Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 11:28:17 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 [434] 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426872 times)
Chris84
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 01:04:44 PM
 #8661


What hash rates are you getting on your hardware? Just want to compare... something.  Roll Eyes

AMD Phenom II X6 1055T - CPU standalone ca 95 kHash/s on 6 threads

AMD Phenom II X6 1055T using the first 3 GPUs in the machine and 6 CPU threads: close to 800 kHash/s   (Groestl remains on CPU)

cannot get GPU use readings, as GPU-z has decided to always crash on start after the previous driver update (revision 334 drivers I think). Currently running R 335 drivers from nvidia.


Nice, imagine that paired with a better cpu...:p

My X79 rig is ready!

Christian, did you think about adding a fee in the program, similarly to all those protoshares miners for ypool do?
That would make it more profitable for you to share the software earlier perhaps.

Say a 2.5% fee. That would be fair.

But adding a fixed fee can be removed by editing the sources.... But, you can make a donation, if you want Smiley

Christian
1714994897
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714994897

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714994897
Reply with quote  #2

1714994897
Report to moderator
1714994897
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714994897

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714994897
Reply with quote  #2

1714994897
Report to moderator
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
myagui
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001



View Profile
March 14, 2014, 01:17:36 PM
 #8662


But adding a fixed fee can be removed by editing the sources.... But, you can make a donation, if you want Smiley

Christian

I'd be happy with a fixed fee and binary release only.
If sources are to be made available, I hereby pledge 5% of my earnings Smiley

- Myagui

cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 01:32:56 PM
 #8663

is ready!

Christian, did you think about adding a fee in the program, similarly to all those protoshares miners for ypool do?
That would make it more profitable for you to share the software earlier perhaps.

Say a 2.5% fee. That would be fair.

as I stated, I haven't even begun thinking about modalities for a release yet. I am still in development mode here.
But I appreciate your input.

Whatever I do, this has to be agreed on with the other Christian Wink

Christian
madman1980
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 02:57:03 PM
 #8664

does anyone have managed to run 6 x 750Ti under debian with cudaminer? I read somewhere it's hard to run more than 4 cards under linux, but havent tested it myself yet.

https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=16800.0

ive got a 6x 750ti rig running right now using this.  gigabyte windforce gpus on a z87-g45 mobo...  trying to get a 7th gpu to recognize.




Does your 750Ti's does have an additional power connector (6-pin pci-e power)?

yes they do
debido666
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 03:31:12 PM
 #8665

Last three days have seen a pretty nice run for HVC

https://www.mintpal.com/market/HVC/BTC

we've accelerated 4 out of 5 hashing algos for HVC, but the last one (Groestl) is causing us a bit of trouble.
Our first port is actually slower than the CPU - at least on my system.

Running Groestl on CPU and the rest on GPU I am getting an 800% performance boost vs. running the CPU alone.
Multiple CPU threads can even share a GPU Wink

Note that overall HVC is *not* CPU-only. They really need to change their advertising, and change it quickly. Whatever they did to SHA256 to turn it into a "GPU and ASIC resistant" HEFTY1 algorithm - it didn't work as they intended.

Christian


Christian, is this your blog? If not, they didn't use quotes. ;-)

http://cryptomining-blog.com/1424-gpu-miner-for-heavycoin-is-possible-and-is-being-worked-on/

ringthefire
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 04:00:11 PM
 #8666

I would be curious to know if it is more profitable to use this new GPU miner on heavycoin in tandem with your CPU against just continuing to mine heavycoin on your CPU and devoting your GPUs to another Scrypt, Scrypt-N, Keccak etc. coin that is profitable.

Obviously this depends on your CPU of course.  I'm using a 3930K, which gets about 400 khash with its overclock and I have a pair of 780ti cards mining another Scrypt-N coin.

Will be interesting to see how this all turns out!  As always, thanks for your excellent work Christian(s) Cheesy
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 04:02:10 PM
 #8667

I know Yeh.  Theirs no asking Christian a question anymore because there's 2 of them! Damn youuuuuuuu!

Glad to see you have some proper help now

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
antonio8
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 04:07:13 PM
 #8668

is ready!

Christian, did you think about adding a fee in the program, similarly to all those protoshares miners for ypool do?
That would make it more profitable for you to share the software earlier perhaps.

Say a 2.5% fee. That would be fair.

as I stated, I haven't even begun thinking about modalities for a release yet. I am still in development mode here.
But I appreciate your input.

Whatever I do, this has to be agreed on with the other Christian Wink

Christian


I feel you guys should add a fee in also. It is up to use,the public, to decide if we want to use miner.

I understand that it can be edited out but I feel that most people would appreciate the work from the authors and leave it alone. If it wasn't for their work we would not be making the profit.

I have been using the YPool Cudaminer that has a 3% fee. I know someone went in and changed it to that because original it was 6%. That was a little unfair on top of the 5% fee from Ypool in my opion. Well the author changed it to 6% because he had it at 10% to begin within. But the point is the person deserves some kind of copensation for their work and time put into the work involved.

JMHO.


If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks Wink
count_cyrpto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 288
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 04:09:17 PM
 #8669

is ready!

Christian, did you think about adding a fee in the program, similarly to all those protoshares miners for ypool do?
That would make it more profitable for you to share the software earlier perhaps.

Say a 2.5% fee. That would be fair.

as I stated, I haven't even begun thinking about modalities for a release yet. I am still in development mode here.
But I appreciate your input.

Whatever I do, this has to be agreed on with the other Christian Wink

Christian


I feel you guys should add a fee in also. It is up to use,the public, to decide if we want to use miner.

