[ANN] Firo (FIRO) - Implementing ZKP privacy without trusted setup

[HexxoDev]

Why on xzc.suprnova.ccl statisctic not correct?

From xzc.suprnova.cc:
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Pool)   20 minutes 15 seconds
Blocks found Last 24 Hours 33

Count the number of blocks per day:
24hours / 20 minutes 15 seconds = (24 *60) / 20.25 = 71.11 Blocks

71 not equal 33

Ocminer, do you feel like trolled?

Pool stats in the code are not accurate, payouts are!

[ocminer]

Why on xzc.suprnova.ccl statisctic not correct?

From xzc.suprnova.cc:
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Pool)   20 minutes 15 seconds
Blocks found Last 24 Hours 33

Count the number of blocks per day:
24hours / 20 minutes 15 seconds = (24 *60) / 20.25 = 71.11 Blocks

71 not equal 33

Again.. The statistics are not correct, please use whattomine and if you don't like the pool, you can choose any other pool, I've explained it several times already

EDIT: Oh and your calculation example there would imply that the pool would find EVERY block, but only 40% of the nethash is on the pool so 33 blocks in 24h is perfectly fine

EDIT2: And looking at your post history it looks like that account was specially made for trolling me/suprnova ... Thanks for the effort, I feel flattened.

[siagirl]

How to mine this coin?

[goodminer]

Does someone have working amd sgminer, because this one on Suprnova help page, doesn't work??
Can you tell me how much h/s gives rx 470 and r7 370?

[GoldTiger69]

Does someone have working amd sgminer, because this one on Suprnova help page, doesn't work??
Can you tell me how much h/s gives rx 470 and r7 370?

The problem I had was due to wrong algo; I switched it to '-k lyra2z' and it worked fine. Hope that helps you.

[zcoinofficial]

xzc.suprnova.cc is BULLSHIT!!! Not whattomine!!!

If you want to think that, it is your problem.
Try an other pool and you will see what is bullshit.

Suprnova is pretty solid I think most of the early issues we had were due to the old lyra algorithm (not ocminer's fault) but it's been pretty good!

MPH is pretty good too and they have more accurate earnings estimate.

[Muddybit]

Just reinstalled Ubuntu. Re-syncing wallet but goddamn it's taking forever - probably 5 days so far and seems to be stuck around block 11,001.  Running the latest code from git but I'm seeing this statement in the wallet: "Warning: Displayed transactions may not be correct!  You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade."

Could you let me know where you downloaded it from? Make sure it's from here.

https://github.com/zcoinofficial/zcoin/releases

Yes, it was from there.  Still stuck on block 11,001.  Do you want me to send logs or something?

I have fixed this with -reindex

[zcoinofficial]

Just reinstalled Ubuntu. Re-syncing wallet but goddamn it's taking forever - probably 5 days so far and seems to be stuck around block 11,001.  Running the latest code from git but I'm seeing this statement in the wallet: "Warning: Displayed transactions may not be correct!  You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade."

Could you let me know where you downloaded it from? Make sure it's from here.

https://github.com/zcoinofficial/zcoin/releases

Yes, it was from there.  Still stuck on block 11,001.  Do you want me to send logs or something?

I have fixed this with -reindex

Awesome thanks for the update

[igorsantos]

sgminer is wrong dll missing api-ms-win-core-synch-l1-2-0.dll why?
 

[zcoinofficial]

sgminer is wrong dll missing api-ms-win-core-synch-l1-2-0.dll why?
 

where are you getting this?

Is it from here? https://github.com/djm34/sgminer-msvc2015/releases

[goldy007]

Why on xzc.suprnova.ccl statisctic not correct?

From xzc.suprnova.cc:
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Pool)   20 minutes 15 seconds
Blocks found Last 24 Hours 33

Count the number of blocks per day:
24hours / 20 minutes 15 seconds = (24 *60) / 20.25 = 71.11 Blocks

71 not equal 33

Again.. The statistics are not correct, please use whattomine and if you don't like the pool, you can choose any other pool, I've explained it several times already

EDIT: Oh and your calculation example there would imply that the pool would find EVERY block, but only 40% of the nethash is on the pool so 33 blocks in 24h is perfectly fine

EDIT2: And looking at your post history it looks like that account was specially made for trolling me/suprnova ... Thanks for the effort, I feel flattened.

No, i not trolling you. I want to understand why a xzc.suprnova.cc only pays 50%.

Last 4 hour somebody on your pools stole 3 blocks: 25546, 25550, 25576

Usally for finding Block need tens of millions Shares.

Block 25576 Actual Shares 6
Block 25550 Actual Shares 22
Block 25546 Actual Shares 26

http://i12.pixs.ru/storage/0/0/9/mainGIF_6100575_25518009.gif

The probability of such events tends to zero. But xzc.suprnova.cc it happened three times in the last 3 hours.

That is absolutely incredible - all of the balls in these blocks belong to one account.

