Bitcoin Forum
April 20, 2018, 05:11:44 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [NEWS] CRYPTOMIXER.IO — Fast, Secure and Reliable Bitcoin Mixer (since 2016)!  (Read 18624 times)
drmarcobelli
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 11

livin livin


View Profile
December 14, 2017, 08:31:38 PM
 #261

Gonna give this a try.
1st mixer that i'll be using.

1524244304
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524244304

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524244304
Reply with quote  #2

1524244304
Report to moderator
1524244304
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524244304

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524244304
Reply with quote  #2

1524244304
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1524244304
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524244304

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524244304
Reply with quote  #2

1524244304
Report to moderator
tradulant
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 15, 2017, 12:39:44 PM
 #262

report back if it worked without problems pls
xTrust
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 17, 2017, 03:23:44 PM
 #263

Is the site working without problems at the moment?
Please say me if it work perfectly?
sabbathhawk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 106


View Profile WWW
January 03, 2018, 09:49:15 AM
 #264

Hello there
Do you use segwit addresses? If no, do you plan to implement them in future? It will help with faster processing and will make lower possible fees
Thanks

★ ★ ★ ★ ★   DeepOnion    Anonymous and Untraceable Cryptocurrency    TOR INTEGRATED & SECURED   ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
› › › › ›  JOIN THE NEW AIRDROP ✈️        VERIFIED WITH DEEPVAULT  ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬   ANN  WHITEPAPER  FACEBOOK  TWITTER  YOUTUBE  FORUM   ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Duddy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 05, 2018, 09:25:45 PM
 #265

Hello there
Do you use segwit addresses? If no, do you plan to implement them in future? It will help with faster processing and will make lower possible fees
Thanks

BEE VERY CAREFUL NOT CONFUSE THE SITE !!! FUCKING SCAMMERS USE SAME DESIGN https://coinmixer.io - FUCKING SCA MM EE RR SS https://coinmixer.io - SCAM, https://coinmixer.io - SCAM, https://coinmixer.io - SCAM !!!!!
CryptoMixer.io
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 178
Merit: 102

Ever used CryptoMixer? Leave your feedback ↓


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2018, 01:42:01 PM
 #266

Is the site working without problems at the moment?
Please say me if it work perfectly?

The website works perfectly, all transactions are being processed. There are some issues with Bitcoin network speed, but mixer process most transactions as soon as they get 1 confirmation. We have no one lost transaction at all times (since 2016). Feel free to mix your coins!
CryptoMixer.io
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 178
Merit: 102

Ever used CryptoMixer? Leave your feedback ↓


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2018, 01:56:25 PM
 #267

Hello there
Do you use segwit addresses? If no, do you plan to implement them in future? It will help with faster processing and will make lower possible fees
Thanks

We do not use segwit addresses, but we are currently researching this possibility. We are preparing a big update on the date of the 2nd anniversary of the mixer.
CryptoMixer.io
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 178
Merit: 102

Ever used CryptoMixer? Leave your feedback ↓


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2018, 02:07:16 PM
 #268

IMPORTANT NOTICE

BE VERY CAREFUL NOT CONFUSE THE SITE !!! FUCKING SCAMMERS USE SAME DESIGN https://coinmixer.io - FUCKING SCA MM EE RR SS https://coinmixer.io - SCAM, https://coinmixer.io - SCAM, https://coinmixer.io - SCAM !!!!!

Thank you for highlighting this! I have put your notice in the announcement post. The cryptomixer.io and cryptomixns23scr.onion domains are registered back in 2016 and have never changed! Bookmark this websites and do not let scammers fool yourself. If you don't bookmark the website always check the domain registration date via whois services. All scammers use freshly registered domains.
salsa321
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


LAW OF ATTRACTION


View Profile WWW
January 15, 2018, 08:34:48 AM
 #269

what kind improvement for this year?