I understand that it can be edited out but I feel that most people would appreciate the work from the authors and leave it alone. If it wasn't for their work we would not be making the profit.

I have been using the YPool Cudaminer that has a 3% fee. I know someone went in and changed it to that because original it was 6%. That was a little unfair on top of the 5% fee from Ypool in my opion. Well the author changed it to 6% because he had it at 10% to begin within. But the point is the person deserves some kind of copensation for their work and time put into the work involved.

JMHO.



Agreed.

I also have no issue with paying a fee.
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 04:11:00 PM
 #8670

Yeh I'm up for that. I'm even up for adverts as long as their not huge and make noise

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 04:27:02 PM
 #8671


Christian, is this your blog? If not, they didn't use quotes. ;-)

http://cryptomining-blog.com/1424-gpu-miner-for-heavycoin-is-possible-and-is-being-worked-on/


the introductory statement " The author of CudaMiner has reported some success already..." should make it clear that the text below is a quote.

Christian
ltcnim
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 914
Merit: 1001



View Profile
March 14, 2014, 04:37:09 PM
 #8672

Today, I finally ordered my rig (5x EVGA 750Ti superclocked) which I will run under Linux. Since the overclocking possibilities are not good/existing under Linux (as far as I know), I have a question:

@cbuchner1: I read that cudaminer is not yet optimized for the maxwell core. It does support it of course, but there might be some room for improvements. Is that true? What is your oppinion for the 750Ti models? Do you think, you will be able to get a few more khash out of these cards?

cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 04:39:55 PM
 #8673

@cbuchner1: I read that cudaminer is not yet optimized for the maxwell core. It does support it of course, but there might be some room for improvements. Is that true?

so far I haven't seen improvements by switching to CUDA 6.0 RC targeting the Compute 5.0 architecture in code - and it hurt performance for non-Maxwell chips (Compute 3.0 specifically). I'll wait for CUDA 6.0 final release then.

the good performance you're already getting from Maxwell comes from architectural differences (bigger cache, better instruction scheduling capabilities). So they're already exploited by the current code.

Christian
scriptfu
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 04:45:13 PM
 #8674

PSA

I got a nice refresher course in power usage today. I was running 4x750 ti cards flashed with an unlocked TDP VBIOS, using powered USB risers, connected to a single 4-connector Molex cable. One unlocked card can pull 65.5w from the PCI express slot.  Typical molex connectors have a max power handling of 187w (11A). With 4 unlocked cards, I was shoving 262w@12v down one cable. The end result:

http://m.imgur.com/vDqGNmh,787qoci

Even at the default TDP of 38.5w (4 cards @ 154w), that's still dangerously close to the limit. Try to connect as few cards as possible to each power lead, or use a higher rated connector designed for more power, like the 6-pin or 8-pin PEG connectors.
ltcnim
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 914
Merit: 1001



View Profile
March 14, 2014, 04:45:21 PM
 #8675

@cbuchner1: I read that cudaminer is not yet optimized for the maxwell core. It does support it of course, but there might be some room for improvements. Is that true?

so far I haven't seen improvements by switching to CUDA 6.0 RC targeting the Compute 5.0 architecture in code - and it hurt performance for non-Maxwell chips (Compute 3.0 specifically). I'll wait for CUDA 6.0 final release then.

the good performance you're already getting from Maxwell comes from architectural differences (bigger cache, better instruction scheduling capabilities). So they're already exploited by the current code.

Christian


Ok, thanks for the statement!

cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 05:11:28 PM
 #8676

Even at the default TDP of 38.5w (4 cards @ 154w), that's still dangerously close to the limit. Try to connect as few cards as possible to each power lead, or use a higher rated connector designed for more power, like the 6-pin or 8-pin PEG connectors.

I don't get why some are voluntarily going from 38.5 W to 65 W for maybe 10-15% higher kHash/s rates.
This kills Maxwells excellent power efficiency.... and apparently also PSU cable connectors.

Christian
dragonseer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 611
Merit: 500


Anglo Saxon Crypto Enthusiast


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 05:13:44 PM
 #8677

Hi there, I've been using the 2-28 cudaMiner on my EVGA Superclocked version GTX 780. So far, I've only got it to work by using the 'auto' setting, every parameter I've tried to put in has led to it crashing, any tips on what else I can try? I only get 1.6 kH this way, I read about people getting up to 5 kH with this card. I don't want it screaming 24/7, and I like being able to use the desktop at the same time, but I should be able to do better than this.. here is my bat file:

cudaminer.exe -s 10 --algo=scrypt-jane:YAC -d 0 -l auto -o *server* -u *worker* -p *password*

Using x64 cudaminer on WIndows 8.1, latest Nvidia drivers.. Any ideas??  Smiley

Crypto sales and more here: https://www.ebay.com.au/usr/dragon-seer
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 05:14:53 PM
 #8678

personally when i go to get mine, they will all be on powered risers and they will be left at their default power usage. all having their own molex power.
my entire system with 3 750Ti's on full blast should pull around 140W

that's with it maxed out! i would rather save the power bill and lose some performance. They've already shown the 750Ti will hit 1.4GHz with NO power adjustments. so why change it at all?

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 05:16:16 PM
 #8679


Binary only releases of heavycoin for CUDA miners would not work out due to GPL requirements.

People would just compile their own binaries without the fee and post them online.

Christian
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 14, 2014, 05:17:20 PM
 #8680


cudaminer.exe -s 10 --algo=scrypt-jane:YAC -d 0 -l auto -o *server* -u *worker* -p *password*

Any ideas??  Smiley

put e.g. -L 6 in front of -l auto

it's all in the README file (there's a section devoted to Yacoin)

Pages: « 1 ... 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 [434] 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!