Bitcoin Forum
May 23, 2024, 08:06:20 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ... 113 »
  Print  
Author Topic: My second ZEC + XMR+ ETH thread builds info links thoughts and photos.  (Read 147865 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4130
Merit: 7912


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
November 14, 2016, 02:02:54 PM
 #1161

over night results using -i 2

best rig  at 119H/s is the asus z170a using an i5 6500t

worst rig at 108H/s is the biostar z170a using an i3 6300t

the asrock h81 is at 113 H/s using an intel i5 4570s

the asrockz170 extreme 3 is at 115 H/s using an i7 6700t


What does it all mean? I suspect to run at -i 2  you need an i5  .

I also have virtual memory set at 32000-64000 on all rigs.




▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
vg54dett
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 501
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 03:46:35 PM
 #1162



I also have virtual memory set at 32000-64000 on all rigs.




I made the change , following your "how to" post, but didn't notice any change in hashrate.
What should I expect setting virtual memory to 32k-64k ?
Thank you
GabryRox
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 600
Merit: 261


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 04:29:51 PM
 #1163

Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner.
=========================

Latest version v5.0:

- improved speed by about 30-50% (depends on card model). About 145H/s on stock 390X.
- improved support for Catalyst 16.x and 4xx cards.
- reduced CPU usage.



LINKS:

GOOGLE: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B69wv2iqszefdmJickl5MF9BOEE?usp=sharing
MEGA: https://mega.nz/#F!P0ZjFDjC!Cmb-ZRqlbAnNrajRtp4zvA


GET IT WHILE IT IS HOT

Hey Aries... what kind of bump did you get on your MSI 470 rig using v5.0?  over 100 H/s now I would assume?

Could you also tell me what effect v5 had (if any) power draw and GPU temps?  I am managing my rig remotely so i need to be careful with changes as I only have someone checking it for crashes twice a day and don't want to risk long down-times or really even get it running too hot while I am away.  With V4 my GPUs were running about 59-60 degrees with minimal fan usage.

Thanks for any results you can share!

philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4130
Merit: 7912


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
November 14, 2016, 04:35:41 PM
 #1164



I also have virtual memory set at 32000-64000 on all rigs.




I made the change , following your "how to" post, but didn't notice any change in hashrate.
What should I expect setting virtual memory to 32k-64k ?
Thank you

maybe no difference at all.

it uses vm  when:

 A)  your system ram is small like a 4gb ram stick
 B) your system cpu is weak like a pentium g1840 in an asrock h81 mobo


@GabryRox  my numbers are for 4 rigs with 15 cards

So  when I had the pentium in my asrock h81 with a single 4gb stick  adding the vm did a small boost 2-4%
When and I still do have an i3 in my biostar z170a it adds a little boost.


claymore 5 uses more power.  8.7 amps at 240 volts  doing 1.1k H/s 

 is now 9.2  amps at 240 volts doing 1.7k H/s  but this is with -i 2

I am switching to -i 1  today.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
vg54dett
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 501
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 04:44:50 PM
 #1165

I'm using ASrock H81 with G1840 and 8GB Ram.
But not noticed real difference in my case.

By the way, how many GPU can I put in a H81 without Risers ?
I have a free H81 empty, and looking to make a cheap RIG with it and maybe some Rx470.
I hope it's not too late to ROI this one.
Oceat
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 368


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 04:53:29 PM
 #1166

I'm using ASrock H81 with G1840 and 8GB Ram.
But not noticed real difference in my case.

By the way, how many GPU can I put in a H81 without Risers ?
I have a free H81 empty, and looking to make a cheap RIG with it and maybe some Rx470.
I hope it's not too late to ROI this one.

The H81 has only one X16 slot. It has 5 X1 slot. So you have to buy 5 risers to make it an efficient system.

3996
AriesIV10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006


Mine for a Bit


View Profile WWW
November 14, 2016, 04:56:06 PM
 #1167

Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner.
=========================

Latest version v5.0:

- improved speed by about 30-50% (depends on card model). About 145H/s on stock 390X.
- improved support for Catalyst 16.x and 4xx cards.
- reduced CPU usage.



LINKS:

GOOGLE: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B69wv2iqszefdmJickl5MF9BOEE?usp=sharing
MEGA: https://mega.nz/#F!P0ZjFDjC!Cmb-ZRqlbAnNrajRtp4zvA


GET IT WHILE IT IS HOT

Hey Aries... what kind of bump did you get on your MSI 470 rig using v5.0?  over 100 H/s now I would assume?