 ▄██████████████████████▄
████████████████████████▀
████      ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
████    ▄████████████████▄
████   █████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀████
████  █████     █████ ████
████ █████     ██████ ████
████ █████    ██████  ████
████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████   ████
 ▀███████████████▀    ████
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀      ████
 ▄████████████████████████
 ▀██████████████████████▀

████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████

████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████

              ▄████████▄
              ██████████
     ▄███████████▄██████
     ███████████████████
     ██████████████████▀
     ██▄▀▀▀▄██████
▄▄▄  █    ███████
█ ▀█ █    ████████
▀█  ██   █▄▄█████▀
 █        █ █     ▄█████▄
███   ▄█    █     ███████
█ ▀█▄█    ▄▀      ███████
▀█▄▄▄▄██▀▀        ▀█████▀
[/link]
[/center]
CryptoMixer.io
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 178
Merit: 102

Ever used CryptoMixer? Leave your feedback ↓


View Profile WWW
January 15, 2018, 12:53:44 PM
 #270

what kind improvement for this year?

Usability and speed
shield132
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 513


Watch Agents Of Shield On ABC


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 10:14:53 PM
 #271

what kind improvement for this year?

Usability and speed
Despite the fact that I was always positive about your mixing service because it always reminds me bitmixer, everything has changed in my mind.
At first I want to ask you, maybe pretty old question, but want to get answer on it: You really own that number of bitcoins as you claim, you showed us proof, messages from those wallets were verified by DT members but is it safe for your users? Someone ever knew your wallets where you stored major bitcoins.... Wasn't that a silly action?

.BITSLER.                 ▄███
               ▄████▀
             ▄████▀
           ▄████▀  ▄██▄
         ▄████▀    ▀████▄
       ▄████▀        ▀████▄
     ▄████▀            ▀████▄
   ▄████▀                ▀████▄
 ▄████▀ ▄████▄      ▄████▄ ▀████▄
█████   ██████      ██████   █████
 ▀████▄ ▀████▀      ▀████▀ ▄████▀
   ▀████▄                ▄████▀
     ▀████▄            ▄████▀
       ▀████▄        ▄████▀
         ▀████▄    ▄████▀
           ▀████▄▄████▀
             ▀██████▀
               ▀▀▀▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄            
▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀    ▄▄█▄▄ ▀▀▄         
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄      
█  ▀▄▄  ▀█▀▀ ▄      ▀████   ▀▀▄   
█ █▄  ▀▄   ▀████       ▀▀ ▄██▄ ▀▀▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
█  ▀▀       ▀▄▄ ▀████      ▄▄▄▀▀▀  █
█            ▄ ▀▄    ▄▄▄▀▀▀   ▄▄  █
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
█ ▄▄   ███   ▀██  █           ▀▀  █ 
█ ███  ▀██       █        ▄▄      █ 
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  
▀▄            █        ▀▀      █  
▀▀▄   ███▄  █   ▄▄          █   
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀    
▀▀▄   █   ▀▀▄▄▄▀▀▀         
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄▀▀▀▀              
              ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
          ▄▄████████████████▄▄
        ▄██████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄
▄     ▄█████▀             ▀█████▄
██▄▄ █████▀                ▀█████
 ████████            ▄██      █████
  ████████▄         ███▀       ████▄
  █████████▀▀     ▄███▀        █████
   █▀▀▀          █████         █████
     ▄▄▄         ████          █████
   █████          ▀▀           ████▀
    █████                     █████
     █████▄                 ▄█████
      ▀█████▄             ▄█████▀
        ▀██████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀
          ▀▀████████████████▀▀
              ▀▀▀██████▀▀▀
            ▄▄▄███████▄▄▄
         ▄█▀▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀▀▀█▄
       █▀▀ ▄█████████████▄ ▀▀█
     █▀▀ ███████████████████ ▀▀█
    █▀ ███████████████████████ ▀█
   █▀ ███████████████▀▀ ███████ ▀█
 ▄█▀ ██████████████▀      ▀█████ ▀█▄
███ ███████████▀▀            ▀▀██ ███
███ ███████▀▀                     ███
███ ▀▀▀▀                          ███
▀██▄                             ▄██▀
  ▀█▄                            ▀▀
    █▄       █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█
     █▄      ▀█████████▀
      ▀█▄      ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
        ▀▀█▄▄  ▄▄▄
            ▀▀█████
[]
CryptoMixer.io
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 178
Merit: 102

Ever used CryptoMixer? Leave your feedback ↓


View Profile WWW
January 17, 2018, 07:13:30 PM
 #272

what kind improvement for this year?

Usability and speed
Despite the fact that I was always positive about your mixing service because it always reminds me bitmixer, everything has changed in my mind.
At first I want to ask you, maybe pretty old question, but want to get answer on it: You really own that number of bitcoins as you claim, you showed us proof, messages from those wallets were verified by DT members but is it safe for your users? Someone ever knew your wallets where you stored major bitcoins.... Wasn't that a silly action?

