Rebranded to Duality Blockchain Solutions

[Orestes]

Guys
you'll be laughing now but in the new Silk(SLK) wallet:
with all the swapping, transfers from weaver, Bittrex and split coins to stake....
I don't know what is my current Silk(SLK) wallet address

I've loads of sending and receiving addresses
when I sent coins from weaver after the swap I sent them to an address, but now it has a zero balance
I used console command listaddressgroupings and it gave me loads of them addys but none has the right amount from the wallet
any ideas?

Menu Bar > File > Receive addresses.

It shows a list of all addresses in the wallet

[Orestes]

Hello, I have a clean installation of silk-core (https://github.com/SilkNetwork/Silk-Core) in a new Ubuntu installation and working fine an its synced with the same block height as the explorer https://slkexplorer.silknetwork.org/

I am now stuck with the wallet, where can I find the basic commands? see the address of my wallet or create wallet, encrypt wallet. I know and I used: silk-cli help and silk-cli getwalletinfo but it doesn't say much. And then how to do coin splitting/coin control.
All of this with command line please. I have no gui installed. Tnx !!

Im not familiar with a linux environment but "help" and "getwalletinfo" are valid commands.

[Orestes]

ttoroie -
I see that you have a SLK donation address in your signature. Why not register your name by using the wallet and accept SLK by using ttoroie instead?

Go to DNS in your wallet
enter your name
duration of service
preferred value (much like an address label i.e. receivables)
enter your SLK address if you want to connect your name to an existing address
and hit submit

for a fee of 0.01 SLK/day you can now use your name and your slk address to receive donations.

[Crypt0Keeper]

Nice, let's see how long it takes to confirm, haha.

I hope you're synced already

It said I was then I restarted the wallet, now I'm not.  Wtf.

[MCDev]

Guys
you'll be laughing now but in the new Silk(SLK) wallet:
with all the swapping, transfers from weaver, Bittrex and split coins to stake....
I don't know what is my current Silk(SLK) wallet address

I've loads of sending and receiving addresses
when I sent coins from weaver after the swap I sent them to an address, but now it has a zero balance
I used console command listaddressgroupings and it gave me loads of them addys but none has the right amount from the wallet
any ideas?

Don't know if it will help but have you tried dumpwallet <filename>

[MCDev]

Nice, let's see how long it takes to confirm, haha.

I hope you're synced already

It said I was then I restarted the wallet, now I'm not.  Wtf.

I'm running into the same issue.  I'm stuck on 1758670 but that matches the explorer.  The 33 coin tx I sent to ttoroie now shows as conflicted.  I've restarted a couple of times and as a last resort used ttoroie's datadirectory zip.  Still at same block

[digitron]

stuck at 1758670 as well

[Karartma1]

Sorry to say but this thread is becoming unreadable: OLD silkcoin, NEW SILK, rebranding, ICO finished with no further announcements.
I would ask the team to clean up a bit. This is a simple request, nothing else

[MCDev]

Sorry to say but this thread is becoming unreadable: OLD silkcoin, NEW SILK, rebranding, ICO finished with no further announcements.
I would ask the team to clean up a bit. This is a simple request, nothing else

I see your point as there have been a couple of times I've had to go back and forth between posts to make sure I knew exactly what the post I was reading was pertaining to.  The majority of the post do pertain to Silk and / or DarkSilk in one way or another, be it the community trying to help with late swappers, or some info on Silk / DarkSilk.  I admit that at times it may be hard to follow but the good thing is that it is showing a lot of community involvement.

Possibly when DarkSilk is released and the rebranding is complete / announced, they will create a new thread exclusively for Silk / DarkSilk / Weaver for the rebrand.

[Bitcoinasourus]

Sorry to say but this thread is becoming unreadable: OLD silkcoin, NEW SILK, rebranding, ICO finished with no further announcements.
I would ask the team to clean up a bit. This is a simple request, nothing else

I see your point as there have been a couple of times I've had to go back and forth between posts to make sure I knew exactly what the post I was reading was pertaining to.  The majority of the post do pertain to Silk and / or DarkSilk in one way or another, be it the community trying to help with late swappers, or some info on Silk / DarkSilk.  I admit that at times it may be hard to follow but the good thing is that it is showing a lot of community involvement.