Could you also tell me what effect v5 had (if any) power draw and GPU temps?  I am managing my rig remotely so i need to be careful with changes as I only have someone checking it for crashes twice a day and don't want to risk long down-times or really even get it running too hot while I am away.  With V4 my GPUs were running about 59-60 degrees with minimal fan usage.

Thanks for any results you can share!



RIG004
6 x MSI RX470
Big Changes:



With the v5.0 -i 0 I was getting about 660Sols

BTC Address (Donations):  3LepZAju88ZRuNVD4cS6Xv5hKyKrjvirkB     Website:  www.MintMining.com
Email: Mining@MintMining.com      Power Supplies: https://bit.ly/2TtvdOR
vg54dett
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 501
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 04:58:08 PM
 #1168

I have a unused IBM DPS 2000w server supply (from BTC mining).
How you guys would you use it to power a GPU mining RIG ?
ps_jb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 05:01:01 PM
 #1169

over night results using -i 2

best rig  at 119H/s is the asus z170a using an i5 6500t

worst rig at 108H/s is the biostar z170a using an i3 6300t

the asrock h81 is at 113 H/s using an intel i5 4570s

the asrockz170 extreme 3 is at 115 H/s using an i7 6700t


What does it all mean? I suspect to run at -i 2  you need an i5  .

I also have virtual memory set at 32000-64000 on all rigs.


I will try today with -i 1 and -i 2 on my i5 and i7 rigs

Thank you, Phil!
Rami84
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 292
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 05:06:11 PM
 #1170

@philipma1957 About the rx 480 cards which one do you use the 4GB or the 8GB?
Thanks

Well any deal I find.  So if I find a cheap 4gb good if I find a cheap 8 gb good.

Mostly now I buy cheap rx 470 4gb.

I get some as low as 170 this,is,a cheap price.

I also found a rx 460 I may get.

Has anyone done rx460s with claymores zcash?

How much Hash do you get with 4GB & 8GB? I mean is there a big difference
Jacknife
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 64
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 05:11:07 PM
 #1171

over night results using -i 2

best rig  at 119H/s is the asus z170a using an i5 6500t

worst rig at 108H/s is the biostar z170a using an i3 6300t

the asrock h81 is at 113 H/s using an intel i5 4570s

the asrockz170 extreme 3 is at 115 H/s using an i7 6700t


What does it all mean? I suspect to run at -i 2  you need an i5  .

I also have virtual memory set at 32000-64000 on all rigs.


I will try today with -i 1 and -i 2 on my i5 and i7 rigs

Thank you, Phil!

I have 6X R9 390 or H81 with Celeron 1840. The miners runs faster with -i =2 than -i=1 or 0. CPU usage is small.
GabryRox
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 600
Merit: 261


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 05:11:17 PM
 #1172

Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner.
=========================

Latest version v5.0:

- improved speed by about 30-50% (depends on card model). About 145H/s on stock 390X.
- improved support for Catalyst 16.x and 4xx cards.
- reduced CPU usage.



LINKS:

GOOGLE: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B69wv2iqszefdmJickl5MF9BOEE?usp=sharing
MEGA: https://mega.nz/#F!P0ZjFDjC!Cmb-ZRqlbAnNrajRtp4zvA


GET IT WHILE IT IS HOT

Hey Aries... what kind of bump did you get on your MSI 470 rig using v5.0?  over 100 H/s now I would assume?

Could you also tell me what effect v5 had (if any) power draw and GPU temps?  I am managing my rig remotely so i need to be careful with changes as I only have someone checking it for crashes twice a day and don't want to risk long down-times or really even get it running too hot while I am away.  With V4 my GPUs were running about 59-60 degrees with minimal fan usage.

Thanks for any results you can share!



RIG004
6 x MSI RX470
Big Changes:



With the v5.0 -i 0 I was getting about 660Sols


Wow! that is insane!  Almost 2x hash rate on same power draw!  I was hoping that this was gonna happen since it seemed like Claymore was concentrating more on the 390/290's first.  Now... if the price of ZEC would just come back a bit lol.  Thanks for the info... well worth the slight risk of managing the upgrade remotely.
AriesIV10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006


Mine for a Bit


View Profile WWW
November 14, 2016, 05:21:08 PM
 #1173

Here is the updated RIG.  There was a 5 degree reduction with lid installed.  

