Submitting to europe1.ethereum.minin
gpoolhub.com ...
  i  02:15:04|openclminer4    Nonce: 0xded9b8a88511b00a
  i  02:15:04|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  02:15:05|<unknown>  Connecting to stratum server europe1.ethereum.miningpoo
lhub.com:20555
  i  02:15:05|stratum  Connected to stratum server europe1.ethereum.miningpoolhu
b.com : 20555
  i  02:15:05|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  02:15:05|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  02:15:05|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  02:15:05|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  02:15:05|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  02:15:05|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  02:15:05|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  02:15:05|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  02:15:05|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  02:15:05|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  02:15:05|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  02:15:05|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  02:15:05|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  02:15:05|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  02:15:05|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  02:15:05|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  X  02:15:05|stratum  Parse response failed: * Line 1, Column 168
  Missing ',' or ']' in array declaration

  i  02:15:05|stratum  Received new job #374e
  i  02:15:05|<unknown>  Connecting to stratum server europe1.ethereum.miningpoo
lhub.com:20555
  i  02:15:05|openclminer0  set work; seed: #9af06ef9, target: #0000000225c17d04

  i  02:15:05|stratum  Connected to stratum server europe1.ethereum.miningpoolhu
b.com : 20555
  i  02:15:05|stratum  Subscribed to stratum server
  i  02:15:05|stratum  Received new job #3747
  i  02:15:05|openclminer1  set work; seed: #9af06ef9, target: #0000000225c17d04

  i  02:15:05|openclminer2  set work; seed: #9af06ef9, target: #0000000225c17d04

  i  02:15:06|openclminer3  set work; seed: #9af06ef9, target: #0000000225c17d04

  i  02:15:06|openclminer4  set work; seed: #9af06ef9, target: #0000000225c17d04

  m  02:15:06|main  Mining on PoWhash #034c2909 : 3.39MH/s [A137+2:R0+0:F0]
  i  02:15:06|stratum  Authorized worker carlo0000.380sapphire
  m  02:15:08|main  Mining on PoWhash #034c2909 : 99.14MH/s [A137+2:R0+0:F0]
  i  02:15:08|openclminer2  Solution found; Submitting to europe1.ethereum.minin
gpoolhub.com ...
  i  02:15:08|openclminer2    Nonce: 0xa578dc1cbef5011f
  i  02:15:08|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  m  02:15:10|main  Mining on PoWhash #034c2909 : 101.63MH/s [A138+2:R0+0:F0]

[thesmokingman]

Has anyone seen this error before? It just started happening over the past few days and I for the life of me can't figure it out.

 ℹ  02:36:53|stratum  Received new job #85a7bcb0
  ℹ  02:37:08|cudaminer1  Solution found; Submitting to us2.ethpool.org ...
  ℹ  02:37:08|cudaminer1    Nonce: 0x6f05999339afe4f1
  ✘  02:37:08|cudaminer1  Submitting stale solution.
CUDA error in func 'search' at line 346 : unspecified launch failure.
CUDA error in func 'search' at line 346 : unspecified launch failure.
CUDA error in func 'search' at line 346 : unspecified launch failure.
  ✘  02:37:08|cudaminer2  Error CUDA mining: unspecified launch failure
  ✘  02:37:08|cudaminer3  Error CUDA mining: unspecified launch failure
  ✘  02:37:08|cudaminer0  Error CUDA mining: unspecified launch failure
CUDA error in func 'search' at line 346 : unspecified launch failure.
  ✘  02:37:08|cudaminer1  Error CUDA mining: unspecified launch failure

I'm mining with GTX 1070s and the rig ran fine for a couple of weeks and now I receive this error randomly. I can't ctrl+c out of it as I just see [^C displayed on the screen so I have to hard reboot. Running Linux Ubuntu 14.04 server with a self compiled version of 1.1.7 with DCOMPUTE=6.1. (No compile errors) I wanted to build an older version to see if it may be an issue with my compiled version, but new to Linux/Github and not sure how to clone a previous release. Any help is appreciated.

[Cryptozillah]

I have two 750Ti rigs just standing and collecting dust since months back.
Is it worth start mining ETC with them ?

Anyone know what hashrate i could expect at this point ?

[finder]

The GTX 1070
How to excavate the eth under Windows 7?
 

[zakariya]

Radeon 7970. Why Mh\s so diff. ? 