Thank you for your question, but dont let this fact confuse you. It only proves that in a certain moment of time there were a certain amount of coins in operation. All coins in reserve are being in the constant circulation, they have no links with the source or destination addresses and fresh coins are constantly entering the reserve.
CryptoMixer.io
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 178
Merit: 102

Ever used CryptoMixer? Leave your feedback ↓


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2018, 10:13:18 PM
 #273

ANNOUNCEMENT

Don't be confused by the new online chat widget on our website — we have changed it. E-mail support@cryptomixer.io works as well. Feel free to mix your coins!
PrivacyImportant
Newbie
*
Online Online

Activity: 8
Merit: 1


View Profile
February 17, 2018, 12:26:24 PM
Merited by Reatim (1)
 #274

I am using your service for a long time now and I am very satisfied with it. But lately I have been investigating possibilities to track transactions which were send over mixing services and I found two possible attack vectors to cluster transactions which were mixed with your service.

The first one is less effective but there is still a decent risk. The transaction fees of your service are constant when the transaction has the same size. For example three transactions with one input and two output addresses had the same size of 42.598 sat/B. Obviously the fees vary when there are more input addresses but most of the time I received transactions with one input two output and the fees were constant.

The second is more severe. Let's say we have a setup of x-forward addresses and all of them are differently delayed in time. Normally you should think that this setup is bullet proof but it isn't. As the delay steps in your service are hour based and your service is sending the transactions at exactly the same time just hourly shifted (for example: 01-01 21:10:21, 01-01 14:12:20, 01-01 03:12:18) it is easy to cluster all transactions which are connected to one mixing step. With the help of the first attack vector the analysis becomes even more effective.

With the help of those information it should be no big deal for future blockchain analysis techniques to track down the source of mixed coins. This is a big risk for a mixing service which should offer a high grade of privacy.

My advice to improve the privacy of your service would be:
First attack vector: Add a small randomly chosen amount to your transaction fee. This hides the fact that a transaction is send by the same service/wallet.
Second attack vector: Offer the functionality of choosing the delay on minute basis OR add a randomly chosen delay (for example +- 10 minutes from the chosen hourly delay) to your transaction time.
CryptoMixer.io
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 178
Merit: 102

Ever used CryptoMixer? Leave your feedback ↓


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2018, 07:44:51 PM
Merited by Reatim (1)
 #275

My advice to improve the privacy of your service would be:
First attack vector: Add a small randomly chosen amount to your transaction fee. This hides the fact that a transaction is send by the same service/wallet.
Second attack vector: Offer the functionality of choosing the delay on minute basis OR add a randomly chosen delay (for example +- 10 minutes from the chosen hourly delay) to your transaction time.

These improvements sound reasonable. We are constantly improving our algorithms and believe there is never too many measures when you deal with security and privacy. Thank you for your feedback!
Reatim
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 20, 2018, 07:51:06 PM
 #276

I am using your service for a long time now and I am very satisfied with it. But lately I have been investigating possibilities to track transactions which were send over mixing services and I found two possible attack vectors to cluster transactions which were mixed with your service.

The first one is less effective but there is still a decent risk. The transaction fees of your service are constant when the transaction has the same size. For example three transactions with one input and two output addresses had the same size of 42.598 sat/B. Obviously the fees vary when there are more input addresses but most of the time I received transactions with one input two output and the fees were constant.

The second is more severe. Let's say we have a setup of x-forward addresses and all of them are differently delayed in time. Normally you should think that this setup is bullet proof but it isn't. As the delay steps in your service are hour based and your service is sending the transactions at exactly the same time just hourly shifted (for example: 01-01 21:10:21, 01-01 14:12:20, 01-01 03:12:18) it is easy to cluster all transactions which are connected to one mixing step. With the help of the first attack vector the analysis becomes even more effective.

With the help of those information it should be no big deal for future blockchain analysis techniques to track down the source of mixed coins. This is a big risk for a mixing service which should offer a high grade of privacy.