Ave Watt on MSI Afterburner = 65W
Watts at the wall = 768W
Amps at the wall = 6.46A
Ave Temp on MSI Afterburner = 50C
ZEC Mining Ave = 700 SOLs (Claymore's v5.0)




https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1676763.new#new

BTC Address (Donations):  3LepZAju88ZRuNVD4cS6Xv5hKyKrjvirkB     Website:  www.MintMining.com
Email: Mining@MintMining.com      Power Supplies: https://bit.ly/2TtvdOR
Cryptozillah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 687
Merit: 502


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 07:02:06 PM
 #1174

over night results using -i 2

best rig  at 119H/s is the asus z170a using an i5 6500t

worst rig at 108H/s is the biostar z170a using an i3 6300t

the asrock h81 is at 113 H/s using an intel i5 4570s

the asrockz170 extreme 3 is at 115 H/s using an i7 6700t


What does it all mean? I suspect to run at -i 2  you need an i5  .

I also have virtual memory set at 32000-64000 on all rigs.




I run -i 2 on all my 480 rigs + my 280x for fun card. On the 470s i run -i 0
All rigs use a Celeron G1820
4-8GB Ram + 16GB virtual memory set on all rigs.
I have no issues with slow gpus. Maybe the trouble start with really big virtual memory settings ?


1 x 280x
6 x 470 4GB
13 x 480 8GB

The 280x card pushes over 100 on stock bios/settings, crazy bang for the buck Smiley
It got some random crap fans ziptied to it because the originals died during DRK mining years ago.
ps_jb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 07:12:33 PM
 #1175


I run -i 2 on all my 480 rigs + my 280x for fun card. On the 470s i run -i 0
All rigs use a Celeron G1820


What is the gain with -i 0 and -i 2 for RX 480?
Cryptozillah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 687
Merit: 502


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 07:19:58 PM
 #1176


I run -i 2 on all my 480 rigs + my 280x for fun card. On the 470s i run -i 0
All rigs use a Celeron G1820


What is the gain with -i 0 and -i 2 for RX 480?
I have not checked with v5 actually.
I hardly remember how much it was on v4 but on my rigs it was a difference worth doing.
Redrose
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 08:05:26 PM
 #1177

I'm wondering why you are all rushing to mine ZCash. It find it less profitable than Ethereum. Moreover Flypool is abosultely not giving me what I should get.
Cryptozillah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 687
Merit: 502


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 08:07:59 PM
 #1178

I'm wondering why you are all rushing to mine ZCash. It find it less profitable than Ethereum. Moreover Flypool is abosultely not giving me what I should get.
I am at Nicehash mining ZEC for BTC.
~25% lower powerdraw than ETH

I am doing more profits from ZEC on a daily basis for sure.
Redrose
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 08:35:16 PM
 #1179

I'm wondering why you are all rushing to mine ZCash. It find it less profitable than Ethereum. Moreover Flypool is abosultely not giving me what I should get.
I am at Nicehash mining ZEC for BTC.
~25% lower powerdraw than ETH

I am doing more profits from ZEC on a daily basis for sure.

How the hell is it possible ? Both Whattomine and NiceHash calculator give me Ethereum a lot more profitable. There would even be a 3$ gap for me between them. That might be related to my configuration, but in my case Ethereum is a lot more profitable. I'd go for NiceHash given the pain it would save me, but considering that it doesn't work on my Nvidia rig, I had to ignore that option.
AriesIV10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006


Mine for a Bit


View Profile WWW
November 14, 2016, 08:56:50 PM
 #1180

I'm wondering why you are all rushing to mine ZCash. It find it less profitable than Ethereum. Moreover Flypool is abosultely not giving me what I should get.
I am at Nicehash mining ZEC for BTC.
~25% lower powerdraw than ETH

I am doing more profits from ZEC on a daily basis for sure.

How the hell is it possible ? Both Whattomine and NiceHash calculator give me Ethereum a lot more profitable. There would even be a 3$ gap for me between them. That might be related to my configuration, but in my case Ethereum is a lot more profitable. I'd go for NiceHash given the pain it would save me, but considering that it doesn't work on my Nvidia rig, I had to ignore that option.

This may be an interesting site to evaluate the most profitable coin based upon equipment and capabilities:

http://whattomine.com


BTC Address (Donations):  3LepZAju88ZRuNVD4cS6Xv5hKyKrjvirkB     Website:  www.MintMining.com
Email: Mining@MintMining.com      Power Supplies: https://bit.ly/2TtvdOR
Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ... 113 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!