Bitcoin Forum
May 21, 2024, 01:20:25 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 [921] 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426873 times)
tarzanbigcity
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 28, 2014, 05:54:20 PM
 #18401

Nice try, I was all setup to solo. Got tor to connect and just got

http request failed: empty reply from server
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds


booo
cayars
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 28, 2014, 06:15:56 PM
 #18402

I am wondering why (or rather is there already?) there is no gpuminer for Cryptonite:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=713538.0

Most of the M7 algo seem to be already part of ccminer. Noob programmer here so not attempting to change the github versions Tongue
yeah sure...  Grin This isn't x7 (need to rewrite 6 or 7 algo...  Roll Eyes I know I did it... and I am not even sure there are for the correct block length)
not mentioning the difference in blockheader and the 512x512 bit multiplications (both for cpu validation... trying to get mpir working... and on gpu...)

edit: actually might be easier with sgminer, at least I can get gmp working there...
So should expect it soonish, eh? Tongue

There is a cudaminer, and I wrote most of an OpenCL one, it's public.

Wolf this coin is nothing to do with CryptoNight.  It has a very similar name being CryptoNite but uses different algo.
yellowduck2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 28, 2014, 06:16:51 PM
 #18403

where is sp_ +100% hashrate x11 ?  Cool
yellowduck2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 28, 2014, 06:31:02 PM
 #18404

where is sp_ +100% hashrate x11 ?  Cool

You mean 10x, which would be +1000%, I think.

u on wrong thread ? This is not a coin thread, 1000% percent is not possible. Unless.....
cayars
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 28, 2014, 06:54:04 PM
 #18405

Not sure if anyone's jumping on Doomcoin (luffa-512) but I just butchered a ccminer fork, ripping 10 out of the 11 algo's for x11, getting 53 MH/s for a 750 Ti and 111 MH/s for 780 Ti. I wonder if I will get blocks as I know nothing about programming and am actually proud it compiled.
I didn't manage to compile my butchered version Sad

Not sure if anyone's jumping on Doomcoin (luffa-512) but I just butchered a ccminer fork, ripping 10 out of the 11 algo's for x11, getting 53 MH/s for a 750 Ti and 111 MH/s for 780 Ti. I wonder if I will get blocks as I know nothing about programming and am actually proud it compiled.
I didn't manage to compile my butchered version Sad

Mine doesn't work either. Sad

If you guys can help me setup the QT wallet for GPU access (I don't remember how- to tired to try and remember) I'll see if I can get you a GPU miner for the coin that will work.

Carlo

PS Is there a spec on the coin? How many rounds of luffa512 is it?
Anything else you may know that could help?

DJM34, did you already do this?

Carlo
bathrobehero
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051


ICO? Not even once.


View Profile
July 28, 2014, 07:00:54 PM
 #18406

We are doing 1 round of Luffa - 512, multiple rounds would limit hashrate unfortunately that is about it.

doomcoin.conf

Code:
server=1

# RPC information
rpcuser=rpcuser
rpcpassword=rpcpassword
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcport=rpcport
daemon=1

# Mining
gen=1


ccminer.exe -a luffa -o 127.0.0.1:rpcport -u rpcuser -p rpcpassword
pause

Not your keys, not your coins!
cayars
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 28, 2014, 07:03:35 PM
 #18407

We are doing 1 round of Luffa - 512, multiple rounds would limit hashrate unfortunately that is about it.

doomcoin.conf

Code:
server=1

# RPC information
rpcuser=rpcuser
rpcpassword=rpcpassword
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcport=rpcport
daemon=1

# Mining
gen=1


ccminer.exe -a luffa -o 127.0.0.1:rpcport -u rpcuser -p rpcpassword
pause

Ahh shit, I'm screwed.  I only have nvMiner. Smiley
bathrobehero
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051


ICO? Not even once.