Pool Workers: 863 (xzc.suprnova.cc)

But Block 25576 got one worker 'anonymous' all 100% shares
But Block 25550 got one worker 'mintallica' all 100% shares
But Block 25546 got one worker 'anonymous' all 100% shares

http://i12.pixs.ru/storage/9/6/7/1GIF_4053478_25517967.gif
http://i12.pixs.ru/storage/9/7/5/2GIF_4094875_25517975.gif
http://i12.pixs.ru/storage/9/8/1/3GIF_3302225_25517981.gif

All 3 Block got one worker of the 863 workers!!!

IT's Impossible

ALL DATA FROM POOL xzc.suprnova.cc

SOMEONE STOLE THESE BLOCKS. IF YOU PROTECT A THIEF MEANS YOU ARE A THIEF.

[ocminer]

Why on xzc.suprnova.ccl statisctic not correct?

From xzc.suprnova.cc:
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Pool)   20 minutes 15 seconds
Blocks found Last 24 Hours 33

Count the number of blocks per day:
24hours / 20 minutes 15 seconds = (24 *60) / 20.25 = 71.11 Blocks

71 not equal 33

Again.. The statistics are not correct, please use whattomine and if you don't like the pool, you can choose any other pool, I've explained it several times already

EDIT: Oh and your calculation example there would imply that the pool would find EVERY block, but only 40% of the nethash is on the pool so 33 blocks in 24h is perfectly fine

EDIT2: And looking at your post history it looks like that account was specially made for trolling me/suprnova ... Thanks for the effort, I feel flattened.

No, i not trolling you. I want to understand why a xzc.suprnova.cc only pays 50%.

Last 4 hour somebody on your pools stole 3 blocks: 25546, 25550, 25576

Usally for finding Block need tens of millions Shares.

Block 25576 Actual Shares 6
Block 25550 Actual Shares 22
Block 25546 Actual Shares 26


The probability of such events tends to zero. But xzc.suprnova.cc it happened three times in the last 3 hours.

That is absolutely incredible - all of the balls in these blocks belong to one account.

Pool Workers: 863 (xzc.suprnova.cc)

But Block 25576 got one worker 'anonymous' all 100% shares
But Block 25550 got one worker 'mintallica' all 100% shares
But Block 25546 got one worker 'anonymous' all 100% shares


All 3 Block got one worker of the 863 workers!!!

IT's Impossible

ALL DATA FROM POOL xzc.suprnova.cc

SOMEONE STOLE THESE BLOCKS. IF YOU PROTECT A THIEF MEANS YOU ARE A THIEF.

At first you troll about all the blocks found on the network, then about the estimates and now about three lucky blocks in a row ?!

There is nothing special about those blocks or shares, just the block times are very close to each other which is already pretty unlikely but you can easily verify from the block explorer. The "shares" you see is actually the accumulated difficulty of shares in that round, so if a round usually takes 15-30 minutes and this round only 2 minutes it's really very close and very unlikely to happen but it happened..

Again, you're welcome to mine at every other pool.

[goldy007]

3 fast blocks is highly unlikely, but real.

All 100% Shares have one User - UNREAL

Three times in a row -  UNREAL * UNREAL * UNREAL = Unrealistic in the third degree

[ocminer]

3 fast blocks is highly unlikely, but real.

All 100% Shares have one User - UNREAL

Three times in a row -  UNREAL * UNREAL * UNREAL = Unrealistic in the third degree

I'll look into it, but I have no idea how a user could or should submit a certain "lucky" share at a certain time shortly after a block was found to gain more of that block...

[yamo]

sgminer is wrong dll missing api-ms-win-core-synch-l1-2-0.dll why?
 

where are you getting this?

Is it from here? https://github.com/djm34/sgminer-msvc2015/releases

I'm having the same problem with kerner version 2 on win 7

[pappomappo]

clearly a pump, low buy order right now. someone accumulated.

[tomsmith26]

clearly a pump, low buy order right now. someone accumulated.

Yes, you are a smart guy. I see this fact but I don't want to talk about this because collecting cheap coins. I just wait and see this action.

[awsses]

hi how to mine using CPU windows 64 bit now ?

http://image.prntscr.com/image/9af5b3f188d74035b35e44c89595cf2a.png

but suprnova No data available in table : http://image.prntscr.com/image/dcf72136304341e9a4e067ad26f9036d.png

i using port: 1596

[ocminer]

hi how to mine using CPU windows 64 bit now ?

http://image.prntscr.com/image/9af5b3f188d74035b35e44c89595cf2a.png

but suprnova No data available in table : http://image.prntscr.com/image/dcf72136304341e9a4e067ad26f9036d.png

i using port: 1596

You're trying to mine with CPU on the GPU Port... Use Port 1598

[Fanyar]

hi how to mine using CPU windows 64 bit now ?

http://image.prntscr.com/image/9af5b3f188d74035b35e44c89595cf2a.png

but suprnova No data available in table : http://image.prntscr.com/image/dcf72136304341e9a4e067ad26f9036d.png

i using port: 1596

As ocminer said, use port 1598 for CPU mining. If it's an old/slow CPU and you still don't get any hits on port 1598, you could try port 1599.