Possibly when DarkSilk is released and the rebranding is complete / announced, they will create a new thread exclusively for Silk / DarkSilk / Weaver for the rebrand.

Also helps if we call the coin what it is, the new chain is Silk, the old chain is SilkCoin and the new ICO coin is Darksilk


I unlocked my wallet on the old silkcoin chain, seemed to get things moving a bit. Since it's still stuck staking 25k silkcoin it seems to move things along when I stake this wallet. I did manage to free up half of what i had locked up.

I'll try and keep the silkcoin chatter to PM

[digitron]

About the old Silkcoin
That's why we moved on to the new Silk because the old one sucked
Guys you might edit your posts and add this line up front: About the old Silkcoin

Sorry to say but this thread is becoming unreadable: OLD silkcoin, NEW SILK, rebranding, ICO finished with no further announcements.
I would ask the team to clean up a bit. This is a simple request, nothing else

Agree
People are getting more confused
I think the team can delete the last posts about the old Silkcoin
we should do this through PM's

How about opening a topic for this matter in Altcoin Discussion?

[MCDev]

About the old Silkcoin
That's why we moved on to the new Silk because the old one sucked
Guys you might edit your posts and add this line up front: About the old Silkcoin

Sorry to say but this thread is becoming unreadable: OLD silkcoin, NEW SILK, rebranding, ICO finished with no further announcements.
I would ask the team to clean up a bit. This is a simple request, nothing else

Agree
People are getting more confused
I think the team can delete the last posts about the old Silkcoin
we should do this through PM's

How about opening a topic for this matter in Altcoin Discussion?

Done
Created new topic
Discussion on Legacy SilkCoin wallet to help late swappers to New Silk (SLK)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1665582.msg16723583#msg16723583

[MCDev]

How about opening a topic for this matter in Altcoin Discussion?

People couldn't find this one with all the changes and threads locked
we should accept the fact that the late ones have missed the train
and will be next to impossible later on to recover their Silkcoins

oops, I just created a new thread ... want me to delete it?
You're the boss since most of this was falling on your shoulders

[ttoroie]

No that's OK
will redirect people there and keep this one clean
BTW I'm no boss exactly because of the responsibilities involved

please move your posts about Silkcoin and old blockchain
to this thread so we don't confuse people

[ttoroie]

I have another question. This question is about the new coin Silk. I downloaded the win64 wallet and I have no active connections. I have let it run for 2 days, nothing, not 1 connection and I am not sure what is wrong. Every other time I have downloaded a wallet they usually get an active connection and start downloading the chain within minutes??? is Silk still in working progress? does Silk only exist in the Weaver at this current time? confused a little, some clarity would be much appreciated.

You might need to add Silk.conf to your Silk folder as well

[ttoroie]

please move your posts about Silkcoin and old blockchain
to this thread so we don't confuse people

[Orestes]

I have another question. This question is about the new coin Silk. I downloaded the win64 wallet and I have no active connections. I have let it run for 2 days, nothing, not 1 connection and I am not sure what is wrong. Every other time I have downloaded a wallet they usually get an active connection and start downloading the chain within minutes??? is Silk still in working progress? does Silk only exist in the Weaver at this current time? confused a little, some clarity would be much appreciated.