What real Mh\s i Have ?

http://i74.fastpic.ru/thumb/2016/0219/2c/34ed9999bfff6901fb7f749632d9f82c.jpeg

The fluctuation is caused by the way hashrate is calculated. Observe the image below.

http://i.snag.gy/ijelJ.jpg

The bar with squares represents your GPU miner thread. Each square is a GPU kernel run. Within each run it calculates --cl-global-work * --cl-local-work hashes (i.e 64 * 65536 = 4194304). The yellow bar represents the the getWork thread, which fetches new mining jobs from geth or pool and also displays hashrate. Most of the time it is a sleeping thread, with a period of --farm-recheck (default 500ms). So once in 500ms, it checks the amount of hashes the miner thread has done. But the miner thread only updates its total after having completed its batch. So the red squares aren't counted. In the sketch I quickly drafted there's only one interval with 3 runs and the rest with 4, but I hope you get the idea.

You can get a more stable hashrate figure by increasing the value of --farm-recheck (i.e. 3000), but don't do this if you're using getwork (-F flag), because then you'll also only get new jobs every 3 seconds. With the stratum miner it doesn't matter, it gets work pushed towards the miners in a separate thread. Another option is lowering --cl-global-work, but that leads to more CPU overhead, which is also not what you want.   

hhmm.. not bad.. upgrade againt and upgrade to the moon 

[scryptr]

I have two 750Ti rigs just standing and collecting dust since months back.
Is it worth start mining ETC with them ?

Anyone know what hashrate i could expect at this point ?

THE 750ti HAS KNOWN PROBLEMS--

There are better coins to mine with a 750ti,, look at Decred, SiaCoin, or Library Credits.  None of the Dagger-Hashimoto coins has a DAG file small enough to be efficiently mined by a 2GB 750ti, it will mine at 4-5 MH/s.  If the DAG file were smaller, it would mine at about 8MH/s, as it performed early after the release of ETH.  The way memory is addressed by the 750ti is a problem.

If you want to mine ETH at 50% or less efficiency, you can.  You would have less than 10MH/s hashrate for the two cards combined, which barely registers at a pool.  But each card will maintain about 50MH/s on the "lbry" algo (LBC), and use very little energy, and produce a chunk of Library Coin every day.  It is possible to find a 4GB 750ti, but you are better off with a GTX 950 or 960. or an AMD R7 265 or HD 7850.  An AMD HD 7850/R7 265, considered to be in the same league as a 750ti, gets 10MH/s or better on ETH or ETC.       --scryptr

[LeChuckDE]

how to get 1.1.8 

GENOIL HAS SAID THE NEXT VERSION IS 1.2--

Although LeChuckDe has forked the project and produced his own version 1.1.8.  I do not believe that LeChuckDe has made a public release, though.  And, Genoill said that his next release will likely be in August.       --scryptr

correct, will not be published.
Works only at HD7850, other pitcarn based cards not working like expected, seg. faults etc.
At moment trying to reproduce the hashingpower-boost on other cards. but seems that every card needs own kernel and not kernelfamillie...
Got next weeks some Pitcarn Cards for testing(4 different) if it only a problem between my hd7850 and hd7870 and other pitcarn works.
i would release a proof of work client only for linux. Windows drivermanagment is crap and produce more problems then solve ...

[LeChuckDE]

I have two 750Ti rigs just standing and collecting dust since months back.
Is it worth start mining ETC with them ?

Anyone know what hashrate i could expect at this point ?

THE 750ti HAS KNOWN PROBLEMS--

There are better coins to mine with a 750ti,, look at Decred, SiaCoin, or Library Credits.  None of the Dagger-Hashimoto coins has a DAG file small enough to be efficiently mined by a 2GB 750ti, it will mine at 4-5 MH/s.  If the DAG file were smaller, it would mine at about 8MH/s, as it performed early after the release of ETH.  The way memory is addressed by the 750ti is a problem.

If you want to mine ETH at 50% or less efficiency, you can.  You would have less than 10MH/s hashrate for the two cards combined, which barely registers at a pool.  But each card will maintain about 50MH/s on the "lbry" algo (LBC), and use very little energy, and produce a chunk of Library Coin every day.  It is possible to find a 4GB 750ti, but you are better off with a GTX 950 or 960. or an AMD R7 265 or HD 7850.  An AMD HD 7850/R7 265, considered to be in the same league as a 750ti, gets 10MH/s or better on ETH or ETC.       --scryptr

try expanse .... 1.1 gb dagfile

hd7850 Stock @ 12 MH/s ETH, ETC and 16 MH/s EXP. boosted 15.6 MH/s ETH/ETC and 20 MH/s EXP
My HD7850 produce solo at time 2 - 4 Blocks a day on Expanse (16 - 32 EXP = ~0.016 - 0.032 BTC = ~ 15 Euro - (((0.120 KW*24h)*0,22Euro)=)0,69 Euro = ~ 14,30 Euro profit a day ...