View Profile
July 28, 2014, 07:16:23 PM
 #18408

Okay, I give up. I compiled like 12 different versions, trying to use both qubit_luffa512 and x11_luffa512 and even did some weird mixes but obviously I only found cpu validation errors and crashes, but mostly air.  Cheesy

Not your keys, not your coins!
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
July 28, 2014, 07:49:37 PM
 #18409

Okay, I give up. I compiled like 12 different versions, trying to use both qubit_luffa512 and x11_luffa512 and even did some weird mixes but obviously I only found cpu validation errors and crashes, but mostly air.  Cheesy

i just removed the four algo from qubit but i don't know if the _80 count as one round(tried both, adding the _64 one also), anyway i'm waiting for pool to see if it work, on solo he just keep running(no error or anything) but dunno if it is working or not

beside that qubit luffa is just for the first hash _80 you certainly need it.... maybe it need that finalhash_80 like whirlcoin  Grin


p.s. i'm mining monero right now gpu are really cool, perhaps it consume less?
myagui
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001



View Profile
July 28, 2014, 07:57:12 PM
 #18410

p.s. i'm mining monero right now gpu are really cool, perhaps it consume less?

Yep, you'll be doing something in the region of 50% TDP. For the venturous types: with the current monero mining performance, you can generally afford a much higher overclock when mining monero. Do remember to switch back if you decide to mine something else afterwards, otherwise you're likely in for a crash  Cool

Happy mining,
~ Myagui

Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
July 28, 2014, 07:59:09 PM
 #18411

p.s. i'm mining monero right now gpu are really cool, perhaps it consume less?

Yep, you'll be doing something in the region of 50% TDP. For the venturous types: with the current monero mining performance, you can generally afford a much higher overclock when mining monero. Do remember to switch back if you decide to mine something else afterwards, otherwise you're likely in for a crash  Cool

Happy mining,
~ Myagui

dunno why but any attempt at oc my cards result in a crash after some hours... i can't even set +25(core, mem are fine i can rise them), maybe those gpu are power limited in the bios...and i don't want to flash anything


btw boolberry gpu miner is still private?
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
July 28, 2014, 08:25:35 PM
 #18412

Okay, I give up. I compiled like 12 different versions, trying to use both qubit_luffa512 and x11_luffa512 and even did some weird mixes but obviously I only found cpu validation errors and crashes, but mostly air.  Cheesy

i just removed the four algo from qubit but i don't know if the _80 count as one round(tried both, adding the _64 one also), anyway i'm waiting for pool to see if it work, on solo he just keep running(no error or anything) but dunno if it is working or not

beside that qubit luffa is just for the first hash _80 you certainly need it.... maybe it need that finalhash_80 like whirlcoin  Grin
the "finalhash" routine in whirlcoin is just there for increasing the performance (not entirely it works though... but with github it is as painful to add than to remove...), this just to avoid to do part of the validation on another kernel).
On keccak-256 including the hash detection increased the hashrate by 30MHash/s (or rather not doin it was decreasing the perf. by that much...) so doing the same things on luffa would certainly increase the perf. too

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
PVmining
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 330
Merit: 252



View Profile
July 28, 2014, 08:32:44 PM
 #18413

btw boolberry gpu miner is still private?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=693118.0
cayars
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 28, 2014, 08:52:24 PM
 #18414

Okay, I give up. I compiled like 12 different versions, trying to use both qubit_luffa512 and x11_luffa512 and even did some weird mixes but obviously I only found cpu validation errors and crashes, but mostly air.  Cheesy

i just removed the four algo from qubit but i don't know if the _80 count as one round(tried both, adding the _64 one also), anyway i'm waiting for pool to see if it work, on solo he just keep running(no error or anything) but dunno if it is working or not

beside that qubit luffa is just for the first hash _80 you certainly need it.... maybe it need that finalhash_80 like whirlcoin  Grin


p.s. i'm mining monero right now gpu are really cool, perhaps it consume less?