You might need to add Silk.conf to your Silk folder as well

Also, are you running the latest version?

if you want to add nodes, getpeerinfo gives

Code:

[
{
"id": 1,
"addr": "159.203.111.196:16662",
"addrlocal": "82.73.172.120:59751",
"services": "0000000000000001",
"lastsend": 1477775769,
"lastrecv": 1477775768,
"bytessent": 217497,
"bytesrecv": 191055,
"conntime": 1477746955,
"pingtime": 0.192541,
"version": 60800,
"subver": "Silk Core:1.0.0",
"inbound": false,
"startingheight": 57539,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 57975,
"synced_blocks": 57975,
"inflight": [
],
"whitelisted": false
}, 
{
"id": 3,
"addr": "45.32.7.212:16662",
"addrlocal": "82.73.172.120:59758",
"services": "0000000000000001",
"lastsend": 1477775780,
"lastrecv": 1477775780,
"bytessent": 70253,
"bytesrecv": 89426,
"conntime": 1477746968,
"pingtime": 0.139018,
"version": 60800,
"subver": "Silk Core:1.0.1",
"inbound": false,
"startingheight": 57539,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 57975,
"synced_blocks": 57975,
"inflight": [
],
"whitelisted": false
}, 
{
"id": 4,
"addr": "84.195.38.128:16662",
"addrlocal": "82.73.172.120:59761",
"services": "0000000000000001",
"lastsend": 1477775793,
"lastrecv": 1477775793,
"bytessent": 91859,
"bytesrecv": 97156,
"conntime": 1477746979,
"pingtime": 0.061508,
"version": 60800,
"subver": "Silk Core:1.0.0",
"inbound": false,
"startingheight": 57539,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 57975,
"synced_blocks": 57975,
"inflight": [
],
"whitelisted": false
}, 
{
"id": 5,
"addr": "195.200.244.73:16662",
"addrlocal": "82.73.172.120:59766",
"services": "0000000000000001",
"lastsend": 1477775812,
"lastrecv": 1477775812,
"bytessent": 84392,
"bytesrecv": 92515,
"conntime": 1477746996,
"pingtime": 0.09001199999999999,
"version": 60800,
"subver": "Silk Core:1.0.1",
"inbound": false,
"startingheight": 57539,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 57975,
"synced_blocks": 57975,
"inflight": [
],
"whitelisted": false
}, 
{
"id": 6,
"addr": "47.208.182.225:16662",
"addrlocal": "82.73.172.120:59767",
"services": "0000000000000001",
"lastsend": 1477775809,
"lastrecv": 1477775809,
"bytessent": 80325,
"bytesrecv": 88940,
"conntime": 1477746997,
"pingtime": 0.246048,
"version": 60800,
"subver": "Silk Core:1.0.1.1",
"inbound": false,
"startingheight": 57539,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 57975,
"synced_blocks": 57975,
"inflight": [
],
"whitelisted": false
}, 
{
"id": 7,
"addr": "163.172.42.67:16662",
"addrlocal": "82.73.172.120:59793",
"services": "0000000000000001",
"lastsend": 1477775783,
"lastrecv": 1477775783,
"bytessent": 81323,
"bytesrecv": 98301,
"conntime": 1477747091,
"pingtime": 0.204542,
"version": 60800,
"subver": "Silk Core:1.0.0",
"inbound": false,
"startingheight": 57540,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 57975,
"synced_blocks": 57975,
"inflight": [
],
"whitelisted": false
}, 
{
"id": 8,
"addr": "[2601:100:8000:5c20:3543:4804:d0e7:34a4]:16662",
"addrlocal": "[2001:0:9d38:6ab8:1475:33eb:adb6:5387]:59823",
"services": "0000000000000001",
"lastsend": 1477775791,
"lastrecv": 1477775791,
"bytessent": 62962,
"bytesrecv": 78171,
"conntime": 1477747220,
"pingtime": 0.196042,
"version": 60800,
"subver": "Silk Core:1.0.0",
"inbound": false,
"startingheight": 57542,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 57975,
"synced_blocks": 57975,
"inflight": [
],
"whitelisted": false
}, 
{
"id": 10,
"addr": "[2001:0:9d38:90d7:38ac:10a4:adb6:5387]:54450",
"addrlocal": "[2001:0:9d38:6ab8:1475:33eb:adb6:5387]:16662",
"services": "0000000000000001",
"lastsend": 1477775754,
"lastrecv": 1477775754,
"bytessent": 79458,
"bytesrecv": 72204,