[carlo_0000]

I have two 750Ti rigs just standing and collecting dust since months back.
Is it worth start mining ETC with them ?

Anyone know what hashrate i could expect at this point ?

THE 750ti HAS KNOWN PROBLEMS--

There are better coins to mine with a 750ti,, look at Decred, SiaCoin, or Library Credits.  None of the Dagger-Hashimoto coins has a DAG file small enough to be efficiently mined by a 2GB 750ti, it will mine at 4-5 MH/s.  If the DAG file were smaller, it would mine at about 8MH/s, as it performed early after the release of ETH.  The way memory is addressed by the 750ti is a problem.

If you want to mine ETH at 50% or less efficiency, you can.  You would have less than 10MH/s hashrate for the two cards combined, which barely registers at a pool.  But each card will maintain about 50MH/s on the "lbry" algo (LBC), and use very little energy, and produce a chunk of Library Coin every day.  It is possible to find a 4GB 750ti, but you are better off with a GTX 950 or 960. or an AMD R7 265 or HD 7850.  An AMD HD 7850/R7 265, considered to be in the same league as a 750ti, gets 10MH/s or better on ETH or ETC.       --scryptr

try expanse .... 1.1 gb dagfile

hd7850 Stock @ 12 MH/s ETH, ETC and 16 MH/s EXP. boosted 15.6 MH/s ETH/ETC and 20 MH/s EXP
My HD7850 produce solo at time 2 - 4 Blocks a day on Expanse (16 - 32 EXP = ~0.016 - 0.032 BTC = ~ 15 Euro - (((0.120 KW*24h)*0,22Euro)=)0,69 Euro = ~ 14,30 Euro profit a day ...

lol i don't belive one word what you say  doing 0.016 - 0.032 BTC on a day with only 1 gpu   i don't know what you smoke

expense for 20mh/s without cost

Per    Pool Fee    Est. Rewards    Rev. BTC    Rev. $    Cost    Profit
Hour    0.001085    0.107423    0.000127    $0.08    $0.02    $0.06
Day    0.026042    2.578146    0.003059    $1.91    $0.53    $1.38
Week    0.182293    18.047023    0.021412    $13.37    $3.70    $9.67
Month    0.781256    77.344386    0.091768    $57.29    $15.84    $41.45
Year    9.505286    941.023361    1.116505    $697.04    $192.72    $504.32

[bensam1231]

I have two 750Ti rigs just standing and collecting dust since months back.
Is it worth start mining ETC with them ?

Anyone know what hashrate i could expect at this point ?

THE 750ti HAS KNOWN PROBLEMS--

There are better coins to mine with a 750ti,, look at Decred, SiaCoin, or Library Credits.  None of the Dagger-Hashimoto coins has a DAG file small enough to be efficiently mined by a 2GB 750ti, it will mine at 4-5 MH/s.  If the DAG file were smaller, it would mine at about 8MH/s, as it performed early after the release of ETH.  The way memory is addressed by the 750ti is a problem.

If you want to mine ETH at 50% or less efficiency, you can.  You would have less than 10MH/s hashrate for the two cards combined, which barely registers at a pool.  But each card will maintain about 50MH/s on the "lbry" algo (LBC), and use very little energy, and produce a chunk of Library Coin every day.  It is possible to find a 4GB 750ti, but you are better off with a GTX 950 or 960. or an AMD R7 265 or HD 7850.  An AMD HD 7850/R7 265, considered to be in the same league as a 750ti, gets 10MH/s or better on ETH or ETC.       --scryptr

You can also mine a Dagger coin with a smaller blockchain... Like Expanse. >>

[LeChuckDE]

I have two 750Ti rigs just standing and collecting dust since months back.
Is it worth start mining ETC with them ?

Anyone know what hashrate i could expect at this point ?

