Capitascism
|
|
May 02, 2016, 12:36:19 PM |
|
Just stay cool, this is an attack on bitcoin, i don't know who is behind it but it is obvious lie. And suddenly we have many newbies here who shiting on bitcoin, over and over again. What we can do with them?
|
*************************Too many scams beware******************************************
|
|
|
RawDog (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1026
|
|
May 02, 2016, 12:37:12 PM |
|
just skimmed through the thread and couldn't find any proof (or an explanation of what it is.). the article are also lacking citations/sources for the important parts. so, bottom line, the media are just being stupid again, am I right?
Pretty much. Nothing was shown/proved in the BBC article. I'm sure a laymen could easily be fooled but what is more concerning is Gavin Andresen seemingly buying this bullshit. Very alarming. I have since learnt that Gavin was paid for his participation. His site did not get hacked - but he received a little something for playing along. Gavin knows how to check whether a message was properly signed. He did not get fooled. He did not get hacked. He got paid.
|
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4354
Merit: 4703
|
|
May 02, 2016, 12:38:10 PM |
|
Just stay cool, this is an attack on bitcoin, i don't know who is behind it but it is obvious lie. And suddenly we have many newbies here who shiting on bitcoin, over and over again. What we can do with them?
this is all drama.. best advice. use this dramatical and temporal price drop period to grab some coins.. because people wise up and the price rises back up
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
bitbitch
|
|
May 02, 2016, 12:40:01 PM Last edit: May 02, 2016, 12:53:38 PM by bitbitch |
|
i'm now officially bored by this story.
today's newspaper headline, tomorrow's fish 'n' chip paper. NEXT.
|
|
|
|
Inedible
|
|
May 02, 2016, 12:45:07 PM |
|
It's possible he was hacked but how long do you think before someone asked Gavin? If it was a hack, the hacker would need to have colluded with Craig thereby incriminating him (Craig) when Gavin is asked "Were you hacked?". Not exactly a foolproof plan.
|
If this post was useful, interesting or entertaining, then you've misunderstood.
|
|
|
Inedible
|
|
May 02, 2016, 12:45:33 PM |
|
just skimmed through the thread and couldn't find any proof (or an explanation of what it is.). the article are also lacking citations/sources for the important parts. so, bottom line, the media are just being stupid again, am I right?
Pretty much. Nothing was shown/proved in the BBC article. I'm sure a laymen could easily be fooled but what is more concerning is Gavin Andresen seemingly buying this bullshit. Very alarming. I have since learnt that Gavin was paid for his participation. His site did not get hacked - but he received a little something for playing along. Gavin knows how to check whether a message was properly signed. He did not get fooled. He did not get hacked. He got paid. Extraordinary claims and all that...
|
If this post was useful, interesting or entertaining, then you've misunderstood.
|
|
|
The Arcitect
|
|
May 02, 2016, 12:45:41 PM Last edit: May 02, 2016, 01:15:57 PM by The Arcitect |
|
Pure speculation, nothing more There is no hard evidence that it is satoshi himself. BBC is becoming just as bad as TMZ on their ground breaking news hype machine ala hulk hogan's sex tape to get an ill fated washed has been 100 million more than what he should of Proof from a source that all of this is just HYPE: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1457687.msg14730880#msg14730880
|
|
|
|
defcon23
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 02, 2016, 12:47:45 PM Last edit: May 02, 2016, 12:57:59 PM by defcon23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capitascism
|
|
May 02, 2016, 12:48:52 PM |
|
And people who are not accustomed to those kind of attacks are now victims and selling their coins.. I thing we must act like community and must punish those who spreading fud (and troling), deliberately with an evil intents .
|
*************************Too many scams beware******************************************
|
|
|
Bitcoiner_cph
|
|
May 02, 2016, 12:53:47 PM |
|
For 10 seconds I thought this was real and that we (us bitcoiners) would be very busy today and the following time... but after just looking a little into this article, I still don’t see the proof?? And isn’t it the second time this man is in the media claiming that he is Satoshi Nakamoto?? Jesus, this man just want to be famous or sell something, how stupid are people and how stupid are journalists??
|
|
|
|
RealMalatesta
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1124
|
|
May 02, 2016, 12:59:04 PM |
|
For 10 seconds I thought this was real and that we (us bitcoiners) would be very busy today and the following time... but after just looking a little into this article, I still don’t see the proof?? And isn’t it the second time this man is in the media claiming that he is Satoshi Nakamoto?? Jesus, this man just want to be famous or sell something, how stupid are people and how stupid are journalists??
Same here... when I got the news, I thought: "Uuups, that'll be a busy day." Then I read the name of Craig Wright, and relaxed. Just another bigblocker who gets credibility from his bigblock-friend Gavin.
|
|
|
|
hd060053
|
|
May 02, 2016, 01:00:36 PM |
|
Can some1 give me a clear answer: did he sign the blocks with the private key or not?
|
|
|
|
--Encrypted--
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1007
hee-ho.
|
|
May 02, 2016, 01:00:58 PM |
|
dude they're in french. just skimmed through the thread and couldn't find any proof (or an explanation of what it is.). the article are also lacking citations/sources for the important parts. so, bottom line, the media are just being stupid again, am I right?
Pretty much. Nothing was shown/proved in the BBC article. I'm sure a laymen could easily be fooled but what is more concerning is Gavin Andresen seemingly buying this bullshit. Very alarming. I have since learnt that Gavin was paid for his participation. His site did not get hacked - but he received a little something for playing along. Gavin knows how to check whether a message was properly signed. He did not get fooled. He did not get hacked. He got paid. I hope not. after all he did he was still one of the biggest bitcoin contributor and some people still respect him because of that. if what you're saying is true then people will lost all their remaining respect to gavin and will most likely turn on him.
|
|
|
|
DimensionZ
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 251
Shit, did I leave the stove on?
|
|
May 02, 2016, 01:02:06 PM |
|
I find it strange that Craig Wright opted to show his proof to ordinary journalists from the BBC, the Economist and GQ. Maybe he wanted to fool them into believing he is the real deal while giving them fake leads. It would have been better if there was a conference of Bitcoin developers where Craig publicly showed that his claims were real and he could successfully sign a message.
|
|
|
|
vgo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1019
|
|
May 02, 2016, 01:03:14 PM |
|
I am not Craig Wright.
|
|
|
|
|
|
stonehedge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1002
Decentralize Everything
|
|
May 02, 2016, 01:05:35 PM |
|
Can some1 give me a clear answer: did he sign the blocks with the private key or not?
The BBC and other news outlets say yes but no evidence of it has been provided.
|
|
|
|
bitbitch
|
|
May 02, 2016, 01:05:40 PM |
|
i wonder if Craig has been recruited by the intelligence community of Five Eyes as their bitcoin disinformation poster boy?
|
|
|
|
Bitcoiner_cph
|
|
May 02, 2016, 01:05:51 PM |
|
I am Satoshi Nakamoto, yes I am a monkey, but you can see how smart I look, so it was me who invented Bitcoin!!!
|
|
|
|
|