I can't play for a few hours until I get home but have you tried this:
1) copy cubit.cu to luffa512.cu
2) add luffa512.cu to VS
3) in luffa512.cu
a) comment out everything from extern void x11_cubehash512_cpu_init to quark_compactTest_cpu_hash_64
4) rename qubithash to luffa512hash
5) comment out
    //sph_cubehash512_context ctx_cubehash;
    //sph_shavite512_context ctx_shavite;
    //sph_simd512_context ctx_simd;
    //sph_echo512_context ctx_echo;
6) also comment out:
    //sph_cubehash512_init(&ctx_cubehash);
    //// ZCUBEHASH;
    //sph_cubehash512 (&ctx_cubehash, (const void*) hash, 64);
    //sph_cubehash512_close(&ctx_cubehash, (void*) hash);

    //sph_shavite512_init(&ctx_shavite);
    //// ZSHAVITE;
    //sph_shavite512 (&ctx_shavite, (const void*) hash, 64);
    //sph_shavite512_close(&ctx_shavite, (void*) hash);

    //sph_simd512_init(&ctx_simd);
    //// ZSIMD
    //sph_simd512 (&ctx_simd, (const void*) hash, 64);
    //sph_simd512_close(&ctx_simd, (void*) hash);

    //sph_echo512_init(&ctx_echo);
    //// ZECHO
    //sph_echo512 (&ctx_echo, (const void*) hash, 64);
    //sph_echo512_close(&ctx_echo, (void*) hash);
7) rename scanhash_qubit to scanhash_luffa512
Cool more generic here but comment out similar routines to above not using luffa
9) rename function calls inside from qubithash to luffa512hash

then setup externs for luffa512hash in main program?

I of course skipped a couple of things as I just quickly looked though it but that should work I'd think if it's just one round of luffa512.

Carlo
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
July 28, 2014, 09:35:44 PM
 #18415

i did not remove compacttest, maybe that the problem

i've left the other "quark_check"

anyway diff is 20 already i can't test well in solo, need to much time to find a block
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
July 28, 2014, 10:10:34 PM
 #18416

i did not remove compacttest, maybe that the problem

i've left the other "quark_check"

anyway diff is 20 already i can't test well in solo, need to much time to find a block
compacttest isn't used.
mostly likely you had a difference between the cpu validation (the sph_algo stuff) and the the hash calculation on gpu they
need to match...

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
sp_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087

Team Black developer


View Profile
July 28, 2014, 10:42:26 PM
 #18417

I have started. But progress is slow:)

Team Black Miner (ETHB3 ETH ETC VTC KAWPOW FIROPOW MEOWPOW + dual mining + tripple mining.. https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner
numanoid
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1148


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 03:30:58 AM
 #18418

Hey all, just started trying my hand at monero and I'm getting an odd issue.  Using NVMiner 1.2D6 my GTX 750 tis are hashing in the 280s or so, but my GTX titan is only getting around 220 or so.  Am I missing something?
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
July 29, 2014, 06:25:49 AM
Last edit: July 29, 2014, 06:40:32 AM by Amph
 #18419

i did not remove compacttest, maybe that the problem

i've left the other "quark_check"

anyway diff is 20 already i can't test well in solo, need to much time to find a block
compacttest isn't used.
mostly likely you had a difference between the cpu validation (the sph_algo stuff) and the the hash calculation on gpu they
need to match...

ok good to know

mmh the code are the same mine and yours, but i'm getting rejected, something with the pool?
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
July 29, 2014, 06:52:21 AM
 #18420

i did not remove compacttest, maybe that the problem

i've left the other "quark_check"

anyway diff is 20 already i can't test well in solo, need to much time to find a block
compacttest isn't used.
mostly likely you had a difference between the cpu validation (the sph_algo stuff) and the the hash calculation on gpu they
need to match...

ok good to know

mmh the code are the same mine and yours, but i'm getting rejected, something with the pool?
you need to use -f 0.25 ot -f 0.125 (multiply the difficulty by 4 or Cool, for some reason there are lots of duplicated share which are sent. (if it is the same problem) 

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Pages: « 1 ... 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 [921] 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!