THE 750ti HAS KNOWN PROBLEMS--

There are better coins to mine with a 750ti,, look at Decred, SiaCoin, or Library Credits.  None of the Dagger-Hashimoto coins has a DAG file small enough to be efficiently mined by a 2GB 750ti, it will mine at 4-5 MH/s.  If the DAG file were smaller, it would mine at about 8MH/s, as it performed early after the release of ETH.  The way memory is addressed by the 750ti is a problem.

If you want to mine ETH at 50% or less efficiency, you can.  You would have less than 10MH/s hashrate for the two cards combined, which barely registers at a pool.  But each card will maintain about 50MH/s on the "lbry" algo (LBC), and use very little energy, and produce a chunk of Library Coin every day.  It is possible to find a 4GB 750ti, but you are better off with a GTX 950 or 960. or an AMD R7 265 or HD 7850.  An AMD HD 7850/R7 265, considered to be in the same league as a 750ti, gets 10MH/s or better on ETH or ETC.       --scryptr

try expanse .... 1.1 gb dagfile

hd7850 Stock @ 12 MH/s ETH, ETC and 16 MH/s EXP. boosted 15.6 MH/s ETH/ETC and 20 MH/s EXP
My HD7850 produce solo at time 2 - 4 Blocks a day on Expanse (16 - 32 EXP = ~0.016 - 0.032 BTC = ~ 15 Euro - (((0.120 KW*24h)*0,22Euro)=)0,69 Euro = ~ 14,30 Euro profit a day ...

lol i don't belive one word what you say  doing 0.016 - 0.032 BTC on a day with only 1 gpu   i don't know what you smoke

expense for 20mh/s without cost

Per    Pool Fee    Est. Rewards    Rev. BTC    Rev. $    Cost    Profit
Hour    0.001085    0.107423    0.000127    $0.08    $0.02    $0.06
Day    0.026042    2.578146    0.003059    $1.91    $0.53    $1.38
Week    0.182293    18.047023    0.021412    $13.37    $3.70    $9.67
Month    0.781256    77.344386    0.091768    $57.29    $15.84    $41.45
Year    9.505286    941.023361    1.116505    $697.04    $192.72    $504.32

[induktor]

Hello
I received my firsts GTX 1070 and I can't make them work with ethminer

when i start the miner i get:

Code:

terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
what():  CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version

nvidia-smi

Code:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 367.35                 Driver Version: 367.35                    |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
|   0  GeForce GTX 1070    Off  | 0000:01:00.0     Off |                  N/A |
|  0%   29C    P0    35W / 180W |      0MiB /  8113MiB |      0%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes:                                                       GPU Memory |
|  GPU       PID  Type  Process name                               Usage      |
|=============================================================================|
|  No running processes found                                                 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

nvcc --version

Code:

nvcc: NVIDIA (R) Cuda compiler driver
Copyright (c) 2005-2015 NVIDIA Corporation
Built on Tue_Aug_11_14:27:32_CDT_2015
Cuda compilation tools, release 7.5, V7.5.17

I am runing the same miner compiled for the GTX 970, do i need to compile it again?, i am using cuda 7.5.
I only ugraded the driver to support the card, and nvidia-smi sees it.
os is xubuntu 14.04 x64.
any idea what i am doing wrong? is CUDA 8 required to work with this driver?

[LeChuckDE]

Hello
I received my firsts GTX 1070 and I can't make them work with ethminer

when i start the miner i get:

Code:

terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
what():  CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version

nvidia-smi

Code:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 367.35                 Driver Version: 367.35                    |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
|   0  GeForce GTX 1070    Off  | 0000:01:00.0     Off |                  N/A |
|  0%   29C    P0    35W / 180W |      0MiB /  8113MiB |      0%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes:                                                       GPU Memory |
|  GPU       PID  Type  Process name                               Usage      |
|=============================================================================|
|  No running processes found                                                 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

nvcc --version

Code:

nvcc: NVIDIA (R) Cuda compiler driver
Copyright (c) 2005-2015 NVIDIA Corporation
Built on Tue_Aug_11_14:27:32_CDT_2015
Cuda compilation tools, release 7.5, V7.5.17

I am runing the same miner compiled for the GTX 970, do i need to compile it again?, i am using cuda 7.5.
I only ugraded the driver to support the card, and nvidia-smi sees it.
os is xubuntu 14.04 x64.
any idea what i am doing wrong? is CUDA 8 required to work with this driver?

yes you have to rebuild with Cuda 8.0