"conntime": 1477754385,
"pingtime": 0.006001,
"version": 60800,
"subver": "Silk Core:1.0.0",
"inbound": true,
"startingheight": 57642,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 57971,
"synced_blocks": -1,
"inflight": [
],
"whitelisted": false
}, 
{
"id": 11,
"addr": "209.122.15.66:16662",
"addrlocal": "82.73.172.120:60467",
"services": "0000000000000001",
"lastsend": 1477775751,
"lastrecv": 1477775751,
"bytessent": 56939,
"bytesrecv": 77549,
"conntime": 1477754499,
"pingtime": 0.693123,
"version": 60800,
"subver": "Silk Core:1.0.1",
"inbound": false,
"startingheight": 57645,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 57975,
"synced_blocks": 57975,
"inflight": [
],
"whitelisted": false
}, 
{
"id": 12,
"addr": "[2001:0:5ef5:79fb:2cfa:c5:9d5b:ac29]:53441",
"addrlocal": "[2001:0:9d38:6ab8:1475:33eb:adb6:5387]:16662",
"services": "0000000000000001",
"lastsend": 1477775758,
"lastrecv": 1477775758,
"bytessent": 62027,
"bytesrecv": 73722,
"conntime": 1477754508,
"pingtime": 0.237045,
"version": 60800,
"subver": "Silk Core:1.0.1.1",
"inbound": true,
"startingheight": 57645,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 57975,
"synced_blocks": -1,
"inflight": [
],
"whitelisted": false
}, 
{
"id": 16,
"addr": "[2001:0:9d38:90d7:20f6:e2b:a12c:dbeb]:49299",
"addrlocal": "[2001:0:9d38:6ab8:1475:33eb:adb6:5387]:16662",
"services": "0000000000000001",
"lastsend": 1477775775,
"lastrecv": 1477775775,
"bytessent": 60997,
"bytesrecv": 50355,
"conntime": 1477766770,
"pingtime": 0.107512,
"version": 60800,
"subver": "Silk Core:1.0.0",
"inbound": true,
"startingheight": 57826,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 57975,
"synced_blocks": -1,
"inflight": [
],
"whitelisted": false
}, 
{
"id": 24,
"addr": "[2001:0:9d38:6ab8:188b:19ca:bec3:26a2]:62586",
"addrlocal": "[2001:0:9d38:6ab8:1475:33eb:adb6:5387]:16662",
"services": "0000000000000001",
"lastsend": 1477775751,
"lastrecv": 1477775751,
"bytessent": 27906,
"bytesrecv": 28079,
"conntime": 1477772118,
"pingtime": 0.188039,
"version": 60800,
"subver": "Silk Core:1.0.1.1",
"inbound": true,
"startingheight": 57911,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 57975,
"synced_blocks": -1,
"inflight": [
],
"whitelisted": false
}
]

[Revelations86]

It's almost a week now and I still don't see the SLK deposited into my SLK ICO address in Weaver.    Is there anyone from the team that can take a look at this?

[Orestes]

Yes I deleted the older version I had on my computer thinking I could fix it by downloading a brand new one from the Silknetwork.org this morning and there is problems with it that the devs need to fix as this will definately cause loss of confidence in the project for people that are not tech savy. We just want to be able to download and have an automated idiot proof (fool proof) wallet that will work and if this is not achievable I believe the project is doomed to tell you the truth.

addnode=159.203.111.196
addnode=45.32.7.212
addnode=84.195.38.128
addnode=195.200.244.73
addnode=47.208.182.225
addnode=163.172.42.67
addnode=209.122.15.66

try these from the peerslist

[Pr0metheus]

Yes I deleted the older version I had on my computer thinking I could fix it by downloading a brand new one from the Silknetwork.org this morning and there is problems with it that the devs need to fix as this will definately cause loss of confidence in the project for people that are not tech savy. We just want to be able to download and have an automated idiot proof (fool proof) wallet that will work and if this is not achievable I believe the project is doomed to tell you the truth.

I just dld the wallet and it runs fine so its for the non tech and foolproof.