My advice to improve the privacy of your service would be:
First attack vector: Add a small randomly chosen amount to your transaction fee. This hides the fact that a transaction is send by the same service/wallet.
Second attack vector: Offer the functionality of choosing the delay on minute basis OR add a randomly chosen delay (for example +- 10 minutes from the chosen hourly delay) to your transaction time.

I have given merit to your account since I'm been also using cryptomixer for a long time and I have notice the same specially the second attack vector.

I would love to see it being implement a delay of -/+ 10 minutes will be OK I guess on my end.

My advice to improve the privacy of your service would be:
First attack vector: Add a small randomly chosen amount to your transaction fee. This hides the fact that a transaction is send by the same service/wallet.
Second attack vector: Offer the functionality of choosing the delay on minute basis OR add a randomly chosen delay (for example +- 10 minutes from the chosen hourly delay) to your transaction time.

These improvements sound reasonable. We are constantly improving our algorithms and believe there is never too many measures when you deal with security and privacy. Thank you for your feedback!

Thank you for your fast reply. I hope that we can see this implemented in the future release of cryptomixer and more power to you guys.



               
      ▓▓▓██
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓
   ▓▓▓▓▓██
   ▓▓▓▀   
    ▀         
               
                 ▌ 
                 ▀ 
Create your hero profile and let your superpowers shine
        ╟────── Website ─────── Telegram ────── Facebook ─────── Twitter ───────Whitepaper ─────╢
     ▄██████████████████▄
   ▄█▀                  ▀██▄ 
  ▀█▄                    ▄█▀ 
I AM HERO
         ▀█▄      ▄██         
           ▀█▄   ██           
             ▀█▄█▀           
               ▀

PrivacyImportant
Newbie
*
Online Online

Activity: 8
Merit: 1


View Profile
February 21, 2018, 12:16:15 PM
 #277

My advice to improve the privacy of your service would be:
First attack vector: Add a small randomly chosen amount to your transaction fee. This hides the fact that a transaction is send by the same service/wallet.
Second attack vector: Offer the functionality of choosing the delay on minute basis OR add a randomly chosen delay (for example +- 10 minutes from the chosen hourly delay) to your transaction time.

These improvements sound reasonable. We are constantly improving our algorithms and believe there is never too many measures when you deal with security and privacy. Thank you for your feedback!

It would be nice to see these improvements implemented as fast as possible so that anybody using your service receives a far better privacy. Can I somehow speed up this process by helping to implement those changes or send you some financial support?

PS: Sadly I can't send you private messages because of my Newbie status. If you are interested then leave me a private message with some contact information. Thank you!
PrivacyImportant
Newbie
*
Online Online

Activity: 8
Merit: 1


View Profile
March 10, 2018, 12:00:54 PM
 #278

Sad to see that still nothing has changed. I don't want to overexagerate but as long as this hasn't been fixed the whole mixing is useless and easily traceable even with open source blockchain analysis tools like BlockSci. And I am sure there exist even more powerful proprietary tools of services like Chainalysis and Elliptic which are already used to trace transactions of mixing services. When a service which pretends to offer privacy is shown that their privacy model is utterly broken one should at least hope that this problem is fixed asap.
CryptoMixer.io
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 178
Merit: 102

Ever used CryptoMixer? Leave your feedback ↓


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2018, 11:40:11 AM
 #279

Sad to see that still nothing has changed. I don't want to overexagerate but as long as this hasn't been fixed

Sorry for the late response. I was sure, I have answered your last message.
CryptoMixer.io
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 178
Merit: 102

Ever used CryptoMixer? Leave your feedback ↓


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2018, 11:41:25 AM
 #280

My advice to improve the privacy of your service would be:
First attack vector: Add a small randomly chosen amount to your transaction fee. This hides the fact that a transaction is send by the same service/wallet.
Second attack vector: Offer the functionality of choosing the delay on minute basis OR add a randomly chosen delay (for example +- 10 minutes from the chosen hourly delay) to your transaction time.

These improvements sound reasonable. We are constantly improving our algorithms and believe there is never too many measures when you deal with security and privacy. Thank you for your feedback!

It would be nice to see these improvements implemented as fast as possible so that anybody using your service receives a far better privacy. Can I somehow speed up this process by helping to implement those changes or send you some financial support?


We are working on improvements that will cover your risk cases. We will roll out this update together with SegWit support.

Your help will be highly appreciated during the production tests. I'll contact you directly as soon as we would be ready. Thank you
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!